Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats

The Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls match player stats from October 27, 2025, tell the story of a close game that turned on Chicago’s third-quarter surge, superior rebounding, and several high-impact all-around performances. The Chicago Bulls defeated the Atlanta Hawks 128-123 at United Center in Chicago, overcoming an eight-point halftime deficit and taking a 3-0 record at the time. (ESPN)

This was not simply a game decided by the highest scorer. Atlanta received 27 points from Kristaps Porzingis, 25 from Jalen Johnson, and 21 points plus 17 assists from Trae Young. Chicago answered with 21 points from Ayo Dosunmu, 18 points and 13 rebounds from Josh Giddey, and a remarkable 17-point, 17-rebound, 9-assist performance from Nikola Vucevic. (ESPN)

The five-point final margin also hides how much the game changed from quarter to quarter. Atlanta led 35-27 after the opening period and remained ahead 58-57 at halftime. Chicago then exploded for 41 points in the third quarter while holding Atlanta to 34, creating the separation that ultimately decided the contest. (ESPN)

Table of Contents

Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place on Monday, October 27, 2025, at the United Center. The official attendance was 18,094, and the game lasted 2 hours and 13 minutes. The officiating crew consisted of Jacyn Goble, Justin Van Duyne, and Robert Hussey. (NBA Stats)

Game Detail	Result
Teams	Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls
Date	October 27, 2025
Venue	United Center, Chicago
Final Score	Chicago Bulls 128, Atlanta Hawks 123
Attendance	18,094
Atlanta Record After Game	1-3
Chicago Record After Game	3-0
Halftime Score	Atlanta 58, Chicago 57
Third Quarter	Atlanta 34, Chicago 41
Fourth Quarter	Atlanta 31, Chicago 30
Game ID	401809970

The official NBA record confirms the 128-123 result and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern. (NBA.com)

official NBA box score

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The most useful way to understand this game is to follow its momentum rather than look only at the final score.

First Quarter: Atlanta Establishes Control

Atlanta opened the game with 35 points while Chicago scored 27. The Hawks shot efficiently enough to establish an early advantage, with Kristaps Porzingis immediately providing scoring inside and from the perimeter.

Porzingis eventually finished with 27 points on 11-of-17 shooting. His 3-of-6 performance from three-point range made him particularly difficult for Chicago to handle because he could contribute without relying entirely on post scoring.

Jalen Johnson also made an early impact. He finished with 25 points on 11-of-18 shooting and added six rebounds, three assists, and three steals. (ESPN)

Chicago’s offense was productive but not yet controlling the game. The Bulls were forced to respond to Atlanta’s combination of transition opportunities, interior scoring, and perimeter shooting.

Second Quarter: Chicago Starts Closing the Gap

The second quarter went 30-23 in Chicago’s favor.

That reduced Atlanta’s advantage from eight points after the first quarter to just one point at halftime. The Hawks entered halftime ahead 58-57, but the direction of the game was changing.

Trae Young was already creating a major offensive advantage through playmaking. He finished with 21 points and 17 assists, while shooting 7-of-22 from the field and 1-of-10 from three-point range.

The shooting numbers are important because they demonstrate that Young’s primary influence was not simply scoring. His 17 assists represented a massive portion of Atlanta’s offensive creation. (ESPN)

Third Quarter: The Turning Point

The third quarter was the decisive stretch.

Chicago scored 41 points compared with Atlanta’s 34. That seven-point swing transformed a one-point halftime deficit into a six-point Bulls advantage entering the final period.

The Bulls did not need one player to dominate every possession. Instead, they combined contributions from multiple positions.

Nikola Vucevic continued to control the glass while Josh Giddey contributed scoring, rebounding, and passing. Ayo Dosunmu provided efficient offensive production from the bench.

The result was a balanced attack that placed more pressure on Atlanta’s defense.

Fourth Quarter: Atlanta Fights Back

Atlanta scored 31 points in the final quarter and did not allow Chicago to pull away completely.

The Hawks continued to receive production from Jalen Johnson, Porzingis, Young, and Nickeil Alexander-Walker. Alexander-Walker finished with 17 points and hit four three-pointers.

