Kansas City Chiefs vs Washington Commanders Player Stats
The kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats from the 28-7 Kansas City victory show a game that changed dramatically after halftime. Washington and Kansas City were tied 7-7 at the break, but the Chiefs controlled the second half with three consecutive touchdown drives and finished with 28 points. Patrick Mahomes completed 25 of 34 passes for 299 yards and three touchdowns, while Travis Kelce produced six catches for 99 yards and a touchdown. Washington quarterback Marcus Mariota completed 21 of 30 passes for 213 yards, one touchdown and two interceptions. The official ESPN box score confirms the individual and team figures used throughout this breakdown. (ESPN)
Game Overview
The matchup between the Washington Commanders and Kansas City Chiefs was played at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium in Week 8 of the 2025 NFL season. Kansas City entered the game at 5-3 overall and 4-1 at home, while Washington came in at 3-5 overall and 1-4 on the road.
Kansas City eventually won 28-7, but the final score does not fully explain how the game developed.
The opening half was unusually tight. Neither team scored in the first quarter, and both offenses struggled to turn opportunities into points. Each side reached the end zone once in the second quarter, sending the teams into halftime tied at 7-7.
The difference came after halftime.
Kansas City scored 14 points in the third quarter and another seven in the fourth. Washington failed to score again. That second-half split is one of the most important details when studying the player statistics because several of the Chiefs’ biggest performances became more influential as the game progressed.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Washington Commanders | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 0 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 28 |
The result also extended Kansas City’s dominance in this series. The Chiefs won their ninth straight game against Washington. (ESPN)
kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats: Quarterback Comparison
Quarterback production provides one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
Marcus Mariota and Patrick Mahomes both completed more than 70 percent of their passes, but Mahomes created significantly more scoring production. Mariota finished with one touchdown and two interceptions, while Mahomes produced three touchdown passes alongside two interceptions.
Patrick Mahomes
Mahomes finished with:
- 25 completions on 34 attempts
- 299 passing yards
- 8.8 yards per attempt
- 3 touchdown passes
- 2 interceptions
- 3 sacks for 15 yards
- 56.4 QBR
- 104.9 passer rating
The most important number is not simply the 299 passing yards. It is the combination of volume, efficiency and touchdown production.
Mahomes averaged 8.8 yards per attempt, which indicates that Kansas City was not relying only on short completions to move the ball. The Chiefs also converted their passing opportunities into touchdowns, with Kelce, Kareem Hunt and Rashee Rice each finding the end zone through the passing game.
There was also an important context to his performance. Mahomes threw two interceptions early, yet Kansas City did not allow those mistakes to define the game. The Chiefs recovered and became much more productive after halftime.
That ability to stabilize after an inefficient opening is a major part of Mahomes’ value.
Marcus Mariota
Mariota’s final numbers were:
- 21 completions on 30 attempts
- 213 passing yards
- 7.1 yards per attempt
- 1 touchdown
- 2 interceptions
- 2 sacks for 13 yards
- 55.2 QBR
- 73.3 passer rating
At first glance, 21 completions on 30 attempts looks efficient. The problem was what happened with those completions.
Washington finished with 213 passing yards and only one passing touchdown. More importantly, both of Mariota’s interceptions became costly because Washington was unable to produce another touchdown after halftime.
The passing statistics therefore show a useful distinction between completion efficiency and scoring efficiency. A quarterback can complete a high percentage of passes while still struggling to turn possessions into points.
That is essentially what happened to Washington.
Patrick Mahomes’ Impact on the Chiefs Offense
Mahomes did not need to throw for 400 yards to control the game.
His 299 passing yards were enough because Kansas City combined them with 148 rushing yards. That balance forced Washington to defend both phases of the offense throughout the game.
Mahomes also spread the ball around effectively.
Seven Kansas City players recorded receptions, and the Chiefs finished with 25 completions on 32 targets. The leading receiver was Kelce, but Rashee Rice was also heavily involved.
