Dallas Mavericks vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The dallas mavericks vs houston rockets match player stats tell a much more detailed story than the final 110-102 score alone. Houston won the November 2025 meeting at Toyota Center, but the game remained competitive deep into the fourth quarter. Dallas received a huge performance from P.J. Washington, while D’Angelo Russell created offense with 12 assists. Houston answered through Amen Thompson, Alperen Sengun, and Kevin Durant, with the Rockets ultimately controlling the most important possession battle: the glass.

This was a game where individual production and team execution did not always point in the same direction. Washington finished with 29 points and 12 rebounds, yet Dallas still lost. Thompson scored 27 points, Sengun added 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 6 assists, and Durant contributed 21 points, 6 rebounds, and 5 assists. Houston’s 54 rebounds compared with Dallas’s 40 proved especially important because the Rockets repeatedly created additional opportunities around the basket.

For readers looking beyond the final score, this matchup offers several useful lessons about evaluating NBA player statistics. Scoring totals matter, but they need to be viewed alongside shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, defensive events, and the way those numbers affected the game’s closing possessions.

dallas mavericks vs houston rockets match player stats: Game Overview

The game was played at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas, in front of 18,055 fans. The final score was:

Houston Rockets 110, Dallas Mavericks 102

Dallas entered the game at 2-5 overall and 0-2 on the road, while Houston entered at 4-2 overall and 2-1 at home.

The official NBA record lists the game as a 110-102 Houston victory, with the Rockets improving to 4-2 and Dallas dropping to 2-5.

Category	Dallas Mavericks	Houston Rockets
Final Score	102	110
Field Goals	40-89	41-89
Field Goal %	45%	46%
Three-Pointers	9-36	8-29
Three-Point %	25%	28%
Free Throws	13-20	20-30
Free Throw %	65%	67%
Rebounds	40	54
Assists	30	23
Turnovers	15	17
Steals	12	9
Blocks	6	7

The first thing that stands out is that Houston did not win because of a huge shooting advantage. The Rockets made only one more field goal than Dallas and actually attempted the same number of shots from the field.

The difference came from several smaller edges working together.

Houston grabbed 14 more rebounds, made 7 more free throws, and finished with a stronger overall scoring profile around the rim. Dallas generated more assists and steals, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Houston’s work on the boards and at the foul line.

How the Game Was Decided

The scoring pattern provides useful context.

Dallas scored 28 points in the first quarter and 27 in the second. Houston answered with 24 points in the first period before producing 34 in the second.

At halftime, Houston led 58-55.

The third quarter was almost even, with Dallas scoring 23 and Houston scoring 23. That meant the game entered the final period with little separating the teams.

Houston then produced 29 fourth-quarter points compared with 24 from Dallas.

That five-point fourth-quarter margin was enough to turn a close contest into an eight-point final result.

The game therefore was not simply a case of one team dominating from beginning to end. Dallas stayed within striking distance, but Houston executed better during the decisive stretch.

That distinction matters when analyzing player statistics. A player can have an excellent box score while the team still loses because basketball outcomes depend on how individual production combines across possessions.

P.J. Washington Leads Dallas

P.J. Washington was Dallas’s leading scorer and leading rebounder.

His final line was:

• 29 points
• 12 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• 11-of-20 shooting
• 1-of-5 from three-point range
• 6-of-10 from the free-throw line

Washington’s 29 points were a game high for Dallas, and his 12 rebounds matched the highest individual rebounding total in the game.

His shooting was particularly important. Washington converted 11 of 20 field-goal attempts for 55 percent shooting. He did not have an efficient night from three, making only one of five attempts, but he still generated most of his offensive value through overall field-goal production and free throws.

The rebounding figure may be even more important.

Dallas collected 40 team rebounds, and Washington personally accounted for 12 of them. That means he supplied a substantial share of Dallas’s total work on the glass.

His performance demonstrates why points alone can be a poor way to identify the most productive player in a game. Washington contributed scoring, rebounding, passing, steals, and a block.

