Lakers vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

The lakers vs golden state warriors match player stats from the Lakers’ 105-99 victory over the Warriors tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Los Angeles won because it converted efficiently, controlled the decisive third quarter, defended the rim, and received balanced production around LeBron James. Golden State, meanwhile, stayed competitive behind Moses Moody’s 25 points and a strong defensive effort, but its 27 percent three-point shooting ultimately limited its offensive ceiling.

The game was played at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles in front of 18,997 fans. The Lakers entered with a 32-19 record, while Golden State entered at 28-25. Los Angeles finished with a 51 percent field-goal percentage compared with 42 percent for the Warriors. The Lakers also made 24 of 30 free throws, while Golden State went just 7 of 11 from the line.

Those numbers explain part of the result, but not all of it.

The most revealing part of the matchup was the way each team generated offense. LeBron James produced 20 points, seven rebounds and 10 assists, Rui Hachimura scored 18, Marcus Smart added 15, and Austin Reaves supplied 16 points with eight assists. For Golden State, Moses Moody led all scorers with 25 points, while Gui Santos added 15 and Draymond Green finished with nine points, four rebounds and six assists.

The biggest swing came in the third quarter. The Lakers scored 38 points while Golden State managed 29. That nine-point advantage transformed a tight halftime game into a lead Los Angeles was able to protect.

Lakers vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was:

Los Angeles Lakers 105, Golden State Warriors 99

The teams were separated by only two points at halftime. Golden State led 21-20 after the opening quarter, and both teams scored 21 points in the second. The Lakers then exploded offensively in the third quarter.

Category	Lakers	Warriors
Final score	105	99
Q1	20	21
Q2	21	21
Q3	38	29
Q4	26	28
Field goals	35-69	39-92
Field-goal percentage	51%	42%
3-pointers	11-27	14-51
3-point percentage	41%	27%
Free throws	24-30	7-11
Rebounds	41	37
Assists	29	25
Turnovers	22	12
Steals	7	16
Blocks	10	3

At first glance, Golden State’s 39 made field goals compared with Los Angeles’ 35 might look surprising. The explanation is volume. The Warriors attempted 92 shots compared with 69 for the Lakers, but they needed those extra attempts because their shooting efficiency was considerably lower.

Los Angeles made 51 percent of its shots. Golden State made 42 percent.

That nine-percentage-point difference is substantial in a game decided by six points.

The Lakers also produced a major advantage at the free-throw line. Their 24 made free throws were 17 more than Golden State’s seven. That alone represents a significant portion of the final margin.

The statistical profile therefore points to an important distinction: Golden State created more possessions and generated more shot attempts, while Los Angeles made better use of its opportunities.

LeBron James Controls the Game Without Needing 30 Points

LeBron James finished with:

• 20 points
• 7 rebounds
• 10 assists
• 6-of-17 shooting
• 2-of-7 from three-point range
• 6-of-7 free throws
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• 7 turnovers
• +7 plus-minus

A traditional box-score reading might focus on the fact that James shot 6-of-17 and committed seven turnovers.

That would miss the bigger picture.

His 10 assists were critical because Los Angeles did not need him to dominate the scoring column. His job was broader. He had to organize the offense, create advantages, attack mismatches and help the Lakers generate efficient opportunities.

James also scored 12 points during the third quarter, the period in which Los Angeles turned the game around. The official NBA recap notes that he hit two three-pointers and converted two additional three-point plays during that stretch.

That third-quarter burst is one of the most important pieces of the game.

For much of the first half, the Lakers and Warriors were locked together. Then James helped change the rhythm. Los Angeles opened the third quarter with a 10-2 run and eventually built an eight-point advantage by the end of the period.

His final line was therefore more valuable than the 20-point total suggests.

A player producing 20 points and 10 assists is responsible for a large portion of an offense’s creation. James also collected seven rebounds and finished with a positive plus-minus.

The seven turnovers are worth noting, however. They show that his high-usage role came with some risk. Golden State finished with 16 steals, more than twice Los Angeles’ seven.

That is an important warning sign for the Lakers. The team won despite turning the ball over 22 times.

Moses Moody Leads the Warriors With 25 Points

Moses Moody was Golden State’s leading scorer and one of the game’s most important individual performers.

