Seahawks vs Texans Match Player Stats
The seahawks vs texans match player stats from October 21, 2025, reveal how the Seattle Seahawks secured an important 27-19 victory over the Houston Texans in a competitive NFL Week 7 matchup. Seattle combined an effective rushing attack, explosive receiving production, and a disruptive defensive performance to overcome Houston at Lumen Field. Although the Texans produced several impressive individual performances, particularly from quarterback C.J. Stroud and tight end Dalton Schultz, their offensive struggles during the first three quarters made it difficult to recover from Seattle’s early advantage.
The game featured two contrasting offensive approaches. Seattle relied on balance, using Kenneth Walker III and Zach Charbonnet to establish its ground game while Sam Darnold connected with Jaxon Smith-Njigba for important passing production. Houston, meanwhile, depended heavily on Stroud’s passing ability and the receiving contributions of Schultz and Jaylin Noel. However, Seattle’s defensive pressure and ability to create difficult passing situations prevented the Texans from finding a consistent rhythm.
One of the most interesting aspects of this matchup was the difference between individual production and overall team efficiency. Stroud finished with more passing yards than Darnold, but Seattle generated more total offensive yards and scored more points. The Seahawks also benefited from two rushing touchdowns by Charbonnet and a defensive performance that created problems for Houston throughout the contest.
This detailed breakdown examines the quarterback numbers, rushing performances, receiving leaders, defensive contributions, turnovers, special teams, and the most important statistical differences that determined the final result.
Seahawks vs Texans Match Player Stats: Final Score and Game Summary
The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Houston Texans 27-19 in their October 2025 regular-season meeting.
Seattle entered the game with a 4-2 record according to the pregame standings context, while Houston was attempting to improve its position after a difficult start to the season. The final records shown in the supplied game data were 5-2 for Seattle and 2-4 for Houston.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Houston Texans | 0 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 19 |
| Seattle Seahawks | 14 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 27 |
Game information:
| Category | Details |
| Sport | National Football League |
| Matchup | Houston Texans vs Seattle Seahawks |
| Date | October 20, 2025, Seattle local date |
| Week | NFL Week 7 |
| Venue | Lumen Field |
| Final Result | Seahawks 27, Texans 19 |
| Winning Team | Seattle Seahawks |
| Losing Team | Houston Texans |
| Winning Margin | 8 points |
| Seahawks Record | 5-2 |
| Texans Record | 2-4 |
The game appeared as October 21 in some international listings because of the time difference between Seattle and overseas broadcast locations.
How the Game Developed
Seattle established control immediately.
The Seahawks scored 14 points in the opening quarter, putting Houston in an uncomfortable position before the Texans had an opportunity to establish their offensive identity.
Zach Charbonnet opened the scoring with a one-yard rushing touchdown. Seattle then extended its advantage through an 11-yard touchdown reception by Jaxon Smith-Njigba, with Sam Darnold delivering the scoring pass.
Houston responded during the second quarter, but its offense could not produce a touchdown. Kicker Ka’imi Fairbairn converted two field goals, reducing Seattle’s advantage to 14-6.
The third quarter became the most eventful period of the game.
Seattle added two field goals and another rushing touchdown from Charbonnet. Houston also found the end zone when Will Anderson Jr. recovered a Seattle fumble in the end zone.
The Seahawks entered the final quarter with a 27-12 advantage.
Houston scored its final touchdown through Woody Marks, who caught a four-yard pass from Stroud. Fairbairn added the extra point, making the score 27-19.
However, Seattle’s defense prevented another scoring drive and preserved the eight-point victory.
Complete Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Analysis
Looking at the scoring sequence helps explain why Seattle won despite Houston producing several productive individual performances.
First Quarter: Seattle Takes Immediate Control
Seattle scored 14 unanswered points in the opening period.
The first touchdown came through Charbonnet, who converted a short rushing opportunity into seven points.
The second scoring drive demonstrated Seattle’s ability to attack through the air. Darnold connected with Smith-Njigba for an 11-yard touchdown.
These two scoring plays established an early advantage and forced Houston to adjust its offensive approach.
The Texans finished the quarter without scoring.