Rice caught nine passes for 93 yards and a touchdown. His nine receptions were the most by any Kansas City player, while Kelce led the team in receiving yards with 99.
That distribution matters because it prevented Washington from focusing exclusively on one target.
Travis Kelce Leads Kansas City Receiving
Travis Kelce was arguably the most productive individual receiver in the matchup.
His line was:
- 6 receptions
- 99 receiving yards
- 16.5 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 38-yard longest reception
- 8 targets
Kelce averaged 16.5 yards every time he caught the football, which is an unusually strong figure for a tight end.
His 38-yard reception was also Kansas City’s longest completion to a receiver in the supplied player statistics.
Kelce’s touchdown came in the third quarter on a 10-yard pass from Mahomes. That score pushed Kansas City ahead 21-7 and helped turn a close game into a comfortable advantage.
The performance was also historically notable. Kelce caught his 80th career regular-season touchdown pass, becoming only the fifth tight end in NFL history to reach that mark. The touchdown also brought his regular-season total to 83, tying Priest Holmes for the most in Chiefs franchise history. (NFL)
Rashee Rice Provides Another Major Threat
Rashee Rice recorded:
- 9 receptions
- 93 yards
- 10.3 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 25-yard longest reception
- 9 targets
Rice’s nine catches gave Mahomes a reliable high-volume option.
His fourth-quarter touchdown was particularly important because it capped a 13-play, 94-yard drive. That drive consumed more than seven minutes and effectively ended Washington’s hopes of mounting a comeback.
The touchdown also demonstrated the value of sustained offensive possessions. Kansas City did not need a quick explosive play to score. It could methodically move the ball and finish drives.
Rice did record a fumble, but it was not lost. That distinction matters when evaluating his overall performance because the mistake did not give Washington a turnover.
Isiah Pacheco and the Kansas City Running Game
Isiah Pacheco was Kansas City’s leading rusher.
He recorded:
- 12 carries
- 58 yards
- 4.8 yards per carry
- 13-yard longest run
- 0 rushing touchdowns
Pacheco did not lead the team in rushing touchdowns, but he provided efficient production on the ground.
Kansas City as a team rushed 30 times for 148 yards, averaging 4.9 yards per carry.
That was a major contrast with Washington.
The Commanders ran the ball only 20 times for 60 yards, averaging 3.0 yards per carry. Kansas City therefore produced 88 more rushing yards while also averaging 1.9 more yards per attempt.
This difference helped the Chiefs maintain offensive balance and made the game increasingly difficult for Washington’s defense.
Kareem Hunt’s Scoring Contribution
Kareem Hunt was especially important because his contribution went beyond his rushing statistics.
He recorded:
- 9 rushing attempts
- 40 rushing yards
- 4.4 yards per carry
- 11-yard longest run
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 1 reception
- 2 receiving yards
- 1 receiving touchdown
Hunt scored the game’s first touchdown on a one-yard rushing play in the second quarter.
He later caught a two-yard touchdown pass from Mahomes in the third quarter.
That means Hunt personally accounted for two of Kansas City’s four offensive touchdowns.
His contribution is a good example of why box-score analysis should look beyond the leading yardage totals. Pacheco was the leading rusher, but Hunt was one of the most important players in the scoring sequence.
Washington Receiving Breakdown
Washington’s passing offense was led by Jeremy McNichols and Terry McLaurin.
Jeremy McNichols
McNichols finished with:
- 5 receptions
- 64 yards
- 12.8 yards per reception
- 24-yard longest reception
- 6 targets
- 0 touchdowns
He led Washington in receptions and receiving yards.
His 64 receiving yards represented a significant portion of Washington’s 213 total passing yards.
Terry McLaurin
McLaurin recorded:
- 3 receptions
- 54 yards
- 18.0 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
- 25-yard longest reception
- 4 targets
Although McNichols led the Commanders in receiving yards, McLaurin produced Washington’s only touchdown.
