charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats
The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats from December 31, 2025, tell a much richer story than the final score alone. Golden State defeated Charlotte 132-125 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, but the seven-point margin does not fully explain how the game developed. The Warriors shot 55% from the field and an outstanding 49% from three-point range, while the Hornets answered with 52% shooting and 40% from beyond the arc. Both teams finished with 37 rebounds and 35 assists, making this a competitive offensive game decided by efficiency, turnovers, and late-game execution.
Stephen Curry led Golden State with 26 points, while Brandon Miller produced 33 points for Charlotte. Draymond Green also played a major all-around role for the Warriors with 8 rebounds and 12 assists. For Charlotte, LaMelo Ball scored 27 points, while Collin Sexton and Kon Knueppel each provided important contributions in scoring and playmaking.
This matchup is particularly useful for anyone studying NBA box scores because it demonstrates why player statistics should be examined alongside team efficiency. A player can lead in scoring and still not be the biggest reason a team wins. Likewise, a team can lose despite shooting above 50% from the field. The December 31 contest provides a clear example of both situations.
Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The game took place on December 31, 2025, at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina, with an announced attendance of 19,685.
Golden State entered the game with an 18-16 record, including an 8-12 mark on the road. Charlotte entered at 11-22 overall and 7-10 at home.
The final score was:
Golden State Warriors 132, Charlotte Hornets 125
The scoring pattern by quarter was:
| Quarter | Warriors | Hornets |
| 1st | 30 | 30 |
| 2nd | 39 | 34 |
| 3rd | 29 | 36 |
| 4th | 34 | 25 |
| Final | 132 | 125 |
The game was tied after the opening quarter. Golden State created separation in the second quarter, Charlotte responded strongly in the third, and the Warriors ultimately closed the game with a 34-point fourth quarter.
That fourth-quarter response is one of the most important details in the box score.
Game Overview
The Warriors did not dominate every phase of this matchup.
Instead, they won because they combined efficient shooting with enough late-game offense to overcome several areas where Charlotte was competitive.
Golden State finished with:
- 46-of-83 shooting from the field
- 55% field-goal shooting
- 24-of-49 three-point shooting
- 49% three-point shooting
- 16-of-17 free-throw shooting
- 37 rebounds
- 35 assists
- 19 turnovers
- 7 steals
- 3 blocks
Charlotte finished with:
- 48-of-93 shooting from the field
- 52% field-goal shooting
- 16-of-40 three-point shooting
- 40% three-point shooting
- 13-of-17 free-throw shooting
- 37 rebounds
- 35 assists
- 15 turnovers
- 11 steals
- 1 block
At first glance, several statistics look remarkably similar. Both teams collected exactly 37 rebounds. Both recorded 35 assists. Both shot better than 50% from the field.
The difference becomes clearer when three-point shooting, free throws, turnovers, and fourth-quarter scoring are considered together.
Stephen Curry Leads Golden State With 26 Points
Stephen Curry was Golden State’s leading scorer with 26 points.
His scoring output was central to the Warriors’ offensive production, especially in a game where Charlotte was also able to generate a high level of offense.
Curry’s importance goes beyond his raw point total. Golden State’s ability to convert 24 three-pointers as a team reflects how valuable perimeter shooting was in this contest. The Warriors finished 24-of-49 from three-point range, an exceptional 49%.
That shooting efficiency gave Golden State a major offensive advantage.
Charlotte made 16 three-pointers on 40 attempts, which is still a strong 40% rate. However, Golden State made eight more three-point field goals.
That is a substantial difference in a seven-point game.
The Warriors therefore did not need to win the rebounding battle or assist battle to secure the victory. Their shooting efficiency created enough offensive value to compensate for other areas.
Brandon Miller Scores 33 for Charlotte
Brandon Miller was the game’s leading individual scorer with 33 points.
That is an important detail when evaluating the result because Charlotte’s leading scorer actually outscored Golden State’s leading scorer.
Miller’s 33 points helped Charlotte remain within striking distance throughout the game. The Hornets scored 36 points in the third quarter, and Miller’s scoring presence was an important part of Charlotte’s offensive resistance.
Yet the game also demonstrates why the highest-scoring individual player is not automatically associated with the winning team.
Miller scored 33, but Golden State finished with 132 points compared with Charlotte’s 125.
The Warriors received meaningful scoring contributions from several players rather than relying exclusively on Curry.