Second Quarter: Houston Starts Responding
Houston improved its scoring position during the second quarter.
Fairbairn successfully converted field goals from 36 and 46 yards.
Although the Texans gained six points, they struggled to finish drives with touchdowns.
Seattle did not score during this period, allowing Houston to reduce the difference to eight points.
The 14-6 halftime score kept the contest competitive, but the Seahawks still had control.
Third Quarter: The Most Important Period
The third quarter featured several momentum-changing moments.
Jason Myers converted a 26-yard field goal to increase Seattle’s lead to 17-6.
Houston then received an unexpected scoring opportunity when Will Anderson Jr. recovered a Seattle fumble in the end zone. The Texans failed to convert the two-point attempt, leaving the score at 17-12.
Seattle responded with another Myers field goal, this time from 47 yards.
Charbonnet then scored his second rushing touchdown of the night on a two-yard run.
The Seahawks finished the quarter with a 27-12 advantage.
Fourth Quarter: Texans Score, Seahawks Finish the Job
Houston needed a strong final period to overcome its deficit.
Stroud connected with Woody Marks for a four-yard touchdown, and Fairbairn successfully converted the extra point.
The score moved to 27-19.
Houston had opportunities to create additional pressure, but Seattle’s defense maintained its discipline and prevented the Texans from completing a comeback.
Neither team scored again.
Quarterback Performance: Sam Darnold vs C.J. Stroud
The quarterback comparison is one of the most interesting parts of this game.
Both quarterbacks threw for more than 200 yards and recorded one passing touchdown. However, neither produced a completely clean performance.
Sam Darnold Player Stats
Sam Darnold delivered a productive performance for Seattle, completing 17 of 31 passing attempts for 213 yards.
| Passing Statistic | Sam Darnold |
| Completions | 17 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Percentage | 54.8% |
| Passing Yards | 213 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.9 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 15 |
| QBR | 44.8 |
| Passer Rating | 73.7 |
Darnold’s biggest contribution was his ability to connect with Seattle’s receiving options while allowing the rushing attack to remain an important part of the offense.
His 213 passing yards were supported by Smith-Njigba’s 123-yard receiving performance.
The touchdown connection between Darnold and Smith-Njigba helped Seattle establish its early lead.
However, Darnold also experienced problems with ball security.
He threw one interception and lost a fumble. These mistakes gave Houston additional opportunities to stay competitive.
One particularly unusual play involved Cooper Kupp attempting a pass. Kupp finished with zero completions on one attempt and one interception.
That unsuccessful passing attempt contributed to Seattle’s total of two interceptions thrown by its quarterbacks.
Despite these mistakes, Darnold’s overall passing production and Seattle’s balanced offensive approach were sufficient to secure the win.
C.J. Stroud Player Stats
C.J. Stroud led Houston’s passing attack.
He completed 23 of 49 attempts for 229 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.
| Passing Statistic | C.J. Stroud |
| Completions | 23 |
| Attempts | 49 |
| Completion Percentage | 46.9% |
| Passing Yards | 229 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 4.7 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 31 |
| QBR | 28.5 |
| Passer Rating | 59.0 |
Stroud finished with 16 more passing yards than Darnold.
However, his completion percentage was lower, and he faced considerable pressure from Seattle’s defensive front.
His 49 passing attempts reflected Houston’s need to throw frequently while attempting to overcome its early deficit.
The Seahawks recorded three sacks against him, resulting in 31 lost passing yards.
Stroud’s strongest receiving connection was with Dalton Schultz, who caught nine passes for 98 yards.
He also found Jaylin Noel four times for 77 yards.
Although Stroud eventually connected with Woody Marks for a touchdown, Houston’s offense struggled to produce consistent scoring opportunities.
Quarterback Comparison
| Statistic | Sam Darnold | C.J. Stroud |
| Completions | 17 | 23 |
| Attempts | 31 | 49 |
| Completion Percentage | 54.8% | 46.9% |
| Passing Yards | 213 | 229 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.9 | 4.7 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 73.7 | 59.0 |
| QBR | 44.8 | 28.5 |
Statistical takeaway: Stroud accumulated more passing yards, but Darnold was more efficient on a per-attempt basis. Seattle also received stronger support from its rushing game, allowing the offense to remain balanced.
