New England patriots vs New Orleans saints match player stats
The new england patriots vs new orleans saints match player stats from October 12, 2025, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. New England defeated New Orleans 25-19, but the statistical picture shows a game shaped by efficient quarterback play, big passing touchdowns, field goal production, return-yardage contributions, and two very different offensive approaches.
Drake Maye finished the afternoon with one of the clearest individual advantages in the game. The Patriots quarterback completed 18 of 26 passes for 261 yards, threw three touchdowns, and did not throw an interception. His reported passer rating was 140.1. On the other side, Spencer Rattler completed 20 of 26 attempts for 227 yards with no touchdowns and no interceptions.
That difference in touchdown production was central to the result.
The Saints actually matched the Patriots with 73 rushing yards, while New Orleans produced a slightly better rushing average. The Saints also received a strong receiving performance from Chris Olave, who caught six passes for 98 yards. However, New England generated three passing touchdowns, including two from Kayshon Boutte, and that proved difficult for New Orleans to overcome.
The following breakdown examines the major player statistics, team numbers, and individual performances from the game.
new england patriots vs new orleans saints match player stats
The most important figures from the game can be summarized through the passing, rushing, receiving, kicking, return, punting, and defensive categories.
| Category | New England Patriots | New Orleans Saints |
| Final Score | 25 | 19 |
| Passing | 261 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT | 227 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT |
| Rushing | 31 carries, 73 yards | 23 carries, 73 yards |
| Rushing Average | 2.4 yards | 3.2 yards |
| Receiving | 18 receptions, 261 yards, 3 TD | 20 receptions, 227 yards, 0 TD |
| Team Sacks | 2 | 1 |
| Tackles | 71 | 59 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 | 7 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 | 4 |
| Passes Defended | 5 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 0 lost | 1 lost |
The numbers reveal an important contrast.
New Orleans moved the ball through short and intermediate completions and recorded 20 receptions. New England had 18 receptions, but those catches produced more total passing yards and all three of the Patriots’ passing touchdowns.
That is an example of why reception totals alone do not explain offensive efficiency.
Drake Maye’s passing performance
Drake Maye was the statistical centerpiece of New England’s victory.
He completed 18 of 26 passes, giving him a completion percentage of approximately 69.2%. He accumulated 261 passing yards and averaged roughly 10.0 yards per attempt. Most importantly, he produced three touchdown passes without an interception.
His statistical line was:
- 18 completions
- 26 attempts
- 261 passing yards
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack
- 140.1 passer rating
The absence of an interception is particularly relevant when examining the Patriots’ offensive efficiency. Maye was able to generate explosive scoring production without giving New Orleans an interception opportunity.
His 261 passing yards also accounted for all of New England’s receiving yardage in the supplied statistics. The Patriots recorded 18 receptions for 261 yards, meaning the passing totals align exactly with the receiving totals.
The three touchdown passes were the defining feature.
A quarterback can produce substantial yardage without converting those yards into touchdowns. That was not the case for Maye in this matchup. His 261 yards were accompanied by three passing scores, giving New England a direct scoring return from its aerial offense.
Spencer Rattler’s passing performance
Spencer Rattler delivered an efficient completion percentage but did not generate a passing touchdown.
His final numbers were:
- 20 completions
- 26 attempts
- 227 passing yards
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 2 sacks
- 102.6 passer rating
Rattler completed 20 of 26 attempts, which works out to approximately 76.9%.
That completion percentage was higher than Maye’s. Yet the Patriots still won the passing battle in the categories that most directly affected the scoreboard.
Rattler’s 227 yards were 34 fewer than Maye’s total, and the larger difference came in touchdown production. New Orleans finished with zero passing touchdowns while New England produced three.
This creates an interesting statistical lesson from the game: a higher completion rate does not automatically translate into greater scoring efficiency.
Rattler also took two sacks compared with one for Maye. The difference was not enormous, but it contributed to the overall contrast between the two passing attacks.
Comparing the two quarterbacks
The quarterback comparison is one of the clearest ways to understand the game.
| Statistic | Drake Maye | Spencer Rattler |
| Completions | 18 | 20 |
| Attempts | 26 | 26 |
| Completion Rate | 69.2% | 76.9% |
| Passing Yards | 261 | 227 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 | 2 |
| Passer Rating | 140.1 | 102.6 |
Rattler completed two more passes than Maye, but Maye produced 34 more passing yards and three touchdowns.
The most significant difference is therefore not completion volume. It is what happened after the completion.
New England’s passing game converted its production into touchdowns. New Orleans accumulated completions and yardage without producing a passing score.
