The Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats from September 28, 2025, tell the story of a competitive NFL game in which Philadelphia defeated Tampa Bay 31-25. The Eagles built an early lead through an efficient passing attack and timely scoring, while the Buccaneers fought back with explosive receiving plays and a stronger rushing performance. Dallas Goedert delivered two touchdown receptions for Philadelphia, while Bucky Irving and Emeka Egbuka produced major contributions for Tampa Bay. Although the Buccaneers gained more total passing and rushing yards, Philadelphia made better use of its scoring opportunities and finished the game with a six-point victory.

This matchup provides a useful example of why football statistics must be evaluated beyond the final score. Passing efficiency, red-zone execution, turnovers, defensive pressure, and special teams all contributed to the outcome. Examining the individual performances alongside the team numbers reveals how Philadelphia secured the win despite Tampa Bay’s impressive offensive production.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The Eagles and Buccaneers met on September 28, 2025, in a regular-season NFL contest. Philadelphia entered the game with an undefeated record and continued its strong start by earning another victory.

The final score was Philadelphia Eagles 31, Tampa Bay Buccaneers 25. Philadelphia improved to 4-0 overall, while Tampa Bay fell to 3-1.

Final

September 28, 2025

Add to Favorites

Philadelphia Eagles

31

Record: 4-0

Add to Favorites

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

25

Record: 3-1

Scoring by quarter

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Eagles	14	10	7	0	31
Buccaneers	3	3	14	5	25

Key Game Information

Category	Details
Competition	National Football League
Matchup	Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Date	September 28, 2025
Final result	Eagles 31, Buccaneers 25
Winning team	Philadelphia Eagles
Losing team	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Philadelphia record after game	4-0
Tampa Bay record after game	3-1
Philadelphia passing leader	Jalen Hurts
Tampa Bay passing leader	Baker Mayfield
Philadelphia receiving standout	Dallas Goedert
Tampa Bay receiving standout	Bucky Irving

The most important detail is the difference between offensive production and scoreboard efficiency. Tampa Bay accumulated considerably more passing yards, but Philadelphia converted its opportunities into points more effectively.

First-Half Performance: Philadelphia Establishes Control

Philadelphia scored 24 points during the first half, creating a substantial advantage before halftime. Tampa Bay managed only six points over the same period.

The Eagles’ opening two quarters accounted for almost 77% of their final score. This early production gave Philadelphia room to withstand Tampa Bay’s second-half comeback.

First-quarter scoring

Philadelphia opened the game with 14 points, while Tampa Bay scored three. That 11-point difference established the initial advantage.

An early lead can influence the way both teams approach the rest of a game. The leading team can emphasize ball security and manage possessions, while the trailing team may need to accept more aggressive passing situations.

Second-quarter scoring

Philadelphia added another 10 points in the second quarter. Tampa Bay managed three, leaving the Eagles ahead 24-6 at halftime.

The 18-point halftime margin proved decisive. Philadelphia did not need to score again after its third-quarter touchdown to finish with 31 points.

Tampa Bay, meanwhile, had to produce a much more aggressive second-half performance.

Second-Half Comeback: Tampa Bay Makes the Game Competitive

The Buccaneers scored 14 points in the third quarter, their strongest period of the game. Philadelphia also scored seven, leaving the Eagles with a 31-20 lead entering the fourth quarter.

Tampa Bay then added five points in the final period, while Philadelphia was held scoreless.

The final two quarters showed the Buccaneers’ ability to generate offense after a slow start. However, the comeback did not erase the deficit created during the opening half.

Quarter-by-quarter analysis

Quarter	Eagles	Buccaneers	Eagles’ lead
First	14	3	11
Second	10	3	18
Third	7	14	11
Fourth	0	5	6

Philadelphia’s scoring pattern was front-loaded. Tampa Bay’s was back-loaded.

That contrast is central to understanding the final result. The Buccaneers won the scoring battle in the second half, but the Eagles had already established enough separation to protect their lead.

Jalen Hurts Player Stats and Passing Performance

Jalen Hurts led Philadelphia’s passing attack with 15 completions on 24 attempts for 130 yards. He threw two touchdowns without an interception.

His performance was not built around high passing volume. Instead, the Eagles benefited from scoring efficiency and his ability to contribute as a runner.

