Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats

Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats from March 13, 2026, tell a clear story of Detroit’s control from the opening quarter through the final buzzer. The Pistons defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-109 at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, improving to 47-18 on the season while Philadelphia fell to 35-31. Detroit did not simply win the scoreboard battle. The team produced a more efficient shooting performance, controlled the glass, moved the ball extremely well, and converted its free throws at an outstanding rate.

For readers looking beyond the final score, this game provides several useful statistical angles. Detroit shot 54% from the field and 40% from three-point range, while Philadelphia finished at 47% overall and only 23% from beyond the arc. The Pistons also recorded 37 assists and 40 rebounds, showing that their advantage came from several areas rather than one individual performance.

The individual numbers are equally important. Duncan Robinson led Detroit with 19 points, Jalen Duren collected 10 rebounds, and Cade Cunningham delivered 13 assists. Philadelphia’s leading scorer was MarJon Beauchamp with 17 points, while Justin Edwards led the 76ers with nine rebounds. Trendon Watford and Quentin Grimes each recorded five assists.

Table of Contents

Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The March 13 meeting was the third game between these teams during the 2025-26 regular season. Detroit entered the contest with a 46-18 record, while Philadelphia came in at 35-30 based on the supplied game information. After the result, Detroit moved to 47-18 and Philadelphia dropped to 35-31.

The game was played at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit, where 20,062 spectators attended.

Detroit won 131-109, producing a 22-point margin. The result also extended Detroit’s advantage in the season series to 3-0.

The three previous results in the supplied season-series data were:

  1. Detroit defeated Philadelphia 111-108.
  2. Detroit defeated Philadelphia 114-105.
  3. Detroit defeated Philadelphia 131-109.

That progression is significant. The first meeting was decided by three points, the second by nine, and the third by 22. While individual games should always be evaluated on their own, the season-series results show that Detroit has consistently found ways to beat Philadelphia.

The fourth meeting was scheduled for April 5, 2026.

Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Detroit did most of its damage early and maintained enough offensive pressure to keep Philadelphia from making the game competitive late.

Quarter Philadelphia 76ers Detroit Pistons
1st 27 36
2nd 33 33
3rd 21 35
4th 28 27
Final 109 131

The opening quarter immediately established the direction of the contest. Detroit scored 36 points compared with Philadelphia’s 27, creating a nine-point advantage.

Philadelphia responded in the second quarter by matching Detroit’s 33 points. That prevented the deficit from growing before halftime, but it did not erase the opening gap.

The third quarter became the decisive period. Detroit scored 35 points while holding Philadelphia to 21. That 14-point quarter advantage transformed a competitive margin into a much larger lead.

Philadelphia won the fourth quarter 28-27, but by that stage Detroit had already built enough separation to protect the victory.

This is an important lesson when evaluating box-score results. A final margin does not always tell you when the game was decided. In this case, Detroit’s first and third quarters were particularly important.

Team Shooting Comparison

Shooting efficiency was one of the strongest statistical differences between the teams.

Statistic Philadelphia 76ers Detroit Pistons
Field Goals 42-90 48-89
Field Goal Percentage 47% 54%
Three-Pointers 8-35 14-35
Three-Point Percentage 23% 40%
Free Throws 17-24 21-22
Free Throw Percentage 71% 95%

Detroit made six more field goals despite attempting only one fewer shot.

That difference matters because it reflects efficiency rather than simply volume. Philadelphia attempted 90 field goals and made 42. Detroit attempted 89 and made 48.

The three-point numbers provide an even clearer contrast. Both teams attempted 35 three-pointers, but Detroit made 14 while Philadelphia made only eight.

That produced a six-made-three advantage for Detroit.

The percentages were also separated by 17 percentage points. Detroit shot 40% from three, while Philadelphia shot 23%.

Free-throw shooting further favored Detroit. The Pistons converted 21 of 22 attempts, an excellent 95% rate. Philadelphia made 17 of 24 for 71%.

When three-point accuracy and free-throw accuracy are combined with better overall field-goal shooting, Detroit’s offensive advantage becomes easy to understand.

How Detroit Built Its Offensive Advantage

Detroit’s 131-point total was supported by several complementary elements.