Jimmy Butler III and Brandin Podziemski Add 19 Each
Jimmy Butler III scored 19 points for Golden State, while Brandin Podziemski also scored 19.
Having two additional players reach 19 points gave the Warriors valuable balance.
Curry led the team with 26, but Butler and Podziemski combined for 38 points. That secondary production made it more difficult for Charlotte to focus its defensive attention on one player.
Golden State’s listed starters were Jimmy Butler III, Draymond Green, Quinten Post, Stephen Curry, and Moses Moody.
The starting lineup therefore included multiple players capable of contributing in different ways.
Curry supplied elite perimeter scoring. Butler added scoring alongside his broader two-way role. Green contributed heavily as a passer and rebounder. Post and Moody completed a lineup that helped Golden State maintain offensive spacing and ball movement.
Draymond Green’s 12 Assists Stand Out
One of the most interesting numbers in the game is Draymond Green’s 12 assists.
Green was also Golden State’s top rebounder with 8 rebounds.
His combination of 8 rebounds and 12 assists shows why looking only at scoring can provide an incomplete picture of player impact.
Green scored 10 points, which was not close to Curry’s 26 or Miller’s 33. However, his playmaking helped connect Golden State’s offense.
The Warriors finished with 35 team assists, meaning Green accounted for a significant portion of their recorded assists.
That becomes particularly important when comparing the teams because Charlotte also finished with 35 assists.
In other words, the two teams were equal in total assists, but Green was a major individual contributor to Golden State’s passing production.
LaMelo Ball Finishes With 27 Points
LaMelo Ball scored 27 points for Charlotte.
His scoring placed him second among the Hornets’ listed scorers, behind Brandon Miller’s 33.
Ball also collected 5 rebounds.
Charlotte’s offense benefited from having two primary scorers capable of producing substantial numbers. Miller’s 33 and Ball’s 27 accounted for 60 points combined.
That gave the Hornets a strong scoring foundation.
The challenge was turning that offensive production into a victory against a Golden State team that produced more efficient perimeter scoring.
Charlotte shot 52% overall, which is a very good field-goal percentage. The problem was that Golden State shot even better at 55% and had a substantial advantage from three-point range.
Kon Knueppel Provides 20 Points and 8 Assists
Kon Knueppel finished with 20 points and 8 assists.
He also recorded 5 rebounds.
His contribution is significant because Charlotte did not rely solely on Miller and Ball. Knueppel reached 20 points while also matching Collin Sexton’s 8 assists for the team lead.
That combination of scoring and passing is one of the more useful details in the box score.
Charlotte had 35 assists overall, with Sexton and Knueppel each credited with 8. Their playmaking helped the Hornets generate efficient offense and contributed to the team’s 52% field-goal percentage.
Knueppel’s performance therefore represents the type of balanced contribution that can sometimes be overlooked when a game is summarized only by the final score.
Collin Sexton Records 16 Points and 8 Assists
Collin Sexton scored 16 points and led Charlotte in the listed assist numbers alongside Knueppel with 8 assists.
He also grabbed 5 rebounds.
Sexton’s contribution demonstrates the difference between scoring leadership and overall offensive involvement.
While his 16 points were below Miller, Ball, and Knueppel, his 8 assists gave Charlotte another major source of creation.
The Hornets therefore had several players contributing to offensive organization:
- Brandon Miller: 33 points
- LaMelo Ball: 27 points
- Kon Knueppel: 20 points and 8 assists
- Collin Sexton: 16 points and 8 assists
That distribution helps explain why Charlotte was able to score 125 points.
Warriors Player Statistics at a Glance
The supplied game data identifies these key Golden State performances:
| Warriors Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Stephen Curry | 26 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Jimmy Butler III | 19 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Brandin Podziemski | 19 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Draymond Green | 10 | 8 | 12 |
| Quinten Post | 9 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Moses Moody | 7 | Not provided | Not provided |
The table should be read carefully. Only the statistics explicitly available in the supplied data are shown. It would be misleading to fill in missing individual categories without a verified full player box score.
That is an important distinction for reliable sports content. A useful statistical article should clearly separate confirmed numbers from information that is not available in the source data being analyzed.
Hornets Player Statistics at a Glance
Charlotte’s key listed performances were:
| Hornets Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Brandon Miller | 33 | Not provided | Not provided |
| LaMelo Ball | 27 | 5 | Not provided |
| Kon Knueppel | 20 | 5 | 8 |
| Collin Sexton | 16 | 5 | 8 |
| Moussa Diabate | Not provided | 8 | Not provided |
Again, this table intentionally avoids inventing statistics.
