New Orleans Pelicans vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats
The new orleans pelicans vs atlanta hawks match player stats from November 1, 2026, highlight an impressive 121-99 victory for the New Orleans Pelicans at the Smoothie King Center in New Orleans. The Pelicans delivered an efficient offensive performance, controlled the rebounding battle, and created consistent scoring opportunities throughout all four quarters. Atlanta struggled with its shooting accuracy, particularly from three-point range, making it difficult to keep pace with the home team’s offensive production.
Saddiq Bey led New Orleans with 25 points off the bench, while rookie guard Jeremiah Fears added 20 points and seven assists. Zion Williamson and Trey Murphy III contributed 15 points each, giving the Pelicans several reliable scoring options. On Atlanta’s side, CJ McCollum finished with 14 points, while Jalen Johnson and Asa Newell recorded 13 points apiece.
The final score reflected more than a difference in individual scoring. New Orleans shot 57% from the field, collected 49 rebounds, and recorded 27 assists. Atlanta managed only 38% shooting and 36 rebounds. Although the Hawks converted 91% of their free throws and recorded 11 steals, their inability to make outside shots created a significant disadvantage.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, shooting efficiency, bench contributions, and the most important factors behind New Orleans’ 22-point victory.
Game Overview: Pelicans vs Hawks
The November 1 matchup took place at the Smoothie King Center, where New Orleans established control early and maintained its advantage until the final buzzer.
FINAL SCORE
New Orleans Pelicans
121
Winner
Atlanta Hawks
99
Away team
| Game Information | Details |
| Date | November 1, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA |
| Venue | Smoothie King Center |
| Location | New Orleans, Louisiana |
| Attendance | 15,366 |
| Final Result | Pelicans 121-99 Hawks |
| Winning Margin | 22 points |
| Game Status | Final |
| Game ID | 401909898 |
New Orleans produced a strong opening quarter, scoring 35 points while limiting Atlanta to just 18. That 17-point first-quarter advantage immediately changed the competitive situation.
Atlanta improved its offensive output in the second quarter, scoring 30 points. However, the Pelicans added another 28 and maintained their comfortable lead.
The third and fourth quarters followed a similar pattern. New Orleans continued scoring efficiently, recording 29 points in each period. Atlanta could not produce a sustained comeback, and the Pelicans eventually secured a convincing 121-99 result.
The official numbers used throughout this analysis are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data.
New Orleans Pelicans vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score
The individual performances reveal how New Orleans benefited from contributions across its starting lineup and bench.
Saddiq Bey was the leading scorer with 25 points, while Jeremiah Fears provided an important combination of scoring and playmaking. Atlanta had several players reach double figures, but its offensive production was not efficient enough to challenge New Orleans.
New Orleans Pelicans Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Saddiq Bey | 25 | 6 | 1 |
| Jeremiah Fears | 20 | 5 | 7 |
| Zion Williamson | 15 | 6 | 4 |
| Trey Murphy III | 15 | 5 | 5 |
| Herbert Jones | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| Karlo Matkovic | 8 | 10 | 1 |
| Derik Queen | 8 | 8 | 4 |
| Bennedict Mathurin | 7 | 1 | 2 |
| Trendon Watford | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| Bryce McGowens | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Julian Reese | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| AJ Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 |
New Orleans received meaningful scoring from several different players. Bey and Fears combined for 45 points, while Williamson and Murphy added another 30.
The rebounding contributions were also important. Matkovic collected 10 rebounds, and Queen added eight. These performances helped the Pelicans finish with a 13-rebound advantage over Atlanta.
Atlanta Hawks Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| CJ McCollum | 14 | 2 | 2 |
| Jalen Johnson | 13 | 7 | 4 |
| Asa Newell | 13 | 4 | 1 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Kingston Flemings | 12 | 2 | 6 |
| Luguentz Dort | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| Aaron Wiggins | 10 | 2 | 1 |
| Dyson Daniels | 8 | 4 | 3 |
| Onyeka Okongwu | 6 | 10 | 1 |
| Dorian Finney-Smith | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corey Kispert | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jock Landale | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Atlanta had seven players reach double figures, demonstrating that its scoring was distributed across multiple contributors.
However, the Hawks struggled to turn those individual contributions into an effective team performance. Their 38% overall field-goal percentage and 17% three-point percentage were major weaknesses.
The contrast between individual scoring totals and team shooting efficiency is one of the most important details in this game.