Rushing Stats: Kenneth Walker III and Zach Charbonnet Lead Seattle
Seattle’s rushing attack was an important reason for its victory.
The Seahawks recorded 118 rushing yards on 33 attempts, compared with Houston’s 56 yards on 17 attempts.
The difference was significant because Seattle could use its running backs to control offensive possessions and create scoring opportunities.
Kenneth Walker III Rushing Performance
Kenneth Walker III led Seattle in rushing attempts and rushing yards.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Rushing Attempts | 17 |
| Rushing Yards | 66 |
| Average | 3.9 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 16 yards |
Walker handled 17 carries and gained 66 yards.
Although he did not score a rushing touchdown, his workload helped Seattle maintain a consistent ground-game presence.
His 66 yards were the highest individual rushing total in the game.
Walker also helped prevent Seattle from becoming overly dependent on Darnold’s passing production.
Zach Charbonnet Rushing Performance
Zach Charbonnet delivered one of the most important individual performances of the matchup.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Rushing Attempts | 12 |
| Rushing Yards | 49 |
| Average | 4.1 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Longest Run | 15 yards |
Charbonnet recorded 49 rushing yards and scored two touchdowns.
His first touchdown opened the scoring, while his second rushing touchdown helped Seattle establish a 27-12 lead during the third quarter.
The importance of his performance goes beyond the total yardage.
He converted two scoring opportunities into touchdowns, providing Seattle with points that did not depend on another successful passing play.
His 4.1-yard average was also slightly better than Walker’s 3.9-yard average.
Other Seattle Rushing Contributions
Seattle received additional rushing production from its supporting players.
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Average | TD |
| Kenneth Walker III | 17 | 66 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 12 | 49 | 4.1 | 2 |
| AJ Barner | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Sam Darnold | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 |
| Team Total | 33 | 118 | 3.6 | 2 |
Seattle’s ability to distribute rushing opportunities helped maintain offensive balance.
Houston Texans Rushing Performance
Houston struggled to establish a productive running game.
The Texans finished with only 56 rushing yards on 17 attempts.
C.J. Stroud was actually Houston’s leading individual rusher.
C.J. Stroud
| Statistic | Performance |
| Attempts | 2 |
| Rushing Yards | 25 |
| Average | 12.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 15 yards |
Stroud’s 25 rushing yards demonstrated his ability to create opportunities outside the pocket.
However, his limited number of rushing attempts meant Houston could not rely on him as a consistent ground-game option.
Nick Chubb
| Statistic | Performance |
| Attempts | 5 |
| Rushing Yards | 16 |
| Average | 3.2 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 5 yards |
Chubb gained 16 yards on five attempts.
Although he contributed to the rushing workload, his production did not provide the explosive plays Houston needed.
Woody Marks
| Statistic | Performance |
| Attempts | 10 |
| Rushing Yards | 15 |
| Average | 1.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 11 yards |
Marks received the largest rushing workload among Houston’s running backs.
However, his 1.5-yard average highlighted the Texans’ difficulties creating space on the ground.
He made a more significant contribution as a receiver, catching a touchdown pass in the fourth quarter.
Complete Texans Rushing Table
| Player | Attempts | Yards | Average | TD |
| C.J. Stroud | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 0 |
| Nick Chubb | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Woody Marks | 10 | 15 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Team Total | 17 | 56 | 3.3 | 0 |
The biggest difference between the teams was their ability to generate rushing production.
Seattle gained 62 more rushing yards than Houston and scored two rushing touchdowns.
That advantage allowed the Seahawks to control the game without requiring an unusually high passing total.
Receiving Stats: Jaxon Smith-Njigba Dominates
The receiving statistics highlight the importance of explosive passing plays in Seattle’s victory.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba was the leading receiver on either team, recording 123 receiving yards and one touchdown.
Houston also received strong production from Dalton Schultz and Jaylin Noel.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba Receiving Stats
| Statistic | Performance |
| Receptions | 8 |
| Targets | 14 |
| Receiving Yards | 123 |
| Yards Per Reception | 15.4 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Longest Reception | 26 yards |
Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s most productive offensive receiver.
