cincinnati reds vs phillies match player stats

The cincinnati reds vs phillies match player stats from the July 8, 2026 meeting tell the story of a game that changed direction quickly and then got away from Philadelphia. The Cincinnati Reds defeated the Philadelphia Phillies 11-5 at Great American Ball Park, collecting 11 hits and five home runs while the Phillies finished with eight hits and two home runs. The game was decided by Cincinnati’s ability to turn a close contest into a multi-run advantage through a huge fourth inning and another four-run sixth.

The final score can look straightforward, but the individual numbers explain much more. Sal Stewart produced two home runs and three RBIs. Noelvi Marte drove in four runs, including a three-run double. JJ Bleday and Elly De La Cruz also homered, while Justin Crawford provided Philadelphia with two hits, an RBI, a triple and a stolen base. Kyle Schwarber and J.T. Realmuto supplied the Phillies’ two home runs.

One clarification is necessary before looking at the numbers. The supplied data labels the 11-5 contest as July 9, but the official MLB schedule and game record identify the 11-5 game as July 8, 2026. The July 9 game between these teams was a separate 1-0 Phillies victory. The correction matters for anyone using this article as a historical reference or connecting these statistics to a specific box score.

Table of Contents

Game overview

The matchup took place at Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati, Ohio, with an attendance of 33,089. The first pitch was at 7:11 p.m. Eastern, and the game lasted 3 hours and 10 minutes. The Phillies entered the game at 51-42, while the Reds were 42-49.

The final line was:

Team	Runs	Hits	Errors
Philadelphia Phillies	5	8	0
Cincinnati Reds	11	11	1

Philadelphia actually opened the scoring and held an early 2-0 advantage. Justin Crawford delivered an RBI triple in the second inning, then scored on a wild pitch. Cincinnati answered with two runs in the third before taking control with five runs in the fourth.

The Reds added four more runs in the sixth, creating an 11-4 advantage. Philadelphia’s final run came in the ninth when Schwarber hit a solo home run.

That scoring sequence is one of the most useful ways to understand the game. Cincinnati did not simply score consistently throughout nine innings. Instead, the Reds produced concentrated offensive bursts that changed the game’s leverage.

cincinnati reds vs phillies match player stats: batting leaders

The offensive numbers show a clear difference in how the two teams converted opportunities.

Philadelphia recorded eight hits and five runs. Cincinnati had only three more hits, but those 11 hits were paired with five home runs, seven walks and 11 RBIs.

The Reds also went 4-for-11 with runners in scoring position, compared with Philadelphia’s 1-for-6 mark. That difference helped explain why the hit totals were relatively close while the final score was not.

Sal Stewart’s two-home-run performance

Sal Stewart was one of the defining players of the game.

He finished 2-for-4 with:

2 runs
2 home runs
3 RBIs
1 walk

His first home run came in the third inning and tied the game at 2-2. His second homer arrived in the fourth inning during Cincinnati’s five-run outburst.

The timing of the two home runs was particularly important. The first erased Philadelphia’s early advantage. The second helped Cincinnati continue its offensive explosion after Noelvi Marte and Elly De La Cruz had already gone deep.

Stewart’s performance was not simply a matter of accumulating home runs. Both blasts arrived during innings when Cincinnati was changing the game’s direction.

The second homer was especially significant because Cincinnati hit four home runs in the fourth inning, tying the club record for most home runs in a single inning. Three of those home runs came consecutively from De La Cruz, Stewart and Bleday.

Noelvi Marte supplied four RBIs

Noelvi Marte provided Cincinnati’s biggest RBI total.

His final line was:

5 at-bats
2 hits
1 run
1 home run
4 RBIs
1 double
2 strikeouts

Marte opened the fourth inning with a solo home run that gave Cincinnati a 3-2 lead.

