Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds Match Player Stats

Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds match player stats from July 11, 2026, tell a clear story of a game controlled by Cincinnati’s pitching and power. The Reds defeated the Cubs 4-0 at Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati, Ohio, behind a dominant seven-inning performance from Hunter Greene and a pair of home runs from Jake Bleday and Elly De La Cruz. Chicago managed only four hits and struck out 16 times, while Cincinnati collected 13 hits and finished with four runs, two home runs and eight strikeouts.

For anyone studying the Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds match player stats, the most important point is that the final score does not fully explain how the game unfolded. Cincinnati combined efficient pitching, consistent contact and timely power. Chicago’s offense struggled to create sustained pressure, and its inability to convert limited opportunities into runs became the defining factor.

The game was played in front of 30,878 fans and lasted 2 hours and 35 minutes. Shota Imanaga took the loss for Chicago after allowing seven hits and one earned run over five innings. Greene earned the win after allowing just three hits and no earned runs across seven innings while striking out 12 and walking only one.

Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place on July 11, 2026, at Great American Ball Park. The Cubs entered the game with a 52-42 record, including 25-23 on the road. The Reds entered at 43-50 overall and 22-26 at home.

The final result was:

Team	Runs	Hits	Errors
Chicago Cubs	0	4	0
Cincinnati Reds	4	13	0

The four-run difference was produced entirely by Cincinnati’s offense and pitching. Both teams played error-free baseball, meaning defensive mistakes did not decide the contest.

That is an important detail when analyzing the game. Cincinnati did not need Chicago to give away extra opportunities. The Reds created their advantage through their own execution.

The team batting totals make the contrast even clearer.

Chicago’s offensive numbers

The Cubs finished with:

• 31 at-bats
• 0 runs
• 4 hits
• 0 RBIs
• 0 home runs
• 1 walk
• 16 strikeouts

Chicago’s four hits represented a very limited offensive output. The Cubs also failed to record an RBI or home run, which meant that every offensive opportunity had to be manufactured through singles, baserunning and sequencing.

The 16 strikeouts were particularly significant. Cincinnati’s pitching staff recorded eight strikeouts as a team, while Chicago’s hitters struck out twice as often.

Cincinnati’s offensive numbers

The Reds recorded:

• 35 at-bats
• 4 runs
• 13 hits
• 4 RBIs
• 2 home runs
• 1 walk
• 8 strikeouts

Cincinnati’s 13 hits were more than three times Chicago’s total. The Reds also produced all four of the game’s RBIs.

This combination of contact and power is one of the clearest explanations for the 4-0 result. Cincinnati was not dependent on one type of offensive production. The Reds generated baserunners with hits and then added extra impact through home runs.

Hunter Greene’s Dominant Pitching Performance

Hunter Greene was the most influential individual player in the game.

His official line was:

Statistic	Hunter Greene
Innings	7.0
Hits Allowed	3
Earned Runs	0
Strikeouts	12
Walks	1
Decision	Win, 1-1

Greene’s performance stands out immediately because of the combination of volume and efficiency. He completed seven innings while allowing only three hits. More importantly, he gave Chicago no earned runs.

His 12 strikeouts were the highest single-game strikeout total listed in the provided data. That figure accounted for 75 percent of Cincinnati’s team strikeouts.

Greene also limited free baserunners. He issued just one walk during his seven innings.

For a hitter, this creates a difficult matchup. A pitcher who limits both hits and walks leaves very little room for an offense to build an inning. Chicago’s four total hits and one walk demonstrate just how little sustained traffic the Cubs were able to create.

Why Greene’s seven innings mattered

Going seven innings allowed Greene to take the game deep while preserving a significant advantage for Cincinnati.

His line of seven innings, three hits, zero earned runs, 12 strikeouts and one walk can be viewed from several angles.

First, he prevented Chicago from scoring.

Second, he kept the Cubs from generating momentum through repeated baserunners.

Third, his strikeout total reduced the number of balls Chicago could put into play.

Fourth, his ability to complete seven innings gave Cincinnati a strong foundation for protecting the lead.

This was not simply a good pitching performance based on the final score. The underlying line shows that Greene actively controlled the matchup.

Shota Imanaga’s Loss Was More Complicated Than the Score Suggests

Shota Imanaga was credited with the loss, but his pitching line deserves closer examination.

Imanaga finished with:

Statistic	Shota Imanaga
Innings	5.0
Hits Allowed	7
Earned Runs	1
Strikeouts	5
Walks	1
Decision	Loss, 5-8

At first glance, a pitcher taking a loss in a 4-0 game might appear to have been heavily responsible for the defeat. The detailed numbers tell a more nuanced story.

Imanaga allowed seven hits across five innings, which gave Cincinnati more opportunities than Chicago’s offense received against Greene. However, he surrendered only one earned run.

That means the game’s offensive gap became much larger after considering the total team performance. Cincinnati’s hitters eventually produced three additional runs, including two home runs, while Chicago remained scoreless.

Imanaga’s five strikeouts and one walk also show that he was able to generate strikeouts without losing control. The biggest difference between the two starting pitchers was not simply walks. It was the volume of contact and the Reds’ ability to turn that contact into meaningful offense.

Jake Bleday’s Two-Run Home Run Changed the Game

Jake Bleday delivered one of the game’s most important offensive moments.

His home run was listed as his 15th of the season, and it produced two RBIs.

The scoring sequence provided with the game data shows that Bleday’s two-run homer came in the seventh inning. Before that point, Cincinnati had a narrow advantage.

That distinction matters because a two-run home run can change the tactical situation immediately.

Instead of Cincinnati protecting a small lead, Bleday’s homer expanded the advantage and gave the Reds additional room to operate late in the game.

Bleday’s contribution was especially valuable because the Cubs had struggled to generate offense throughout the afternoon. When an opposing lineup is having difficulty producing runs, even a single additional scoring opportunity can become decisive.

The two-run homer was therefore more than just another entry in the box score. It was a high-impact event that helped turn Cincinnati’s advantage into a comfortable four-run margin.

Elly De La Cruz Adds Another Home Run

Elly De La Cruz also hit a home run, listed as his 15th of the season.

His solo home run came in the fifth inning and produced one RBI.

The timing of the homer is important. Cincinnati’s offense had already collected multiple hits, but De La Cruz provided the first home-run breakthrough identified in the scoring summary.

His solo shot gave the Reds an important lead and demonstrated the value of power in a game where Chicago was struggling to score.

De La Cruz also contributed one RBI to Cincinnati’s four-run total.

The provided scoring information identifies his fifth-inning solo homer as one of the game’s key scoring events. His ability to provide a run without requiring another baserunner was a major part of Cincinnati’s offensive efficiency.

Spencer Steer’s Sacrifice Fly

Spencer Stewart is listed in the provided scoring summary as producing a sacrifice fly and one RBI.

The Reds’ scoring sequence therefore included different forms of run production:

1. Elly De La Cruz hit a solo home run in the fifth inning.
2. Spencer Stewart produced a sacrifice fly in the seventh inning.
3. Jake Bleday hit a two-run home run in the seventh inning.

This is useful when looking beyond the home runs.

Cincinnati did not score exclusively through long balls. The sacrifice fly shows that the Reds were also capable of converting a scoring opportunity into a run without needing an extra-base hit.

That kind of offensive variety is valuable in individual games because it reduces dependence on one specific outcome.

Seiya Suzuki Was Chicago’s Leading Hitter

Seiya Suzuki was the Cubs’ leading hitter based on the provided box-score data.

He went:

2-for-4

Suzuki accounted for half of Chicago’s four hits.

That makes his performance one of the clearest individual positives for the Cubs. Even though the team could not score, Suzuki was able to produce two hits in four at-bats against a Cincinnati pitching staff that held Chicago to only four total hits.

However, baseball is a team sport where individual hitting production must be considered in context.

Suzuki’s two hits did not translate into runs or RBIs. The Cubs therefore received some individual offensive success without receiving the situational production required to change the scoreboard.

Spencer Steer and Cincinnati’s Contact Advantage

Spencer Steer was listed as Cincinnati’s leading hitter with a 3-for-4 performance.

That means Steer reached safely with a hit in three of his four at-bats.

His performance was part of Cincinnati’s much stronger overall contact production. The Reds collected 13 hits, compared with four from Chicago.

Steer’s three hits were especially notable because they represented nearly one-quarter of Cincinnati’s total hits.

When examining player statistics, a 3-for-4 line is important not only because of the batting average represented in that game, but also because it indicates repeated success at the plate.

The Reds had several players contributing to their offensive output, rather than relying entirely on one hitter.

Comparing the Starting Pitchers

One of the most useful ways to understand the game is to compare Greene and Imanaga directly.

Category	Hunter Greene	Shota Imanaga
Innings	7.0	5.0
Hits Allowed	3	7
Earned Runs	0	1
Strikeouts	12	5
Walks	1	1
Decision	Win	Loss

Greene had the stronger statistical performance across almost every major category.

He pitched two more innings, allowed four fewer hits, struck out seven more batters and gave up no earned runs.

Both pitchers issued only one walk, so control was relatively similar based on the supplied statistics.

The biggest difference was therefore Greene’s ability to prevent contact and miss bats while working deeper into the game.

The Strikeout Gap Explains Much of Chicago’s Offensive Problem

Chicago’s 16 strikeouts deserve special attention.

A team can lose a game despite making plenty of contact, but the Cubs did not have that luxury here. They recorded only four hits while striking out 16 times.

Cincinnati, meanwhile, had 13 hits and eight strikeouts.

The difference is dramatic:

• Cubs: 4 hits and 16 strikeouts
• Reds: 13 hits and 8 strikeouts

Chicago struck out four times for every hit it recorded.

Cincinnati had more hits than strikeouts by a substantial margin.

This does not mean strikeouts alone determine the winner. Baseball outcomes are influenced by pitching, defense, baserunning, situational hitting and many other factors. However, in this particular game, the strikeout and hit totals provide a strong statistical explanation for the offensive imbalance.

Cincinnati’s 13 Hits Created More Opportunities

The Reds finished with 13 hits from 35 at-bats.

That gave Cincinnati repeated opportunities to put runners on base.

Chicago had only four hits from 31 at-bats.

The difference in at-bats was relatively small, but the difference in hits was enormous.

Cincinnati recorded nine more hits despite having only four additional at-bats.

That is one of the strongest team-level statistics in the game.

The Reds also converted those opportunities into four runs and four RBIs.

Chicago, despite recording four hits and one walk, produced no runs and no RBIs.

This is why a simple box-score reading can be misleading. Four hits might sound like a reasonable offensive contribution until it is compared with 13 hits from the opposing team.

Home Runs Provided Cincinnati With Immediate Run Production

Cincinnati hit two home runs.

Chicago hit none.

The home runs came from two of Cincinnati’s most recognizable offensive contributors in the supplied data:

• Elly De La Cruz: 15th home run
• Jake Bleday: 15th home run

Together, their home runs accounted for three of Cincinnati’s four runs.

De La Cruz’s solo homer supplied one run, while Bleday’s two-run homer supplied two.

The remaining run came through the sacrifice fly credited in the scoring summary.

This distribution shows how Cincinnati combined power with situational offense.

Chicago, by comparison, had no home runs and no RBIs.

Error-Free Defense Kept the Game Clean

Both teams were charged with zero errors.

That is an important part of the game profile because neither club received assistance from defensive mistakes.

When a game finishes without errors, offensive and pitching execution often become even more important in explaining the final result.

That was the case here.

Cincinnati created its advantage through 13 hits, two home runs and strong pitching.

Chicago did not lose because of an error-filled defensive performance. The Cubs were simply unable to match Cincinnati’s production.

What the Team Batting Lines Reveal

The full team batting numbers offer a useful snapshot of the game.

Cubs

Chicago finished with 31 at-bats, four hits, one walk and 16 strikeouts.

There were no runs, no RBIs and no home runs.

The key issue was not simply a lack of power. The Cubs also struggled to put the ball in play consistently.

Reds

Cincinnati finished with 35 at-bats, 13 hits, one walk and eight strikeouts.

The Reds scored four runs, collected four RBIs and hit two home runs.

Their offensive profile was therefore considerably more balanced.

They put the ball in play more frequently, reached base through hits and created scoring through power.

The Most Important Player Stats From the Game

If the entire box score needs to be reduced to the individual performances that mattered most, several statistics stand above the rest.

Hunter Greene

Greene’s seven innings, three hits allowed, zero earned runs and 12 strikeouts formed the foundation of the victory.

Jake Bleday

Bleday’s two-run home run in the seventh inning provided a major scoring push and gave him two RBIs.

