Atlanta Hawks vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

The atlanta hawks vs golden state warriors match player stats from January 12, 2026, reveal how Atlanta secured an impressive 124-111 road victory against Golden State at Chase Center. Although Stephen Curry and Jimmy Butler delivered outstanding individual performances, the Hawks produced a more balanced offensive display, controlled the middle quarters, and made better use of their scoring opportunities. Nickeil Alexander-Walker led Atlanta with 24 points, while Jalen Johnson contributed 23 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists. On the Warriors’ side, Curry finished with 31 points, and Butler added 30 points.

This matchup provided an interesting contrast between individual scoring excellence and collective team performance. Golden State had two players score at least 30 points, but Atlanta received important contributions from several players, including Luke Kennard, Onyeka Okongwu, Dyson Daniels, and CJ McCollum. The difference became particularly noticeable in the second and third quarters, when Atlanta created a 19-point scoring advantage over the Warriors across those two periods. This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, shooting efficiency, rebounds, assists, turnovers, quarter-by-quarter results, and the statistical factors that decided the contest.

Match Overview: Atlanta Hawks vs Golden State Warriors

The Atlanta Hawks visited the Golden State Warriors at Chase Center in San Francisco for an important regular-season matchup. Both teams entered the contest with competitive records, making the result particularly interesting for their respective conference standings.

Atlanta entered the game with a 20-21 overall record and a 13-10 record on the road. Golden State had a 21-19 overall record and an impressive 13-6 home record.

Despite playing away from home, Atlanta managed to overcome the Warriors through efficient shooting, better ball movement, and a strong third-quarter performance.

Here are the essential details from the matchup.

Match Information	Details
Matchup	Atlanta Hawks vs Golden State Warriors
Game Date	January 11, 2026, US local date
ESPN Game Date	January 12, 2026
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	Chase Center
Location	San Francisco, California
Attendance	18,064
Home Team	Golden State Warriors
Away Team	Atlanta Hawks
Final Score	Atlanta 124, Golden State 111
Winning Team	Atlanta Hawks
Losing Team	Golden State Warriors
Atlanta Record	20-21
Golden State Record	21-19
Game Status	Final
Game ID	401810411

Date clarification: The matchup took place on the evening of January 11 in San Francisco. ESPN’s game information also identifies January 12, reflecting the date associated with the game’s reporting and international time-zone presentation.

Atlanta entered the contest looking to improve its road performance, while Golden State wanted to protect its home-court advantage. The result ultimately favored the visiting team, which delivered a strong performance in the second half.

The attendance of 18,064 reflected a full and energetic Chase Center crowd. However, home support was not enough to prevent Atlanta from taking control of the game.

Atlanta Hawks vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

The individual performances explain why Atlanta emerged victorious despite facing two exceptional scoring performances from Golden State’s leading players.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s leading scorer with 24 points. Jalen Johnson delivered an impressive all-around performance with 23 points and 11 rebounds. Onyeka Okongwu controlled important areas of the interior, while Dyson Daniels helped organize the offense with nine assists.

Golden State depended heavily on Stephen Curry and Jimmy Butler. Curry scored 31 points, while Butler contributed 30 points, seven rebounds, and six assists.

Complete Atlanta Hawks Player Statistics

The following table provides the available individual performances from Atlanta’s roster.

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals	Blocks
Nickeil Alexander-Walker	24	2	2	3	0
Jalen Johnson	23	11	6	1	2
Onyeka Okongwu	18	12	8	2	0
Dyson Daniels	11	7	9	0	1
Vit Krejci	5	5	0	1	0
CJ McCollum	12	0	4	1	0
Luke Kennard	22	1	1	0	0
Mouhamed Gueye	5	5	0	0	0
Corey Kispert	2	2	3	1	0
Keaton Wallace	2	0	0	0	0
Asa Newell	0	1	0	0	1
Zaccharie Risacher	DNP	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Individual statistics are presented using the available game box-score data. DNP means Did Not Play.

Atlanta’s offensive production was not limited to its starting lineup. Luke Kennard’s 22 points off the bench were especially valuable, while Okongwu and Johnson provided a strong combination of interior scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

Complete Golden State Warriors Player Statistics

Golden State also received excellent performances from its leading players, although the supporting cast struggled to match Atlanta’s overall scoring production.