New Orleans Pelicans Player Performance Analysis
Saddiq Bey Leads All Scorers With 25 Points
Saddiq Bey delivered the most productive scoring performance of the night, finishing with 25 points, six rebounds, one assist, and four steals according to the supplied game data.
His 25-point performance was particularly valuable because it provided New Orleans with additional offensive production beyond its starting lineup.
Bey’s contribution also demonstrated the importance of bench scoring. A team does not always need its starting five to produce every major scoring run. Reliable contributions from reserve players can create separation, maintain offensive pressure, and prevent opponents from gaining momentum when starters rest.
His four steals were another important part of his statistical contribution.
Steals can create additional possessions and interrupt an opponent’s offensive rhythm. Although individual steals do not automatically produce points, they can give a team opportunities to attack before the defense becomes organized.
Bey finished as the leading scorer for both teams, making his performance one of the defining features of the matchup.
Jeremiah Fears Records 20 Points and Seven Assists
Jeremiah Fears produced one of the most complete performances for New Orleans.
He recorded:
- 20 points
- 5 rebounds
- 7 assists
Fears finished second among all scorers and led the game in assists.
His combination of scoring and playmaking gave the Pelicans another offensive option. Instead of relying exclusively on individual scoring, New Orleans benefited from a player who could also create opportunities for teammates.
Seven assists were particularly valuable in a game where the Pelicans finished with 27 total assists.
Fears’ performance also helped balance the offensive responsibilities between the starting lineup and the bench. His 20 points reduced the pressure on Williamson and Murphy to carry the scoring load.
The ability to contribute in multiple statistical categories makes his performance especially important when evaluating the overall team result.
Zion Williamson Provides Consistent Scoring
Zion Williamson finished with 15 points, six rebounds, and four assists.
Although he was not the leading scorer, his contribution helped New Orleans maintain a balanced offense.
Williamson’s scoring was matched by Trey Murphy III, who also finished with 15 points. Having multiple players produce similar scoring totals made the Pelicans less dependent on a single offensive option.
His six rebounds also supported the team’s overall advantage on the glass.
Williamson’s four assists showed that his contribution extended beyond scoring. The Pelicans benefited from distributing offensive responsibilities across several players rather than relying entirely on isolation possessions.
Trey Murphy III Adds 15 Points and Five Assists
Trey Murphy III delivered another valuable performance with:
- 15 points
- 5 rebounds
- 5 assists
His five assists were particularly useful in a game where New Orleans recorded seven more assists than Atlanta.
Murphy’s performance complemented Fears’ playmaking and Williamson’s scoring. This combination gave the Pelicans several ways to create offense.
The important point is not simply that Murphy scored 15 points. His five assists and five rebounds demonstrate a broader contribution across the game.
When multiple players contribute in different areas, opponents have fewer opportunities to focus their defensive attention on one individual.
Karlo Matkovic Controls the Glass
Karlo Matkovic finished with eight points, 10 rebounds, and one assist.
His 10 rebounds tied Onyeka Okongwu for the highest individual rebound total in the game.
Matkovic’s contribution was especially important because New Orleans finished with 49 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 36.
Rebounding helps determine which team controls possession after missed shots. Defensive rebounds prevent opponents from receiving additional scoring opportunities, while offensive rebounds can extend an attack.
Matkovic’s 10-rebound performance supported the Pelicans’ overall advantage in this area.
Derik Queen Provides Valuable Bench Production
Derik Queen recorded eight points, eight rebounds, and four assists.
His statistical contribution was notable because he provided value in three different categories.
Eight rebounds helped New Orleans maintain its advantage on the glass, while four assists added another playmaking option.
Queen’s contribution also highlights the importance of bench depth. The Pelicans received productive performances from Bey, Queen, Watford, and other reserves.
This made it easier for the team to maintain its offensive production throughout the game.
Atlanta Hawks Player Performance Analysis
CJ McCollum Leads Atlanta With 14 Points
CJ McCollum finished as Atlanta’s leading scorer with 14 points, two rebounds, and two assists.
He recorded five field goals on nine attempts, giving him a 55.6% field-goal percentage based on the supplied starter statistics.
That was a relatively efficient individual shooting performance compared with Atlanta’s overall 38% team mark.
However, McCollum’s 14 points were not enough to compensate for the team’s broader shooting difficulties.
His performance illustrates an important distinction between individual efficiency and collective offensive production. A player can shoot effectively while the team still struggles to score consistently.