However, Dallas needed more collective production around him to turn that individual output into a victory.

Amen Thompson’s 27-Point Performance

Amen Thompson was Houston’s leading scorer with 27 points.

His reported line was:

• 27 points
• 5 rebounds
• 4 assists

Thompson’s scoring was especially valuable because Houston needed offensive production from multiple areas. Sengun provided interior scoring and playmaking, while Durant offered perimeter shot creation.

Thompson helped bridge those two areas.

His 27 points were the highest total on Houston’s roster, and his five rebounds and four assists showed that his contribution extended beyond scoring.

The NBA game record confirms that Thompson scored a season-high 27 points in the victory.

One useful feature of Thompson’s performance was timing. Houston did not need him to score 27 points in a runaway game. His production came in a contest that remained close into the fourth quarter.

That makes the total more meaningful when viewed alongside the game situation.

Alperen Sengun Controls the Interior

Alperen Sengun produced one of the most complete statistical lines of the night:

• 26 points
• 11 rebounds
• 6 assists

He was Houston’s leading rebounder and leading assist provider.

Sengun’s 11 rebounds were particularly important because Houston finished with 54 team rebounds.

His six assists also show why his role cannot be understood simply as that of a traditional scoring center. He contributed to the Rockets’ offensive creation while remaining a major presence on the boards.

The combination of 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 6 assists made Sengun one of the central statistical figures in the game.

His importance became even clearer late in the contest, when Houston needed reliable offense while protecting its narrow advantage.

For a player-stat analysis, this is an excellent example of why a complete box score should include at least points, rebounds, and assists rather than focusing only on scoring.

Kevin Durant’s Efficient Role Despite Limited Three-Point Success

Kevin Durant finished with:

• 21 points
• 6 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 2-of-8 from three-point range

His three-point shooting was not particularly strong, but his overall contribution remained significant.

Durant’s 21 points gave Houston a third major scoring option alongside Thompson and Sengun.

That balance mattered.

Dallas could not focus entirely on Thompson because Sengun presented a major interior threat. At the same time, concentrating too heavily on Sengun created opportunities for Houston’s perimeter players.

Durant’s five assists also indicate that he was not functioning solely as a scorer. His ability to contribute as a passer helped Houston maintain multiple offensive options.

The larger lesson from his line is that a player’s impact cannot always be evaluated through one shooting category. A poor three-point percentage does not automatically mean a poor offensive game if the player contributes through scoring, rebounding, passing, spacing, and defensive attention.

Dallas’s Supporting Scorers

P.J. Washington was not the only Dallas player to make a meaningful offensive contribution.

Max Christie

Max Christie recorded:

• 17 points
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists

His 17 points ranked second among the listed Dallas performers, while his six assists tied Sengun for the highest individual assist total shown in the supplied player data.

Christie’s combination of scoring and playmaking was valuable because Dallas needed creation outside Washington.

Daniel Gafford

Daniel Gafford finished with:

• 14 points
• 4 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 steals
• 3 blocks

The three blocks were a notable defensive contribution.

Gafford also scored 14 points without relying on a high-volume perimeter role. His production gave Dallas an interior scoring option and defensive presence.

Cooper Flagg

Cooper Flagg posted:

• 12 points
• 5 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals

His five rebounds and two steals added value beyond his scoring total.

Flagg’s statistical line illustrates an important distinction between offensive volume and all-around contribution. Twelve points may not lead a team, but rebounds, assists, and steals can still affect possessions and overall team performance.

D’Angelo Russell

D’Angelo Russell’s contribution was centered on playmaking:

• 10 points
• 12 assists
• 4 rebounds

His 12 assists were the highest total by any player in the supplied data.

That is significant because Dallas finished with 30 team assists.

Russell therefore played a major role in creating scoring opportunities for teammates even though his own scoring total was only 10 points.

His line is a reminder that a point guard’s value cannot be judged simply by points per game. Twelve assists in a single game represents substantial offensive creation.

Naji Marshall

Naji Marshall recorded:

• 9 points
• 2 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals

The two steals gave Dallas another source of defensive activity.