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals	Blocks
Stephen Curry	31	3	5	0	0
Jimmy Butler III	30	7	6	2	0
Draymond Green	5	9	4	0	1
Quinten Post	8	3	0	0	0
Moses Moody	2	1	1	0	0
De’Anthony Melton	10	5	3	1	1
Gary Payton II	6	5	0	1	0
Trayce Jackson-Davis	6	2	0	0	0
Al Horford	5	8	2	0	1
Gui Santos	5	2	3	0	1
Brandin Podziemski	3	1	1	1	0
Will Richard	0	1	2	0	0
Buddy Hield	0	1	1	0	0
Jonathan Kuminga	DNP	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Individual statistics are rounded to the recorded whole-number box-score values. Jonathan Kuminga did not participate because of the coach’s decision.

The biggest takeaway from Golden State’s individual statistics is the gap between its leading scorers and the rest of the roster.

Curry and Butler combined for 61 points. That was an excellent scoring contribution, but the remaining Warriors players did not provide enough consistent offensive support to overcome Atlanta’s balanced production.

Nickeil Alexander-Walker Leads Atlanta With 24 Points

Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s leading scorer and one of the most influential players in the game.

He finished with:

• 24 points
• 2 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 3 steals
• 9-of-18 field-goal shooting
• 3-of-7 three-point shooting
• 3-of-3 free-throw shooting

His shooting efficiency made an important difference.

Alexander-Walker converted 50% of his field-goal attempts and approximately 43% of his three-point attempts. He also made every free throw he attempted.

These numbers demonstrate that his contribution was not simply based on taking a high volume of shots. He converted opportunities efficiently and helped Atlanta maintain offensive pressure.

One particularly important moment came near the end of the first half. Alexander-Walker scored eight consecutive points during the final 1 minute and 14 seconds, including consecutive three-pointers.

That scoring sequence helped Atlanta establish a 59-53 halftime advantage.

His ability to generate points during a short stretch changed the momentum of the contest. Golden State had initially started strongly, but Alexander-Walker’s late second-quarter scoring helped Atlanta regain control.

His three steals also contributed to the defensive side of his performance. While his primary responsibility was scoring, he provided additional value by creating opportunities for Atlanta through defensive activity.

Jalen Johnson Delivers an All-Around Performance

Jalen Johnson was another major reason behind Atlanta’s success.

He finished the game with 23 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists. His performance demonstrated the importance of having a forward who can contribute in several statistical categories.

His recorded shooting numbers included:

• 9-of-16 field goals
• 1-of-4 three-pointers
• 4-of-6 free throws
• 11 total rebounds
• 6 assists
• 2 blocks
• Plus/minus of +11

Johnson converted approximately 56% of his field-goal attempts.

His rebounding was particularly valuable because Atlanta needed to compete against a Golden State team that finished with 48 total rebounds.

Johnson collected 11 rebounds, giving Atlanta another reliable presence around the basket.

His six assists also demonstrated his ability to create opportunities for teammates rather than relying entirely on individual scoring.

The two blocks added further defensive value.

Johnson’s plus/minus of +11 means Atlanta outscored Golden State by 11 points during his time on the court. This statistic does not measure his individual contribution alone, but it provides useful context about the team’s performance with him playing.

His combination of scoring, rebounding, passing, and defense made him one of the most complete performers in the matchup.

Stephen Curry Scores 31 Points for Golden State

Stephen Curry was Golden State’s leading scorer.

He recorded 31 points, five assists, and three rebounds while shooting 11-of-21 from the field.

His shooting performance included:

• 31 total points
• 11-of-21 field goals
• 3-of-11 three-pointers
• 6-of-6 free throws
• 5 assists
• 3 rebounds

Curry converted approximately 52% of his field-goal attempts.

His overall shooting efficiency was respectable, but his three-point accuracy was not at the level Golden State needed.

He made only three of his 11 attempts from beyond the arc, representing approximately 27% accuracy.

For a team that relies heavily on outside shooting, this was an important limitation.

Curry still demonstrated his scoring ability by reaching 31 points. His six successful free throws also helped maintain his scoring output.

However, the Warriors needed more efficient perimeter production from the rest of the lineup.

Atlanta’s defense did not completely eliminate Curry’s offensive opportunities, but it managed to prevent Golden State from turning his individual scoring into a winning team performance.

His five assists also showed that he remained involved in creating opportunities for teammates.

The key distinction was that Curry performed well individually while Golden State struggled collectively.

Jimmy Butler Adds 30 Points and Seven Rebounds

Jimmy Butler was another outstanding performer for Golden State.