Atlanta needed more players to produce efficient offensive performances to challenge New Orleans.
Jalen Johnson Contributes Across Three Categories
Jalen Johnson recorded:
- 13 points
- 7 rebounds
- 4 assists
He was one of Atlanta’s more productive all-around players.
His seven rebounds helped support the Hawks’ frontcourt activity, while four assists demonstrated his involvement in creating opportunities for teammates.
Johnson’s performance was useful, but Atlanta’s overall offensive problems limited the impact of individual contributions.
Onyeka Okongwu Records 10 Rebounds
Onyeka Okongwu finished with six points, 10 rebounds, and one assist.
Although his scoring output was limited, he tied Matkovic for the game’s highest individual rebound total.
His 10 rebounds were important for Atlanta because the team needed additional possessions to offset its poor shooting.
However, the Hawks finished with 36 total rebounds, considerably fewer than New Orleans.
This difference reduced Atlanta’s ability to compete consistently for possession throughout the matchup.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker Adds 12 Points
Nickeil Alexander-Walker finished with 12 points, two rebounds, and one assist.
He made three of his 12 field-goal attempts, representing a 25% shooting percentage.
His performance reflected the larger shooting difficulties experienced by Atlanta.
Although he reached double figures, the number of attempts required to produce those points demonstrates why scoring totals should always be considered alongside shooting efficiency.
Kingston Flemings Shows Playmaking Ability
Kingston Flemings recorded 12 points, two rebounds, and six assists.
His six assists were the highest total for Atlanta.
Flemings provided an important playmaking contribution, helping the Hawks generate offensive opportunities despite their shooting problems.
His performance also showed that Atlanta had players capable of distributing the basketball.
However, the team needed better shot conversion to make those opportunities count on the scoreboard.
Asa Newell and Aaron Wiggins Support the Bench
Asa Newell recorded 13 points, four rebounds, and one assist.
Aaron Wiggins added 10 points, two rebounds, and one assist.
Both players reached double figures and provided additional scoring away from the starting lineup.
These contributions were important, but Atlanta’s bench production did not solve the team’s overall shooting inefficiency.
The Hawks needed stronger conversion from three-point range and better collective field-goal accuracy.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern provides a clear explanation of why New Orleans won by 22 points.
The Pelicans established an early advantage and never allowed Atlanta to recover completely. Even when the Hawks improved their scoring in the second quarter, New Orleans continued producing enough offense to protect its lead.
First Quarter: Pelicans Take Early Control
Pelicans 35-18 Hawks
New Orleans opened the game with 35 points, while Atlanta managed only 18.
The 17-point difference was the largest quarter-level advantage of the game.
This opening period established the direction of the matchup. The Pelicans generated offense at a much higher rate, while Atlanta struggled to convert its scoring opportunities.
Starting with such a significant lead also gave New Orleans more flexibility. The team did not need to chase the scoreboard or force difficult offensive possessions.
Atlanta, meanwhile, entered the second quarter needing a substantial improvement.
Second Quarter: Hawks Improve Their Scoring
Pelicans 28-30 Hawks
Atlanta responded with its highest-scoring quarter, producing 30 points.
New Orleans scored 28, allowing the Hawks to win the period by two points.
This was a better offensive stretch for Atlanta, but it did not significantly change the overall situation.
The Pelicans had already built a 17-point advantage in the opening quarter. Winning the second period by two points was not enough to erase that deficit.
At halftime, the quarter scores produced the following totals:
- New Orleans Pelicans: 63 points
- Atlanta Hawks: 48 points
The Pelicans entered halftime with a 15-point advantage.
Third Quarter: New Orleans Maintains Its Advantage
Pelicans 29-26 Hawks
New Orleans scored 29 points in the third quarter, while Atlanta added 26.
The Pelicans extended their lead by another three points.
This period was important because Atlanta needed a major scoring run to make the game competitive again.
Instead, New Orleans maintained its offensive efficiency and prevented the Hawks from building momentum.
The Pelicans’ ability to continue scoring after halftime showed that their first-quarter performance was not simply an isolated offensive burst.
Fourth Quarter: Pelicans Complete the Victory
Pelicans 29-25 Hawks
The final quarter produced another four-point advantage for New Orleans.
The Pelicans scored 29 points, while Atlanta managed 25.
New Orleans maintained control until the end and finished with a 121-99 victory.