First, the Pistons shot 54% from the field. That means the team was consistently turning possessions into successful field goals.

Second, Detroit made 14 three-pointers. Philadelphia matched the number of attempts but could not match the conversion rate.

Third, Detroit converted 21 of 22 free throws. Those opportunities were turned into points at a very high rate.

Fourth, the Pistons recorded 37 assists. That figure indicates substantial ball movement and shared offensive creation.

Cade Cunningham’s 13 assists were particularly important. His playmaking allowed Detroit to generate offense without requiring one player to take an excessive number of shots.

The offensive result was therefore not simply a matter of one hot shooter. The team combined efficient shooting, perimeter production, passing, and free-throw execution.

Detroit Pistons Player Performance

The individual numbers provide more context than the team totals alone.

Duncan Robinson

Duncan Robinson was Detroit’s leading scorer with 19 points.

His scoring lead is notable because Detroit had several players capable of contributing offensively. The Pistons did not need one player to carry the entire scoring load.

Robinson’s 19 points were the highest individual total for Detroit in the supplied data, making him the team’s top scorer for the game.

Jalen Duren

Jalen Duren led Detroit in rebounding with 10 boards.

Double-digit rebounding is important because Philadelphia finished with 35 total rebounds while Detroit collected 40.

Duren’s contribution helped Detroit maintain its advantage on the glass and provided the Pistons with an important interior presence.

Cade Cunningham

Cade Cunningham’s 13 assists were one of the most important individual statistics in the box score.

Assists provide useful context for understanding how a high-scoring team creates efficient offense. Detroit recorded 37 assists overall, and Cunningham accounted for 13 of them.

That means his passing was a major component of the team’s offensive organization.

His 13 assists also exceeded the total of any individual Philadelphia player.

Tobias Harris

Tobias Harris started for Detroit alongside Duncan Robinson, Jalen Duren, Marcus Sasser, and Cade Cunningham.

The supplied information does not provide his individual scoring, rebounding, or assist totals, so those figures should not be invented or inferred.

That distinction matters when analyzing player statistics. A reliable match report should separate confirmed box-score information from assumptions.

Marcus Sasser

Marcus Sasser was also part of Detroit’s starting lineup.

His role alongside Cunningham provided another perimeter option within the starting group, but the supplied data does not provide his individual statistical line.

Detroit’s Bench

Detroit’s listed bench included:

  • Paul Reed
  • Isaiah Stewart
  • Ronald Holland II
  • Javonte Green
  • Kevin Huerter
  • Chaz Lanier
  • Daniss Jenkins

The available data confirms the players listed above but does not provide individual statistical totals for each bench player.

That means the safest analysis is to focus on the confirmed team totals and the individual leaders rather than creating unsupported player lines.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Performance

Philadelphia lost the game by 22 points, but several individual performances still stand out.

MarJon Beauchamp

MarJon Beauchamp led Philadelphia with 17 points.

His scoring total was the highest individual mark for the 76ers in the supplied game data.

However, Detroit’s balanced offensive output meant Philadelphia’s leading scorer did not produce enough points to close the team gap.

Justin Edwards

Justin Edwards led Philadelphia in rebounding with nine.

Philadelphia finished with 35 rebounds compared with Detroit’s 40, giving the Pistons a five-rebound advantage.

Edwards therefore made a meaningful contribution in an area where the 76ers needed more collective production.

Trendon Watford

Trendon Watford started for Philadelphia and finished with five assists.

His five assists tied Quentin Grimes for the team lead.

Watford’s passing contribution is particularly relevant because Philadelphia finished with 20 total assists. His five represented a substantial portion of the team’s overall assist production.

Quentin Grimes

Quentin Grimes also recorded five assists, matching Watford for Philadelphia’s team lead.

Grimes was part of Philadelphia’s starting lineup and contributed to the team’s offensive creation.

The fact that Philadelphia’s two assist leaders had five each, while Detroit’s Cade Cunningham recorded 13 by himself, highlights a significant difference in playmaking production.