Klay Thompson

Klay Thompson finished with:

• 5 points
• 3 rebounds
• 3 assists

His scoring output was modest in this particular game, making the production from Washington, Christie, Russell, and Gafford even more important for Dallas.

Houston’s Supporting Production

Houston’s three main statistical contributors were Thompson, Sengun, and Durant, but the supporting cast also affected the outcome.

Tari Eason

Tari Eason recorded:

• 15 points
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 3-of-5 from three-point range

His three-point shooting was especially notable.

Eason made three of his five attempts from deep, giving Houston a useful perimeter scoring boost.

His 15 points also meant Houston did not need to depend entirely on its three primary offensive contributors.

Josh Okogie

Josh Okogie recorded:

• 2 points
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist

His scoring total was small, but low-scoring games can still contain important possessions.

A player’s contribution should therefore be interpreted within role and game context rather than through points alone.

Shooting Comparison

The shooting numbers were surprisingly close.

Dallas made 40 of 89 field-goal attempts, while Houston made 41 of 89.

That translates to approximately:

• Dallas: 45 percent
• Houston: 46 percent

The one-percentage-point difference in field-goal accuracy does not explain an eight-point victory by itself.

Three-point shooting was also relatively close.

Dallas made 9 of 36 attempts, or 25 percent.

Houston made 8 of 29 attempts, or 28 percent.

Interestingly, Dallas actually made one more three-pointer than Houston despite taking seven more attempts.

This means the decisive statistical story was not simply perimeter shooting.

Free Throws Created a Noticeable Difference

Free throws provided a more meaningful scoring advantage.

Dallas went 13-of-20 from the line.

Houston went 20-of-30.

That produced a seven-point advantage for Houston in made free throws.

In an eight-point game, that is a major part of the final margin.

Free throws are particularly important in close fourth quarters because they allow teams to score without requiring a successful field-goal attempt.

Houston’s ability to reach the line more frequently helped create additional scoring opportunities while Dallas had fewer chances to recover points through free throws.

The Rebounding Gap Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

If one statistic deserves special attention in this matchup, it is rebounding.

Dallas finished with 40 rebounds.

Houston finished with 54.

That is a 14-rebound advantage for Houston.

This is considerably larger than the one-field-goal difference between the teams.

Rebounding affects a game in two ways.

First, defensive rebounds end the opponent’s possession.

Second, offensive rebounds can create another scoring opportunity for the same team.

When a team wins the rebounding battle by 14, it can compensate for other areas where the statistical margins are small.

This appears to be one of the clearest explanations for why Houston could win despite Dallas producing 30 assists and 12 steals.

Dallas Won the Assist Battle

Dallas finished with 30 assists.

Houston finished with 23.

That gives Dallas a seven-assist advantage.

At first glance, this might seem surprising because Houston won the game.

But assists measure successful passing connections leading to made baskets. They do not directly measure every factor that determines scoring efficiency or possession value.

Dallas’s 30 assists show that the team generated a high level of assisted offense.

The problem was that Houston offset Dallas’s playmaking advantage through rebounding, free throws, and its three-player scoring core.

This is an important lesson when reading box scores: winning more categories does not necessarily mean winning the game.

The categories have different relationships with final scoring.

Turnovers and Steals

Dallas recorded 15 turnovers.

Houston recorded 17.

That gave Dallas a two-turnover advantage.

Dallas also had 12 steals compared with Houston’s nine.

Again, these were positive areas for Dallas.

The Mavericks created more steals and committed fewer turnovers, yet Houston still won.

That tells us the Rockets were able to overcome a disadvantage in ball security through other forms of production.

This is exactly why a complete statistical analysis is more useful than looking for one “winning statistic.”

Blocks and Defensive Activity

Dallas recorded six blocks.

Houston recorded seven.

Daniel Gafford accounted for three of Dallas’s blocks, while the supplied team totals show Houston finishing with seven.

Blocks can influence offensive decision-making even when they do not directly produce points.