With less than a minute remaining, Alexander-Walker made a three-pointer that cut Chicago’s lead to three points. However, the Bulls responded with Josh Giddey’s three-pointer and Tre Jones’ late free throws, preserving the victory. NBA’s play-by-play shows those late possessions as critical moments in the closing sequence. (NBA.com)

Atlanta Hawks Player Stats

Atlanta produced 123 points on 49-of-98 shooting, exactly 50 percent from the field. The Hawks made 11 of 32 three-point attempts and 14 of 20 free throws. (ESPN)

They also committed only six turnovers, which is a significant positive considering they were playing on the road.

Kristaps Porzingis

Porzingis was Atlanta’s leading scorer with 27 points.

His complete line was:

27 points
11-of-17 field goals
3-of-6 three-pointers
2-of-2 free throws
2 rebounds
2 assists
1 turnover
1 block

His 64.7 percent field-goal shooting was one of Atlanta’s most efficient individual performances. (NBA.com)

The key takeaway is that Porzingis generated high-value scoring efficiently. His three-point shooting also forced Chicago’s defense to account for him away from the basket.

Jalen Johnson

Johnson recorded:

25 points
6 rebounds
3 assists
3 steals
11-of-18 shooting
3-of-3 free throws

His 11 made field goals were tied with Porzingis for the Atlanta team high. (ESPN)

Johnson’s three steals were especially useful because Atlanta did not generate many defensive events elsewhere. His all-around production helped keep the Hawks competitive throughout the game.

Trae Young

Young’s stat line was one of the most unusual of the contest:

21 points
3 rebounds
17 assists
7-of-22 field goals
1-of-10 three-pointers
6-of-7 free throws

His 17 assists were the most of any player in the game. (ESPN)

The contrast between scoring efficiency and playmaking is important. Young struggled from the field, especially from long range, but his passing remained highly effective.

Atlanta therefore received strong offensive creation from its lead guard even though his own shooting percentage was modest.

Onyeka Okongwu

Okongwu supplied one of Atlanta’s best interior performances from the bench:

18 points
10 rebounds
2 assists
1 steal
1 block
8-of-11 field goals

He was Atlanta’s leading rebounder and recorded a double-double. (NBA Stats)

His 10 rebounds were particularly valuable because Atlanta finished with only 36 total rebounds compared with Chicago’s 51.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker

Alexander-Walker scored 17 points while shooting 6-of-11 from the field and 4-of-6 from three-point range.

He also added three rebounds, three assists, and one steal. His four made three-pointers tied for the highest total on either team. (ESPN)

His late three-pointer briefly gave Atlanta another opportunity to steal the game.

Dyson Daniels

Daniels finished with:

2 points
7 rebounds
2 assists
3 steals
1 turnover

His offensive contribution was limited, but his seven rebounds and three steals added value in other areas.

The three steals were tied with Johnson for Atlanta’s team high.

Other Atlanta Contributors

Luke Kennard scored seven points and added three rebounds and two assists.

Mouhamed Gueye scored four points.

Keaton Wallace did not score but contributed two rebounds and one assist.

Zaccharie Risacher finished with two points and no rebounds or assists in 20 minutes. (ESPN)

Chicago Bulls Player Stats

Chicago scored 128 points on 48-of-92 shooting, good for 52 percent from the field.

The Bulls made 16 of 43 three-point attempts and 16 of 21 free throws. They also dominated the rebounding battle 51-36. (ESPN)

That 15-rebound advantage is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the victory.

Ayo Dosunmu

Dosunmu led Chicago with 21 points.

His line included:

21 points
7-of-10 field goals
4-of-6 three-pointers
3-of-4 free throws
3 rebounds
2 assists

His 70 percent shooting from the field and four made threes made him one of Chicago’s most efficient scorers. (ESPN)

The fact that the Bulls received 21 points from a reserve was important because it gave their offense additional scoring beyond the starting lineup.

Nikola Vucevic

Vucevic delivered one of the game’s most complete stat lines:

17 points
17 rebounds
9 assists
2 steals
7-of-11 field goals
1-of-4 three-pointers
2-of-2 free throws

His 17 rebounds were the game high. His nine assists were also tied for the Chicago team high. (ESPN)

This performance shows why box-score analysis should go beyond points. Vucevic did not lead the Bulls in scoring, but he affected the game through rebounding and passing while still scoring efficiently.