Philadelphia’s Starting Lineup

The 76ers’ starting group consisted of:

  • Trendon Watford
  • Justin Edwards
  • Dominick Barlow
  • Quentin Grimes
  • VJ Edgecombe

The bench included:

  • MarJon Beauchamp
  • Jabari Walker
  • Dalen Terry
  • Cameron Payne
  • Kyle Lowry
  • Tyrese Martin
  • Andre Drummond

The supplied information confirms these lineups but does not provide complete individual statistical lines for every player.

Detroit vs Philadelphia Rebounding Battle

Rebounding was another area where Detroit held an advantage.

Detroit finished with 40 rebounds.

Philadelphia finished with 35.

That five-rebound difference may look modest next to the 22-point final margin, but possessions generated through rebounds can influence offensive opportunities and second-chance scoring.

Jalen Duren’s 10 rebounds were especially important for Detroit because he reached double figures individually.

Justin Edwards led Philadelphia with nine rebounds, narrowly trailing Duren’s total.

The larger point is that Detroit won the overall rebounding battle even though Philadelphia had an individual player close to the Pistons’ leading rebounder.

Passing and Ball Movement

One of the clearest statistical differences in the game came through assists.

Detroit recorded 37 assists.

Philadelphia recorded 20.

That is a 17-assist advantage for the Pistons.

This is one of the most revealing numbers in the entire box score.

Detroit’s 48 made field goals were supported by 37 assists, showing that a large portion of its successful offense involved teammates creating scoring opportunities for one another.

Cade Cunningham’s 13 assists were the individual highlight.

Philadelphia had two players at five assists each, Trendon Watford and Quentin Grimes, but the team still finished with only 20 assists.

The difference suggests that Detroit’s offensive production was more consistently connected through passing.

Three-Point Shooting Was a Major Difference

Both teams attempted exactly 35 three-point shots.

That makes the comparison especially useful because the shot volume was identical.

Philadelphia made eight.

Detroit made 14.

The Pistons therefore made six more three-pointers without taking a single additional attempt.

At 40%, Detroit converted its opportunities at a significantly higher rate than Philadelphia’s 23%.

This is one of the strongest explanations for the final score.

When two teams take the same number of three-point attempts, accuracy becomes the major separator. Detroit turned 35 attempts into 14 successful shots, while Philadelphia converted only eight.

The resulting six-shot difference from three-point range contributed heavily to Detroit’s offensive advantage.

Free-Throw Efficiency

Detroit’s free-throw performance was another standout.

The Pistons went 21-for-22, producing a 95% conversion rate.

Philadelphia went 17-for-24, producing a 71% rate.

The raw attempt difference was only two, but Detroit converted four more free throws.

This is an important efficiency statistic because free throws are uncontested scoring opportunities. Missing them leaves points on the table.

Detroit missed only one free throw in the entire game according to the supplied data.

Philadelphia missed seven.

That difference represents six additional missed free throws for Philadelphia compared with Detroit.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

The turnover comparison was relatively close.

Philadelphia committed 15 turnovers.

Detroit committed 17.

Therefore, Detroit did not win this game because it protected the ball better. Philadelphia actually committed two fewer turnovers.

That makes the shooting and passing differences even more significant.

Philadelphia recorded 10 steals, while Detroit also recorded 10.

The teams were therefore even in steals.

Blocks were also relatively close. Philadelphia recorded eight blocks, while Detroit recorded seven.

These numbers show that Detroit’s victory was not primarily driven by a huge advantage in steals, blocks, or turnover creation.

Instead, the biggest differences were offensive efficiency, three-point shooting, free-throw conversion, assists, and rebounding.

What the Box Score Says About the Game

A useful way to interpret this matchup is to separate the result into strengths and weaknesses.

Detroit’s Biggest Strengths

Detroit’s strongest statistical areas were:

  • 54% field-goal shooting
  • 40% three-point shooting
  • 14 made three-pointers
  • 95% free-throw shooting
  • 40 rebounds
  • 37 assists
  • 131 total points
  • 13 assists from Cade Cunningham
  • 10 rebounds from Jalen Duren
  • 19 points from Duncan Robinson

The combination of these numbers explains why Detroit reached 131 points.

Philadelphia’s Main Challenges

Philadelphia’s main statistical challenges were:

  • 23% three-point shooting
  • 71% free-throw shooting
  • 35 total rebounds
  • 20 total assists
  • 109 total points
  • A 22-point final deficit

Philadelphia did some things well. The team shot 47% overall, recorded 10 steals, and had eight blocks.