His final numbers were:

• 25 points
• 8-of-17 field goals
• 5-of-14 three-pointers
• 4-of-5 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 3 steals
• 1 block
• 4 personal fouls
• +5 plus-minus

Moody played 39 minutes and 13 seconds, showing how heavily Golden State relied on him.

His 25 points were especially important because Stephen Curry did not play in the contest. The official NBA recap states that Curry missed his third consecutive game because of a knee issue.

Without Curry’s usual offensive gravity, Golden State needed other players to generate perimeter scoring.

Moody responded.

Five made three-pointers were a major part of his performance. He accounted for five of Golden State’s 14 made threes, meaning more than one-third of the Warriors’ successful three-point attempts came from him.

His 14 three-point attempts also demonstrate how important he was to the team’s perimeter attack.

However, Moody’s individual efficiency could not completely solve Golden State’s team-wide shooting problem. The Warriors attempted 51 threes and made only 14.

That works out to approximately 27.5 percent.

When a team takes 51 three-point attempts, a 27 percent conversion rate creates a difficult path to victory.

Rui Hachimura Provides Efficient Scoring

Rui Hachimura produced one of the most efficient scoring performances for Los Angeles.

He finished with:

• 18 points
• 7-of-10 field goals
• 4-of-5 three-pointers
• 1 rebound
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• +? official box-score impact reflected in the team context

The most striking number is his four made three-pointers on only five attempts.

Hachimura shot 70 percent from the field and 80 percent from three-point range.

That kind of efficiency helped compensate for some of the Lakers’ offensive limitations elsewhere.

It also explains why Los Angeles could win despite James shooting below 40 percent from the field.

The Lakers did not rely on one scorer.

Instead, they received highly efficient contributions from multiple players.

Hachimura’s perimeter shooting was particularly important against a Warriors team that attempted to create offense through volume from behind the arc.

Austin Reaves Gives the Lakers a Major Bench Boost

Austin Reaves was another key piece of the Lakers’ victory.

He finished with:

• 16 points
• 5-of-10 shooting
• 0-of-2 from three
• 6-of-7 free throws
• 5 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 2 steals
• 1 block

His eight assists were particularly valuable.

Reaves was not simply a scoring option. He helped maintain offensive organization when James was not directly creating the play.

The combination of James’ 10 assists and Reaves’ eight meant the Lakers had 18 assists between two players.

That is a significant part of the Lakers’ 29 total assists.

Reaves also helped the Lakers get to the free-throw line. His six made free throws were part of Los Angeles’ 24-for-30 performance.

The bench production mattered because the Warriors had several players contributing off the bench as well. Los Angeles needed its second unit to avoid losing ground during non-LeBron minutes.

Reaves did that while also providing playmaking.

Marcus Smart Adds Two-Way Value

Marcus Smart scored 15 points and provided another important layer to the Lakers’ performance.

His line included:

• 15 points
• 3-of-7 field goals
• 1-of-2 three-pointers
• 8-of-9 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 blocks
• +7 plus-minus

The free-throw shooting stands out.

Smart made eight of nine from the line, giving Los Angeles another reliable source of points when the Warriors could not prevent drives without fouling.

His two blocks were also notable from a perimeter player’s perspective.

The Lakers finished with 10 blocks as a team, compared with only three for Golden State.

That difference illustrates one of the clearest defensive advantages in the game.

Jarred Vanderbilt Makes an Impact Beyond Scoring

Jarred Vanderbilt scored 13 points and grabbed eight rebounds in only 19 minutes.

He shot 4-of-6 from the field and 3-of-4 from the free-throw line.

His +11 plus-minus was one of the better figures on the Lakers.

The value of Vanderbilt’s performance was not simply his scoring.

Eight rebounds in 19 minutes gave Los Angeles additional possessions and helped the team finish with a 41-37 rebounding advantage.

He also provided energy during an important portion of the game.

The official NBA recap highlighted Vanderbilt’s involvement in the late stretch, including a dunk generated from a Luke Kennard pass during an 11-0 Lakers run.

That sequence captures why box-score totals do not always explain a player’s influence.

Vanderbilt’s contribution was about activity, rebounding, finishing and defensive energy as much as points.

Luke Kennard Makes a Useful Lakers Debut

Luke Kennard scored 10 points in his Lakers debut.

His arrival was particularly interesting because he provided another perimeter shooting option.

The official NBA recap reported that Kennard was acquired from Atlanta before the game and scored 10 points in his first appearance for Los Angeles.

More importantly, Kennard hit a key corner three-pointer and later found Vanderbilt for a dunk during the Lakers’ late 11-0 run.

That is an example of why a player’s impact should not be judged solely by total points.

A 10-point performance can become much more meaningful when several of those points or assists arrive during a decisive run.

Draymond Green’s All-Around Contribution

Draymond Green finished with:

• 9 points
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 1 steal
• 2-of-6 shooting
• 2-of-6 from three
• 1-of-2 free throws
• 2 turnovers
• +11 plus-minus

His scoring was limited, but his six assists show how much Golden State depended on him to help create offense.

Green’s +11 plus-minus was also notable because the Warriors lost by six.

That suggests his minutes were productive overall, even though the team could not maintain that level across the full game.

His playmaking remained one of Golden State’s most useful offensive tools.

Gui Santos Provides 15 Points

Gui Santos was Golden State’s second-highest scorer with 15 points.

He shot:

• 6-of-12 from the field
• 1-of-4 from three
• 2-of-4 from the free-throw line

He also collected eight rebounds and three assists.

Santos’ eight rebounds tied him with the Warriors’ best individual rebounding totals in the game.

His performance helped Golden State stay competitive despite the shooting struggles.

However, his four free-throw attempts and one made three were not enough to offset the team’s poor perimeter efficiency.

The Third Quarter Decided the Game

The third quarter is the clearest explanation for the final result.

Golden State entered halftime trailing by only one point.

After two quarters:

Lakers 41, Warriors 42

Then Los Angeles scored 38 points in the third.

Golden State scored 29.

That changed the game from a possession-by-possession contest into one where the Lakers had control.

The Lakers’ third-quarter offensive explosion was especially impressive because their first-half scoring had been modest.

They scored only 20 points in the first quarter and 21 in the second.

Then their offense suddenly became much more efficient.

James was central to that transformation.

The Lakers did not simply shoot more. They generated better scoring opportunities and converted them.

The Warriors eventually responded by scoring 28 points in the fourth quarter, but Los Angeles had created enough separation to survive the late push.

The official NBA game chart lists the game’s longest run as 11 points and shows 15 lead changes and four ties.

That is consistent with a game that remained highly competitive for long stretches.

Shooting Efficiency Was the Deciding Statistical Advantage

The clearest team-level difference was shooting efficiency.

Los Angeles:

35-of-69 from the field, 51 percent

Golden State:

39-of-92 from the field, 42 percent

The Warriors made four more field goals but attempted 23 more shots.

That is an enormous difference in shot volume.

Golden State needed 92 attempts to score 99 points.

Los Angeles needed only 69 attempts to score 105.

The Lakers’ effective offensive efficiency was therefore much stronger.

Three-point shooting created another major contrast.

Los Angeles made 11 of 27 threes, or 41 percent.

Golden State made 14 of 51, or 27 percent.

The Warriors made three more three-pointers, but they needed 24 additional attempts to do it.

This is the classic difference between volume and efficiency.

Taking more threes is not automatically better.

The value comes from making enough of them to justify the attempts.

Free Throws Gave Los Angeles Another Advantage

The free-throw numbers were decisive.

Lakers:

24-of-30, 80 percent

Warriors:

7-of-11, 64 percent

Los Angeles made 17 more free throws.

Since the final margin was six points, this category alone had a massive effect on the outcome.

The Lakers were more successful at turning contact into points.

James made six of seven.

Reaves made six of seven.

Smart made eight of nine.

Those three players combined for 20 made free throws.

That is a remarkable portion of the Lakers’ total.

It also shows that Los Angeles did not need to rely exclusively on three-point shooting to generate offense.

Rebounding Was Close, But the Lakers Still Won It

The Lakers grabbed 41 rebounds.

The Warriors grabbed 37.

That four-rebound advantage was not overwhelming, but it mattered.

Vanderbilt contributed eight rebounds.

James added seven.

Reaves collected five.

Golden State had eight rebounds from Santos and four from Green.

The rebounding margin helped Los Angeles limit the number of additional possessions created by Golden State.

However, the more unusual statistic was Golden State’s 16 steals compared with the Lakers’ seven.

The Warriors clearly created defensive disruption.

Yet they were unable to turn that advantage into enough points.

That is an important lesson from the game.

Creating turnovers is valuable only when those turnovers translate into efficient offense.

Turnovers Nearly Changed the Result

Los Angeles committed 22 turnovers.

Golden State committed only 12.

That gives the Warriors a 10-turnover advantage.

On paper, that should have been enough to create a major opportunity.

It was not.

The reason is that the Lakers compensated with superior shooting, free-throw production and rim protection.

Golden State’s 16 steals were also significant.

The Lakers were therefore far from perfect offensively.

Their 22 turnovers are probably the clearest area that would concern the coaching staff after the win.

Against a team that converts transition opportunities more efficiently, that number could become decisive.

The Lakers won this particular game because their advantages in other areas outweighed the turnover deficit.

Defensive Rim Protection Favored Los Angeles

The Lakers recorded 10 blocks.

Golden State recorded three.

That seven-block difference is substantial.

It reflects the Lakers’ ability to challenge shots around the basket and protect the paint.

Golden State’s 48 points in the paint were actually higher than Los Angeles’ 42.

That makes the blocking numbers even more interesting.

The Warriors still generated interior scoring, but the Lakers repeatedly disrupted attempts at the rim.

This is another example of why one statistic should not be viewed in isolation.

Golden State scored well enough inside to stay competitive, but Los Angeles’ ability to challenge shots prevented some possessions from becoming efficient scoring opportunities.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Team

The deeper lesson from these lakers vs golden state warriors match player stats is that the teams won different statistical battles.

Golden State won:

• Field-goal makes
• Shot attempts
• Steals
• Turnover margin
• Three-point makes

Los Angeles won:

• Field-goal percentage
• Three-point percentage
• Free throws
• Rebounding
• Assists
• Blocks
• Final score

That contrast explains the six-point result.

The Warriors played an aggressive, high-volume game.

The Lakers played a more efficient game.

When efficiency is this different, a team can lose even after creating more possessions.

Key Takeaways From the Match

Several conclusions stand out when the full box score is considered.

1. LeBron’s playmaking mattered as much as his scoring

James did not need 30 points because he created offense for teammates.

His 10 assists helped keep the Lakers’ offense balanced.

2. Moody carried the Warriors’ scoring load

Moody’s 25 points were the highest individual total in the game.

His five made threes were particularly important.

3. Los Angeles won through efficiency

The Lakers shot 51 percent from the field and 41 percent from three.

That was the biggest offensive difference.

4. Free throws were crucial

Los Angeles made 24 free throws.

Golden State made seven.

The 17-point difference was enormous in a six-point game.

5. The third quarter changed everything

The Lakers won the third quarter 38-29.

That was the largest single-quarter advantage of the game.

6. Turnovers kept Golden State alive

The Warriors forced enough mistakes to remain competitive.

Los Angeles’ 22 turnovers are a clear area for improvement.

7. Bench contributions mattered

Reaves scored 16.

Vanderbilt scored 13.

Kennard scored 10.

That secondary scoring prevented the Lakers from becoming completely dependent on James.

How to Read Match Player Stats More Accurately

For readers trying to understand NBA box scores, this game provides a useful example.

Do not begin with points alone.

Start with five questions:

1. Who scored efficiently?
2. Who created shots for teammates?
3. Which team won the possession battle?
4. Where did the free throws come from?
5. Which team won the decisive quarter?

Using those questions, the game becomes much easier to understand.

Moody led the game in scoring, but James had a broader offensive role.

Golden State had more field goals, but Los Angeles shot far more efficiently.

Golden State forced more turnovers, but Los Angeles generated enough efficient offense to overcome them.

This is why a good statistical analysis should move beyond simply listing points and rebounds.

Why the Box Score Matters for Future Matchups

A single game should never be treated as a complete evaluation of a team.

However, individual games can reveal tactical patterns.

For the Lakers, the biggest positive was offensive balance.

James had 20 points and 10 assists.

Hachimura scored 18.

Reaves scored 16.

Smart scored 15.

Vanderbilt scored 13.