His eight receptions represented a major part of Darnold’s passing production.
He also scored Seattle’s second touchdown of the opening quarter.
His 123 receiving yards were particularly important because they gave the Seahawks a reliable option for gaining significant yardage through the air.
Smith-Njigba’s performance demonstrated how a receiver can influence a game through both consistent catches and important scoring plays.
Dalton Schultz Receiving Stats
Dalton Schultz was Houston’s leading receiver.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Receptions | 9 |
| Targets | 10 |
| Receiving Yards | 98 |
| Yards Per Reception | 10.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 22 yards |
Schultz caught nine of his ten targets.
His 98 receiving yards were the highest total among Houston’s receivers.
He provided Stroud with a dependable option throughout the game, especially when Houston needed to move the football through shorter passing routes.
Although Schultz did not score, his receiving production was one of the strongest individual performances for the Texans.
Jaylin Noel Receiving Stats
Jaylin Noel also produced an impressive performance.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Targets | 7 |
| Receiving Yards | 77 |
| Yards Per Reception | 19.3 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Reception | 29 yards |
Noel averaged 19.3 yards per reception, the highest average among Houston’s primary receivers.
His 29-yard reception was also the longest catch recorded by a Texans receiver in the supplied statistics.
Despite his strong contribution, Houston could not convert enough passing opportunities into touchdowns.
Other Houston Receiving Contributions
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Yards | TD |
| Dalton Schultz | 9 | 10 | 98 | 0 |
| Jaylin Noel | 4 | 7 | 77 | 0 |
| Nico Collins | 4 | 10 | 27 | 0 |
| Woody Marks | 3 | 5 | 20 | 1 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 1 | 4 | 13 | 0 |
| Braxton Berrios | 1 | Not specified | -1 | 0 |
| Nick Chubb | 1 | Not specified | -5 | 0 |
Houston’s receiving attack generated 229 total receiving yards and one touchdown.
Schultz and Noel combined for 175 yards, representing a substantial portion of the team’s passing production.
However, the Texans needed more consistent contributions from their other receiving options.
Nico Collins, for example, finished with only 27 yards on four receptions.
Seattle Seahawks Receiving Stats
Seattle distributed its receiving production among several players.
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving Yards | Average | TD |
| Jaxon Smith-Njigba | 8 | 14 | 123 | 15.4 | 1 |
| Elijah Arroyo | 4 | 5 | 42 | 10.5 | 0 |
| Cooper Kupp | 1 | 1 | 32 | 32.0 | 0 |
| AJ Barner | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Jake Bobo | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Tory Horton | 0 | Not specified | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seattle finished with 213 receiving yards and one receiving touchdown.
Smith-Njigba was clearly the leading option, but Elijah Arroyo and Cooper Kupp also provided valuable contributions.
Arroyo recorded four catches for 42 yards, while Kupp gained 32 yards on his only reception.
Receiving Comparison
| Category | Texans | Seahawks |
| Receptions | 23 | 17 |
| Receiving Yards | 229 | 213 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Team Targets | 46 | 29 |
| Leading Receiver | Dalton Schultz | Jaxon Smith-Njigba |
| Leading Receiver Yards | 98 | 123 |
Houston recorded more total receiving yards and receptions.
However, Seattle’s passing offense generated a better average per attempt and connected on an important touchdown early in the game.
This comparison illustrates why receiving volume alone does not determine which offense performs better.
Defensive Player Stats: Seahawks Apply Consistent Pressure
Defense was one of the most important factors behind Seattle’s victory.
The Seahawks limited Houston to 19 points and prevented the Texans from scoring a touchdown until the fourth quarter, apart from the defensive fumble recovery.
Seattle also recorded three sacks and forced an interception.
The defensive numbers show that the Seahawks were effective at disrupting Houston’s offensive rhythm.
Ernest Jones IV Leads Seattle’s Defense
Ernest Jones IV was one of Seattle’s most productive defensive players.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 11 |
| Solo Tackles | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Interception Return Yards | 23 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
Jones led Seattle in tackles according to the supplied defensive statistics.