Josh Giddey

Giddey produced:

18 points
13 rebounds
5 assists
1 steal
1 block
7-of-14 field goals
2-of-5 three-pointers

His 13 rebounds were second only to Vucevic’s 17 among Chicago players. (ESPN)

Giddey also delivered one of the game’s most important late shots. With 1:05 remaining, he made a three-pointer that put Chicago ahead 126-120. (NBA.com)

Tre Jones

Jones finished with:

14 points
7 rebounds
9 assists
2 steals
1 block
5-of-10 field goals

His nine assists matched Vucevic for the team lead. (ESPN)

He also made two free throws with eight seconds remaining to give Chicago a 128-123 lead.

That late sequence illustrates his value as a secondary creator and ball-handler.

Matas Buzelis

Buzelis recorded:

16 points
5 rebounds
3 assists
2-of-7 three-point shooting
6-of-14 field goals

He helped Chicago maintain scoring depth throughout the game. (ESPN)

Isaac Okoro

Okoro finished with 10 points, one assist, and four made field goals on eight attempts.

Although his scoring total was relatively modest, he provided another starting option within a balanced Chicago lineup.

Chicago Bench Production

Chicago’s bench supplied meaningful scoring:

Ayo Dosunmu: 21 points
Kevin Huerter: 15 points
Patrick Williams: 12 points
Julian Phillips: 5 points
Jalen Smith: 0 points

Huerter shot 6-of-8 from the field and made one of three three-point attempts. Williams added three rebounds and two assists. (ESPN)

This bench contribution helped Chicago avoid depending exclusively on its starting five.

Team Comparison

Category	Atlanta Hawks	Chicago Bulls
Points	123	128
Field Goals	49-98	48-92
FG Percentage	50%	52%
Three-Pointers	11-32	16-43
3PT Percentage	34%	37%
Free Throws	14-20	16-21
FT Percentage	70%	76%
Rebounds	36	51
Offensive Rebounds	8	12
Defensive Rebounds	28	39
Assists	32	33
Turnovers	6	14
Steals	8	5
Blocks	1	4
Personal Fouls	17	20

The comparison reveals an interesting statistical contradiction.

Atlanta protected the basketball much better, committing only six turnovers compared with Chicago’s 14. The Hawks also recorded more steals.

Yet Chicago controlled the glass and shot slightly better from both the field and three-point range. (ESPN)

That combination helped the Bulls compensate for their turnover disadvantage.

The Rebounding Battle Was Crucial

The biggest numerical gap in the box score is the rebounding margin.

Chicago collected 51 rebounds.

Atlanta collected 36.

That is a difference of 15 rebounds.

The Bulls also had a 12-8 advantage in offensive rebounds. That gave Chicago additional possessions and opportunities to turn missed shots into second-chance points. (ESPN)

Vucevic and Giddey were central to this advantage.

Vucevic grabbed 17 rebounds while Giddey added 13. Together, they accounted for 30 of Chicago’s 51 rebounds.

Atlanta’s best rebounder was Okongwu with 10.

That means two Chicago players combined for three times as many rebounds as Atlanta’s leading rebounder.

For anyone studying the game beyond the final score, this is one of the clearest indicators of how Chicago controlled important possessions.

Shooting Efficiency vs Possession Control

The game provides a useful example of why one statistical category rarely explains an NBA result by itself.

Atlanta actually shot 50 percent from the field.

That is a strong percentage.

Chicago shot 52 percent.

The difference was not enormous.

From three-point range, Chicago made 16 of 43 attempts, while Atlanta made 11 of 32. The Bulls therefore made five more three-pointers. (ESPN)

At the same time, Atlanta had a huge advantage in turnovers.

The Hawks committed only six turnovers.

Chicago committed 14.

That eight-turnover difference gave Atlanta additional possession value, but Chicago’s rebounding advantage helped offset it.

The final result came from the interaction of these factors rather than from one overwhelming statistical advantage.

Trae Young’s 17 Assists Deserve Special Attention

Young’s 17 assists were arguably the most distinctive individual statistic in the game.

He finished with 21 points and 17 assists, meaning he directly created a large number of scoring opportunities even while shooting 7-of-22.

His 17 assists also exceeded the combined total of several Chicago players.

However, the game demonstrates an important distinction between individual playmaking production and team success.

Young’s passing helped Atlanta generate 123 points, but Chicago’s ability to win rebounds and shoot slightly more efficiently allowed the Bulls to score 128.

This does not reduce the value of Young’s performance. Instead, it shows why player analysis should examine multiple categories simultaneously.