Moussa Diabate was Charlotte’s top listed rebounder with 8. Knueppel, Sexton, and Ball each had 5 rebounds.
The result is a useful reminder that box-score analysis should be transparent. If a category is not available, it is better to state that it was not provided than to estimate or manufacture a number.
Why Golden State Won the Game
The most convincing explanation is a combination of shooting efficiency and fourth-quarter execution.
Golden State scored 132 points despite committing 19 turnovers, four more than Charlotte.
That means turnovers were not the Warriors’ advantage.
Rebounding was not the advantage either because both teams finished with 37.
Assists were also equal at 35 apiece.
Steals actually favored Charlotte, which recorded 11 compared with Golden State’s 7.
Blocks favored Golden State, 3 to 1, but that difference alone does not explain the result.
The clearest advantage was shooting.
Golden State made:
24 three-pointers
Charlotte made:
16 three-pointers
That eight-made-three difference is enormous.
Even though Charlotte attempted 40 threes, Golden State attempted 49 and converted at a higher percentage.
The Warriors also made 16 of 17 free throws, an outstanding 94% rate. Charlotte made 13 of 17, or 76%.
The free-throw difference was smaller than the three-point difference, but it still contributed to Golden State’s offensive efficiency.
The Importance of Three-Point Shooting
Three-point shooting was arguably the defining statistical factor.
Golden State attempted 49 three-point shots and made 24.
That means nearly half of the Warriors’ three-point attempts went in.
Charlotte attempted 40 and made 16.
The Hornets’ 40% conversion rate was strong, but Golden State’s 49% rate was exceptional.
The Warriors therefore gained value from both volume and accuracy.
This distinction matters.
A team can make a high percentage from three but lose because it does not take enough attempts. Another team can take many threes but struggle with efficiency.
Golden State combined both.
That made its perimeter attack particularly difficult for Charlotte to match.
Field-Goal Efficiency Was Also Important
Golden State shot 55% from the field, compared with Charlotte’s 52%.
The difference may appear small, but it matters over 83 and 93 field-goal attempts.
Golden State made 46 field goals from 83 attempts.
Charlotte made 48 from 93 attempts.
Charlotte actually made two more total field goals, but needed 10 additional attempts to do it.
That is an excellent example of why total made shots should not be viewed independently of efficiency.
Golden State’s 46 made field goals came from a smaller number of attempts, while the Warriors also generated significantly more three-point makes.
The offensive profile was therefore more efficient even though Charlotte made more total field goals.
Free Throws Favored Golden State
The free-throw numbers were another small but meaningful advantage.
Golden State:
16-of-17, 94%
Charlotte:
13-of-17, 76%
Both teams attempted 17 free throws, so this was a direct comparison of conversion efficiency rather than opportunity volume.
Golden State missed only one free throw.
Charlotte missed four.
In a game decided by seven points, small differences such as this can matter.
It would be too simplistic to say the free throws alone won the game. The three-point shooting difference was much larger. However, the Warriors’ accuracy at the line helped protect their scoring advantage.
Turnovers Tell a Different Story
Turnovers favored Charlotte.
Golden State committed 19 turnovers.
Charlotte committed 15.
That gives the Hornets a four-turnover advantage.
Charlotte also recorded 11 steals compared with Golden State’s 7.
This suggests that the Hornets created defensive pressure and were capable of disrupting Golden State’s possessions.
Yet Charlotte could not convert that advantage into a win.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the matchup.
A team can force more turnovers and still lose if the opponent is significantly more efficient when it gets clean offensive opportunities.
The Warriors gave the ball away more often, but they compensated by shooting extremely well.
Rebounding Was Completely Even
Both teams finished with 37 rebounds.
That makes the rebounding battle one of the easiest aspects of the game to interpret.
Neither team established a clear advantage on the glass.
For Charlotte, Moussa Diabate led the listed rebounders with 8.
For Golden State, Draymond Green led the team with 8.
Both teams therefore had a key player reaching the same individual rebounding total.
Because the overall rebound count was identical, the result cannot reasonably be attributed to dominance on the boards.
Assists Were Also Identical
The teams each recorded 35 assists.
This is another unusual point of symmetry.