He finished with 30 points, seven rebounds, and six assists.

His statistical contribution included:

• 30 points
• 7 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 2 steals
• 10-of-19 field goals
• 2-of-6 three-pointers
• 8-of-8 free throws

Butler shot approximately 53% from the field.

He also converted all eight of his free-throw attempts, demonstrating his ability to generate points without depending entirely on perimeter shooting.

His six assists were important because they provided another offensive option alongside Curry.

Butler’s seven rebounds also helped Golden State compete physically against Atlanta.

However, even with 30 points from Butler, the Warriors could not maintain their offensive rhythm throughout the game.

The problem was not a lack of production from the two leading players. Instead, Golden State needed additional contributions from its supporting players and better execution during the second and third quarters.

Butler’s performance deserves recognition because he contributed across multiple categories while maintaining efficient shooting.

Luke Kennard Provides a Major Scoring Boost Off the Bench

One of the most important individual performances came from Atlanta’s bench.

Luke Kennard scored 22 points, making him the second-highest scorer for the Hawks.

His contribution included:

• 22 points
• 8-of-11 field goals
• 6-of-9 three-pointers
• 1 rebound
• 1 assist

Kennard’s three-point shooting was particularly impressive.

He converted six of his nine attempts from beyond the arc, giving Atlanta an important source of perimeter scoring.

His 22 points were also significant because they reduced the scoring pressure on Alexander-Walker and Johnson.

Atlanta did not need its starting lineup to produce every basket. Kennard provided an additional scoring option that helped maintain offensive efficiency when the rotation changed.

His performance illustrates why bench production is an important part of NBA basketball.

A team can have excellent starting players, but the ability to maintain scoring when substitutes enter the game often determines whether it can sustain a lead.

Kennard’s contribution was especially valuable against a Warriors team that struggled to contain Atlanta’s perimeter offense.

Onyeka Okongwu Controls the Rebounding Battle

Onyeka Okongwu delivered one of Atlanta’s most complete interior performances.

He finished with 18 points, 12 rebounds, and eight assists.

His statistical contribution included:

• 18 points
• 12 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 2 steals
• 6-of-14 field goals
• 3-of-6 three-pointers
• 3-of-4 free throws

The most impressive aspect of his performance was his ability to contribute beyond traditional center responsibilities.

Okongwu collected 12 rebounds, making him Atlanta’s leading rebounder.

He also recorded eight assists, which is a notable contribution from a player operating in the frontcourt.

His passing helped Atlanta move the ball effectively and create better offensive opportunities.

Another interesting detail is that he converted three of his six three-point attempts. This gave Atlanta an additional perimeter threat from the center position.

His performance helped the Hawks create a more flexible offensive system.

Instead of depending only on guards to initiate every possession, Atlanta could also use Okongwu’s passing and shooting to create advantages.

Dyson Daniels Directs Atlanta’s Offense

Dyson Daniels finished with nine assists, the highest total of any player in the game.

He also recorded:

• 11 points
• 7 rebounds
• 9 assists
• 1 block

Daniels’ primary value came from his ability to organize the offense.

His nine assists helped Atlanta create scoring opportunities for multiple players.

This was especially important because the Hawks had several productive offensive options.

Alexander-Walker, Johnson, Okongwu, Kennard, and McCollum all contributed to the scoring effort.

Daniels’ passing helped distribute offensive responsibilities rather than allowing the game to become dependent on one player.

His seven rebounds also demonstrated his involvement outside traditional guard responsibilities.

Although he was not Atlanta’s leading scorer, his playmaking was central to the team’s offensive balance.

Team Statistics: Comparing Atlanta and Golden State

Individual performances provide only part of the story. Team statistics help explain how Atlanta managed to win by 13 points despite Golden State having two players score at least 30.

Here is a comparison of the main team statistics.

Statistical Category	Atlanta Hawks	Golden State Warriors
Final Points	124	111
Field Goals	46/94	42/90
Field-Goal Percentage	49%	47%
Three-Pointers	15/39	10/42
Three-Point Percentage	38%	24%
Free Throws	17/25	17/21
Free-Throw Percentage	68%	81%
Total Rebounds	46	48
Offensive Rebounds	11	11
Defensive Rebounds	35	37
Assists	33	28
Steals	9	5
Blocks	4	4
Personal Fouls	21	21
Player Turnovers	7	15

These numbers highlight several important differences.

Atlanta was more efficient from the field, particularly from three-point range.

The Hawks also recorded more assists and fewer player turnovers.

Golden State had a small advantage in total rebounds and free-throw percentage, but those advantages were not enough to compensate for its poor three-point shooting and ball-control problems.

Field-Goal Percentage

Atlanta converted 46 of 94 field-goal attempts, finishing at approximately 49%.

Golden State made 42 of 90 attempts, finishing at approximately 47%.

Although the difference in overall field-goal percentage was relatively small, Atlanta made four additional field goals.

That difference contributed to its 13-point victory.

The Hawks also demonstrated a balanced approach to shot selection.

Their offense generated opportunities through perimeter shooting, interior scoring, and ball movement.

Golden State also produced a respectable overall field-goal percentage, but its lower three-point conversion rate limited its scoring potential.

Three-Point Shooting

Three-point shooting was one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.

Atlanta made 15 of 39 attempts, while Golden State converted only 10 of 42.

Three-Point Comparison	Atlanta	Golden State
Successful Attempts	15	10
Total Attempts	39	42
Accuracy	38%	24%

Atlanta made five more three-pointers despite attempting three fewer shots.

That difference represents 15 additional points from beyond the arc.

In a game decided by 13 points, this shooting advantage was particularly important.

Atlanta also received excellent perimeter contributions from Kennard and Alexander-Walker.

Kennard made six three-pointers, while Alexander-Walker added three.

Golden State’s outside shooting was less effective.

Curry made three three-pointers, and Butler converted two.

The remaining Warriors players combined for five successful shots from beyond the arc.

Free-Throw Shooting

Golden State was more efficient at the free-throw line.

The Warriors converted 17 of 21 attempts, producing an 81% success rate.

Atlanta also made 17 free throws but needed 25 attempts.

Its free-throw percentage was approximately 68%.

This means Golden State had a clear advantage in free-throw accuracy.

However, both teams made the same number of free throws.

Consequently, the difference in free-throw percentage did not create an advantage in total points from the line.

Atlanta’s success came primarily from its field-goal and three-point production.

Rebounding Comparison

Golden State finished with 48 rebounds, two more than Atlanta’s 46.

The Warriors collected 11 offensive rebounds and 37 defensive rebounds.

Atlanta also recorded 11 offensive rebounds, alongside 35 defensive rebounds.

This suggests that Golden State performed slightly better in total rebounding, although the difference was not substantial.

Okongwu led Atlanta with 12 rebounds, while Johnson contributed 11.

For Golden State, Draymond Green collected nine rebounds, and Al Horford added eight.

The Warriors competed effectively around the basket, but their rebounding advantage did not translate into enough additional scoring opportunities to change the result.

Assists and Ball Movement

Atlanta recorded 33 assists compared with Golden State’s 28.

This five-assist advantage highlights the Hawks’ ability to create scoring opportunities through teamwork.

Daniels recorded nine assists, Okongwu added eight, and Johnson contributed six.

Together, these three players accounted for 23 of Atlanta’s 33 assists.

Golden State received six assists from Butler, five from Curry, and four from Green.

The Warriors also moved the ball effectively at times, but Atlanta had the stronger overall playmaking performance.

More assists do not automatically guarantee victory, but in this game they reflected Atlanta’s ability to distribute offensive responsibilities.

Turnovers and Possession Management

Turnovers were another important factor.

Atlanta recorded seven player turnovers, while Golden State recorded 15.

That is an eight-turnover difference.

For Golden State, losing possession so frequently created additional opportunities for Atlanta.

Turnovers can be especially damaging when they occur against a team capable of converting defensive stops into fast-break points.

Atlanta’s ability to protect possession helped it maintain offensive continuity.

It also reduced the number of opportunities Golden State had to create additional scoring runs.

One statistical distinction is worth noting: the ESPN team comparison lists seven and 15 player turnovers. Official NBA box-score totals also account for team turnovers, producing nine and 16 total turnovers, respectively. These figures use different reporting conventions and should not be treated as contradictory individual-player totals.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

The scoring progression explains how Atlanta turned a competitive opening quarter into a comfortable victory.

Quarter	Atlanta Hawks	Golden State Warriors
First Quarter	27	28
Second Quarter	32	25
Third Quarter	35	25
Fourth Quarter	30	33
Final Score	124	111

Golden State won the opening quarter by one point.

However, Atlanta responded with a stronger second quarter and continued its momentum after halftime.