Kayshon Boutte leads the Patriots receiving attack
Kayshon Boutte produced the standout receiving performance for New England.
He finished with:
- 5 receptions
- 93 receiving yards
- 2 touchdowns
Boutte’s 93 yards represented more than one third of New England’s 261 receiving yards. His two touchdowns also accounted for two of the Patriots’ three passing scores.
That combination of volume and scoring efficiency made his performance particularly important.
Five receptions may not look like an overwhelming workload in isolation, but the production attached to those five catches was significant. Boutte averaged 18.6 yards per reception based on the supplied figures.
That average demonstrates the explosive nature of his contribution.
Rather than requiring a very large number of receptions to accumulate yardage, Boutte created substantial production on a relatively modest number of catches.
DeMario Douglas provides another Patriots highlight
DeMario Douglas also delivered an important contribution.
He recorded:
- 3 receptions
- 71 yards
- 1 touchdown
Douglas averaged approximately 23.7 yards per reception.
That is an especially notable figure because his three receptions generated 71 yards. He therefore contributed a substantial amount of New England’s total passing production despite making only three catches.
With Boutte and Douglas combining for 164 receiving yards and all three of the Patriots’ receiving touchdowns, the scoring production was concentrated among two key pass catchers.
Chris Olave leads the Saints in receiving
Chris Olave was New Orleans’ leading receiver.
His numbers were:
- 6 receptions
- 98 yards
- 0 touchdowns
Olave’s 98 yards were the highest receiving total by an individual player listed in the supplied game statistics.
He also had the most receptions among the highlighted receiving leaders.
However, the lack of a receiving touchdown is important when comparing his production with the Patriots’ leading pass catchers. Olave produced more receiving yards than Boutte, but Boutte scored twice.
This illustrates another important distinction between volume and scoring impact.
Olave’s six catches generated 98 yards, while Boutte’s five catches generated 93 yards and two touchdowns. Both performances were productive, but their statistical profiles were different.
Patriots rushing statistics
New England ran the ball 31 times for 73 yards.
The team’s rushing average was 2.4 yards per carry, and the Patriots did not record a rushing touchdown.
The most notable individual rushing performance came from Drake Maye.
Maye recorded:
- 9 carries
- 28 yards
- 3.1 yards per carry
His nine rushing attempts were a meaningful portion of New England’s overall rushing workload.
The Patriots’ total rushing production was not particularly efficient on a per-carry basis. With 31 attempts producing 73 yards, New England averaged only 2.4 yards per attempt.
Yet the Patriots did not need their rushing attack to carry the scoring burden. Their passing game provided three touchdowns.
This is an important part of understanding the final result. New England’s offense was not dominant in every statistical category. Instead, it produced enough high-value passing plays to compensate for modest rushing efficiency.
Saints rushing statistics
New Orleans also finished with 73 rushing yards, matching New England’s total yardage on the ground.
The difference was that the Saints reached those 73 yards on only 23 carries.
That produced an average of 3.2 yards per carry.
New Orleans therefore had the better rushing average while using eight fewer rushing attempts.
Alvin Kamara led the Saints’ rushing attack with:
- 10 carries
- 31 yards
- 3.1 yards per carry
Kamara accounted for 31 of New Orleans’ 73 rushing yards.
The Saints also produced one rushing touchdown, giving them a touchdown on the ground that New England did not have.
That means New Orleans scored one rushing touchdown while New England scored three passing touchdowns.
The rushing comparison
The rushing statistics are surprisingly close in total yardage.
| Rushing Statistic | Patriots | Saints |
| Attempts | 31 | 23 |
| Yards | 73 | 73 |
| Average | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Rushing TD | 0 | 1 |
Both teams gained exactly 73 rushing yards.
The difference was efficiency and workload.
New Orleans averaged 3.2 yards per carry compared with New England’s 2.4. The Saints also scored one rushing touchdown.
New England, however, ran the ball eight more times.
This suggests two different offensive profiles within the game. The Patriots relied on more rushing attempts but gained relatively little per carry, while the Saints were more efficient per rush but did not produce more total rushing yardage.
Receiving production tells a different story
The passing and receiving statistics line up perfectly for both teams.
New England recorded 18 receptions for 261 yards and three touchdowns.
New Orleans recorded 20 receptions for 227 yards and no touchdowns.
This is one of the most useful statistical comparisons from the matchup.
The Saints caught two more passes, but the Patriots produced 34 more receiving yards.
More importantly, New England’s receptions produced three touchdowns.
The Patriots therefore averaged approximately 14.5 yards per reception, while the Saints averaged approximately 11.4 yards per reception.