His interception was especially important because it prevented Houston from gaining additional passing momentum.
He also recorded 23 interception return yards, creating a valuable field-position opportunity.
Ty Okada’s Defensive Contribution
Ty Okada produced an effective performance in the defensive backfield.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 6 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 |
Okada’s nine tackles made him one of Seattle’s most active defenders.
His sack also contributed to the pressure placed on Stroud.
DeMarcus Lawrence
DeMarcus Lawrence recorded two tackles and one sack.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 2 |
| Solo Tackles | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 |
Lawrence contributed to Seattle’s ability to disrupt Houston’s passing plays.
His work in the defensive front helped make Stroud’s pocket less comfortable.
Uchenna Nwosu
Nwosu also recorded a productive defensive performance.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 2 |
| Solo Tackles | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 |
His sack added to Seattle’s pass-rushing production.
Other Important Seattle Defenders
| Player | Total Tackles | Additional Contribution |
| Ernest Jones IV | 11 | 1 interception |
| Ty Okada | 9 | 1 sack |
| Byron Murphy II | 6 | 1 tackle for loss |
| Coby Bryant | 5 | 1 tackle for loss |
| Drake Thomas | 5 | 2 tackles for loss, 3 passes defended |
| Josh Jobe | 5 | 2 passes defended |
| Leonard Williams | 3 | 2 quarterback hits |
| DeMarcus Lawrence | 2 | 1 sack |
| Uchenna Nwosu | 2 | 1 sack |
Seattle finished with 65 total tackles, three sacks, ten tackles for loss, and 12 passes defended in the supplied defensive breakdown.
Houston Texans Defensive Performance
Houston also had several impressive individual defensive performances.
The Texans recorded two interceptions and recovered two Seattle fumbles.
Their defense created opportunities to keep the game competitive, even though the offense struggled to take full advantage.
Kamari Lassiter
Kamari Lassiter led Houston in tackles.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 10 |
| Solo Tackles | 7 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
Lassiter’s ten tackles made him the Texans’ leading defensive tackler.
His three tackles for loss were particularly valuable because they helped limit Seattle’s offensive progress.
Jalen Pitre
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 4 |
Pitre was another important contributor, finishing with nine tackles.
Will Anderson Jr.
Will Anderson Jr. recorded one of Houston’s most significant defensive plays.
| Statistic | Performance |
| Total Tackles | 5 |
| Solo Tackles | 3 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 1 |
Anderson recovered a Seattle fumble in the end zone during the third quarter.
The play resulted in a Houston defensive touchdown and reduced Seattle’s lead.
This was an important moment because it allowed the Texans to score without needing their offense to complete a traditional touchdown drive.
Danielle Hunter
Danielle Hunter recorded four tackles and one quarterback hit.
His contribution helped Houston maintain pressure against Seattle’s passing attack.
Tommy Togiai
Togiai recorded three tackles, two tackles for loss, one pass defended, and one quarterback hit.
His defensive activity demonstrated Houston’s ability to create pressure and disrupt offensive plays.
Other Important Texans Defenders
| Player | Total Tackles | Additional Contribution |
| Kamari Lassiter | 10 | 3 tackles for loss |
| Jalen Pitre | 9 | 4 solo tackles |
| E.J. Speed | 7 | 1 tackle for loss |
| M.J. Stewart | 6 | 4 solo tackles |
| Azeez Al-Shaair | 6 | 1 pass defended |
| Will Anderson Jr. | 5 | 1 sack, defensive touchdown |
| Calen Bullock | 4 | 1 pass defended |
| Danielle Hunter | 4 | 1 quarterback hit |
| Tommy Togiai | 3 | 2 tackles for loss |
| Denico Autry | 2 | 1 sack |
Houston recorded 72 total tackles, two sacks, eight tackles for loss, and five passes defended.
The Texans’ defense created turnovers and made several important plays, but Seattle’s offensive balance helped overcome those defensive contributions.
Interception and Turnover Analysis
Turnovers played a major role in this matchup.
Both teams made mistakes, but Houston managed to convert one of Seattle’s turnovers into a defensive touchdown.