Elly De La Cruz

De La Cruz hit his 15th home run of the season, providing a solo run in the fifth inning.

Spencer Steer

Steer went 3-for-4 and was Cincinnati’s most productive hitter by hits.

Seiya Suzuki

Suzuki went 2-for-4 and accounted for two of Chicago’s four hits.

Shota Imanaga

Imanaga allowed seven hits and one earned run over five innings, with five strikeouts and one walk.

What Chicago Could Have Done Differently

The provided statistics suggest several areas where Chicago’s offense could have been more effective.

The first is contact.

Sixteen strikeouts made it difficult for the Cubs to sustain innings. Against a pitcher producing 12 strikeouts, avoiding empty at-bats becomes especially important.

The second is converting hits into scoring opportunities.

Chicago collected four hits but did not score. That means the team was unable to string enough productive plate appearances together to generate a run.

The third is matching Cincinnati’s power.

The Reds hit two home runs. Chicago hit none.

A team does not need a home run to win a baseball game, but when one offense produces multiple home runs while the other produces none, the power difference can become highly influential.

What Cincinnati Did Well

Cincinnati’s success can be grouped into three major areas.

1. Strong starting pitching

Greene gave Cincinnati seven innings of scoreless baseball and struck out 12.

2. Consistent offensive contact

The Reds collected 13 hits, more than three times Chicago’s total.

3. Timely power

De La Cruz and Bleday both homered, with Bleday’s two-run shot coming in the seventh inning.

The combination of these factors gave Cincinnati control of the game.

A Closer Look at Run Production

The four Cincinnati runs were not evenly distributed across the game.

The scoring summary identifies the fifth and seventh innings as the decisive points.

De La Cruz’s solo home run in the fifth inning opened the scoring.

Then the Reds added three runs in the seventh through a sacrifice fly and Bleday’s two-run homer.

That sequence demonstrates the importance of late-game separation.

For several innings, the contest remained relatively close on the scoreboard. Cincinnati eventually created enough distance to make the Cubs’ offensive struggles even more costly.

Why the 4-0 Final Score Matters

A shutout is always worth examining because it requires one team to completely prevent the other from producing a run.

Cincinnati achieved that despite allowing Chicago four hits and one walk.

The Reds did not need a perfect game from their pitching staff. They needed to prevent those baserunners from becoming runs.

Greene’s seven scoreless innings accomplished most of that task.

The rest of the Cincinnati pitching effort preserved the shutout after Greene departed.

The Cubs’ inability to score also meant that Cincinnati’s four runs were enough to produce a comfortable victory.

Great American Ball Park as the Setting

The game was played at Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The venue hosted a crowd of 30,878 for the July 11 matchup.

The setting is relevant when discussing the game because the contest featured two home runs from Cincinnati hitters. However, the supplied data does not provide enough information to attribute those home runs to specific park effects.

It is therefore more accurate to simply record the venue and the home-run results rather than make unsupported claims about how the ballpark influenced the outcome.

Game Time and Attendance

The official game time provided was 2 hours and 35 minutes.

Attendance was listed at 30,878.

Those details help place the game in context and can be useful for readers researching a specific box score rather than simply looking for a general team comparison.

The game was also listed as being covered by MLB.TV.

Series Context

The supplied data shows the series result as Cubs winning 2-1.

It also lists:

• Game 1: Cubs 0, Reds 4 on July 11
• Game 2: Cubs 5, Reds 3 on July 12
• Game 3: Cubs 8, Reds 4 on July 12

Because the supplied information is presented this way, those figures are reproduced as provided rather than attempting to reconstruct or modify the series chronology.

For a reader interested specifically in the July 11 game, the important point is that Cincinnati won 4-0 despite the overall series result shown as 2-1 in favor of Chicago.

That distinction prevents confusion between an individual game result and the series outcome.

Umpiring Crew

The provided umpiring information lists:

• Jim Wolf at home plate
• Tyler Jones at first base
• Alex Mackay at second base
• Roberto Ortiz at third base

No claims about specific calls or umpiring impact should be made from the supplied statistical information because no pitch-by-pitch or disputed-call data was provided.

For a statistical article, recording the crew without assigning unsupported influence is the more reliable approach.

Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds match player stats reveal several clear conclusions.

Cincinnati won because its pitching prevented Chicago from converting limited offensive opportunities into runs, while its hitters generated enough contact and power to build a four-run lead.

Hunter Greene was the standout performer. His seven-inning, 12-strikeout outing was the strongest individual pitching performance in the supplied box score.

Spencer Steer led Cincinnati in hits with a 3-for-4 performance.

Jake Bleday delivered the biggest individual scoring contribution with a two-run home run.

Elly De La Cruz added a solo home run in the fifth inning.

For Chicago, Seiya Suzuki’s 2-for-4 performance was the team’s strongest offensive result by hits.

Shota Imanaga’s five-inning outing included five strikeouts and only one walk, although Cincinnati’s seven hits against him helped create the conditions for its eventual scoring advantage.

Player Statistics Table

For readers who want the most important individual numbers in one place, the supplied data can be summarized as follows:

Player	Team	Key Stat	Impact
Hunter Greene	Reds	7.0 IP, 3 H, 0 ER, 12 K, 1 BB	Winning pitcher
Shota Imanaga	Cubs	5.0 IP, 7 H, 1 ER, 5 K, 1 BB	Losing pitcher
Spencer Steer	Reds	3-for-4	Team-leading hitter
Seiya Suzuki	Cubs	2-for-4	Cubs-leading hitter
Jake Bleday	Reds	2-run HR, 2 RBI	Major seventh-inning scoring play
Elly De La Cruz	Reds	Solo HR, 1 RBI	Fifth-inning scoring play
Spencer Stewart	Reds	Sacrifice fly, 1 RBI	Seventh-inning run

Team Comparison at a Glance

Category	Cubs	Reds
Final Score	0	4
At-Bats	31	35
Hits	4	13
Runs	0	4
RBIs	0	4
Home Runs	0	2
Walks	1	1
Strikeouts	16	8
Errors	0	0

This table captures the central story of the game better than the final score alone.

Cincinnati had nine more hits, twice as many home runs and half as many strikeouts.

The Cubs did not commit an error and did receive solid individual contributions from Suzuki and Imanaga, but those performances were not enough to overcome the overall offensive gap.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Cubs vs Reds game on July 11, 2026?

The Cincinnati Reds defeated the Chicago Cubs 4-0 at Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati.

Who was the winning pitcher?

Hunter Greene earned the win. He pitched seven innings, allowed three hits and no earned runs, struck out 12 and walked one.

Who was the losing pitcher?

Shota Imanaga was credited with the loss. He pitched five innings, allowed seven hits and one earned run, struck out five and walked one.

Who were the leading hitters?

Spencer Steer led the Reds with a 3-for-4 performance. Seiya Suzuki led the Cubs with a 2-for-4 performance.

Which players hit home runs?

Elly De La Cruz and Jake Bleday each hit a home run for Cincinnati. Both were listed with 15 home runs for the season. Bleday’s homer produced two RBIs.

How many hits did each team have?

The Cubs recorded four hits, while the Reds collected 13 hits.

Conclusion

The Chicago Cubs vs Cincinnati Reds match player stats from July 11, 2026, show a game defined by Cincinnati’s pitching dominance and superior offensive production.

Hunter Greene delivered the central performance, going seven innings with three hits allowed, no earned runs, 12 strikeouts and one walk. His ability to limit Chicago’s offense gave the Reds the pitching foundation they needed.

Cincinnati’s offense then provided the difference. The Reds collected 13 hits compared with four for Chicago, hit two home runs and produced four RBIs. Elly De La Cruz opened the scoring with a solo home run in the fifth inning, while Jake Bleday’s two-run homer in the seventh created important separation. Spencer Steer’s 3-for-4 performance added another strong contact component to the Reds’ attack.

Chicago’s best individual offensive performance came from Seiya Suzuki, who went 2-for-4. Imanaga also limited the damage on the pitching side by allowing only one earned run across five innings, although seven hits against him gave Cincinnati repeated opportunities.

The final 4-0 score was therefore supported by a substantial statistical difference. Cincinnati had more hits, more power and fewer strikeouts, while Chicago could not turn its limited offensive opportunities into runs.

For readers examining this box score closely, the biggest lesson is that the result was not produced by one isolated moment. It came from the combination of Greene’s dominant start, Cincinnati’s 13-hit attack, timely home runs and Chicago’s difficulty maintaining productive at-bats.