That difference helps explain why New England was able to turn fewer receptions into greater passing production.
Field goals played a major role for New Orleans
Blake Grupe was responsible for a significant portion of New Orleans’ scoring.
He made:
- 4 of 4 field goals
- 1 of 1 extra points
- 13 total points
Thirteen points from the kicker is a substantial contribution in a 25-19 game.
It also helps explain why the Saints remained within one score despite not producing a passing touchdown.
New Orleans’ offense generated enough opportunities for Grupe to convert four field goals.
This is a valuable reminder that the final score cannot be understood solely through offensive touchdowns. Kicking production can keep a team competitive even when touchdown efficiency is limited.
Andy Borregales’ kicking statistics
Andy Borregales finished with:
- 1 of 1 field goals
- 2 of 2 extra points
- 5 total points
His contribution was smaller in total points because New England’s three passing touchdowns created more opportunities for extra points while limiting the team’s need for field goals.
The Patriots’ scoring profile was therefore different from New Orleans’.
New England relied heavily on touchdowns through the passing game, while New Orleans received 13 points from field goals.
Kick returns added hidden yardage
Special teams also played a meaningful role.
For New England, Efton Chism III returned five kicks for 129 yards.
His average was 25.8 yards per return.
That is a substantial amount of field position gained through kick returns.
For New Orleans, Mason Tipton recorded four kick returns for 89 yards, averaging 22.3 yards per return.
The comparison is:
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Efton Chism III | 5 | 129 | 25.8 |
| Mason Tipton | 4 | 89 | 22.3 |
Chism produced 40 more kick return yards than Tipton despite having only one additional return.
Those yards do not appear in passing or rushing totals, but they can influence where an offense begins its possessions.
Punt return statistics
The punt return numbers were more limited.
Marcus Jones had one punt return for six yards for New England.
Rashid Shaheed returned two punts for 21 yards for New Orleans.
Shaheed therefore accumulated more punt return yardage, although the total difference was only 15 yards.
The special teams statistics collectively show that both teams received useful contributions outside of the conventional offensive categories.
Patriots punting performance
Bryce Baringer punted three times for 144 yards.
His average was 48.0 yards per punt, with a long of 66 yards.
The 66-yard longest punt stands out because it indicates that New England was capable of flipping the field with its punting game.
Baringer’s average also exceeded the Saints’ team punting average.
Saints punting performance
Kai Kroeger punted twice for 70 yards.
His average was 35.0 yards, with a long of 47 yards.
The difference between the teams was substantial:
| Punting Statistic | Bryce Baringer | Kai Kroeger |
| Punts | 3 | 2 |
| Total Yards | 144 | 70 |
| Average | 48.0 | 35.0 |
| Long | 66 | 47 |
Punting does not directly appear on the scoreboard, but it is part of the field-position battle.
New England’s punting numbers were stronger according to the supplied statistics, particularly in average distance and longest punt.
Defensive statistics
The defensive numbers provide another interesting contrast.
New England recorded:
- 71 tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
New Orleans recorded:
- 59 tackles
- 1 sack
- 7 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
Neither defense recorded an interception.
The Patriots had more total tackles, more sacks, and more passes defended.
The Saints had more tackles for loss.
Both defenses recorded four quarterback hits.
This indicates that the defensive battle was not completely one-sided. New Orleans created seven tackles for loss, which was three more than New England. However, New England generated twice as many sacks and more passes defended.
Turnovers were limited
Turnovers are often decisive in close NFL games, and this matchup was notable for the absence of interceptions.
Neither team recorded an interception.
The Patriots had two fumbles but lost neither.
The Saints had one fumble and lost it.
Therefore, New England finished with no lost turnovers while New Orleans lost one.
That single turnover difference matters in a six-point game.
It is not accurate to say that the turnover margin alone determined the outcome, because New England also had a clear passing touchdown advantage. However, protecting the football prevented New Orleans from receiving additional possessions from Patriots mistakes.
Why the final score was 25-19
The scoring profile helps explain the six-point margin.
New England’s offense produced three passing touchdowns.
New Orleans produced one rushing touchdown and relied heavily on field goals.
The Saints’ kicker made four field goals and one extra point for 13 points.
The Patriots’ kicker contributed five points.
The overall scoring distribution therefore looked very different.
New England created more touchdown-level plays through the passing game.
New Orleans accumulated points through a combination of rushing and kicking production.
This distinction is more informative than simply stating that New England scored 25 and New Orleans scored 19.