His most important contribution came later. In the sixth inning, Marte delivered a three-run double with the bases loaded. That hit pushed Cincinnati’s advantage from 8-4 to 11-4 and effectively ended Philadelphia’s realistic path back into the game.

Four RBIs from one player in an 11-run performance is significant, but the context makes the number even more useful. Marte contributed both a home run and a high-leverage extra-base hit, showing two different ways to produce runs.

JJ Bleday added power

JJ Bleday finished with two hits, including a home run, and drove in two runs.

His solo home run came in the fourth inning, immediately following Stewart’s second homer. That sequence gave Cincinnati three consecutive home runs and four home runs in the inning overall.

Bleday’s contribution illustrates how quickly Cincinnati’s lineup created pressure. Philadelphia’s pitching staff could not stop the home run sequence once the inning gained momentum.

Elly De La Cruz continued the home-run sequence

Elly De La Cruz also produced two hits, including a two-run home run, while drawing two walks.

His fourth-inning homer was particularly important because it came with a runner aboard. Instead of allowing Philadelphia to settle after Marte’s solo shot, Cincinnati immediately increased the lead.

The combination of De La Cruz, Stewart and Bleday created the consecutive-home-run sequence that became one of the defining moments of the game.

Spencer Steer and Edwin Arroyo added extra-base hits

Spencer Steer finished with two hits, including a double, while Edwin Arroyo contributed a triple.

Neither player produced the same RBI total as Marte or Stewart, but their extra-base hits added to the overall pressure on Philadelphia’s pitching.

This is worth noting because Cincinnati’s offensive performance was not built around one player. Five home runs came from four different players, while extra-base hits came from several other parts of the lineup.

Phillies offensive player stats

Philadelphia’s offense had several productive individual performances even though the team lost by six runs.

Justin Crawford was Philadelphia’s most complete offensive contributor

Justin Crawford finished 2-for-3 with:

1 run
1 RBI
1 walk
1 strikeout
1 stolen base
1 triple

His RBI triple in the second inning gave Philadelphia its first run. He later scored on a wild pitch to make it 2-0.

Crawford’s performance stood out because his production was not limited to hitting. He reached base, produced an extra-base hit and stole a base. His two hits were also important because Philadelphia’s offense managed only eight hits as a team.

J.T. Realmuto provided a home run

Realmuto went 1-for-3 with a solo home run, one RBI, one run and one walk.

His sixth-inning homer brought Philadelphia within 7-4. For a short period, it gave the Phillies an opportunity to reduce Cincinnati’s lead.

That opportunity disappeared in the bottom half of the inning when the Reds scored four times.

Realmuto’s home run was therefore productive, but its timing also highlights one of the central themes of the game: Philadelphia could create individual offensive moments, but Cincinnati repeatedly responded with larger scoring bursts.

Kyle Schwarber reached another milestone

Schwarber went 1-for-4 with a home run, one RBI, one run and one walk.

His ninth-inning home run was his 32nd of the season at that point. MLB’s game story noted that the homer moved him past Mike Schmidt’s 31 home runs in 1979 for the most by a Phillies player before the All-Star break.

The homer was significant historically, but it did not change the game’s result. Cincinnati already led 11-4, making the blast a late individual achievement rather than a turning point in the contest.

Bryce Harper reached base despite a hitless night

Harper went 0-for-3 but drew two walks and scored once.

This is an important reminder about reading a box score. A player can finish without a hit and still contribute to the offense by reaching base.

Harper’s two walks gave Philadelphia additional opportunities, but the Phillies were unable to convert enough of those opportunities. The team’s 1-for-6 performance with runners in scoring position was a major factor.

Brandon Marsh and Alec Bohm collected one hit each

Brandon Marsh went 1-for-4 with a walk, while Alec Bohm finished 1-for-4 with a walk.

Gabriel Rincones Jr. went 1-for-5 and scored once. He also produced a double that helped start Philadelphia’s early scoring sequence.

Edmundo Sosa added one hit in three at-bats.