The final scoring breakdown is shown below.
| Quarter | Pelicans | Hawks |
| First | 35 | 18 |
| Second | 28 | 30 |
| Third | 29 | 26 |
| Fourth | 29 | 25 |
| Total | 121 | 99 |
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
Points scored by both teams in each quarter.
■ Pelicans
■ Hawks
The most important observation is that Atlanta won only one quarter, and its two-point advantage in that period did not compensate for the damage created in the opening minutes.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
The team statistics explain the difference between the two performances more clearly than the final score alone.
New Orleans had advantages in field-goal percentage, rebounding, assists, and steals. Atlanta performed better at the free-throw line and committed fewer turnovers.
| Statistical Category | Pelicans | Hawks |
| Points | 121 | 99 |
| Field Goals | 43-76 | 35-91 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 57% | 38% |
| Three-Pointers | 7-17 | 8-46 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 41% | 17% |
| Free Throws | 28-35 | 21-23 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 80% | 91% |
| Total Rebounds | 49 | 36 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 10 | 14 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 39 | 22 |
| Assists | 27 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 23 | 19 |
| Steals | 15 | 11 |
| Blocks | 4 | 4 |
| Personal Fouls | 21 | 21 |
Several categories deserve closer examination.
Field-Goal Percentage: New Orleans Has a Major Advantage
The most significant statistical difference was field-goal efficiency.
New Orleans converted 43 of 76 attempts, finishing at 57%.
Atlanta made 35 of 91 attempts, finishing at 38%.
This created a 19-percentage-point difference between the teams.
The Pelicans attempted 15 fewer field goals but made eight more baskets.
That is a substantial advantage.
It demonstrates why shot quality and conversion rate are often more important than simply counting attempts.
Atlanta had more opportunities to shoot, but those opportunities did not produce enough successful baskets.
Three-Point Shooting: Atlanta Struggles From Long Range
Three-point shooting was another major factor.
New Orleans converted seven of 17 attempts, while Atlanta made eight of 46.
The Hawks made one more three-pointer than the Pelicans, but they required 29 additional attempts to do so.
Their three-point percentage was just 17%, compared with 41% for New Orleans.
This difference had a major effect on Atlanta’s offensive efficiency.
Three-point attempts can provide substantial scoring value, but they become less effective when a team consistently misses.
Atlanta’s 46 attempts represented slightly more than half of its 91 total field-goal attempts.
Despite that volume, the team converted only eight.
New Orleans, by contrast, produced better overall field-goal efficiency without relying heavily on three-point shooting.
This was one of the clearest explanations for the 22-point result.
Free-Throw Shooting: Atlanta Performs Better
Atlanta’s strongest shooting category was free-throw accuracy.
The Hawks converted 21 of 23 attempts, finishing at 91%.
New Orleans made 28 of 35 attempts, recording an 80% percentage.
Atlanta therefore had an 11-percentage-point advantage at the free-throw line.
However, free-throw efficiency could not compensate for its poor performance from the field.
The Pelicans attempted 12 more free throws and made seven more.
Consequently, New Orleans still scored more points from the free-throw line.
This demonstrates the importance of evaluating shooting categories together rather than looking at one percentage in isolation.
Rebounding: Pelicans Control Possession
New Orleans collected 49 rebounds, while Atlanta recorded 36.
That produced a 13-rebound advantage for the Pelicans.
The difference was particularly noticeable in defensive rebounding.
- Pelicans defensive rebounds: 39
- Hawks defensive rebounds: 22
- Pelicans offensive rebounds: 10
- Hawks offensive rebounds: 14
Atlanta actually recorded four more offensive rebounds.
This is an important detail because it shows that the Hawks were able to generate some additional possessions through offensive rebounding.
However, New Orleans’ advantage on the defensive glass was much larger.
The Pelicans collected 17 more defensive rebounds, helping them end Atlanta’s possessions and limit second-chance opportunities.
Matkovic and Queen were valuable contributors in this area.
Assists: New Orleans Shows Better Offensive Distribution
The Pelicans recorded 27 assists compared with Atlanta’s 20.
Seven additional assists indicate that New Orleans generated more assisted scoring opportunities.
Jeremiah Fears led the game with seven assists.
Kingston Flemings led Atlanta with six.
The difference between the teams was not enormous in individual playmaking, but New Orleans had greater overall offensive production.
Its higher assist total also complemented the 57% field-goal percentage.