What the player statistics reveal about offensive efficiency
One of the most useful lessons from the game is that raw volume does not always correspond with scoring production.
Consider the receiving numbers.
New Orleans had 20 receptions.
New England had 18.
Yet New England gained 261 receiving yards compared with New Orleans’ 227.
Then consider touchdowns.
New England had three receiving touchdowns.
New Orleans had none.
The Patriots therefore produced more yardage and substantially more scoring despite having fewer receptions.
The quarterback numbers tell the same story.
Rattler completed 76.9% of his passes.
Maye completed 69.2%.
Yet Maye produced more yards, three touchdowns, and a higher passer rating.
The statistical lesson is straightforward: completion percentage is useful, but it must be considered alongside yardage, touchdowns, turnovers, sacks, and efficiency.
The importance of explosive receiving plays
The performances of Boutte and Douglas show why explosive plays can change a game.
Boutte averaged 18.6 yards per reception.
Douglas averaged approximately 23.7.
Olave averaged approximately 16.3 yards per reception based on six catches for 98 yards.
All three players generated meaningful yardage per catch.
The major difference was scoring.
Boutte scored twice.
Douglas scored once.
Olave did not score.
The Patriots therefore converted their explosive receiving production into points more effectively.
The Saints were not dominated in every category
The final score might suggest a straightforward Patriots advantage, but the statistics show a more balanced game.
New Orleans:
- Had more completions
- Had a higher completion percentage
- Had the same rushing yardage
- Had a better rushing average
- Had one rushing touchdown
- Had more tackles for loss
- Had fewer total offensive rushing attempts
- Had strong kicking production
New England:
- Had more passing yards
- Had three passing touchdowns
- Had no turnovers lost
- Had more sacks
- Had more passes defended
- Had more kick return yards
- Had a higher punting average
This is why a detailed player-stat analysis is more useful than looking at the final score alone.
The role of field position
Special teams numbers are easy to overlook when evaluating a game.
Efton Chism III produced 129 kick return yards for New England.
Bryce Baringer averaged 48.0 yards per punt.
Those contributions can affect where offensive drives begin and where opposing offenses must start their possessions.
New Orleans also received useful special teams production from Mason Tipton and Rashid Shaheed, but the Patriots’ kick return and punting numbers were stronger according to the supplied statistics.
Field position does not always result in an obvious individual statistic such as a touchdown or interception. Its value often appears indirectly through drive opportunities and starting position.
What the statistics say about New England’s offensive identity in this game
The Patriots’ performance was built around passing efficiency rather than rushing efficiency.
The team ran 31 times but averaged only 2.4 yards per carry.
By contrast, Maye completed 18 passes for 261 yards and three touchdowns.
That combination suggests that the passing game carried a large share of the team’s scoring responsibility in this particular matchup.
The performance of the receiving corps reinforced that approach.
Boutte and Douglas combined for 164 yards and three touchdowns.
That is 62.8% of New England’s 261 receiving yards.
Their production was therefore concentrated and highly productive.
What the statistics say about New Orleans’ offensive approach
New Orleans generated 227 passing yards and 73 rushing yards.
The team completed 20 passes and ran 23 times.
The Saints therefore maintained a relatively balanced statistical distribution between passing attempts and rushing attempts.
Rattler completed a high percentage of his passes, while Kamara led the rushing attack.
The problem, from a scoring perspective, was the lack of passing touchdowns.
New Orleans did produce a rushing touchdown and four field goals, but the offense did not turn its passing yardage into passing scores.
That difference became especially important against a Patriots offense that produced three passing touchdowns.
Player-by-player statistical highlights
Several individual performances deserve attention.
Drake Maye
Maye completed 18 of 26 passes for 261 yards and three touchdowns. He also rushed nine times for 28 yards.
His 140.1 passer rating was the highest quarterback rating listed in the game data.
Spencer Rattler
Rattler completed 20 of 26 passes for 227 yards with no touchdowns or interceptions. He was sacked twice and recorded a 102.6 passer rating.
Kayshon Boutte
Boutte caught five passes for 93 yards and two touchdowns.
His two touchdowns were the most by any individual receiver listed.
DeMario Douglas
Douglas caught three passes for 71 yards and one touchdown.
His 23.7 yards per reception was particularly notable.
Chris Olave
Olave led New Orleans with six receptions for 98 yards.
He finished without a receiving touchdown.
Alvin Kamara
Kamara carried the ball 10 times for 31 yards and averaged 3.1 yards per carry.
Efton Chism III
Chism returned five kicks for 129 yards and averaged 25.8 yards per return.