But those positives were not enough to offset Detroit’s shooting efficiency and offensive organization.

Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats and Season Series

The broader season series is particularly interesting.

Detroit won all three completed meetings listed in the supplied data.

First Meeting

Detroit won 111-108.

The three-point margin indicates a competitive game that could have gone either way late.

Second Meeting

Detroit won 114-105.

The margin increased to nine points.

Third Meeting

Detroit won 131-109.

The margin reached 22 points.

Across the three completed meetings, Detroit demonstrated consistent success against Philadelphia.

The progression from a three-point victory to a nine-point victory and then a 22-point victory does not by itself prove that the teams were moving in opposite directions, because each game has its own circumstances. However, it does establish that Detroit had solved the matchup successfully three times.

The fourth game was scheduled for April 5, 2026.

Why Cade Cunningham’s 13 Assists Matter

Points often receive the most attention in basketball analysis, but assists can reveal how an offense is functioning.

Cade Cunningham recorded 13 assists in this game.

Detroit as a team had 37 assists.

That means Cunningham was directly responsible for a large share of the team’s recorded assists.

This is particularly meaningful because Detroit did not merely win through isolation scoring. The team made 48 field goals and finished with 37 assists.

That relationship between made baskets and assists points toward strong offensive coordination.

For analysts studying player impact, Cunningham’s 13 assists are arguably more revealing than simply noting whether he was among the team’s top scorers.

Why Jalen Duren’s 10 Rebounds Matter

Jalen Duren’s 10 rebounds were the best individual rebounding performance for Detroit.

The Pistons finished with 40 team rebounds.

Philadelphia had 35.

Duren’s double-digit total therefore contributed to an area where Detroit held a measurable team advantage.

Rebounding becomes especially valuable when a team is already shooting efficiently. Defensive rebounds can end opposing possessions, while offensive rebounds can create additional opportunities.

The supplied data does not provide a detailed offensive-versus-defensive rebounding split, so it would be inappropriate to assign Duren a specific number in either category without verified information.

Why Duncan Robinson’s 19 Points Matter

Duncan Robinson led all Detroit scorers with 19 points.

What makes this interesting is that Detroit reached 131 points without needing an individual scorer to approach an exceptionally high total.

That suggests a distributed offensive performance.

Detroit’s attack produced 48 made field goals, 14 made three-pointers, and 21 made free throws. The scoring was therefore supported by multiple offensive actions rather than a single dominant scoring line.

Robinson’s 19 points were enough to lead the team, but the overall team output was the more important story.

Philadelphia’s Most Important Statistical Contributors

MarJon Beauchamp led Philadelphia with 17 points.

Justin Edwards led the team in rebounds with nine.

Trendon Watford and Quentin Grimes tied for the team lead in assists with five each.

Those three categories identify Philadelphia’s leading contributors in the supplied data:

Category Philadelphia Leader Total
Points MarJon Beauchamp 17
Rebounds Justin Edwards 9
Assists Trendon Watford 5
Assists Quentin Grimes 5

The figures also demonstrate that Philadelphia’s production was spread across different players.

The issue was not a complete lack of individual contribution. The larger problem was that the team’s overall efficiency did not match Detroit’s.

Team Statistical Comparison

A complete comparison makes the outcome easier to understand.

Category Philadelphia Detroit
Final Score 109 131
Field Goals 42-90 48-89
Field Goal % 47% 54%
Three-Pointers 8-35 14-35
Three-Point % 23% 40%
Free Throws 17-24 21-22
Free Throw % 71% 95%
Rebounds 35 40
Assists 20 37
Turnovers 15 17
Steals 10 10
Blocks 8 7

The table reveals an important analytical point.

Detroit did not dominate every statistical category.

Philadelphia had fewer turnovers, the same number of steals, and more blocks.

Yet Detroit won comfortably because several high-impact offensive categories favored the Pistons at the same time.

Understanding Plus/Minus

Plus/minus is often misunderstood when reading basketball box scores.

The supplied game information notes that team plus/minus represents the team’s net points while a player is on the court.