Good passing is valuable when it creates quality attempts, and the Pelicans converted their opportunities much more effectively.
Turnovers: Atlanta Protects the Ball Better
One area where Atlanta performed better was turnovers.
The Hawks committed 19 turnovers, while New Orleans committed 23.
That means the Pelicans gave away the ball four more times.
This is an important counterpoint to the overall result.
New Orleans did not win because it was better in every statistical category. It won because its shooting efficiency, rebounding, and overall scoring production outweighed its turnover disadvantage.
For Atlanta, the lower turnover total was a positive statistic, but it could not overcome the poor shooting performance.
Steals and Blocks: Defensive Activity From Both Teams
New Orleans recorded 15 steals compared with Atlanta’s 11.
The Pelicans therefore finished with four additional steals.
Bey’s four steals were particularly notable, as he led all players in this category.
Both teams recorded four blocks.
This suggests that the difference in defensive statistical production was more visible in steals and rebounding than in shot blocking.
New Orleans created more turnovers through steals and collected more defensive rebounds.
Those contributions helped the Pelicans control the overall game.
Why the New Orleans Pelicans Won by 22 Points
The final result was produced by several statistical advantages working together.
There was no single explanation for the victory. New Orleans combined efficient shooting, balanced scoring, stronger rebounding, and defensive activity.
1. Superior Shooting Efficiency
The biggest advantage was New Orleans’ 57% field-goal percentage.
Atlanta finished at 38%.
The 19-percentage-point difference was significant enough to create a substantial scoring gap.
New Orleans made more shots despite attempting considerably fewer.
That efficiency allowed the Pelicans to maintain their scoring production throughout the game.
2. Balanced Scoring Across the Roster
The Pelicans had several productive offensive contributors.
Saddiq Bey scored 25 points, Jeremiah Fears added 20, and Williamson and Murphy each finished with 15.
This distribution reduced the team’s dependence on one scorer.
Atlanta also had several players reach double figures, but its overall shooting percentages remained considerably lower.
The difference was not simply how many players scored. It was how efficiently the team converted its attempts.
3. Strong Rebounding Performance
New Orleans finished with 49 rebounds, compared with 36 for Atlanta.
The 13-rebound advantage helped the Pelicans control possession and limit the Hawks’ opportunities after missed shots.
Matkovic and Okongwu tied for the individual rebounding lead with 10 each.
However, New Orleans received additional support from Queen, Williamson, Bey, and other contributors.
4. Better Three-Point Efficiency
New Orleans converted 41% of its three-point attempts.
Atlanta converted just 17%.
Although the Hawks made one more three-pointer, their 46 attempts produced a very low return.
The Pelicans did not need to attempt as many outside shots because they were more efficient with their overall field-goal opportunities.
5. Strong First-Quarter Performance
New Orleans scored 35 points in the first quarter and limited Atlanta to 18.
That 17-point advantage established a difficult situation for the Hawks.
Atlanta improved during the second quarter, but it could not create the consistent scoring runs necessary to recover.
The opening period ultimately became one of the defining moments of the matchup.
Starting Lineups and Bench Contributions
A closer look at the starting and reserve players reveals another important difference between the teams.
The Pelicans received their highest individual scoring contribution from Saddiq Bey, who came off the bench.
This shows that the team’s offensive production was not limited to its starting lineup.
Pelicans Starting Lineup
| Starter | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Herbert Jones | 11 | 3 | 2 |
| Zion Williamson | 15 | 6 | 4 |
| Trey Murphy III | 15 | 5 | 5 |
| Karlo Matkovic | 8 | 10 | 1 |
| Jeremiah Fears | 20 | 5 | 7 |
The starting lineup featured a combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.
Fears led the starters with 20 points and seven assists.
Williamson and Murphy both scored 15, while Jones added 11.
Matkovic provided an important rebounding presence with 10 boards.
Pelicans Bench Performance
| Reserve Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Saddiq Bey | 25 | 6 | 1 |
| Trendon Watford | 7 | 4 | 0 |
| Julian Reese | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Derik Queen | 8 | 8 | 4 |
| Bryce McGowens | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Bennedict Mathurin | 7 | 1 | 2 |
| AJ Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bey was the standout reserve player.
His 25 points were the highest individual total in the entire game.
Queen also contributed with eight points, eight rebounds, and four assists.
The bench provided additional scoring options and helped New Orleans maintain offensive production.