Nikola Vucevic’s All-Around Impact

Vucevic’s 17 points might look ordinary compared with Porzingis’ 27 or Young’s 21.

His full stat line tells a different story.

He recorded 17 rebounds and nine assists while shooting 7-of-11 from the field.

That means he contributed directly in three major offensive and possession areas:

Scoring
Rebounding
Playmaking

He also recorded two steals.

His nine assists tied Tre Jones for Chicago’s team lead. (ESPN)

The result was a center performance that influenced the game without requiring a high-volume scoring role.

Why Atlanta’s Six Turnovers Mattered

One of the strongest parts of Atlanta’s performance was ball security.

The Hawks committed only six turnovers.

Chicago committed 14.

In a five-point game, that difference is significant.

Atlanta also finished with 32 assists, only one fewer than Chicago’s 33. This suggests that the Hawks were moving the ball effectively and generating offense through collective creation.

The problem was that those advantages were not enough to overcome Chicago’s rebounding and shooting edge.

This is an important lesson when reading box scores: a team can win the turnover battle and still lose if another possession category creates a larger disadvantage.

Why Chicago’s Third Quarter Changed the Game

The Bulls entered halftime trailing 58-57.

They then scored 41 points in the third quarter.

Atlanta scored 34.

That seven-point swing was enough to move Chicago from one point behind to six points ahead entering the fourth.

Chicago’s third-quarter performance combined scoring from multiple players rather than relying on a single scorer.

Giddey, Vucevic, Buzelis, Jones, and others all contributed to the offensive response.

The game remained close because Atlanta scored 31 points in the fourth, but the Bulls had already created enough separation to protect the lead.

Atlanta’s Biggest Positive Takeaways

Even though Atlanta lost, the box score contains several encouraging individual performances.

Efficient Porzingis scoring

Porzingis made 11 of 17 field-goal attempts and 3 of 6 threes.

Strong Johnson production

Johnson contributed 25 points, six rebounds, three assists, and three steals.

Elite Young playmaking

Young produced 17 assists.

Okongwu’s double-double

Okongwu recorded 18 points and 10 rebounds.

Excellent ball security

Atlanta committed only six turnovers.

These numbers explain why the Hawks remained within striking distance until the final possessions.

Chicago’s Biggest Statistical Strengths

Chicago’s performance was built around balance.

Rebounding

The Bulls won the rebounding battle 51-36.

Three-point production

Chicago made 16 threes compared with Atlanta’s 11.

Efficient shooting

The Bulls shot 52 percent overall.

Multiple playmakers

Vucevic and Jones each recorded nine assists.

Strong contributions from the bench

Dosunmu scored 21 points while Huerter added 15 and Williams added 12.

The combination created a team performance that did not require one player to carry the entire scoring load.

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Show

Plus-minus can be useful, but it should not be treated as a complete player evaluation.

For Atlanta, Jalen Johnson finished at -14 and Dyson Daniels at -15. Porzingis was at -8, while Okongwu finished at +4.

For Chicago, Vucevic was +11 and Dosunmu was +12. Huerter was +8.

These figures reflect the team’s scoring margin while each player was on the court. They do not isolate individual performance from teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, or game context.

Therefore, plus-minus is most useful when combined with traditional statistics rather than used alone.

A Closer Look at the Final Minute

The closing sequence shows how narrow the margin was.

With 1:23 remaining, Johnson scored to bring Atlanta within striking distance.

Giddey then made a three-pointer with 1:05 left, putting Chicago ahead 126-120.

At 58 seconds, Alexander-Walker answered with a three-pointer, cutting the margin to three.

Atlanta had another opportunity, but the Bulls defended the final possessions effectively. Tre Jones made two free throws with eight seconds remaining to make the score 128-123. (NBA.com)

The Hawks could not convert their final attempt, and Chicago secured the five-point victory.

This sequence matters because the final score does not accurately represent how competitive the game remained in the closing minute.

What These Player Stats Tell Us

The deeper lesson from the game is that team success came from different forms of production.

Atlanta had:

More ball security
More steals
32 assists
Strong scoring from Porzingis and Johnson
17 assists from Young

Chicago had:

More rebounds
More offensive rebounds
More three-pointers
Better overall shooting
Strong contributions across starters and reserves

The Bulls therefore created a statistical profile capable of surviving their turnover problem.