A blocked shot may prevent a basket, change a player’s shot selection, or force an offensive possession away from the preferred area.

Still, the nearly even block totals suggest that shot blocking was not a major statistical separator in this particular game.

Fourth-Quarter Execution

The final quarter deserves special attention.

Dallas scored 24 points.

Houston scored 29.

The Rockets therefore won the fourth quarter by five points.

That may sound modest, but it came after three quarters in which the teams remained close.

A team does not need to dominate every quarter to win an NBA game. It needs to accumulate enough advantages to create a winning margin by the final buzzer.

Houston’s late-game execution turned a close contest into an eight-point victory.

The importance of the fourth quarter also explains why overall player totals should be considered alongside game flow.

A player can accumulate points early, but late possessions often have greater practical importance because the score is tighter and the number of remaining opportunities is smaller.

Why P.J. Washington’s Big Night Was Not Enough

Washington’s 29 points and 12 rebounds were outstanding numbers.

Yet Dallas lost.

That is not a contradiction.

Basketball is a five-player sport, and team outcomes depend on the interaction of all possessions.

Washington supplied a major portion of Dallas’s scoring and rebounding. Russell supplied 12 assists. Christie added 17 points and six assists. Gafford contributed 14 points and three blocks.

But Houston had three players producing 20 or more points:

• Amen Thompson: 27
• Alperen Sengun: 26
• Kevin Durant: 21

That scoring balance reduced the pressure on any one Houston player to carry the offense.

Dallas, by comparison, received its largest scoring output from Washington.

The lesson is not that Washington’s performance was unimportant. Rather, it shows how a strong individual performance can coexist with a team loss.

The Importance of Houston’s Three-Man Scoring Core

Houston’s top three scorers combined for 74 points:

• Thompson: 27
• Sengun: 26
• Durant: 21

That represents a very large share of Houston’s 110 total points.

The advantage of having multiple high-level scoring options is that defensive attention becomes harder to concentrate.

If Dallas emphasized perimeter coverage, Sengun could attack inside.

If Dallas focused more attention on the interior, Durant could operate from outside.

Thompson added another scoring threat.

That three-player balance gave Houston a stable offensive foundation throughout the game.

What the Player Stats Say About Dallas

The Dallas numbers point toward a team that generated opportunities but did not convert enough of its advantages into points.

Positive areas included:

• 30 assists
• 12 steals
• 15 turnovers compared with Houston’s 17
• 40 made field goals
• 29 points and 12 rebounds from Washington

The weaknesses were also clear:

• Only 13 made free throws
• 25 percent three-point shooting
• 40 total rebounds
• Five fewer fourth-quarter points than Houston
• A lack of multiple 20-point scorers

Dallas’s statistical profile was therefore not one-dimensional. The team performed well in several playmaking and defensive categories.

The biggest issue was that Houston produced enough efficient scoring and rebounding to offset those advantages.

What the Player Stats Say About Houston

Houston’s numbers reveal a different formula.

The Rockets had:

• 54 rebounds
• 20 made free throws
• 41 made field goals
• 23 assists
• 17 turnovers
• 9 steals
• 7 blocks
• Three players with at least 21 points

Not every category was favorable.

Houston had more turnovers and fewer assists and steals than Dallas.

But the Rockets dominated the boards and generated seven more made free throws.

Those advantages mattered more to the final score than the categories Dallas won.

A Practical Way to Read This Box Score

For readers researching dallas mavericks vs houston rockets match player stats, a useful approach is to examine the numbers in five layers.

1. Start with scoring

Identify the leading scorers and check whether the production was concentrated among one player or spread across multiple players.

2. Check efficiency

Look at field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, and free-throw percentage.

A 25-point performance on efficient shooting tells a different story from 25 points generated through a very high number of attempts.

3. Examine possession statistics

Rebounds and turnovers help explain how many opportunities each team created.

4. Review playmaking

Assists provide context for how scoring opportunities were created.

5. Compare the decisive categories

Finally, identify which statistical differences were large enough to plausibly influence the final score.