Atlanta Starting Lineup
| Starter | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Onyeka Okongwu | 6 | 10 | 1 |
| Jalen Johnson | 13 | 7 | 4 |
| CJ McCollum | 14 | 2 | 2 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Dyson Daniels | 8 | 4 | 3 |
McCollum led the starting lineup with 14 points.
Johnson added 13 points and seven rebounds, while Alexander-Walker finished with 12.
Okongwu’s 10 rebounds were an important contribution, even though his scoring output was limited to six points.
Atlanta Bench Performance
| Reserve Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Dorian Finney-Smith | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corey Kispert | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Asa Newell | 13 | 4 | 1 |
| Jock Landale | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luguentz Dort | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| Aaron Wiggins | 10 | 2 | 1 |
| Kingston Flemings | 12 | 2 | 6 |
Newell, Dort, Wiggins, and Flemings all reached double figures.
Flemings provided six assists, while Newell led the listed Atlanta reserves in scoring with 13 points.
The Hawks received contributions from their bench, but those performances were not enough to overcome the team’s shooting difficulties.
Important Statistical Takeaways From the Game
The box score provides several useful lessons for understanding the final result.
Saddiq Bey was the leading scorer. His 25 points made him the most productive offensive player in the matchup.
Jeremiah Fears led the game in assists. His seven assists demonstrated his importance as a playmaker.
Matkovic and Okongwu tied for the rebounding lead. Both collected 10 rebounds.
New Orleans dominated overall shooting efficiency. The Pelicans converted 57% of their field goals compared with Atlanta’s 38%.
Atlanta struggled from three-point range. The Hawks converted only eight of 46 attempts.
New Orleans controlled defensive rebounding. Its 39 defensive rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 22 represented a major difference.
Atlanta committed fewer turnovers. The Hawks recorded 19 turnovers, four fewer than New Orleans.
These details help explain why the Pelicans won comfortably despite committing more turnovers and shooting a lower free-throw percentage.
What This Result Reveals About Both Teams
What the Pelicans Can Take From the Victory
New Orleans can take several positives from this performance.
First, the team’s offensive efficiency was excellent. A 57% field-goal percentage reflects a highly productive shooting night.
Second, the Pelicans demonstrated that multiple players could contribute meaningful scoring.
Bey’s 25 points, Fears’ 20, and the 15-point performances from Williamson and Murphy created a balanced offensive profile.
Third, the rebounding advantage demonstrated the value of collective work on the glass.
The Pelicans did not rely on one player to control rebounds. Matkovic, Queen, Williamson, and other contributors helped create a 13-rebound team advantage.
However, the 23 turnovers are an area worth monitoring.
Despite winning comfortably, New Orleans gave away the ball four more times than Atlanta. Against a more efficient opponent, those additional possessions could become costly.
What Atlanta Needs to Improve
Atlanta’s most obvious issue was shooting efficiency.
The Hawks attempted 46 three-pointers but made only eight. Improving shot selection and outside shooting accuracy would be important areas to examine.
The team also needs to improve its overall field-goal percentage.
A 38% shooting performance makes it difficult to remain competitive, particularly when the opponent is converting 57% of its attempts.
Defensive rebounding is another area for attention.
Atlanta finished with 22 defensive rebounds compared with New Orleans’ 39. Although the Hawks collected more offensive rebounds, their defensive rebounding production was substantially lower.
The positive signs included 91% free-throw shooting, fewer turnovers, and several players reaching double figures.
Those strengths provide useful starting points for evaluating the team’s performance.
How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly
Understanding a box score requires more than looking at the highest scoring total.
The following statistical categories provide a more complete picture.
Points
Points measure a player’s direct scoring contribution.
However, a player scoring 20 points on efficient shooting may have a different impact from someone scoring 20 points after taking considerably more attempts.
Rebounds
Rebounds measure how many missed shots a player recovers.
They are divided into offensive and defensive rebounds.
Offensive rebounds can extend possessions, while defensive rebounds help a team end the opponent’s attack.
Assists
Assists measure passes that directly lead to a made basket under the official statistical definition.
They help show how effectively players create scoring opportunities for teammates.
Steals
A steal occurs when a defensive player legally takes possession of the basketball from an opponent.
Steals can interrupt offensive possessions and create transition opportunities.
Blocks
Blocks measure shots successfully deflected or stopped by a defensive player.
They are useful for evaluating rim protection, although they do not capture every form of defensive impact.