Kennard scored 10.

That distribution makes it harder for an opponent to focus entirely on one scorer.

For Golden State, Moody’s scoring was encouraging, but the three-point efficiency was a major concern.

Fourteen made threes sounds impressive until the 51 attempts are considered.

At 27 percent, the Warriors left too many points on the table.

The team’s 12 turnovers and 16 steals also show that Golden State was capable of creating extra possessions.

The challenge was converting those advantages into enough efficient offense.

A Closer Look at the Final Six-Point Margin

A 105-99 result can appear close, and it was.

The game featured 15 lead changes and four ties, according to the NBA game data.

The final margin therefore should not be interpreted as a dominant Lakers performance.

Instead, it was a competitive game decided by several small but meaningful statistical advantages.

Los Angeles’ biggest advantages were:

• 9 percentage points in field-goal accuracy
• 14 percentage points in three-point accuracy
• 17 more made free throws
• 4 more rebounds
• 4 more assists
• 7 more blocks

Golden State’s advantages included:

• 10 fewer turnovers
• 9 more steals
• 4 more made field goals
• 3 more made three-pointers
• 23 more field-goal attempts

The result came down to which advantages mattered more.

The Lakers’ efficiency advantages ultimately outweighed Golden State’s possession advantages.

Game Context and Availability

The result also needs to be viewed in the context of player availability.

The official NBA recap reports that Luka Doncic did not play for Los Angeles after suffering a mild hamstring strain, while DeAndre Ayton was a late scratch because of a knee issue. Stephen Curry also missed the game for Golden State because of a knee issue.

That context matters when evaluating individual performances.

For example, Moody’s 25-point performance came in a game without Curry.

Likewise, James’ 20-point, 10-assist line came in a Lakers lineup without Doncic.

The absences changed the offensive responsibilities on both sides.

This is one reason raw box-score comparisons should always be combined with lineup context.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top scorer in the Lakers vs Warriors game?

Moses Moody led all scorers with 25 points for Golden State. Rui Hachimura scored 18 for Los Angeles, while LeBron James finished with 20.

What was LeBron James’ stat line?

LeBron James recorded 20 points, seven rebounds and 10 assists. He shot 6-of-17 from the field, 2-of-7 from three and 6-of-7 from the free-throw line.

What was the final score?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Golden State Warriors 105-99.

Which team shot better?

The Lakers shot better overall. Los Angeles made 35 of 69 field-goal attempts for 51 percent, while Golden State made 39 of 92 for 42 percent.

How did Golden State’s three-point shooting compare with the Lakers?

Golden State made 14 of 51 three-point attempts, or about 27 percent. Los Angeles made 11 of 27, or 41 percent. The Warriors made more threes, but the Lakers were significantly more efficient.

Who led the Lakers off the bench?

Austin Reaves led the Lakers’ bench scoring with 16 points. He also contributed five rebounds and eight assists.

Conclusion

The lakers vs golden state warriors match player stats show why the Lakers were able to win a competitive 105-99 game despite committing 10 more turnovers than Golden State.

The Warriors created extra opportunities through 16 steals and took 23 more field-goal attempts. Moses Moody’s 25 points gave them a reliable scoring leader, while Gui Santos and Draymond Green also contributed.

But Los Angeles was more efficient.

The Lakers shot 51 percent from the field, made 41 percent of their threes and converted 80 percent of their free throws. They also held advantages in rebounds, assists and blocks.

LeBron James was central to that success with 20 points, seven rebounds and 10 assists. His 12-point third quarter helped ignite the period that ultimately separated the teams.

Hachimura’s 18 points, Reaves’ 16, Smart’s 15 and Vanderbilt’s 13 gave Los Angeles the balanced support it needed.

The most important lesson from the lakers vs golden state warriors match player stats is that scoring totals alone do not explain an NBA result. Golden State made more field goals and more three-pointers, yet Los Angeles won because its shots were converted at a much higher rate and its free-throw advantage was enormous.

For anyone studying the game, the third-quarter swing, shooting efficiency, free-throw disparity and contrasting turnover numbers provide the clearest explanation for the final result.

In short, Golden State generated volume and disruption, while Los Angeles generated efficiency and timely execution. That difference produced the six-point Lakers victory.