Houston Texans Interceptions
Houston recorded two interceptions.
| Player | Interceptions | Return Yards |
| Derek Stingley Jr. | 1 | 17 |
| Calen Bullock | 1 | 11 |
| Team Total | 2 | 28 |
Stingley and Bullock each recorded an interception.
Their combined 28 return yards gave Houston additional opportunities to change field position.
Seattle Seahawks Interception
Ernest Jones IV recorded Seattle’s defensive interception.
| Player | Interceptions | Return Yards |
| Ernest Jones IV | 1 | 23 |
| Team Total | 1 | 23 |
His interception was an important defensive contribution.
Fumble Statistics
| Team | Total Fumbles | Fumbles Lost | Fumbles Recovered |
| Houston Texans | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Seattle Seahawks | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Seattle lost two fumbles.
Houston recovered both, and one recovery resulted in a touchdown by Will Anderson Jr.
This was one of the Texans’ biggest positive moments in the game.
However, Seattle’s offense recovered from its mistakes and maintained enough scoring production to protect the lead.
Why Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game Alone
Houston generated more interceptions and benefited from Seattle’s lost fumbles.
Despite that advantage, the Texans still lost.
The reason was the difference in offensive execution.
Seattle generated 316 total net yards, compared with Houston’s 254.
The Seahawks also produced 118 rushing yards, while Houston managed only 56.
These advantages helped Seattle overcome its turnover problems.
Special Teams Stats: Kicking, Punting and Returns
Special teams contributed to the final score and field-position battle.
Both teams received reliable kicking performances, although Seattle missed one field-goal attempt.
Kicking Comparison
| Statistic | Jason Myers | Ka’imi Fairbairn |
| Field Goals Made | 2 | 2 |
| Field Goal Attempts | 3 | 2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 66.7% | 100% |
| Longest Field Goal | 47 yards | 46 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 3 | 1 |
| Extra Point Attempts | 3 | 1 |
| Total Kicking Points | 9 | 7 |
Jason Myers converted two field goals and all three extra-point attempts.
His successful 47-yard field goal helped Seattle extend its lead during the third quarter.
Fairbairn was perfect on his two field-goal attempts and converted his extra point after Marks’ touchdown.
However, Seattle’s additional scoring production meant Myers finished with nine kicking points compared with Fairbairn’s seven.
Punting Statistics
| Statistic | Tommy Townsend | Michael Dickson |
| Punts | 7 | 4 |
| Total Punt Yards | 344 | 205 |
| Average | 49.1 | 51.3 |
| Longest Punt | 57 yards | 58 yards |
| Touchbacks | 1 | 0 |
| Inside 20 | 1 | 1 |
Michael Dickson averaged 51.3 yards per punt, slightly higher than Townsend’s 49.1.
Houston punted seven times, compared with Seattle’s four.
This difference reflected the Texans’ greater difficulty sustaining offensive drives.
Kick Return Statistics
| Player | Team | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Tremon Smith | Texans | 6 | 154 | 25.7 | 33 |
| George Holani | Seahawks | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 34 |
| Dareke Young | Seahawks | 1 | 28 | 28.0 | 28 |
Seattle averaged 29.0 yards per kick return as a team.
Houston averaged 25.7 yards.
George Holani provided Seattle with the longest kick return among the listed players, gaining 34 yards.
Punt Return Statistics
| Player | Team | Returns | Yards | Average | Longest |
| Braxton Berrios | Texans | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 10 |
| Tory Horton | Seahawks | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 19 |
Seattle also held the advantage in punt-return production.
Horton gained 67 yards on five returns, averaging 13.4 yards.
Berrios finished with 25 yards on three returns.
These contributions helped Seattle maintain better field-position opportunities.
Complete Team Statistics: Texans vs Seahawks
The team statistics provide the clearest explanation of the final result.
Seattle finished with more total yards, more rushing production, and a longer time of possession.