Field-Goal Percentage
Field-goal percentage measures successful field goals relative to total field-goal attempts.
The formula is:
\[ FG\%=\frac{\text{Field Goals Made}}{\text{Field Goals Attempted}}\times100 \]
For example, New Orleans made 43 of 76 attempts.
\[ \frac{43}{76}\times100\approx56.6\% \]
That rounds to the 57% listed in the supplied team statistics.
Three-Point Percentage
Three-point percentage measures the proportion of successful shots taken from beyond the three-point line.
Atlanta’s eight successful attempts from 46 attempts produced approximately 17.4%.
New Orleans made seven of 17, producing approximately 41.2%.
This calculation helps explain the large difference between the teams’ outside shooting performances.
Turnovers
Turnovers measure possessions lost without producing a field-goal attempt or another qualifying continuation of the possession.
A high turnover total can reduce offensive opportunities.
In this matchup, New Orleans committed 23 turnovers, while Atlanta committed 19.
This was one of the few major statistical categories in which Atlanta performed better.
Data Accuracy and Box Score Notes
Reliable player-statistics analysis depends on using the correct game information and distinguishing confirmed numbers from interpretation.
The figures in this article are transcribed from the supplied ESPN box-score text for Game ID 401909898.
A few details deserve attention:
- The team records displayed in different sections of the supplied ESPN material do not match. The listed game-header records are Atlanta 3-4 and New Orleans 2-4, with the corresponding away and home records shown separately.
- The listed individual player statistics are presented as supplied and have not been independently verified against a second source.
- The team totals and individual player statistics are treated as separate box-score fields rather than assuming that every displayed field can be reconstructed from the other.
- The quarter scores add correctly to the final result of 121-99.
- The listed next matchup is November 2, 2026, at 5:00 AM, according to the supplied schedule information. This is a listed time, not an independently confirmed result or schedule update.
Readers looking for the original figures can consult the official ESPN game box score.
These distinctions are important because accurate sports reporting should not turn incomplete or inconsistent source information into unsupported conclusions.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the New Orleans Pelicans vs Atlanta Hawks game on November 1, 2026?
The New Orleans Pelicans defeated the Atlanta Hawks 121-99 at the Smoothie King Center in New Orleans, Louisiana. The Pelicans won by 22 points.
2. Who was the highest scorer in the game?
Saddiq Bey was the leading scorer with 25 points for New Orleans. Jeremiah Fears followed with 20 points, while CJ McCollum led Atlanta with 14 points.
3. How many points did Zion Williamson score against Atlanta?
Zion Williamson scored 15 points, collected six rebounds, and recorded four assists for the Pelicans.
4. Who recorded the most rebounds in the matchup?
Onyeka Okongwu of Atlanta and Karlo Matkovic of New Orleans tied for the highest individual rebound total. Both players collected 10 rebounds.
5. How many assists did Jeremiah Fears record?
Jeremiah Fears recorded seven assists, the highest total of any player in the game. He also contributed 20 points and five rebounds.
6. What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?
Field-goal efficiency was the biggest difference. New Orleans shot 57% from the field, while Atlanta finished at 38%. The Pelicans also collected 49 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 36.
Conclusion
The New Orleans Pelicans secured an impressive 121-99 victory over the Atlanta Hawks on November 1, 2026. Their performance was built on efficient shooting, balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and consistent offensive production across all four quarters.
Saddiq Bey was the standout scorer with 25 points, while Jeremiah Fears delivered an excellent all-around performance with 20 points and seven assists. Zion Williamson and Trey Murphy III contributed 15 points each, and Karlo Matkovic added 10 rebounds.
Atlanta had several players reach double figures, including CJ McCollum, Jalen Johnson, Asa Newell, and Kingston Flemings. However, the Hawks struggled to convert their field-goal attempts, particularly from three-point range. Their 17% three-point shooting and 38% overall field-goal percentage made it difficult to challenge New Orleans.
The team statistics further explain the result. New Orleans finished with 49 rebounds, 27 assists, and 15 steals. Atlanta recorded 36 rebounds, 20 assists, and 11 steals.
Ultimately, the new orleans pelicans vs atlanta hawks match player stats demonstrate how shooting efficiency, team contributions, and control of rebounds can determine the outcome of an NBA matchup. Although Atlanta performed better at the free-throw line and committed fewer turnovers, New Orleans dominated enough important statistical categories to earn a convincing 22-point victory.