The Hawks, meanwhile, generated enough offensive efficiency to score 123 points but did not control enough extra possessions to finish ahead.

How to Read This Box Score More Effectively

Readers searching for player statistics often focus only on points.

That can miss the actual story.

A better approach is to examine the game in five layers:

1. Scoring

Look at points and field-goal efficiency.

2. Creation

Review assists and turnovers together.

3. Possessions

Study total rebounds and offensive rebounds.

4. Defensive activity

Look at steals and blocks.

5. Context

Check when the production occurred.

In this matchup, this method immediately highlights the contrast between Young’s 17 assists, Vucevic’s 17 rebounds, and Chicago’s 41-point third quarter.

Player Stat Leaders

Atlanta Hawks

Points: Kristaps Porzingis, 27

Rebounds: Onyeka Okongwu, 10

Assists: Trae Young, 17

Steals: Jalen Johnson and Dyson Daniels, 3 each

Three-pointers: Nickeil Alexander-Walker, 4

Chicago Bulls

Points: Ayo Dosunmu, 21

Rebounds: Nikola Vucevic, 17

Assists: Nikola Vucevic and Tre Jones, 9 each

Steals: Nikola Vucevic and Tre Jones, 2 each

Three-pointers: Ayo Dosunmu, 4

These leaders are taken directly from the official game records. (ESPN)

Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats in Context

When evaluating the Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls match player stats, the most important point is that this was a balanced offensive game decided by possession quality.

Atlanta scored 123 points and shot 50 percent.

Chicago scored 128 and shot 52 percent.

The five-point difference therefore came from a relatively narrow efficiency gap combined with a much larger rebounding advantage.

The Bulls’ 51 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 36 created 15 additional rebounds in Chicago’s favor.

At the same time, Atlanta’s six turnovers compared with Chicago’s 14 showed that the Hawks were taking better care of the basketball.

That contrast is what makes this box score particularly useful for analysis. It demonstrates that possession value comes from multiple sources.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Hawks vs Bulls game?

Kristaps Porzingis led Atlanta with 27 points, while Ayo Dosunmu led Chicago with 21 points. (ESPN)

Who had the most rebounds?

Nikola Vucevic led all players with 17 rebounds. Josh Giddey followed with 13, while Atlanta’s Onyeka Okongwu had 10. (ESPN)

How many assists did Trae Young have?

Trae Young recorded 17 assists along with 21 points and three rebounds. (ESPN)

What was the final score?

The Chicago Bulls defeated the Atlanta Hawks 128-123 on October 27, 2025, at United Center. (NBA.com)

Which team shot better?

Chicago shot 52 percent from the field compared with Atlanta’s 50 percent. The Bulls also shot 37 percent from three-point range, compared with Atlanta’s 34 percent. (ESPN)

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Chicago won the rebounding battle 51-36, including a 12-8 advantage on the offensive glass. (ESPN)

Conclusion

The Atlanta Hawks vs Chicago Bulls match player stats from October 27, 2025, reveal a game that was much closer than the final five-point margin suggests.

Atlanta received outstanding individual production from Kristaps Porzingis, Jalen Johnson, Trae Young, and Onyeka Okongwu. Porzingis led the Hawks with 27 points, Johnson added 25, Young produced 17 assists, and Okongwu recorded a double-double.

Chicago answered with a broader statistical balance. Ayo Dosunmu scored 21 points, Nikola Vucevic produced 17 points, 17 rebounds, and nine assists, while Josh Giddey posted 18 points and 13 rebounds. Tre Jones also supplied nine assists.

The decisive statistical difference was rebounding. Chicago collected 51 boards compared with Atlanta’s 36, while also making five more three-pointers. Atlanta’s six turnovers were a major positive, but the Hawks could not fully compensate for Chicago’s possession advantage.

The third quarter ultimately separated the teams. Chicago scored 41 points to Atlanta’s 34, turning a one-point halftime deficit into a six-point lead. Atlanta pushed back in the fourth, but Chicago executed well enough in the final minute to secure the 128-123 victory.

For readers studying individual performances, the game is a strong reminder that points alone do not define impact. Young’s 17 assists, Vucevic’s 17 rebounds, Giddey’s 13 rebounds, and the teams’ contrasting turnover and rebounding numbers provide a much fuller picture of how the result developed.