In general terms, a positive plus/minus means the player’s team outscored its opponent during that player’s minutes, while a negative figure means the opponent outscored the player’s team during those minutes.

However, individual plus/minus figures were not included in the supplied data.

Therefore, no individual plus/minus values should be attributed to the players in this article.

This is an important distinction for trustworthy statistical reporting. A good analysis should explain a statistic without manufacturing values that are not available.

What Made This Game Different From a Simple Scoring Battle?

At first glance, a 131-109 score might suggest that Detroit simply had a better offensive night.

The deeper numbers show something more specific.

Detroit was better in several efficiency categories at the same time.

The Pistons shot seven percentage points better from the field, 17 percentage points better from three-point range, and 24 percentage points better from the free-throw line.

Detroit also recorded 17 more assists.

That is a substantial difference in offensive organization.

The Pistons also won the rebounding battle by five.

Philadelphia’s advantages in turnovers, steals, and blocks were not large enough to overcome those offensive gaps.

This is why a complete box-score analysis is more useful than simply reporting the final score.

Key Takeaways for Fans and Analysts

Several conclusions stand out from this matchup.

1. Detroit’s Shooting Efficiency Was Superior

The Pistons made 48 of 89 field-goal attempts compared with Philadelphia’s 42 of 90.

The seven-point field-goal percentage difference was meaningful.

2. The Three-Point Gap Was Significant

Both teams attempted 35 threes, but Detroit made six more.

This was one of the clearest statistical advantages in the game.

3. Detroit Moved the Ball Better

The Pistons recorded 37 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 20.

Cunningham’s 13 assists were the individual highlight.

4. Detroit Controlled the Glass

The Pistons collected 40 rebounds against Philadelphia’s 35.

Duren led Detroit with 10.

5. Philadelphia Did Not Lose Because of Turnovers

Philadelphia had 15 turnovers compared with Detroit’s 17.

The 76ers actually committed fewer turnovers.

6. Free Throws Added Another Detroit Advantage

Detroit converted 21 of 22 attempts.

Philadelphia made 17 of 24.

The Pistons were considerably more efficient at the line.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Detroit Pistons vs 76ers game on March 13, 2026?

The Detroit Pistons defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-109 on March 13, 2026, at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit.

Who was Detroit’s leading scorer?

Duncan Robinson led the Detroit Pistons with 19 points.

Who led the Pistons in rebounds?

Jalen Duren led Detroit with 10 rebounds.

Who had the most assists for Detroit?

Cade Cunningham led the Pistons with 13 assists.

Who was Philadelphia’s leading scorer?

MarJon Beauchamp led Philadelphia with 17 points.

What was the season series between Detroit and Philadelphia?

Detroit led the completed season series 3-0 after the March 13 game. The fourth meeting was scheduled for April 5, 2026.

Conclusion

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats from March 13, 2026, show why Detroit was able to secure a convincing 131-109 victory.

The Pistons combined efficient shooting with excellent ball movement and strong free-throw execution. They shot 54% from the field, made 14 of 35 three-pointers, converted 21 of 22 free throws, collected 40 rebounds, and recorded 37 assists.

Individually, Duncan Robinson led Detroit with 19 points, Jalen Duren produced 10 rebounds, and Cade Cunningham delivered 13 assists. For Philadelphia, MarJon Beauchamp led the scoring with 17 points, Justin Edwards had nine rebounds, while Trendon Watford and Quentin Grimes each recorded five assists.

The most important statistical contrast was not simply the final score. Detroit was more efficient in almost every major shooting category and created considerably more assisted offense. Philadelphia actually committed fewer turnovers and recorded more blocks, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Detroit’s shooting, passing, rebounding, and free-throw efficiency.

The third straight Detroit victory also made the season series especially noteworthy. With the Pistons leading 3-0 in the completed meetings covered by the supplied data, this matchup had become a clear statistical challenge for Philadelphia.

For anyone studying the box score, the central lesson is straightforward: Detroit won because several important strengths worked together. The Pistons did not depend on one extraordinary scoring performance. Instead, efficient shooting, 37 assists, 40 rebounds, strong free-throw accuracy, and contributions from multiple players produced one of the team’s most convincing victories in the series.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *