San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats from April 9, 2026, tell a clear story about how San Antonio controlled the game without needing an overwhelming three point shooting night. The Spurs defeated the Portland Trail Blazers 112-101 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, improving to 61-19 while Portland moved to 40-40. San Antonio also finished the game with advantages in field goal percentage, free throw efficiency, assists, steals, and blocks. For readers studying individual performances, the box score shows how De’Aaron Fox, Keldon Johnson, Carter Bryant, Harrison Barnes, Deni Avdija, Scoot Henderson, and Donovan Clingan shaped the result.
San Antonio Spurs vs Portland Trail Blazers Match Player Stats Overview
The April 9, 2026 matchup was the third meeting between these teams during the season, with San Antonio taking the season series 2-1.
San Antonio entered the game with a 61-19 record and a 31-7 home record. Portland came in at 40-40 overall and 18-23 on the road. Those records provide useful context, but the individual and team numbers from this specific game are more important when evaluating what actually happened on the court.
San Antonio won all four quarters:
| Quarter | Portland | San Antonio |
| 1st | 23 | 32 |
| 2nd | 28 | 29 |
| 3rd | 22 | 27 |
| 4th | 28 | 24 |
| Final | 101 | 112 |
The opening quarter created the biggest early separation. San Antonio scored 32 points while Portland managed 23. Portland recovered somewhat in the second and fourth quarters, but the Spurs maintained enough control through the middle of the game to protect their lead.
This is one of the first things worth noticing when examining a box score. A final 11-point margin does not necessarily mean the game was decided late. In this case, San Antonio’s strong first quarter gave the team an important foundation.
Final Score and Game Context
The final score was:
San Antonio Spurs 112, Portland Trail Blazers 101
The game was played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, with an attendance of 18,354.
The game time was listed as 6:30 AM on April 9, 2026. The listed officials were Brent Barnaky, Ben Taylor, and Sha’Rae Mitchell.
Portland’s starting lineup consisted of:
- Toumani Camara
- Deni Avdija
- Donovan Clingan
- Jrue Holiday
- Scoot Henderson
San Antonio started:
- Julian Champagnie
- Luke Kornet
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
- Dylan Harper
These lineups help explain where the major statistical contributions came from. Portland received its highest scoring output from Avdija and Henderson, while San Antonio’s scoring was led by Fox and supported by Johnson and Bryant.
Team Shooting Comparison
Shooting efficiency was one of the most important differences between the teams.
Portland finished:
- 42 of 93 from the field
- 12 of 37 from three point range
- 5 of 10 from the free throw line
- 45% from the field
- 32% from three point range
- 50% from the free throw line
San Antonio finished:
- 43 of 88 from the field
- 11 of 29 from three point range
- 15 of 19 from the free throw line
- 49% from the field
- 38% from three point range
- 79% from the free throw line
The field goal difference is especially useful.
Portland actually attempted five more field goals than San Antonio, but the Spurs made one more basket. San Antonio’s 49% shooting was four percentage points better than Portland’s 45%.
The free throw line created an even larger efficiency gap. Portland made only five free throws from 10 attempts, while San Antonio converted 15 of 19.
That means San Antonio scored 10 more points at the free throw line despite taking only nine more attempts. In a game decided by 11 points, that difference is significant.
How San Antonio Built Its 112 Points
San Antonio’s offense did not depend on one statistical category alone.
The Spurs combined:
- 43 made field goals
- 11 made three pointers
- 15 made free throws
- 28 assists
- 45 rebounds
The team shot 49% overall and 38% from three point range. The 28 assists also indicate that a substantial portion of the team’s offense involved successful passing leading to baskets.
De’Aaron Fox was particularly important as both a scorer and playmaker. He led San Antonio with 25 points and seven assists.
Keldon Johnson added 20 points, while Carter Bryant scored 17.
That gave San Antonio three players with at least 17 points, creating a more balanced scoring structure than Portland’s offense.
De’Aaron Fox Leads San Antonio
De’Aaron Fox was the leading scorer in the game for San Antonio with 25 points.
His seven assists were also a team high.
That combination makes Fox’s contribution particularly important when reading the box score. He was not simply responsible for putting points on the board. He also created opportunities for teammates.
A player’s scoring total can sometimes hide how involved he was in an offense. Fox’s 25 points and seven assists provide two different measures of offensive responsibility.
His performance also came in a game where San Antonio had 28 total assists. That means Fox accounted for a meaningful portion of the team’s recorded assists.
For a reader researching player statistics, this is one of the clearest examples of why points should not be viewed in isolation.
Keldon Johnson Adds 20 Points
Keldon Johnson finished with 20 points, making him San Antonio’s second leading scorer.
His offensive production was particularly useful because it gave Fox another high-scoring option.
Johnson also finished with a team-best plus/minus tie of +13, sharing that mark with Harrison Barnes.
Plus/minus should be interpreted carefully. It measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the floor and does not independently explain why that differential occurred. Still, Johnson’s +13 alongside his 20 points shows that San Antonio performed strongly during his minutes in this matchup.
Carter Bryant Provides 17 Points
Carter Bryant scored 17 points, giving the Spurs another important scoring contribution.
The three leading San Antonio scorers combined for 62 points:
25 from Fox, 20 from Johnson, and 17 from Bryant.
That represents more than half of San Antonio’s 112 points.
This distribution is important because it demonstrates that the Spurs did not rely exclusively on their top scorer. Fox led the game, but Johnson and Bryant helped keep the offense productive across multiple scoring options.
Harrison Barnes Makes an Impact Beyond Scoring
Harrison Barnes shared San Antonio’s best plus/minus figure at +13 with Keldon Johnson.
Barnes also recorded eight rebounds, tying Luke Kornet for the team lead.
These statistics highlight a useful principle when analyzing basketball box scores: scoring is only one part of a player’s contribution.
A player can influence a game through rebounding, passing, defensive activity, shooting efficiency, and possessions that do not appear fully in the traditional scoring column.
Barnes’ eight rebounds and +13 plus/minus make his overall game more interesting than simply looking for his point total.
Luke Kornet Leads San Antonio in Rebounding
Luke Kornet recorded eight rebounds, tying Harrison Barnes for the San Antonio team lead.
The Spurs collected 45 rebounds overall, compared with Portland’s 43.
That two-rebound advantage was not enormous, but it gave San Antonio a small edge on the glass.
Rebounding becomes especially relevant in a game where one team attempts fewer field goals. Portland attempted 93 shots compared with San Antonio’s 88. San Antonio therefore did not need to generate its advantage through sheer shot volume.
Its combination of shooting efficiency, free throws, assists, and rebounding helped produce the final result.
Portland’s Scoring Was Led by Deni Avdija
Deni Avdija was Portland’s leading scorer with 29 points.
His performance was the highest individual scoring total from either team.
Avdija’s 29 points were therefore a major part of Portland’s offensive output. He also recorded six assists, tying Toumani Camara and Jrue Holiday for the Portland team lead.
This creates an interesting contrast between individual and team results.
Portland had the game’s leading scorer, but San Antonio still won by 11 points. That demonstrates why one player’s scoring total does not automatically determine the outcome of a basketball game.
Avdija produced 29 points, yet San Antonio’s more balanced combination of scoring, shooting efficiency, and other statistical categories gave the Spurs the overall advantage.
Scoot Henderson Scores 20
Scoot Henderson finished with 20 points, making him Portland’s second leading scorer.
His scoring contribution gave Portland another player capable of producing significant offense alongside Avdija.
The two combined for 49 points.
Portland’s third leading scorer was Jrue Holiday with 13 points.
Together, Avdija, Henderson, and Holiday accounted for 62 of Portland’s 101 points.
Interestingly, that is exactly the same combined point total produced by San Antonio’s top three scorers: Fox, Johnson, and Bryant also combined for 62.
This comparison is useful because it shows that the difference in total scoring was not caused simply by the leading three scorers. Both teams received 62 points from their respective top three scorers.
The remaining production and efficiency therefore mattered considerably.
Donovan Clingan Controls the Boards for Portland
Donovan Clingan was Portland’s leading rebounder with 11 rebounds.
His 11 boards were the highest individual rebounding total listed for either team.
Portland finished with 43 rebounds overall, meaning Clingan was responsible for a substantial portion of the team’s work on the glass.
This was one of the strongest individual statistical areas for Portland.
The fact that Portland collected 43 rebounds compared with San Antonio’s 45 also shows that the Blazers were competitive in this category despite losing the game.
Portland’s Passing Contributions
Portland’s leading assist total was six.
Toumani Camara, Deni Avdija, and Jrue Holiday each recorded six assists.
That distribution indicates that Portland did not have one dominant assist leader in the way San Antonio did with Fox’s seven assists.
Instead, three Portland players shared the team lead.
Portland finished with 26 assists, compared with San Antonio’s 28.
The two-point difference in assists was relatively small. The larger separation came from shooting and free throw efficiency.
This distinction matters because a team can have a similar number of assists while producing different results due to shooting percentages, turnovers, free throws, or shot selection.
Complete Team Statistical Comparison
The overall numbers provide a useful snapshot of why San Antonio won.
| Category | Portland | San Antonio |
| Final Score | 101 | 112 |
| Field Goals | 42-93 | 43-88 |
| Field Goal % | 45% | 49% |
| Three Pointers | 12-37 | 11-29 |
| Three Point % | 32% | 38% |
| Free Throws | 5-10 | 15-19 |
| Free Throw % | 50% | 79% |
| Rebounds | 43 | 45 |
| Assists | 26 | 28 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 15 |
| Steals | 9 | 13 |
| Blocks | 5 | 6 |
Several differences stand out immediately.
San Antonio had:
- Better field goal percentage
- Better three point percentage
- Much better free throw percentage
- Two more rebounds
- Two more assists
- One fewer turnover
- Four more steals
- One more block
Portland had one notable advantage in the shooting-volume column: the Blazers attempted more field goals and made more three pointers.
However, additional attempts do not automatically translate into more points. San Antonio converted its opportunities at higher rates.
Turnovers and Possession Efficiency
Portland committed 16 turnovers, while San Antonio committed 15.
That is a relatively small one-turnover difference.
It suggests that turnovers alone do not explain the 11-point final margin.
The teams were also close in assists, with San Antonio holding a 28-26 advantage.
The more meaningful separation came from efficiency.
San Antonio shot 49% from the field compared with Portland’s 45%. The Spurs also shot 38% from three point range compared with 32% for Portland.
Most importantly, San Antonio converted 79% of its free throws, while Portland made only 50%.
These differences accumulated throughout the game.
San Antonio’s Defensive Activity
The Spurs recorded 13 steals and six blocks.
Portland recorded nine steals and five blocks.
The four-steal advantage is notable because steals can create transition opportunities and additional possessions.
San Antonio also finished with one more block.
Neither statistic should be treated as a complete measure of defense, but the box score clearly shows greater defensive activity from the Spurs in these two categories.
Combined with 15 Portland turnovers, those defensive plays helped San Antonio create opportunities without needing a huge advantage in offensive rebounding.
Why the First Quarter Mattered
San Antonio opened the game with a 32-23 first-quarter advantage.
That nine-point lead represented most of the eventual 11-point margin.
Portland did not collapse after the opening period. The Blazers actually scored 28 points in the second quarter, reducing the gap slightly as San Antonio scored 29.
The Spurs then won the third quarter 27-22.
By the fourth quarter, Portland outscored San Antonio 28-24, but the deficit was already established.
This quarter-by-quarter pattern is important for anyone trying to understand the game rather than simply record the final score.
San Antonio’s win was built largely through its early and middle-game control, while Portland’s strongest scoring response came later.
Reading the Box Score Beyond Points
A common mistake in player-stat analysis is focusing almost entirely on points.
This game offers several reasons to look deeper.
Deni Avdija scored 29 points, the highest total in the game. Yet San Antonio won.
Donovan Clingan recorded 11 rebounds, the highest individual rebounding total. Yet Portland lost.
De’Aaron Fox had 25 points and seven assists, giving him the strongest combination of scoring and playmaking among the listed leaders.
Harrison Barnes and Keldon Johnson each posted a +13 plus/minus.
Each statistic answers a different question:
- Points: Who scored?
- Rebounds: Who controlled missed shots?
- Assists: Who helped create made baskets?
- Steals: Who generated defensive takeaways?
- Blocks: Who disrupted shots?
- Turnovers: Which team lost possessions?
- Plus/minus: How did the team’s scoring margin look while a player was on the court?
- Shooting percentage: How efficiently did the team convert attempts?
A useful analysis considers all of them together.
Comparing the Leading Players
The individual leaders from both teams can be summarized clearly.
| Player | Team | Key Contribution |
| Deni Avdija | Portland | 29 points, 6 assists |
| Scoot Henderson | Portland | 20 points |
| Jrue Holiday | Portland | 13 points, 6 assists |
| Donovan Clingan | Portland | 11 rebounds |
| Toumani Camara | Portland | 6 assists |
| De’Aaron Fox | San Antonio | 25 points, 7 assists |
| Keldon Johnson | San Antonio | 20 points, +13 |
| Carter Bryant | San Antonio | 17 points |
| Luke Kornet | San Antonio | 8 rebounds |
| Harrison Barnes | San Antonio | 8 rebounds, +13 |
This table shows how different players influenced different areas of the game.