Golden State had Draymond Green producing 12 assists.
Charlotte had Collin Sexton and Kon Knueppel each producing 8.
The Hornets’ offense was therefore well distributed, while Green served as a particularly prominent playmaking hub for the Warriors.
Equal team assist totals reinforce the broader point that the game was not decided simply by passing volume.
The efficiency of the shots created from those possessions mattered more.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter: 30-30
The opening quarter ended level at 30 points each.
That immediately established the competitive nature of the game.
Neither side gained meaningful separation early.
Charlotte was able to match Golden State’s offensive output, setting the stage for a game that remained within reach for most of the night.
Second Quarter: Warriors Take Control
Golden State scored 39 points in the second quarter while Charlotte scored 34.
The five-point advantage gave the Warriors a 69-64 halftime lead.
This was the first clear swing in the game.
Golden State’s ability to produce 39 points in one quarter demonstrated how dangerous its offense could become when its shooting rhythm was established.
Third Quarter: Hornets Respond
Charlotte answered in the third quarter.
The Hornets scored 36 points compared with 29 for Golden State.
That seven-point swing erased the Warriors’ five-point halftime advantage and put Charlotte ahead entering the final quarter.
This was arguably Charlotte’s strongest stretch of the game.
Rather than allowing the halftime deficit to grow, the Hornets responded offensively and turned the contest into a one-quarter battle.
Fourth Quarter: Golden State Finishes Strong
The decisive quarter belonged to Golden State.
The Warriors scored 34 points.
Charlotte scored 25.
That nine-point difference was enough to transform a close game into a seven-point Warriors victory.
The fourth quarter is therefore central to understanding the result.
Golden State did not simply survive Charlotte’s third-quarter comeback. It responded with its best scoring quarter of the second half.
That late offensive surge separated the teams when it mattered most.
The Game Was Closer Than the Final Score Suggests
A seven-point final margin can sometimes make a game appear relatively comfortable.
The quarter scores show otherwise.
The first quarter was tied.
Golden State led by five at halftime.
Charlotte then outscored Golden State by seven in the third quarter.
The Warriors finally won the fourth quarter by nine.
This means the game repeatedly shifted momentum.
Charlotte demonstrated enough offensive power to take control entering the final period, but Golden State produced the stronger closing performance.
For readers studying NBA game results, this is a useful example of why quarter-by-quarter data can add context that a final score cannot provide.
Comparing the Leading Scorers
The individual scoring leaders were:
Brandon Miller: 33 points
Stephen Curry: 26 points
LaMelo Ball: 27 points
This creates an interesting statistical contrast.
Miller was the game’s leading scorer, yet his team lost.
Curry was Golden State’s leading scorer, but his 26 points were supported by 19 from Butler, 19 from Podziemski, 10 from Green, 9 from Post, and 7 from Moody among the listed Warriors.
Charlotte also had balanced scoring among its key players, but Golden State’s perimeter efficiency provided a stronger team-level scoring advantage.
The lesson is straightforward: scoring leadership and winning are related, but they are not identical.
A Closer Look at Team Efficiency
The team numbers reveal several layers.
Golden State’s offensive profile
Golden State combined:
- 55% overall shooting
- 49% three-point shooting
- 94% free-throw shooting
- 35 assists
- 132 points
Those numbers describe a highly efficient offensive performance.
The 19 turnovers are the obvious weakness, but the shooting numbers were strong enough to offset them.
Charlotte’s offensive profile
Charlotte produced:
- 52% overall shooting
- 40% three-point shooting
- 76% free-throw shooting
- 35 assists
- 125 points
That is also a very productive offensive profile.
A team shooting 52% from the field and 40% from three should normally expect to have a strong chance of winning.
Charlotte’s loss therefore highlights just how unusual Golden State’s shooting performance was.
What the Matchup Says About Curry’s Role
Stephen Curry’s 26 points were the highest individual scoring total for Golden State.
But the Warriors’ success was not based on Curry carrying the entire offense.
That distinction matters when analyzing the team.
Golden State had three listed players at 19 points or more, with Curry at 26 and Butler and Podziemski at 19.
Draymond Green added 10 points while contributing 12 assists and 8 rebounds.
This suggests a broader offensive structure in which Curry’s scoring is complemented by secondary scoring and Green’s playmaking.
For opponents, that creates a more difficult defensive problem than simply trying to limit Curry’s individual points.