Blake Grupe
Grupe converted all four field goal attempts and his lone extra point, producing 13 points.
Bryce Baringer
Baringer averaged 48.0 yards on three punts and had a long of 66 yards.
A closer look at the six-point margin
The Patriots won by six points.
That margin is important because the game was not separated by a large difference in total rushing yardage. Both teams had exactly 73 rushing yards.
It was also not a turnover-heavy game. Neither team intercepted a pass, and New England did not lose a fumble.
Instead, the clearest statistical separator was touchdown production.
New England’s passing game produced three touchdowns.
New Orleans had no passing touchdowns and relied on one rushing touchdown plus four field goals.
In a close game, the ability to convert yardage into touchdowns can be more important than accumulating additional completions.
Important statistical takeaways
Several conclusions can be drawn directly from the supplied game statistics.
First, Drake Maye’s passing production was the most important offensive statistical feature of the matchup.
Second, Kayshon Boutte was the Patriots’ most productive scoring receiver, with two touchdowns and 93 yards.
Third, Chris Olave was New Orleans’ leading receiver by yardage and receptions, but he did not score.
Fourth, both teams produced exactly 73 rushing yards despite different workloads and averages.
Fifth, New Orleans’ four made field goals were a major component of its 19-point total.
Sixth, neither team intercepted a pass.
Seventh, New England lost no fumbles, while New Orleans lost one.
Eighth, the Patriots produced more sacks and passes defended.
Ninth, the Saints produced more tackles for loss.
Finally, the six-point final margin was produced by several small statistical differences rather than one overwhelming advantage in every category.
Why player stats matter when reviewing an NFL game
A box score is more than a list of numbers.
Player statistics can help identify where a game was won, where opportunities were missed, and which performances had the greatest effect on the scoreboard.
For this matchup, looking only at completion percentage could lead to an incomplete conclusion because Rattler completed a higher percentage of his passes.
Looking only at rushing average could also be misleading because New Orleans averaged more yards per carry.
Looking only at reception totals would overlook the Patriots’ greater receiving yardage and three touchdowns.
The useful analysis comes from combining the categories.
Passing efficiency, touchdown production, rushing volume, receiving efficiency, turnovers, defensive pressure, kicking, and field position all contribute to the overall picture.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Patriots and Saints?
The New England Patriots defeated the New Orleans Saints 25-19 on October 12, 2025, according to the game data provided for this analysis.
How many touchdowns did Drake Maye throw?
Drake Maye threw three touchdown passes. He completed 18 of 26 attempts for 261 yards and had no interceptions.
Who was the Patriots’ leading receiver?
Kayshon Boutte led the Patriots in the supplied receiving statistics with five receptions for 93 yards and two touchdowns.
Who led the Saints in receiving?
Chris Olave led New Orleans with six receptions for 98 yards. He did not record a receiving touchdown.
How many rushing yards did each team have?
Both New England and New Orleans recorded 73 rushing yards. The Patriots had 31 rushing attempts, while the Saints had 23.
Did either team throw an interception?
No. Neither Drake Maye nor Spencer Rattler threw an interception in the supplied statistics.
Conclusion
The October 12, 2025 matchup between the New England Patriots and New Orleans Saints was a useful example of why football statistics need context.
New England won 25-19, but the Patriots did not dominate every statistical category. Both teams finished with 73 rushing yards, while New Orleans actually posted the better rushing average. The Saints also completed more passes and had a higher completion percentage.
The decisive difference came through passing production and touchdown efficiency.
Drake Maye completed 18 of 26 passes for 261 yards and three touchdowns without an interception. Kayshon Boutte added five catches for 93 yards and two touchdowns, while DeMario Douglas contributed three catches for 71 yards and another touchdown.
For New Orleans, Spencer Rattler completed 20 of 26 passes for 227 yards without a touchdown or interception. Chris Olave led the receiving group with 98 yards, while Alvin Kamara led the rushing attack with 31 yards. Blake Grupe’s four field goals were also a major part of the Saints’ scoring output.
The defensive and special teams statistics add another layer. New England recorded two sacks, five passes defended, and 129 kick return yards from Efton Chism III. New Orleans created seven tackles for loss and received 13 points from Grupe.
Taken together, the numbers show a close game in several areas, with New England creating more touchdown-level passing production and avoiding a lost turnover. That combination was enough to produce the six-point victory.
For anyone reviewing the new england patriots vs new orleans saints match player stats, the most useful approach is to look beyond the final score. The quarterback efficiency, receiving touchdowns, rushing workload, turnover results, defensive pressure, kicking output, and special teams contributions collectively explain how the game developed.