His 18.0 yards per reception were also higher than McNichols’ 12.8 average.
The contrast illustrates two different types of receiving impact. McNichols provided volume, while McLaurin supplied more explosive production per catch and finished the team’s only scoring drive.
Washington’s Rushing Attack
Washington’s rushing production was one of the clearest statistical weaknesses.
The Commanders finished with:
- 20 rushing attempts
- 60 rushing yards
- 3.0 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
- 8-yard longest run
Mariota led the team with eight carries for 28 yards.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt added 25 yards on nine carries, while Jeremy McNichols recorded four yards on one carry. Chris Rodriguez Jr. had two yards on one attempt, and Deebo Samuel added one rushing yard.
No Washington runner reached 30 rushing yards.
That made the offense easier for Kansas City to pressure because the Chiefs did not have to consistently respect a productive ground attack.
kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats: Defensive Leaders
The defensive statistics tell another important part of the story.
Washington actually produced more total tackles than Kansas City, with 71 compared with 64. But tackles alone do not tell us which defense controlled the game.
Washington’s defense recorded:
- 71 total tackles
- 48 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 7 quarterback hits
- 2 interceptions
Kansas City recorded:
- 64 total tackles
- 28 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
- 2 interceptions
The turnover totals were equal, with both teams intercepting the opposing quarterback twice.
The key difference was what each offense did after those mistakes.
Kansas City ultimately produced 28 points. Washington produced only seven.
Quan Martin Leads Washington in Tackles
Quan Martin was Washington’s leading tackler with 14 total tackles, including 10 solo tackles.
That is a substantial workload and shows how frequently he was involved in defensive plays.
Bobby Wagner and Marshon Lattimore also made major contributions, with Wagner recording an interception and Lattimore also picking off Mahomes.
However, Washington’s defense was placed in a difficult position because Kansas City’s offense became more efficient as the game progressed.
A defense can create turnovers and still lose if the offense fails to capitalize on those opportunities.
Daron Payne Creates Pressure
Daron Payne recorded two sacks for Washington.
Those two sacks represented Washington’s strongest individual pass-rushing performance.
The Commanders finished with three sacks overall and seven quarterback hits. That suggests they were able to disrupt Mahomes at various points, even though they could not maintain that pressure consistently enough to stop Kansas City’s second-half offense.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the defensive statistics.
The Chiefs did not have a flawless passing performance. Mahomes threw two interceptions and was sacked three times. Yet the offense remained productive because the team could compensate through its rushing attack and multiple receiving options.
Kansas City Defensive Leaders
Chamarri Conner led the Chiefs with 10 total tackles and five solo tackles.
Kansas City also received one sack each from Mike Danna and George Karlaftis.
Danna had an especially productive defensive game because he also intercepted Mariota and returned the interception 10 yards.
Jack Cochrane recorded Kansas City’s other interception.
The Chiefs therefore finished with two interceptions, matching Washington’s total.
The important difference was that Kansas City’s defense shut Washington out during the entire second half.
Turnovers and the Hidden Story of the Game
Turnovers are often one of the easiest ways to understand why a game changed direction.
Both teams threw two interceptions.
That means the turnover count itself does not explain the 21-point margin.
Instead, the context around those turnovers matters.
Washington’s offense could not turn its opportunities into additional points. Kansas City, meanwhile, continued to generate offensive production despite Mahomes’ two interceptions.
The game was tied at 7-7 at halftime.
Kansas City then scored on three consecutive possessions in the second half, according to the scoring sequence, producing touchdowns by Kareem Hunt, Travis Kelce and Rashee Rice. (ESPN)
That sequence is more revealing than simply saying that the Chiefs scored 28 points.
It shows that Kansas City’s offense found answers after halftime while Washington’s offense did not.
Why the Second Half Decided the Game
The biggest statistical divide was the scoring pattern.