What the Matchup Says About Brandon Miller
Brandon Miller’s 33 points were the highest individual scoring output in the game.
His performance shows that Charlotte had a reliable scoring centerpiece.
However, the team’s overall result demonstrates that strong individual production needs to be supported by efficiency across the lineup and defensive execution.
Charlotte’s offense was not poor. In fact, 125 points is a substantial total.
The problem was that Golden State reached 132.
That seven-point difference came despite Charlotte’s advantages in turnovers and steals.
Miller’s performance should therefore be viewed as a major positive within a team result that fell short.
The Role of LaMelo Ball
LaMelo Ball’s 27 points gave Charlotte another high-level scoring option.
His 5 rebounds also contributed to the team’s balanced frontcourt and backcourt statistical profile.
Having both Miller and Ball reach at least 27 points is a significant offensive achievement.
Charlotte’s problem was not the absence of scoring talent.
Instead, Golden State’s combination of three-point volume, shooting accuracy, and fourth-quarter production proved difficult to overcome.
Why the 19 Turnovers Did Not Sink Golden State
Nineteen turnovers would normally be an obvious concern.
Charlotte had only 15.
The Hornets also recorded 11 steals.
That means Charlotte generated more defensive disruption.
Yet the Warriors still won.
The explanation is efficiency.
When a team produces 24 made three-pointers and shoots 55% overall, it can sometimes absorb mistakes that would otherwise be costly.
This should not be interpreted as saying turnovers are unimportant.
Rather, it shows that statistical advantages exist in different forms, and some can be large enough to outweigh others.
Golden State’s shooting advantage was one of those cases.
What Charlotte Did Well
Despite the loss, Charlotte had several strong statistical areas.
Strong overall shooting
The Hornets shot 52% from the field.
That is a highly efficient offensive result.
Good three-point accuracy
Charlotte made 16 of 40 three-point attempts for 40%.
That kept the team within reach throughout the contest.
More steals
The Hornets recorded 11 steals.
That was four more than Golden State.
Fewer turnovers
Charlotte committed 15 turnovers compared with 19 for Golden State.
Strong third quarter
Charlotte won the third quarter 36-29.
These are not the statistics of a team that was simply outplayed from start to finish.
The Hornets competed well and created several advantages.
What Golden State Did Best
Golden State’s most important strengths were offensive.
Three-point production
The Warriors made 24 threes.
Three-point efficiency
They shot 49% from beyond the arc.
Field-goal efficiency
They shot 55% overall.
Free-throw accuracy
They converted 16 of 17 free throws.
Fourth-quarter scoring
They scored 34 points in the final quarter.
Playmaking from Green
Draymond Green recorded 12 assists.
Together, these elements explain the victory more convincingly than any single player statistic.
A Statistical Summary of the Matchup
| Category | Golden State | Charlotte | Advantage |
| Final Score | 132 | 125 | Warriors |
| Field Goals | 46-83 | 48-93 | Warriors by efficiency |
| Field-Goal % | 55% | 52% | Warriors |
| Three-Pointers | 24-49 | 16-40 | Warriors |
| Three-Point % | 49% | 40% | Warriors |
| Free Throws | 16-17 | 13-17 | Warriors |
| Free-Throw % | 94% | 76% | Warriors |
| Rebounds | 37 | 37 | Even |
| Assists | 35 | 35 | Even |
| Turnovers | 19 | 15 | Hornets |
| Steals | 7 | 11 | Hornets |
| Blocks | 3 | 1 | Warriors |
This table captures the basic statistical story.
Golden State won the shooting categories.
Charlotte won turnovers and steals.
Rebounding and assists were equal.
The final score therefore reflects a game where shooting efficiency outweighed defensive disruption.
Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats offer several useful conclusions.
First, Brandon Miller was the game’s leading scorer with 33 points, but Golden State won because its scoring was efficient and distributed across multiple contributors.
Second, Stephen Curry led the Warriors with 26 points, but Draymond Green’s 12 assists and 8 rebounds show why Curry was not the only important player.
Third, LaMelo Ball’s 27 points and Kon Knueppel’s 20 points helped Charlotte maintain a powerful offensive attack.
Fourth, the Warriors’ 24 three-pointers were a defining statistical advantage.
Fifth, the Hornets’ 11 steals and 15 turnovers compared with Golden State’s 7 steals and 19 turnovers demonstrate that Charlotte had meaningful defensive advantages.