The Phillies therefore had contributions spread across the lineup, but they lacked the sustained run production Cincinnati generated.

Pitching comparison

The pitching line is one of the most interesting parts of the game because neither starting pitcher produced a dominant statistical performance.

Chase Burns

Chase Burns earned the win and improved to 11-1.

His line:

5.0 innings
3 hits allowed
3 runs allowed
3 earned runs
6 walks
2 strikeouts
106 pitches

Burns did not overpower Philadelphia. His six walks were a season high, while his two strikeouts were a season low according to the Associated Press report carried by CBS Philadelphia.

Yet Burns still gave Cincinnati five innings and left with the team ahead.

That distinction matters when evaluating the performance. The winning pitcher does not necessarily have to deliver the best individual pitching line of the night. Burns’ main contribution was keeping the game manageable long enough for Cincinnati’s offense to take control.

Alan Rangel

Alan Rangel took the loss and finished 3.1 innings.

His line:

3.1 innings
3 hits allowed
3 runs allowed
3 earned runs
3 walks
5 strikeouts
2 home runs allowed

Rangel was making a pre-planned bullpen-game start for Philadelphia. MLB reported that he was recalled from Triple-A Lehigh Valley for the assignment.

The most difficult part of his outing was not simply the three runs charged to him. The Phillies needed length from their pitching plan, and the game moved to the bullpen in the fourth inning.

Tanner Banks absorbed the biggest single-inning damage

Banks recorded only one out while allowing four runs.

The fourth inning became the decisive pitching sequence. Cincinnati hit four home runs in the frame, with De La Cruz, Stewart and Bleday contributing three consecutive homers after Marte had already opened the inning with a solo shot.

That inning changed the game from a 2-2 contest into a 7-2 Cincinnati advantage.

José Alvarado’s sixth inning

Alvarado allowed four runs in the sixth inning and was charged with the damage that pushed Cincinnati’s lead to 11-4.

The Reds did not need another home run barrage in the sixth. Instead, they combined base runners and Marte’s three-run double to create a four-run inning.

This difference is useful when analyzing Cincinnati’s offense. The Reds were not dependent on home runs for every scoring opportunity.

Inning-by-inning breakdown

First inning: both teams scoreless

The game began without a run.

Burns struck out Schwarber in the top half, while Rangel worked through Cincinnati’s first inning.

Philadelphia’s offense was not yet threatening in a major way, and Cincinnati’s early walks did not immediately turn into runs.

Second inning: Philadelphia takes control

The Phillies scored twice in the second.

Rincones Jr. doubled, and Crawford followed with an RBI triple. Crawford then scored on a wild pitch.

Suddenly, Philadelphia had a 2-0 advantage.

At that point, the game looked very different from the final score.

Third inning: Cincinnati responds

Stewart’s two-run home run tied the game.

The home run brought De La Cruz home and erased Philadelphia’s early lead.

The Reds had now shifted the momentum without needing a long rally.

Fourth inning: the decisive offensive explosion

This was the game’s most important inning.

Marte hit a solo home run to make it 3-2.

De La Cruz then hit a two-run homer.

Stewart followed with his second home run.

Bleday completed the four-home-run inning with a solo shot.

Cincinnati scored five times in the inning and went from trailing 2-0 earlier in the game to leading 7-2.

MLB reported that the four home runs tied Cincinnati’s club record for home runs in one inning.

Fifth inning: Philadelphia cuts into the deficit

Philadelphia responded with a run in the fifth on Stott’s sacrifice fly.

The Phillies were now behind 7-3.

The run mattered because it kept the deficit from becoming even larger, but Cincinnati still had a four-run advantage.

Sixth inning: Philadelphia scores, then Cincinnati answers

Realmuto hit a solo home run in the top of the sixth, cutting the deficit to 7-4.

The Reds immediately answered.

Bleday produced an RBI single, and Marte followed with a three-run double.

Cincinnati scored four times and moved ahead 11-4.

That response was arguably the clearest illustration of the difference between the two offenses. Philadelphia needed several events to score its runs, while Cincinnati repeatedly produced high-impact extra-base hits.

Seventh and eighth innings: Cincinnati shuts the door

Neither team scored in the seventh or eighth.

The Reds entered the ninth with an 11-4 lead.

Ninth inning: Schwarber adds a final run

Schwarber hit his 32nd homer of the season to make the final score 11-5.

The Phillies could not generate a larger rally, and Cincinnati completed the win.

Why the hit totals do not tell the whole story

At first glance, the 11-8 hit advantage for Cincinnati does not look large enough to explain an 11-5 result.

That is exactly why the deeper statistics matter.

The Reds had:

11 hits
5 home runs
11 RBIs
7 walks
4-for-11 with runners in scoring position
7 runners left on base

The Phillies had:

8 hits
2 home runs
4 RBIs
8 walks
1-for-6 with runners in scoring position
10 runners left on base

The Phillies actually drew one more walk than Cincinnati. The difference was what happened after opportunities appeared.

Cincinnati converted 4 of 11 chances with runners in scoring position. Philadelphia converted only 1 of 6.

The Reds also produced more total bases because of their home runs and extra-base hits.

This is one of the most useful lessons from the game: a simple hit count can hide the quality and timing of offensive production.

Power hitting was the defining difference

Cincinnati hit five home runs.

Those came from:

Sal Stewart, 2
Noelvi Marte, 1
Elly De La Cruz, 1
JJ Bleday, 1

Philadelphia hit two:

J.T. Realmuto, 1
Kyle Schwarber, 1

The three-run difference in home runs did not directly equal the six-run final margin, but it created a major difference in scoring potential.

Cincinnati’s home runs also arrived at critical moments.

Stewart’s first homer tied the game.

Marte’s homer gave Cincinnati the lead.

De La Cruz’s homer expanded the advantage.

Stewart’s second homer kept the fourth-inning rally moving.

Bleday’s homer completed the four-homer inning.

This was not random power production. The home runs arrived in a sequence that repeatedly changed the scoreboard.

The importance of situational hitting

The Reds’ 4-for-11 performance with runners in scoring position deserves special attention.

Marte’s three-run double in the sixth was the clearest example.

With the bases loaded, a single hit produced three runs and effectively removed the Phillies from contention.

Philadelphia had fewer opportunities in this category and did not convert them at the same rate.

The Phillies went 1-for-6 with runners in scoring position, leaving 10 runners on base overall.

That combination helps explain why Philadelphia scored five runs despite eight hits and eight walks.

Defensive contributions

Cincinnati committed one error, while Philadelphia committed none.

The Reds also turned two double plays.

One of the notable defensive moments came from TJ Friedl in the third inning. He made a running, leaping catch that denied Bryson Stott an extra-base hit. The play helped prevent Philadelphia from building another scoring opportunity before Cincinnati’s offense took over.

This is an important part of a player-stat analysis because defensive value does not always appear in the main batting line.

A hitter can go 0-for-4 and still affect the game with a defensive play. Friedl’s catch was one such moment.

What the pitching statistics really show

The pitching numbers should not be interpreted simply as Burns good and Rangel bad.

Burns won, but his six walks created significant traffic. He allowed three runs and threw 106 pitches in only five innings.

Rangel struck out five batters in 3.1 innings, but he also allowed two home runs and could not provide the length Philadelphia needed from the opening pitcher in a bullpen game.

The larger pitching story was the difference in what happened after the starters exited.

Cincinnati’s bullpen allowed two runs over four innings after Burns departed.

Philadelphia’s relief group absorbed eight runs over 5.2 innings.

That is a substantial difference and one of the strongest statistical explanations for the final score.

A closer look at Philadelphia’s offensive efficiency

Philadelphia’s offense produced eight hits and eight walks, which means Cincinnati’s pitching staff allowed plenty of opportunities.