Avdija was the top scorer.
Clingan was the top individual rebounder.
Fox was San Antonio’s leading scorer and assist provider.
Barnes and Johnson shared the highest plus/minus mark for the Spurs.
That is a much more informative picture than simply saying San Antonio won 112-101.
The Importance of Free Throws
The free throw statistics deserve special attention.
Portland made 5 of 10 attempts.
San Antonio made 15 of 19.
The difference was:
San Antonio: 15 points
Portland: 5 points
That is a 10-point advantage at the line.
The final margin was 11 points.
This means the free throw difference alone accounted for nearly the entire final scoring gap.
That does not mean free throws were the only reason for the outcome. San Antonio also had advantages in field goal percentage, three point percentage, assists, steals, and blocks.
Still, the free throw numbers are arguably one of the clearest statistical separators in this particular box score.
Three Point Shooting Tells Another Story
Portland made 12 three pointers.
San Antonio made 11.
At first glance, that gives Portland a one-basket advantage from beyond the arc.
But Portland attempted 37 three pointers compared with San Antonio’s 29.
The resulting percentages were:
- Portland: 32%
- San Antonio: 38%
So Portland made one more three pointer despite taking eight additional attempts.
This is an important distinction between volume and efficiency.
A team can attempt more shots from a particular area while still being less efficient from that area.
San Antonio’s 38% three point shooting helped compensate for Portland’s additional three point attempts.
Field Goal Efficiency and Shot Volume
The same concept appears in overall field goals.
Portland attempted 93 shots and made 42.
San Antonio attempted 88 shots and made 43.
That means San Antonio made one more field goal while taking five fewer attempts.
The difference in field goal percentage was four percentage points.
This is why the basic final score does not tell the whole statistical story.
Portland generated more attempts, but San Antonio converted a higher percentage of its attempts.
The Spurs also benefited from more successful free throws, giving them another source of efficient scoring.
What the Season Records Add to the Analysis
The records entering the game were dramatically different.
Portland was 40-40, including an 18-23 road record.
San Antonio was 61-19, including a 31-7 home record.
Those numbers establish the broader season context, but they should not be used as a substitute for analyzing the actual game.
A team’s season record describes performance across many games. The box score describes one specific matchup.
For this April 9 contest, the game-specific numbers show that San Antonio’s victory was supported by superior shooting percentages, free throw conversion, defensive activity, and a small advantage in rebounds and assists.
What the Season Series Shows
The Spurs won the season series 2-1.
That means San Antonio won two of the three meetings between the teams during the season.
The season-series result provides additional context for readers comparing the franchises, but it does not change the individual statistics from this game.
For historical or statistical research, it is useful to keep those two levels separate:
Game level: San Antonio won 112-101 on April 9, 2026.
Season-series level: San Antonio finished the matchup series with a 2-1 advantage.
Keeping those facts separate makes statistical analysis easier to follow.
Practical Takeaways From the Player Statistics
There are several useful conclusions that can be drawn from this box score.
1. Portland had the highest individual scorer
Deni Avdija’s 29 points were the most by any player in the game.
2. San Antonio had a strong lead scorer and playmaker
De’Aaron Fox produced 25 points and seven assists.
3. Portland’s best rebounding performance came from Clingan
Donovan Clingan collected 11 rebounds.
4. San Antonio had more balanced scoring among its top three
Fox, Johnson, and Bryant combined for 62 points.
5. The free throw gap was substantial
San Antonio made 10 more free throws than Portland.
6. San Antonio shot more efficiently
The Spurs finished at 49% from the field compared with Portland’s 45%.
7. The Spurs were more active defensively
San Antonio recorded 13 steals and six blocks.
8. The game was not decided by turnovers alone
The teams were separated by only one turnover.
How to Analyze Similar NBA Box Scores
If you are researching player statistics for another NBA matchup, a simple process can produce a much clearer analysis.
Start with the final score, then examine the quarter breakdown.
Next, compare:
- Field goal attempts and makes
- Three point attempts and makes
- Free throw attempts and makes
- Rebounds
- Assists
- Turnovers
- Steals
- Blocks
- Individual scoring leaders
- Individual rebounding and assist leaders
- Plus/minus where available
After collecting these numbers, ask which categories created the largest difference.
This approach is better than simply listing the highest scorers because it explains how the result developed.