Kansas City scored:
- 7 points in the second quarter
- 14 points in the third quarter
- 7 points in the fourth quarter
Washington scored:
- 7 points in the second quarter
- 0 points in the third quarter
- 0 points in the fourth quarter
The game was therefore competitive for two quarters and one-sided for the final two.
This is important when evaluating player performances.
Mahomes’ overall statistics look strong, but his influence became more visible after halftime. Kelce’s touchdown came in the third quarter. Hunt scored again through the air in the third quarter. Rice finished the scoring in the fourth.
Washington, meanwhile, had no second-half touchdown and no second-half scoring points of any kind.
What the Receiving Numbers Tell Us
Kansas City completed 25 passes for 299 yards.
Washington completed 21 for 213 yards.
The Chiefs therefore produced 86 more passing yards despite only four more completions.
That difference came partly from yards per attempt.
Kansas City averaged 8.8 yards per attempt.
Washington averaged 7.1.
The Chiefs also had greater touchdown production through the passing game, with three passing touchdowns compared with Washington’s one.
Another important difference was target distribution.
Kelce received eight targets, Rice nine and Xavier Worthy seven. Kansas City therefore had several legitimate options capable of carrying the passing workload.
Washington’s receiving production was more concentrated around McNichols and McLaurin.
What the Rushing Numbers Tell Us
The rushing difference was even larger than the passing difference.
Kansas City:
- 30 attempts
- 148 yards
- 4.9 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
Washington:
- 20 attempts
- 60 yards
- 3.0 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
Kansas City ran the ball 10 more times and gained 88 more yards.
The Chiefs also averaged nearly two yards more per rushing attempt.
That balance helped Kansas City avoid becoming dependent on Mahomes for every offensive yard.
It also created a useful contrast with Washington, where Mariota was the team’s leading rusher despite being the quarterback.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams did not decide the game, but the numbers provide additional context.
Washington
Luke McCaffrey returned one kickoff for 37 yards.
Jaylin Lane returned two kickoffs for 30 yards and one punt for 14 yards.
Tress Way punted three times for 142 yards, averaging 47.3 yards per punt. His longest punt was 59 yards, and one punt finished inside the 20-yard line.
Matthew Wright converted his only extra-point attempt.
Kansas City
Nikko Remigio returned two kickoffs for 46 yards, averaging 23.0 yards per return, with a long of 30 yards.
He also returned two punts for 13 yards.
Matt Araiza punted once for 56 yards.
Harrison Butker converted all four of his extra-point attempts.
The extra-point numbers match the touchdown totals. Kansas City scored four touchdowns and converted all four extra points. Washington scored one touchdown and converted its only extra point.
The Most Important Player Matchups
Patrick Mahomes vs. Washington’s Pass Rush
Washington recorded three sacks as a team, including two from Daron Payne.
Mahomes still finished with 299 passing yards and three passing touchdowns.
That suggests Washington could create pressure but struggled to turn pressure into sustained defensive control.
Travis Kelce vs. Washington’s Coverage
Kelce’s six catches for 99 yards and one touchdown made him one of the most important offensive players.
His 38-yard reception also provided a major chunk of explosive yardage.
Washington’s defense had to account for Kelce while also handling Rice and Worthy, which made it difficult to eliminate every passing option.
Kansas City Running Game vs. Washington Front
Pacheco averaged 4.8 yards per carry, Hunt averaged 4.4 and Mahomes averaged 7.5 on his four rushing attempts.
Kansas City’s entire rushing unit averaged 4.9 yards per carry.
Washington could not consistently stop the run, and that made Kansas City’s offense harder to predict.
Marcus Mariota vs. Kansas City Secondary
Mariota completed 21 passes, but his two interceptions limited Washington’s ability to sustain scoring opportunities.
Kansas City recorded two interceptions overall, with Mike Danna and Jack Cochrane each producing one.
The Chiefs therefore succeeded in limiting the damage despite allowing Washington to complete 21 passes.
Three Biggest Statistical Takeaways
1. Kansas City’s offensive balance was decisive
The Chiefs did not simply win through Mahomes’ arm.