But the Phillies struggled to turn those opportunities into runs.

Ten runners were left on base.

The 1-for-6 RISP performance is especially revealing.

For example, Harper reached base twice through walks but did not record a hit. Crawford produced two hits and a triple, while Realmuto and Schwarber each homered.

The problem was not an absence of individual production.

The problem was the lack of enough productive events arriving together.

That is an important distinction when reviewing a box score.

A closer look at Cincinnati’s offensive efficiency

Cincinnati’s lineup created multiple forms of pressure.

The Reds:

Hit five home runs.
Produced three doubles.
Added a triple.
Drew seven walks.
Went 4-for-11 with runners in scoring position.
Scored in three separate innings.
Produced two innings of at least four runs.

The fourth inning was the clearest example of power.

The sixth inning showed a different approach, with walks and base runners eventually leading to Marte’s three-run double.

That variety made Cincinnati difficult to contain.

cincinnati reds vs phillies match player stats: the numbers worth remembering

For readers looking for the most important figures without reviewing every line of the box score, these are the standout statistics:

Player	Team	Key production
Sal Stewart	Reds	2 HR, 3 RBI, 2 R, 2 H
Noelvi Marte	Reds	2 H, 1 HR, 4 RBI, 1 2B
JJ Bleday	Reds	2 H, 1 HR, 2 RBI
Elly De La Cruz	Reds	2 H, 1 HR, 2 RBI
Spencer Steer	Reds	2 H, 1 2B
Edwin Arroyo	Reds	1 H, 1 3B
Justin Crawford	Phillies	2 H, 1 RBI, 1 3B, 1 SB
J.T. Realmuto	Phillies	1 H, 1 HR, 1 RBI
Kyle Schwarber	Phillies	1 H, 1 HR, 1 RBI
Bryce Harper	Phillies	2 BB, 1 R

These figures show why Cincinnati won despite Philadelphia receiving strong individual contributions from several players.

What this game says about player evaluation

A single game should not be treated as a complete assessment of a player.

That principle is especially important in baseball because outcomes can be heavily influenced by matchup, ballpark conditions, sequencing and a small number of high-leverage plays.

Stewart’s two-home-run performance was outstanding in this game, but it should be evaluated alongside his broader season record.

The same applies to Burns. A five-inning win with six walks is a very different pitching performance from a seven-inning, low-walk start, even though both could produce a victory.

For readers using player statistics for fantasy baseball, betting research, historical analysis or team evaluation, the best approach is to separate:

Single-game production
Season-long production
Recent form
Role and playing time
Opponent quality
Park effects
Underlying plate discipline
Pitching workload
Defensive contribution

The July 8 game is most useful as a case study in how those categories can interact.

Great American Ball Park and the power environment

Great American Ball Park has long been recognized as a hitter-friendly environment, particularly for home runs.

That context matters when analyzing a game in which nine total home runs were hit.

The Reds hit five of them, while Philadelphia hit two, and the game’s scoring was heavily influenced by the long ball.

However, the park alone does not explain the result.

Cincinnati still needed quality swings and favorable situations to produce five home runs. The fourth-inning sequence required four separate successful home-run events, and the sixth-inning rally required Marte to deliver a bases-loaded double.

The useful takeaway is to consider park context alongside player performance rather than treating either one as the complete explanation.

Series context

The 11-5 victory was part of a three-game series between Philadelphia and Cincinnati.

The Phillies won the overall series 2-1.

Philadelphia won the opening game 4-1 on July 7, Cincinnati won the middle game 11-5 on July 8, and Philadelphia won the July 9 finale 1-0.

This sequence makes the July 8 result particularly interesting.

The Reds lost the series, but they produced the largest offensive performance of the three games.

The next day, the Phillies responded with a completely different type of game, winning 1-0 behind Jesús Luzardo’s seven scoreless innings and 11 strikeouts.