For the Spurs and Trail Blazers matchup, that process points toward shooting efficiency and free throw conversion as major areas of separation.
Why Individual Stats Need Team Context
Player statistics become more meaningful when placed beside team statistics.
Avdija’s 29 points were impressive within Portland’s box score, but Portland still scored only 101 points.
Clingan’s 11 rebounds show his impact on the glass, but the team finished with 43 total rebounds.
Fox’s 25 points and seven assists show his dual role as scorer and creator, while San Antonio finished with 28 assists overall.
This relationship between individual and team numbers is essential for accurate sports reporting.
A player does not operate independently of the team’s shooting, possessions, lineups, defensive actions, and overall strategy.
A Closer Look at the 11-Point Margin
The final margin was 11 points.
Breaking down the major statistical differences helps explain that margin.
San Antonio scored 112 points to Portland’s 101.
The Spurs had:
- One more made field goal
- Better overall field goal percentage
- One fewer made three pointer but a higher three point percentage
- Ten more made free throws
- Two more rebounds
- Two more assists
- One fewer turnover
- Four more steals
- One more block
The combined picture is consistent.
San Antonio did not dominate one single statistical category such as rebounding. Instead, it accumulated modest advantages across several areas while producing a major advantage at the free throw line.
That kind of multi-category efficiency can be enough to decide a close statistical matchup.
The Most Important Numbers at a Glance
For quick reference, these are the numbers most readers will want to remember from the April 9 game:
Final score: San Antonio 112, Portland 101
Top scorer: Deni Avdija, 29 points
San Antonio top scorer: De’Aaron Fox, 25 points
San Antonio assists leader: De’Aaron Fox, 7 assists
Portland rebounds leader: Donovan Clingan, 11 rebounds
San Antonio rebound leaders: Luke Kornet and Harrison Barnes, 8 each
San Antonio top plus/minus: Harrison Barnes and Keldon Johnson, +13
Field goal percentage: San Antonio 49%, Portland 45%
Three point percentage: San Antonio 38%, Portland 32%
Free throw percentage: San Antonio 79%, Portland 50%
Rebounds: San Antonio 45, Portland 43
Assists: San Antonio 28, Portland 26
Turnovers: San Antonio 15, Portland 16
Steals: San Antonio 13, Portland 9
Blocks: San Antonio 6, Portland 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Spurs in scoring against the Trail Blazers?
De’Aaron Fox led San Antonio with 25 points.
Who was Portland’s leading scorer?
Deni Avdija led Portland with 29 points, which was also the highest individual scoring total in the game.
Who had the most rebounds?
Donovan Clingan led all listed players with 11 rebounds for Portland. San Antonio’s leading rebounders were Luke Kornet and Harrison Barnes with eight each.
How many assists did De’Aaron Fox have?
De’Aaron Fox recorded seven assists, the highest assist total for San Antonio.
What was the final score?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Portland Trail Blazers 112-101 on April 9, 2026, at Frost Bank Center.
Which team shot better?
San Antonio shot better in all three listed shooting percentage categories. The Spurs shot 49% from the field, 38% from three point range, and 79% from the free throw line. Portland shot 45%, 32%, and 50%, respectively.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs portland trail blazers match player stats from April 9, 2026, show a game in which San Antonio combined balanced scoring with better shooting efficiency and stronger defensive activity to secure a 112-101 victory.
Deni Avdija led all players with 29 points, while De’Aaron Fox supplied 25 points and seven assists for San Antonio. Scoot Henderson added 20 points for Portland, Keldon Johnson scored 20 for the Spurs, and Carter Bryant contributed 17. Donovan Clingan’s 11 rebounds led the game, while Luke Kornet and Harrison Barnes each collected eight for San Antonio.
The team statistics provide additional context. San Antonio shot 49% from the field compared with Portland’s 45%, converted 79% of its free throws compared with Portland’s 50%, and finished with advantages in rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks. Portland attempted more field goals and made more three pointers, but the Spurs converted their opportunities more efficiently.
The quarter scores also explain the shape of the contest. San Antonio built a nine-point advantage in the opening period and extended its control through the third quarter. Portland finished stronger in the fourth, but the early deficit proved difficult to erase.
Taken together, the box score presents a detailed picture of how individual performances translated into a team result. The leading scorer was on Portland’s side, while San Antonio’s combination of Fox’s playmaking, Johnson’s scoring, Barnes’ rebounding and plus/minus, and contributions from other players produced the statistical balance necessary for the 11-point victory.