Houston had some advantages in passing volume and turnover creation, but those strengths were not enough to overcome Seattle’s overall efficiency.
| Team Statistic | Texans | Seahawks |
| Final Score | 19 | 27 |
| Total Net Yards | 254 | 316 |
| First Downs | 18 | 19 |
| Rushing Attempts | 17 | 33 |
| Rushing Yards | 56 | 118 |
| Rushing Average | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Net Passing Yards | 198 | 198 |
| Gross Passing Yards | 229 | 213 |
| Passing Completions | 23 | 17 |
| Passing Attempts | 49 | 32 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks Allowed | 3 | 2 |
| Sacks Recorded | 2 | 3 |
| Penalties | 10 | 12 |
| Penalty Yards | 105 | 93 |
| Time of Possession | 27:43 | 32:17 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Field Goals Made | 2 | 2 |
| Total Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
Total Offensive Yardage
Seattle generated 316 total net yards, while Houston finished with 254.
The 62-yard difference demonstrates Seattle’s advantage in overall offensive production.
First Downs
Seattle recorded 19 first downs compared with Houston’s 18.
The difference was small, but it reflected Seattle’s slightly stronger ability to sustain offensive possessions.
Time of Possession
Seattle controlled the football for 32 minutes and 17 seconds.
Houston held possession for 27 minutes and 43 seconds.
The Seahawks’ additional possession time helped limit Houston’s offensive opportunities.
Penalties
Houston committed ten penalties for 105 yards.
Seattle committed 12 penalties for 93 yards.
Although Seattle committed more penalties, Houston lost more yardage because of its penalties.
Third-Down Efficiency
Both teams struggled on third downs.
Houston converted two of 15 attempts, while Seattle converted two of 14.
These numbers show that neither offense was particularly effective in these situations.
Seattle’s advantage came from other areas, particularly rushing production and scoring opportunities.
Fourth-Down Efficiency
Seattle successfully converted both fourth-down attempts.
Houston converted only one of four.
This difference gave Seattle an additional advantage in extending drives and maintaining offensive opportunities.
Five Biggest Reasons Seattle Defeated Houston
The final score tells only part of the story. Several statistical factors explain how Seattle managed to win.
1. Seattle Established an Early Two-Touchdown Lead
The Seahawks scored twice during the first quarter.
This early advantage forced Houston to play from behind for most of the game.
The Texans had to attempt more passes, which increased the pressure on Stroud and made their offense more predictable.
2. Zach Charbonnet Converted Two Important Scoring Opportunities
Charbonnet scored twice on the ground.
His touchdowns were valuable because they allowed Seattle to finish drives without depending entirely on passing plays.
His performance also complemented Walker’s 66 rushing yards.
3. Seattle Generated More Rushing Production
Seattle recorded 118 rushing yards, while Houston managed only 56.
That 62-yard difference was one of the biggest statistical advantages in the matchup.
The Seahawks’ ability to gain yards on the ground helped them maintain offensive balance.
4. Seattle’s Defense Disrupted C.J. Stroud
Stroud completed only 46.9% of his passing attempts.
He was also sacked three times for 31 lost yards.
Seattle’s pressure made it difficult for Houston to develop consistent passing drives.
Although Stroud eventually threw a touchdown, the Texans waited until the fourth quarter for their first offensive touchdown.
5. Jaxon Smith-Njigba Delivered an Outstanding Receiving Performance
Smith-Njigba finished with 123 yards and one touchdown.
He was Seattle’s leading receiver and provided the offense with an important downfield option.
His early touchdown also helped establish the Seahawks’ first-quarter advantage.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The statistical comparison reveals different strengths and weaknesses for both franchises.
Seattle Seahawks: A Balanced Offensive Performance
Seattle did not depend on one player to produce every scoring opportunity.
Darnold contributed 213 passing yards, Walker gained 66 rushing yards, and Charbonnet scored twice.
Smith-Njigba added 123 receiving yards and a touchdown.
The defense also played an important role by pressuring Stroud and limiting Houston’s scoring opportunities.
Seattle’s performance showed the value of balancing the passing game with a productive rushing attack.
Houston Texans: Passing Volume Without Enough Efficiency
Houston produced 229 passing yards, but Stroud needed 49 attempts to reach that total.
The Texans’ 4.7 yards per attempt reflected their difficulty creating consistent passing gains.