Jalen Hurts passing statistics

Statistic	Performance
Completions	15
Pass attempts	24
Completion percentage	62.5%
Passing yards	130
Yards per attempt	5.4
Passing touchdowns	2
Interceptions	0
Times sacked	2
Sack yards lost	18
QBR	52.8
Passer rating	104.5

Hurts completed 62.5% of his passes, and his 104.5 passer rating reflected a productive passing performance despite relatively modest yardage.

His two touchdown passes were particularly important because Philadelphia’s passing attack generated only 130 yards in total. The team did not require a 300-yard performance from its quarterback to reach 31 points.

Why Hurts’ efficiency mattered

Three details stand out from his statistical line.

First, he avoided interceptions. Turnovers can change the direction of a close game. Hurts protected the football through the air and did not give Tampa Bay an interception.

Second, he converted passing opportunities into touchdowns. His two touchdown passes accounted for two of Philadelphia’s most important scoring plays.

Third, he added value on the ground. Hurts led the Eagles in rushing yards, providing another way to move the ball when passing opportunities were limited.

His performance illustrates why quarterback evaluation should include passing, rushing, turnovers, and scoring rather than passing yardage alone.

Baker Mayfield Player Stats and Tampa Bay’s Passing Attack

Baker Mayfield delivered the more productive passing performance in terms of total yardage. He completed 22 of 40 attempts for 289 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception.

Despite his higher passing total, Tampa Bay finished six points behind Philadelphia.

Baker Mayfield passing statistics

Statistic	Performance
Completions	22
Pass attempts	40
Completion percentage	55.0%
Passing yards	289
Yards per attempt	7.2
Passing touchdowns	2
Interceptions	1
Times sacked	2
Sack yards lost	17
QBR	21.9
Passer rating	84.3

Mayfield’s 289 passing yards exceeded Hurts’ total by 159 yards. He also averaged 7.2 yards per attempt compared with Hurts’ 5.4.

However, the quarterback comparison is not as simple as the passing-yardage difference suggests.

Mayfield attempted 16 more passes than Hurts. Tampa Bay therefore relied more heavily on its passing game to generate offensive production.

His one interception also represented a turnover that Philadelphia did not match through an interception of its own.

Mayfield’s statistical strengths

Mayfield’s passing performance featured several positive elements:

• He completed 22 passes.
• He generated 289 passing yards.
• He averaged 7.2 yards per attempt.
• He threw two touchdown passes.
• He connected with multiple receivers for substantial gains.

The primary concern was the combination of one interception, a lower completion percentage, and the team’s slow first-half scoring.

His numbers demonstrate how a quarterback can produce impressive passing totals without his team winning the game.

Jalen Hurts vs Baker Mayfield: Quarterback Comparison

The Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats provide an interesting comparison between two different quarterback performances.

Hurts delivered the more efficient scoring result, while Mayfield generated substantially more passing yardage.

Statistic	Jalen Hurts	Baker Mayfield
Completions	15	22
Attempts	24	40
Completion percentage	62.5%	55.0%
Passing yards	130	289
Yards per attempt	5.4	7.2
Passing touchdowns	2	2
Interceptions	0	1
Sacks	2	2
Passer rating	104.5	84.3
QBR	52.8	21.9
Rushing yards	62	13

Who had the better performance?

The answer depends on the criteria.

Mayfield led in passing yards and yards per attempt. Hurts led in completion percentage, passer rating, QBR, and rushing yards. Both quarterbacks threw two touchdown passes.

For the outcome of this particular game, Hurts’ combination of passing touchdowns, rushing production, and ball security was more effective.

Mayfield’s larger passing total helped Tampa Bay remain competitive, but it did not overcome Philadelphia’s early scoring advantage.

It is also important to distinguish passer rating from QBR. These are different evaluation systems and should not be treated as interchangeable measurements.

Philadelphia Eagles Rushing Stats

Philadelphia finished with 88 rushing yards on 32 carries, averaging 2.8 yards per attempt.

The team’s rushing output was modest, but the distribution of carries reveals how the Eagles used their backfield and quarterback mobility.

Eagles rushing statistics

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Longest
Jalen Hurts	9	62	6.9	0	29
Saquon Barkley	19	43	2.3	1	10
A.J. Dillon	3	17	5.7	0	11
Braden Mann	1	-34	-34.0	0	-34
Team total	32	88	2.8	1	29

Jalen Hurts leads Philadelphia in rushing yards

Hurts rushed nine times for 62 yards, averaging 6.9 yards per carry.