In this game, the 14-rebound difference and seven-made-free-throw difference stand out more than the one-field-goal difference.

Player Stat Summary

Player	Team	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other
P.J. Washington	Dallas	29	12	3	2 STL, 1 BLK
D’Angelo Russell	Dallas	10	4	12	2 TO
Max Christie	Dallas	17	4	6	3-6 3PT
Daniel Gafford	Dallas	14	4	1	2 STL, 3 BLK
Cooper Flagg	Dallas	12	5	2	2 STL
Naji Marshall	Dallas	9	2	2	2 STL
Klay Thompson	Dallas	5	3	3	1 BLK
Amen Thompson	Houston	27	5	4	Season-high scoring total
Alperen Sengun	Houston	26	11	6	Team-leading rebounds and assists
Kevin Durant	Houston	21	6	5	2-8 3PT
Tari Eason	Houston	15	4	2	3-5 3PT
Josh Okogie	Houston	2	3	1	Limited scoring output

This table makes the contrast clear.

Dallas had an individual leader in Washington and a major playmaking contribution from Russell.

Houston had three players above 20 points, plus Sengun’s all-around interior production.

Key Numbers at a Glance

The most important statistics from the matchup were:

Final score: Houston 110, Dallas 102

Largest individual scoring total: P.J. Washington with 29 points for Dallas, while Amen Thompson led Houston with 27.

Top rebounder: P.J. Washington with 12 for Dallas, while Alperen Sengun had 11 for Houston.

Top assist total: D’Angelo Russell with 12.

Team rebounding edge: Houston, 54-40.

Team assist edge: Dallas, 30-23.

Team free-throw edge: Houston, 20 made compared with Dallas’s 13.

Three-point percentage: Houston 28 percent, Dallas 25 percent.

Attendance: 18,055.

The official NBA box score is the best reference point for checking the complete player-by-player statistical record. NBA official box score

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was Dallas’s leading scorer against Houston?

P.J. Washington led Dallas with 29 points. He also recorded 12 rebounds, making him Dallas’s leading scorer and rebounder in the game.

Who led Houston in scoring?

Amen Thompson led Houston with 27 points. He also added five rebounds and four assists.

What were Alperen Sengun’s stats?

Alperen Sengun finished with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists. He was Houston’s leading rebounder and assist provider.

How many assists did D’Angelo Russell have?

D’Angelo Russell recorded 12 assists, the highest assist total in the supplied game statistics. He also scored 10 points and grabbed four rebounds.

Why did Houston win despite Dallas having more assists?

Houston compensated for Dallas’s seven-assist advantage with a 14-rebound advantage and seven more made free throws. Houston also had three players score at least 21 points.

How many rebounds did each team record?

Houston collected 54 rebounds, while Dallas collected 40. The Rockets therefore held a 14-rebound advantage.

Conclusion

The dallas mavericks vs houston rockets match player stats show why a final score should never be analyzed in isolation.

Dallas received a standout performance from P.J. Washington, who posted 29 points and 12 rebounds. D’Angelo Russell added 12 assists, Max Christie contributed 17 points and six assists, and Daniel Gafford provided 14 points and three blocks.

Houston answered with a balanced scoring group. Amen Thompson led the Rockets with 27 points, Alperen Sengun delivered 26 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists, and Kevin Durant added 21 points, six rebounds, and five assists.

The biggest team-level separator was the rebounding battle. Houston finished with 54 rebounds compared with Dallas’s 40. The Rockets also made 20 free throws compared with Dallas’s 13.

Dallas won the assist battle 30-23 and recorded more steals, while Houston controlled the glass and produced more made free throws.

That combination explains the shape of the 110-102 result. The matchup was competitive for most of the night, but Houston’s rebounding, balanced scoring, and fourth-quarter execution gave the Rockets enough separation to finish with the victory.

For anyone studying player production, this game is a useful reminder that points are only one part of an NBA box score. Rebounding, playmaking, shooting efficiency, turnovers, defensive events, and scoring distribution all contribute to understanding what actually happened on the court.