Sixth, both teams recorded 37 rebounds and 35 assists, meaning neither category separated the teams.
Finally, the fourth quarter was decisive. Golden State scored 34 points while Charlotte managed 25.
What This Game Reveals About NBA Box-Score Analysis
One of the biggest mistakes in sports analysis is treating one statistic as the entire explanation.
A box score should be read as a collection of connected signals.
For example, saying “Brandon Miller scored 33 points” is accurate but incomplete.
Saying “Golden State won despite Miller scoring 33” provides more context.
Adding that Charlotte had fewer turnovers and more steals provides even more context.
Then adding Golden State’s 49% three-point shooting explains why the Warriors were able to overcome those disadvantages.
Finally, the quarter-by-quarter results show when the game was decided.
This layered approach produces a much more useful understanding of the contest.
Season Series and Next Matchup
The December 31 game gave Golden State a 1-0 lead in the season series.
The next listed matchup in the supplied data was on January 18, 2026.
That game ended:
Charlotte Hornets 116, Golden State Warriors 136
The second listed result therefore went in Golden State’s favor as well, with a 20-point margin.
That provides useful broader context when looking back at the December meeting. The first game was a competitive seven-point contest, while the next listed matchup ended with a much larger Warriors victory.
Final Assessment
The December 31, 2025 matchup between the Golden State Warriors and Charlotte Hornets was an excellent example of how NBA games can be decided by efficiency rather than simple statistical volume.
Charlotte had the game’s leading scorer in Brandon Miller, who finished with 33 points. LaMelo Ball added 27, while Kon Knueppel contributed 20 points and 8 assists. Collin Sexton added 16 points and 8 assists, and Moussa Diabate led the listed Hornets rebounders with 8.
Golden State responded with 26 points from Stephen Curry, 19 each from Jimmy Butler III and Brandin Podziemski, and a highly valuable all-around performance from Draymond Green, who recorded 10 points, 8 rebounds, and 12 assists.
The team statistics explain the final result even more clearly.
The Warriors shot 55% from the field and 49% from three-point range. Charlotte shot 52% overall and 40% from three. Golden State also converted 94% of its free throws.
Charlotte had advantages in turnovers and steals, while both teams were even in rebounds and assists.
The decisive difference was therefore offensive efficiency, particularly from long range, combined with Golden State’s ability to win the fourth quarter 34-25 after Charlotte had taken control of the third.
The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats ultimately show that individual scoring, team efficiency, playmaking, turnovers, and late-game execution all need to be considered together. Looking at only the top scorer would miss the central reason Golden State left Charlotte with a 132-125 victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Warriors vs Hornets game?
Brandon Miller was the game’s leading scorer with 33 points for the Charlotte Hornets. Stephen Curry led Golden State with 26 points.
What was the final score between the Warriors and Hornets on December 31, 2025?
The Golden State Warriors defeated the Charlotte Hornets 132-125 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte.
How many points did Stephen Curry score against the Hornets?
Stephen Curry scored 26 points for Golden State.
How many points did Brandon Miller score against the Warriors?
Brandon Miller scored 33 points, making him the highest-scoring player in the game.
Who led the Warriors in assists?
Draymond Green led Golden State with 12 assists.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Golden State shot better from three-point range, making 24 of 49 attempts for 49%. Charlotte made 16 of 40 for 40%.
Conclusion
The December 31, 2025 meeting between Charlotte and Golden State was a closely contested offensive game that came down to efficiency and execution.
Charlotte produced excellent individual scoring, led by Brandon Miller’s 33 points and LaMelo Ball’s 27. The Hornets also had strong contributions from Kon Knueppel and Collin Sexton, while their defense created more turnovers and steals than Golden State.
Golden State’s response was built around elite shooting. The Warriors made 24 three-pointers, shot 55% from the field, converted 94% of their free throws, and received balanced scoring from several players. Draymond Green’s 12 assists and 8 rebounds added another layer to the team’s performance.
The quarter scores provide the clearest picture of the game’s momentum. Golden State built a halftime lead, Charlotte responded with a strong third quarter, and the Warriors then produced a decisive fourth-quarter performance.
The final 132-125 score was therefore not the result of one overwhelming statistical category. It came from Golden State combining exceptional shooting efficiency with strong late-game execution, while Charlotte’s advantages in turnovers, steals, rebounds, and individual scoring were not enough to offset the Warriors’ perimeter production.