That contrast is a useful reminder that baseball series can change dramatically from one game to the next.

Common mistakes when reading this box score

There are several easy ways to misunderstand the game.

Mistake 1: Assuming the game was July 9

The supplied data identifies July 9, but the official record shows the 11-5 game occurred July 8.

July 9 was the 1-0 Phillies win.

For accurate historical publishing, July 8 should be used for the 11-5 box score.

Mistake 2: Looking only at hits

Cincinnati had only three more hits than Philadelphia, but five of those hits were home runs.

Extra-base power significantly changed the scoring output.

Mistake 3: Treating Burns as dominant

Burns earned the win, but he walked six batters and struck out only two.

His performance was effective enough to support the win, but it was not a conventional dominant start.

Mistake 4: Ignoring Philadelphia’s baserunners

The Phillies had eight hits and eight walks.

They had opportunities.

Their main problem was converting those opportunities, particularly with runners in scoring position.

Mistake 5: Ignoring the bullpen

The starting pitching lines do not fully explain the 11-5 final score.

Cincinnati’s relief pitchers limited Philadelphia to two runs after Burns exited, while Philadelphia’s relievers gave up eight runs after Rangel departed.

That difference was central to the result.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Phillies vs Reds game on July 8, 2026?

The Cincinnati Reds defeated the Philadelphia Phillies 11-5 at Great American Ball Park.

Who was the winning pitcher?

Chase Burns earned the win for Cincinnati, improving to 11-1. He pitched five innings, allowed three earned runs, walked six and struck out two.

Who was the losing pitcher?

Alan Rangel took the loss for Philadelphia. He pitched 3.1 innings, allowing three earned runs on three hits with three walks and five strikeouts.

Who hit the most home runs?

Sal Stewart hit two home runs for Cincinnati. Noelvi Marte, Elly De La Cruz and JJ Bleday each added one home run.

Who led the game in RBIs?

Noelvi Marte led all players with four RBIs. He hit a solo home run and later delivered a three-run double.

How many hits did each team have?

Cincinnati recorded 11 hits, while Philadelphia recorded eight.

What was the biggest inning?

Cincinnati’s fourth inning was the game’s biggest. The Reds scored five runs and hit four home runs, tying the club record for home runs in one inning.

Was July 9 the date of the 11-5 game?

No. The 11-5 Reds victory was played on July 8, 2026. On July 9, Philadelphia defeated Cincinnati 1-0.

Conclusion

The cincinnati reds vs phillies match player stats from the 11-5 Cincinnati victory show how a baseball game can be decided by sequencing rather than simply by total hits.

Cincinnati recorded 11 hits against Philadelphia’s eight, but the larger difference came from power and situational production. The Reds hit five home runs, went 4-for-11 with runners in scoring position and produced five runs in the fourth inning followed by four more in the sixth.

Sal Stewart’s two-home-run performance was the headline contribution, while Noelvi Marte led the game with four RBIs. Elly De La Cruz and JJ Bleday added important home runs, and Spencer Steer and Edwin Arroyo contributed extra-base hits.

For Philadelphia, Justin Crawford provided a strong all-around offensive performance with two hits, a triple, an RBI and a stolen base. Realmuto and Schwarber each homered, with Schwarber’s ninth-inning blast also carrying historical significance because it gave him 32 home runs before the All-Star break.

The pitching numbers tell an equally nuanced story. Chase Burns earned the win despite six walks, while Alan Rangel produced five strikeouts in 3.1 innings but could not provide enough length. The decisive separation came after the starters left, when Cincinnati’s bullpen held Philadelphia to two runs while the Reds’ offense continued to score.

Most importantly, the date should be recorded correctly. The 11-5 game was July 8, 2026. The July 9 matchup was a separate 1-0 Phillies victory. Keeping that distinction clear makes the statistical record more useful for readers, researchers and baseball fans reviewing the series.