They combined 299 passing yards with 148 rushing yards.
That gave Kansas City 447 gross offensive yards from the supplied passing and rushing figures before accounting for sack yardage.
The balance allowed the Chiefs to continue moving the ball even when one part of the offense was not perfect.
2. Washington could not sustain scoring after halftime
The Commanders scored seven points in the second quarter and then went scoreless.
That was the central offensive problem.
Mariota’s 213 passing yards were respectable, and Washington had several players contribute through the air, but the offense could not finish enough drives.
3. Kansas City’s stars produced in the second half
Mahomes, Kelce, Hunt and Rice all played important roles in the second-half scoring surge.
Kelce caught a touchdown.
Hunt produced both a rushing and receiving touchdown.
Rice caught the final touchdown.
Mahomes threw three touchdown passes.
The result was an offense that became more dangerous as the game went on.
Player Stat Leaders at a Glance
| Category | Washington | Kansas City |
| Passing leader | Marcus Mariota, 213 yards | Patrick Mahomes, 299 yards |
| Passing TDs | Mariota, 1 | Mahomes, 3 |
| Rushing leader | Marcus Mariota, 28 yards | Isiah Pacheco, 58 yards |
| Receiving leader | Jeremy McNichols, 64 yards | Travis Kelce, 99 yards |
| Receiving TD leader | Terry McLaurin, 1 | Kelce, Rice and Hunt, 1 each |
| Tackles leader | Quan Martin, 14 | Chamarri Conner, 10 |
| Sacks leader | Daron Payne, 2 | Mike Danna and George Karlaftis, 1 each |
| Interceptions | Bobby Wagner, Marshon Lattimore | Mike Danna, Jack Cochrane |
What This Game Reveals About Both Teams
The statistics point to two very different offensive profiles.
Washington showed that it could move the football in stretches. Mariota completed 21 passes, McNichols gained 64 receiving yards and McLaurin averaged 18.0 yards per catch.
The problem was consistency.
The Commanders scored once and failed to sustain that production.
Kansas City showed a different level of offensive depth.
Mahomes threw three touchdown passes to three different players. Kelce nearly reached 100 receiving yards. Rice caught nine passes for 93 yards. Pacheco supplied 58 rushing yards, while Hunt contributed two touchdowns.
That variety made Kansas City difficult to contain.
Why the Final Score Can Be Misleading
A 28-7 result might suggest a completely one-sided game from the opening whistle.
It was not.
The first half ended 7-7.
Both teams had defensive opportunities, and both quarterbacks threw two interceptions. Washington also recorded three sacks.
The separation happened later.
Kansas City found a way to string together scoring drives while Washington’s offense stopped producing points.
That is why the most useful way to study this game is not simply to look at the final score. The quarter-by-quarter scoring, rushing efficiency, passing production and touchdown distribution provide a much clearer picture.
A Practical Way to Read NFL Player Stats
For readers using this type of box score to evaluate players, there is a useful order to follow.
First, check the final score and quarter breakdown.
Second, compare quarterback efficiency.
Third, compare rushing volume and yards per attempt.
Fourth, identify the receiving leaders and touchdown scorers.
Fifth, examine turnovers and sacks.
Finally, look at defensive involvement and special teams.
This approach prevents one eye-catching statistic from dominating the entire analysis.
For example, Mariota’s 21 completions might look encouraging by themselves. But once his two interceptions, one touchdown and Washington’s zero second-half points are considered, the overall picture becomes much clearer.
Likewise, Mahomes’ two interceptions should not be viewed in isolation. His three touchdown passes, 299 yards and Kansas City’s 28 points show that the offense recovered from those mistakes.
kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats: Complete Statistical Perspective
The full statistical picture favors Kansas City in almost every major offensive category.
The Chiefs produced 148 rushing yards compared with Washington’s 60.
They generated 299 passing yards compared with 213.
They scored four touchdowns compared with one.