Schultz and Noel produced strong receiving numbers, but the rest of the offense did not generate enough support.
The rushing attack was another concern.
Houston finished with just 56 rushing yards, limiting its ability to keep Seattle’s defense uncertain about the next play.
The Importance of Defensive Pressure
The Seahawks’ defensive performance was a major factor in the outcome.
Three sacks, multiple quarterback hits, and an interception helped restrict Houston’s offensive opportunities.
The Texans also generated turnovers, but their offense could not consistently convert those opportunities into points.
This difference between defensive production and offensive execution explains why Houston remained behind despite several important defensive plays.
Historical and Statistical Context of the Matchup
The October 2025 meeting provided another chapter in the competitive history between the Seattle Seahawks and Houston Texans.
The teams entered the matchup with different records and different offensive priorities.
Seattle was attempting to strengthen its position in the NFC, while Houston needed a stronger performance to improve its standing in the AFC.
The Seahawks’ victory moved them to 5-2 in the supplied game records.
Houston fell to 2-4.
The final eight-point margin also reflected a game in which Seattle established control early but Houston continued competing through the final quarter.
For readers evaluating individual performances, the most important distinction is that statistical leaders do not always represent the winning team’s entire story.
Stroud led the game in passing yards.
Schultz led Houston in receiving production.
Walker led the game in rushing yards.
Smith-Njigba led all receivers in yardage.
Charbonnet led the game in rushing touchdowns.
Ernest Jones IV led Seattle’s supplied defensive tackle totals.
Each player influenced a different part of the contest.
Together, these performances explain how the Seahawks produced a more effective overall team performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Seahawks vs Texans game on October 21, 2025?
The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Houston Texans 27-19. Seattle established a 14-0 first-quarter advantage and maintained its lead throughout the game.
2. How many passing yards did Sam Darnold record against Houston?
Sam Darnold completed 17 of 31 passes for 213 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. He also had two sacks for 15 yards lost.
3. How many passing yards did C.J. Stroud record against Seattle?
C.J. Stroud completed 23 of 49 passes for 229 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. He was sacked three times for 31 yards lost.
4. Who was the leading receiver in the Seahawks vs Texans game?
Jaxon Smith-Njigba was the leading receiver, recording eight receptions for 123 yards and one touchdown. Dalton Schultz led Houston with nine receptions for 98 yards.
5. How many touchdowns did Zach Charbonnet score?
Zach Charbonnet scored two rushing touchdowns. He finished with 49 rushing yards on 12 attempts and averaged 4.1 yards per carry.
6. Which team had more rushing yards?
The Seattle Seahawks had more rushing yards. Seattle recorded 118 yards on 33 attempts, while Houston finished with 56 yards on 17 attempts.
Conclusion
The October 2025 matchup between Seattle and Houston demonstrated the importance of offensive balance, defensive pressure, and efficient scoring opportunities.
Seattle secured a 27-19 victory by establishing an early lead and maintaining its advantage through a productive rushing attack and a strong defensive performance.
Sam Darnold contributed 213 passing yards and one touchdown, while Kenneth Walker III led the rushing attack with 66 yards. Zach Charbonnet made a particularly important contribution with two rushing touchdowns.
Jaxon Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s leading receiver, finishing with 123 yards and one touchdown. On the Houston side, C.J. Stroud threw for 229 yards, Dalton Schultz recorded 98 receiving yards, and Jaylin Noel added 77 yards.
The defensive statistics also highlighted the importance of individual contributions. Ernest Jones IV led Seattle in tackles and recorded an interception, while Kamari Lassiter led Houston with ten tackles. Will Anderson Jr. provided one of Houston’s biggest moments by recovering a fumble in the end zone for a defensive touchdown.
Ultimately, Seattle’s 62-yard advantage in total rushing production and its ability to score through multiple offensive approaches made the difference. Houston showed flashes of quality, especially through its receiving game and defensive turnovers, but could not produce enough consistent offensive scoring to complete a comeback.
The seahawks vs texans match player stats demonstrate that Seattle’s victory was a team effort built on rushing production, receiving efficiency, defensive pressure, and timely scoring.