His longest run covered 29 yards. That single gain represented a substantial portion of his rushing production.

Hurts’ mobility gave Philadelphia an additional offensive dimension. When a passing play did not develop as expected, his ability to gain yards on the ground created another option.

Saquon Barkley’s workload

Barkley carried the ball 19 times for 43 yards and one touchdown.

His average of 2.3 yards per carry was lower than Hurts’ average. However, his workload was much larger, and he recorded Philadelphia’s only rushing touchdown.

The distinction between workload and efficiency matters. Barkley handled the bulk of the team’s conventional rushing attempts, while Hurts produced more yards with fewer carries.

Philadelphia’s unusual negative rushing entry

Braden Mann recorded one carry for minus-34 yards. This significantly reduced the team’s overall rushing average.

Without examining individual plays, it would be inappropriate to attribute that loss to a particular tactical mistake. The statistical record does, however, show how one unusually negative rushing result can affect a team’s aggregate numbers.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Rushing Stats

Tampa Bay recorded 104 rushing yards on 26 carries, averaging 4.0 yards per attempt.

The Buccaneers gained 16 more rushing yards than Philadelphia despite having six fewer attempts.

Buccaneers rushing statistics

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Longest
Bucky Irving	15	63	4.2	0	15
Rachaad White	6	17	2.8	0	5
Baker Mayfield	2	13	6.5	0	7
Sterling Shepard	1	6	6.0	0	6
Tez Johnson	1	5	5.0	0	5
Emeka Egbuka	1	0	0.0	0	0
Team total	26	104	4.0	0	15

Bucky Irving’s contribution on the ground

Irving led Tampa Bay with 63 rushing yards on 15 attempts.

His 4.2-yard average was higher than the Eagles’ team average of 2.8 yards per carry. He provided a consistent source of rushing production and also made a major contribution as a receiver.

Irving’s performance was one of the most versatile individual efforts in the game.

Comparing the rushing attacks

Category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Rushing attempts	32	26
Rushing yards	88	104
Yards per carry	2.8	4.0
Rushing touchdowns	1	0
Longest recorded run	29	15

Tampa Bay had the more productive rushing attack by yardage and average. Philadelphia, however, recorded the only rushing touchdown.

That difference is important because rushing success is not measured exclusively by total yards. Scoring production and the timing of successful plays also affect the result.

Philadelphia Eagles Receiving Stats

Philadelphia’s receiving group recorded 15 catches for 130 yards and two touchdowns on 24 targets.

Dallas Goedert led the team in receiving yards and touchdown receptions. His four catches produced 37 yards and two scores.

Eagles receiving statistics

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Targets
Dallas Goedert	4	37	9.3	2	4
Saquon Barkley	4	31	7.8	0	4
DeVonta Smith	2	29	14.5	0	2
Grant Calcaterra	1	16	16.0	0	2
John Metchie III	2	10	5.0	0	2
A.J. Brown	2	7	3.5	0	9
Will Shipley	0	0	0.0	0	1
Team total	15	130	8.7	2	24

Dallas Goedert’s two-touchdown performance

Goedert was Philadelphia’s most important receiving scorer.

His four receptions produced 37 yards, but the two touchdowns made his contribution especially valuable. He scored on half of his recorded receptions.

This is a useful example of why receiving yards alone do not capture a player’s impact. A receiver with fewer yards can still be decisive if his catches come in scoring situations.

Goedert’s performance gave Philadelphia a reliable scoring option without requiring a large volume of passing yards.

Saquon Barkley’s receiving contribution

Barkley caught four passes for 31 yards.

His receiving production added value beyond his 43 rushing yards. Combining the two categories gives him 74 yards from scrimmage, along with one rushing touchdown.

For an all-purpose running back, receiving involvement can help maintain offensive flexibility, especially when the defense is prepared to stop conventional runs.

DeVonta Smith and A.J. Brown

Smith recorded two catches for 29 yards, averaging 14.5 yards per reception.

Brown finished with two receptions for seven yards on nine targets. His receiving total was modest relative to his target count.

These figures highlight different roles within the offense. Smith produced more yards on fewer targets, while Brown was targeted more frequently but generated less receiving production.

The supplied statistics do not establish why every target did or did not result in a catch. Route quality, defensive coverage, and the location of each pass would require play-by-play evidence for a complete assessment.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Receiving Stats

Tampa Bay’s receivers generated 289 yards on 22 receptions, averaging 13.1 yards per catch.

The Buccaneers’ receiving production was considerably greater than Philadelphia’s. Bucky Irving and Emeka Egbuka each surpassed 100 receiving yards.

Buccaneers receiving statistics

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Targets
Bucky Irving	5	102	20.4	1	5
Emeka Egbuka	4	101	25.3	1	10
Rachaad White	4	29	7.3	0	5
Chris Godwin Jr.	3	26	8.7	0	10
Sterling Shepard	2	14	7.0	0	4
Cade Otton	3	9	3.0	0	4
Tez Johnson	1	8	8.0	0	1
Team total	22	289	13.1	2	39

Bucky Irving’s 102 receiving yards

Irving was Tampa Bay’s leading receiver by yardage, finishing with 102 yards on five catches.

He averaged 20.4 yards per reception and recorded a 72-yard longest reception. He also caught a touchdown pass.

When his rushing and receiving statistics are combined, Irving produced 165 yards from scrimmage.

That total made him one of the most productive all-purpose players in the matchup. His contribution was not limited to the backfield, as his receiving ability gave Tampa Bay an additional way to attack Philadelphia.

Emeka Egbuka’s 101-yard performance

Egbuka caught four passes for 101 yards and one touchdown.

His 25.3 yards per reception was the highest average among Tampa Bay’s listed receivers. He also recorded the team’s longest reception, a 77-yard gain.

Egbuka’s ability to produce substantial yardage on a relatively small number of catches was a major part of Tampa Bay’s offensive threat.

His performance also demonstrates why explosive plays deserve separate attention in statistical analysis. Four receptions can produce more than 100 yards when a player generates significant gains.

The impact of Tampa Bay’s explosive plays

Irving and Egbuka combined for 203 receiving yards and two touchdowns.

That represented approximately 70% of Tampa Bay’s 289 receiving yards.

Their combined production helps explain how the Buccaneers were able to generate significant offense despite their early scoring difficulties.

However, explosive gains do not automatically translate into victory. Teams must still finish drives, protect possession, and prevent opponents from building a lead that becomes difficult to overcome.

Receiving Comparison: Which Team Had the Better Performance?

Tampa Bay clearly led the receiving comparison in total yardage, receptions, average yards per catch, and total targets.

Receiving category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Receptions	15	22
Receiving yards	130	289
Yards per reception	8.7	13.1
Receiving touchdowns	2	2
Targets	24	39
Longest reception	22	77

The Buccaneers produced 159 more receiving yards than the Eagles.

Yet both teams recorded two receiving touchdowns. Philadelphia obtained the same number of passing scores with considerably less receiving yardage.

This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the result. Tampa Bay generated more volume and bigger gains, but Philadelphia was more efficient at turning its passing production into points.

Defensive Player Stats: Philadelphia Eagles

Philadelphia’s defense recorded 70 total tackles, two sacks, four tackles for loss, 13 passes defended, one quarterback hit, and one defensive touchdown.

The unit also recorded one interception.

Eagles defensive statistics

Category	Total
Total tackles	70
Solo tackles	47
Sacks	2
Tackles for loss	4
Passes defended	13
Quarterback hits	1
Interceptions	1
Defensive touchdowns	1

Cooper DeJean’s defensive performance

Cooper DeJean recorded nine total tackles, including eight solo tackles, and three passes defended.

His tackle total placed him among Philadelphia’s leading defensive contributors. The three passes defended also indicate involvement in disrupting Tampa Bay’s passing attempts.

The combination of tackles and pass breakups reflects a defensive contribution that goes beyond simply stopping ball carriers.

Zack Baun’s impact

Zack Baun recorded eight tackles, five solo tackles, one sack, and one tackle for loss.

His sack was part of Philadelphia’s two-sack team total.

Pressure on a quarterback can disrupt timing and reduce the time available for receivers to get open. However, sacks alone do not capture every form of pressure, and the supplied figures do not provide a complete pressure rate.

Jihaad Campbell’s interception

Jihaad Campbell recorded one interception for Philadelphia.

The interception added a key defensive event to the Eagles’ statistical profile. Turnovers can be especially important when a game becomes close in the second half.

The supplied box-score data lists no interception return yards or defensive touchdown for Campbell. The team’s defensive touchdown is recorded separately in the supplied statistics, and the available figures do not identify its scorer.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Defensive Player Stats

Tampa Bay recorded 61 total tackles, two sacks, 11 tackles for loss, five passes defended, and three quarterback hits.

The Buccaneers did not record an interception or a defensive touchdown.

Buccaneers defensive statistics

Category	Total
Total tackles	61
Solo tackles	45
Sacks	2
Tackles for loss	11
Passes defended	5
Quarterback hits	3
Interceptions	0
Defensive touchdowns	0

Tykee Smith’s contribution

Tykee Smith led Tampa Bay’s listed defensive standouts with nine total tackles, five solo tackles, and two passes defended.

His performance combined run and pass involvement, as reflected by his tackle total and pass breakups.

SirVocea Dennis’ defensive work

SirVocea Dennis recorded eight tackles, including six solo tackles, and one tackle for loss.

His numbers show consistent involvement in defensive stops.

Comparing the defensive units

The Eagles recorded more total tackles and passes defended, while Tampa Bay recorded more tackles for loss and quarterback hits.

Defensive category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Total tackles	70	61
Solo tackles	47	45
Sacks	2	2
Tackles for loss	4	11
Passes defended	13	5
Quarterback hits	1	3
Interceptions	1	0
Defensive touchdowns	1	0

Tampa Bay’s 11 tackles for loss suggest that the defense made several plays behind the line of scrimmage. Philadelphia, meanwhile, recorded more passes defended and the only interception listed in the team totals.

The numbers point to different defensive strengths rather than a simple overall ranking.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers are among the most important statistics in football because they can end promising drives, create short fields, and change the momentum of a game.

Philadelphia recorded two team fumbles but lost none. Tampa Bay also recorded two fumbles but lost one.

The Eagles additionally recorded one interception on defense, while Tampa Bay recorded none.

Fumble statistics

Category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Team fumbles	2	2
Fumbles lost	0	1
Fumbles recovered	2	1
Interceptions recorded	1	0

Philadelphia’s ability to retain possession after its fumbles was a positive aspect of its performance.

Tampa Bay’s lost fumble represented a possession-ending mistake. The Buccaneers also threw one interception, giving them more recorded turnovers across the two categories.

The supplied data does not establish the exact scoring consequences of each turnover. It would therefore be inaccurate to assign a specific number of points directly to these mistakes without reviewing the relevant drives.

Still, ball security provides an important part of the broader explanation for Philadelphia’s victory.

Special Teams Performance

Special teams contributed to field position and scoring for both teams.

Philadelphia benefited from productive kick returns, while Tampa Bay received strong punt-return production and made all three of its field-goal attempts.

Kick-return statistics

Category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Returns	5	5
Return yards	148	96
Average per return	29.6	19.2
Longest return	39	21
Return touchdowns	0	0

Philadelphia gained 52 more kick-return yards than Tampa Bay.

Tank Bigsby recorded 82 yards on three returns, while Will Shipley added 66 yards on two returns.

These returns helped Philadelphia generate a stronger average starting position after kickoffs, although exact drive-start locations are not included in the supplied data.

Punt-return statistics

Category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Punt returns	1	6
Return yards	3	100
Average per return	3.0	16.7
Longest return	3	46
Return touchdowns	0	0

Tampa Bay’s Kameron Johnson returned six punts for 100 yards, averaging 16.7 yards per return.

His longest return was 46 yards, giving the Buccaneers an important source of field-position production.

Philadelphia had only one recorded punt return, gaining three yards.

Kicking statistics

Category	Jake Elliott, Eagles	Chase McLaughlin, Buccaneers
Field goals made	1	3
Field goals attempted	1	3
Field-goal percentage	100%	100%
Longest field goal	39 yards	65 yards
Extra points made	4	2
Total kicking points	7	11

Both kickers made every recorded attempt.

McLaughlin converted three field goals, including a long of 65 yards. Elliott made one field goal and four extra points.

McLaughlin scored more total points, but Philadelphia’s greater number of touchdowns meant the Eagles did not need as many field goals to reach their final total.

Punting statistics

Category	Braden Mann, Eagles	Riley Dixon, Buccaneers
Punts	7	3
Total punt yards	363	110
Average	51.9	36.7
Touchbacks	0	0
Inside the 20	2	0
Longest punt	63 yards	52 yards

Mann averaged 51.9 yards per punt, compared with Dixon’s 36.7.

Philadelphia also recorded two punts inside the 20-yard line. These figures indicate that Mann’s punting helped the Eagles manage field position, although a full evaluation would also consider return yards and net punting.

The difference in punt volume is notable. Philadelphia punted seven times, while Tampa Bay punted three times, reflecting different possession and drive patterns.

Team Statistical Comparison

The combined player and team figures reveal an unusual result: Tampa Bay produced more offensive yardage, but Philadelphia scored more points.

Offensive comparison

Category	Eagles	Buccaneers
Passing yards	130	289
Rushing yards	88	104
Combined passing and rushing yards	218	393
Passing touchdowns	2	2
Rushing touchdowns	1	0
Total offensive touchdowns	3	2
Final score	31	25

Based on the supplied passing and rushing totals, Tampa Bay generated 175 more yards.

However, the Eagles scored one more offensive touchdown and finished with a six-point advantage.

This comparison highlights the limits of total yardage as a measure of performance. Yardage describes how much ground a team gained. It does not show the value of each possession, the location of each gain, or how often the offense converted opportunities into touchdowns.

Three key statistical differences

1. Philadelphia scored more touchdowns. The Eagles recorded three offensive touchdowns in the supplied statistics, compared with Tampa Bay’s two.
2. Philadelphia protected possession more effectively. The Eagles lost no fumbles, while Tampa Bay lost one and threw an interception.
3. Tampa Bay generated more explosive receiving production. The Buccaneers had 289 receiving yards and two receivers with more than 100 yards, but that production was not enough to overcome their early deficit.

These factors provide a stronger explanation of the result than any single player statistic.

Why Philadelphia Won Despite Fewer Yards

The six-point margin is especially interesting because the Buccaneers produced substantially more passing and rushing yards.

Several factors help explain the difference.

1. A strong opening half

Philadelphia scored 24 points before halftime.

Tampa Bay scored only six points during the same period. That difference created a large deficit and changed the competitive situation for the rest of the game.

2. Effective touchdown production

Hurts threw two touchdown passes, both recorded by Goedert. Barkley added a rushing touchdown.

Philadelphia therefore obtained touchdowns through both the passing and rushing attacks.

Tampa Bay also scored two passing touchdowns, but the supplied rushing statistics list no rushing touchdowns.

3. Better ball security

Philadelphia did not lose a fumble, while Tampa Bay lost one. The Eagles also recorded the only interception in the team totals.

Although the exact points associated with these turnovers are not available in the supplied figures, the difference in possession security favored Philadelphia.

4. A balanced approach

Hurts contributed 130 passing yards and 62 rushing yards. Barkley added 43 rushing yards and 31 receiving yards.

This distribution allowed Philadelphia to generate production through several players without depending on a single high-volume passing performance.

5. A lead that survived the comeback

Tampa Bay scored 19 points in the second half, compared with Philadelphia’s seven.

The Buccaneers clearly improved after halftime, but the Eagles’ early scoring advantage proved large enough to withstand the rally.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Team

Individual box scores become more useful when they are connected to broader team tendencies.

Philadelphia Eagles: Scoring efficiency and flexibility

Philadelphia’s statistical profile was defined by touchdowns, quarterback mobility, and ball security.

Hurts did not need to throw for 250 or 300 yards. Instead, he contributed through the air and on the ground, while Goedert and Barkley supplied important scoring production.

The Eagles’ defensive statistics also included 13 passes defended and an interception, suggesting that the defense contributed to limiting Tampa Bay’s passing opportunities at key moments.

The principal weakness visible in the numbers was the low rushing average. Philadelphia averaged only 2.8 yards per carry, although the unusual negative rushing entry affected that figure.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Explosive production and missed opportunities

Tampa Bay’s strongest statistical feature was its ability to gain yards through the air.

Mayfield threw for 289 yards, and Irving and Egbuka each surpassed 100 receiving yards. The team also averaged 4.0 yards per rushing attempt.

The weakness was the gap between yardage and scoring. Tampa Bay generated 393 combined passing and rushing yards but finished with 25 points.

The Buccaneers’ first-half scoring total was particularly damaging. Their second-half improvement demonstrated offensive potential, but they could not fully recover from the early deficit.

Understanding the Most Important NFL Statistics

For readers comparing player performances, a few statistics deserve special attention.

Passing yards

Passing yards measure the distance gained through completed forward passes. They provide a useful picture of a quarterback’s production, but they do not account for interceptions, touchdowns, or rushing contributions.

Yards per attempt

Yards per attempt divides passing yards by pass attempts. It helps compare quarterbacks who have different workloads.

Mayfield’s 7.2 yards per attempt exceeded Hurts’ 5.4 in this matchup.

Passer rating

Passer rating combines completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown rate, and interception rate into a standardized figure.

Hurts recorded a 104.5 rating, while Mayfield recorded 84.3.

Rushing average

Rushing average measures yards gained per carry. Tampa Bay averaged 4.0 yards per attempt, while Philadelphia averaged 2.8.

This statistic is useful, but unusually long or negative runs can influence the average significantly.

Receiving yards per catch

This metric divides receiving yards by receptions. It helps identify players who generate larger gains on their catches.

Egbuka averaged 25.3 yards per reception, while Irving averaged 20.4.

Tackles for loss and sacks

Tackles for loss measure defensive plays that stop a ball carrier behind the line of scrimmage. Sacks record instances in which a quarterback is brought down behind the line while attempting to pass.

Tampa Bay recorded 11 tackles for loss, while Philadelphia recorded four. Both teams recorded two sacks.

These numbers illustrate why defensive evaluation requires more than looking at the final score.

Challenges When Interpreting the Box Score

Even detailed player statistics have limitations.

A box score provides the results of individual plays and team totals, but it does not explain every decision or tactical detail behind those results.

Statistics do not always explain the cause

A low completion total might result from inaccurate passes, strong coverage, dropped passes, or a combination of factors.

Similarly, a long reception shows that a large gain occurred, but it does not independently explain whether the result came from a coverage breakdown, a missed tackle, or excellent route execution.

Volume can distort comparisons

Mayfield attempted 40 passes, while Hurts attempted 24.

Comparing their passing totals without considering attempts would overlook the difference in workload. Rate statistics such as completion percentage and yards per attempt provide additional context.

Team totals can conceal unusual plays

Philadelphia’s negative-34-yard rushing entry illustrates how one unusual event can affect an aggregate figure.

When a statistic appears inconsistent with the overall performance, the individual player entries should be reviewed before drawing a conclusion.

Advanced metrics require context

QBR and passer rating are not identical. They use different methodologies and should be interpreted separately.

Neither statistic provides a complete explanation of a quarterback’s performance without considering the game situation, supporting cast, and defensive opposition.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers game on September 28, 2025?

The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 31-25. Philadelphia improved to 4-0, while Tampa Bay fell to 3-1.

2. How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts record against Tampa Bay?

Jalen Hurts completed 15 of 24 passes for 130 yards and two touchdowns. He threw no interceptions and recorded a passer rating of 104.5.

3. How many passing yards did Baker Mayfield have against Philadelphia?

Baker Mayfield completed 22 of 40 passes for 289 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. He averaged 7.2 yards per attempt.

4. Who was the leading receiver in the Eagles vs Buccaneers game?

Bucky Irving led all listed receivers with 102 receiving yards on five catches. Emeka Egbuka followed closely with 101 yards on four receptions.

5. How many touchdowns did Dallas Goedert score?

Dallas Goedert caught four passes for 37 yards and two touchdowns. He was Philadelphia’s leading receiving scorer in the game.

6. Why did the Eagles win despite gaining fewer yards?

Philadelphia established an 18-point halftime lead, scored three offensive touchdowns, and avoided losing a fumble. Tampa Bay gained more total yardage but could not overcome its slow start.

Conclusion

The Philadelphia Eagles vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats reveal a game shaped by early scoring, efficient touchdown production, and contrasting offensive approaches.

Philadelphia won 31-25 after scoring 24 first-half points. Jalen Hurts contributed two passing touchdowns and 62 rushing yards, while Dallas Goedert caught two touchdown passes. Saquon Barkley added a rushing touchdown, giving the Eagles three offensive touchdowns in total.

Tampa Bay produced more yardage, with Baker Mayfield throwing for 289 yards and Bucky Irving and Emeka Egbuka combining for 203 receiving yards. Irving also led the Buccaneers in rushing, finishing with 165 total yards from scrimmage.

The statistical difference was not simply about which team moved the ball farther. Philadelphia made better use of its early opportunities, protected possession more effectively, and built a lead that Tampa Bay could not completely erase.

The game serves as a useful reminder that passing yards, rushing averages, and individual receiving totals are only part of the story. Touchdowns, turnovers, timing, and field position all contribute to the final outcome.