They averaged 4.9 yards per rushing attempt compared with Washington’s 3.0.
Their quarterback produced three touchdown passes compared with one.
The defensive turnover totals were equal, but Kansas City’s offense made much more of its opportunities.
That combination explains why the game was tied at halftime but ended with a 21-point margin.
The most important lesson is that Kansas City did not win because of one isolated superstar performance. Mahomes was excellent, Kelce was highly productive, Rice provided volume, Hunt scored twice and Pacheco helped maintain the running game.
Washington had individual contributors as well, particularly McNichols, McLaurin, Martin and Payne. But the Commanders could not combine those individual performances into enough sustained team production.
Final Assessment
The kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats provide a strong example of how an NFL game can change without a dramatic turnover advantage.
Kansas City and Washington entered halftime tied 7-7. Both teams had already experienced quarterback interceptions, and neither offense had found consistent scoring rhythm.
The third quarter changed everything.
Kansas City scored twice in the third quarter, then added another touchdown in the fourth. Mahomes finished with 299 yards and three touchdown passes. Kelce delivered 99 receiving yards and a touchdown, while Rice added nine receptions, 93 yards and a touchdown. Hunt scored once on the ground and once through the air. Pacheco contributed 58 rushing yards.
Washington’s numbers were more uneven. Mariota passed for 213 yards, McNichols led the team with 64 receiving yards, McLaurin caught the team’s only touchdown and Martin recorded 14 tackles. Payne generated two sacks.
Those individual contributions were not enough to keep Washington competitive after halftime.
The final statistical picture is therefore straightforward. Kansas City combined passing efficiency, a productive running game, multiple receiving threats and second-half defensive control. Washington moved the ball at times but failed to convert enough opportunities into points.
The kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats ultimately tell the story of a 7-7 game that became a 28-7 Kansas City victory because one team solved its offensive problems after halftime while the other could not generate another scoring drive.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Chiefs in passing against Washington?
Patrick Mahomes led Kansas City with 25 completions on 34 attempts for 299 yards and three touchdown passes.
Who was the Chiefs’ leading rusher?
Isiah Pacheco led Kansas City with 12 carries for 58 yards, averaging 4.8 yards per carry.
Who led Kansas City in receiving?
Travis Kelce led the Chiefs with six receptions for 99 yards and one touchdown. His longest reception covered 38 yards.
Who led Washington in receiving?
Jeremy McNichols led Washington with five receptions for 64 yards. Terry McLaurin led the Commanders in receiving touchdowns with one.
How many interceptions did each quarterback throw?
Both Marcus Mariota and Patrick Mahomes threw two interceptions.
What was the final score?
Kansas City defeated Washington 28-7. Washington scored its only points in the second quarter, while Kansas City scored 21 unanswered points after halftime. The official ESPN box score provides the complete player statistics.
Conclusion
The kansas city chiefs vs washington commanders match player stats show that the decisive factor was not one isolated number. Kansas City built its victory through a combination of quarterback production, rushing efficiency, receiving depth and second-half execution.
Mahomes’ 299 passing yards and three touchdowns gave the Chiefs the passing advantage. Pacheco and the Kansas City rushing unit added 148 yards, while Kelce, Rice and Hunt supplied the major receiving and scoring contributions.
Washington’s offense had useful individual performances, but its production disappeared after halftime. Mariota’s 213 passing yards, McNichols’ 64 receiving yards and McLaurin’s touchdown could not overcome the lack of second-half scoring.
Defensively, both teams recorded two interceptions, but Kansas City ultimately limited Washington to seven points while continuing to generate offensive touchdowns.
The game therefore stands as a clear example of why player statistics are most useful when they are examined together. Passing numbers explain one part of the contest, rushing numbers explain another, and the quarter-by-quarter scoring shows when the game actually changed.
For anyone studying this matchup, the central statistical takeaway is simple: Kansas City turned a 7-7 halftime game into a 28-7 victory by combining balance and execution after the break.