The third quarter was particularly important because the Hawks extended their advantage.

Golden State won the fourth quarter, but the deficit created earlier was too large to overcome.

First Quarter: Warriors Start Strong

Golden State opened the contest with an aggressive offensive approach.

The Warriors made five of their first six shots and quickly established a 14-4 advantage.

Curry was responsible for seven points during that early stretch.

This opening suggested that Golden State could control the game through its perimeter shooting and offensive movement.

However, Atlanta gradually settled into the contest.

The Hawks improved their offensive execution and managed to keep the deficit small.

Golden State finished the first quarter ahead 28-27.

Although the Warriors had a one-point advantage, Atlanta remained close enough to challenge the home team.

Second Quarter: Atlanta Takes Control

The second quarter marked an important change in momentum.

Atlanta scored 32 points, while Golden State managed only 25.

The Hawks began finding better scoring opportunities and increased their offensive pressure.

Alexander-Walker was especially important during the closing stages of the period.

His eight consecutive points helped Atlanta establish separation.

CJ McCollum also contributed a jumper that beat the halftime buzzer.

At the end of the first half, Atlanta held a 59-53 advantage.

The six-point lead gave the visitors a better position entering the second half.

More importantly, Atlanta had demonstrated that it could respond to Golden State’s early offensive success.

Third Quarter: Hawks Create the Decisive Advantage

The third quarter was arguably the most important period of the entire contest.

Atlanta scored 35 points, its highest total in any quarter.

Golden State managed only 25.

The Hawks therefore added another 10 points to their halftime advantage.

One important sequence occurred after Dyson Daniels scored a layup with 8:47 remaining in the third quarter.

That basket gave Atlanta a 70-58 advantage.

Golden State responded with a 10-0 scoring run, showing that the Warriors still had the ability to challenge the visitors.

However, they could not maintain that momentum.

Atlanta continued to find scoring opportunities and finished the quarter with an 18-point advantage.

The score entering the fourth quarter was 94-78.

This was a critical development because Golden State now needed a significant comeback to regain control.

Fourth Quarter: Warriors Respond but Fall Short

Golden State performed better in the final quarter.

The Warriors scored 33 points, compared with Atlanta’s 30.

Curry and Butler continued contributing offensively, but the earlier deficit remained too large.

Atlanta maintained its composure and continued producing enough points to protect its advantage.

The Hawks ultimately secured a 124-111 victory.

The fourth-quarter result showed that Golden State had not stopped competing, but its improved offensive production arrived too late to change the final outcome.

Why Did Atlanta Hawks Beat Golden State Warriors?

The final score provides the result, but several statistical factors explain why Atlanta was able to defeat Golden State.

1. Better Three-Point Efficiency

The most obvious difference was Atlanta’s outside shooting.

The Hawks made 15 three-pointers, while the Warriors converted only 10.

This five-shot difference created a 15-point advantage from three-point range.

Kennard’s six successful attempts were especially important.

Atlanta also received reliable perimeter shooting from Alexander-Walker and Okongwu.

Golden State had more difficulty converting its outside opportunities.

Although Curry remained productive, his three-point shooting was less efficient than usual.

2. More Balanced Scoring

Atlanta had six players score at least 10 points.

These players were:

• Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 24 points
• Jalen Johnson: 23 points
• Luke Kennard: 22 points
• Onyeka Okongwu: 18 points
• CJ McCollum: 12 points
• Dyson Daniels: 11 points

This distribution gave Atlanta several offensive options.

Golden State also had two outstanding scorers in Curry and Butler, but only one additional player reached double figures.

De’Anthony Melton scored 10 points.

The difference was significant because Atlanta did not depend on just one or two players to generate its offense.

3. Stronger Ball Movement

Atlanta finished with 33 assists.

Golden State recorded 28.

The Hawks created scoring opportunities through Daniels, Johnson, and Okongwu.

Their combined passing contribution helped distribute the offensive workload.

This made Atlanta more difficult to defend because Golden State had to account for several players capable of creating opportunities.

4. Fewer Turnovers

Atlanta protected possession more effectively.

The Hawks recorded seven player turnovers compared with 15 for Golden State.

This reduced the number of avoidable offensive possessions Atlanta surrendered.

It also helped the Hawks maintain control during important stretches.

5. A Dominant Third Quarter

Atlanta’s 35-25 third-quarter advantage was a major turning point.

The Hawks increased their lead from six points at halftime to 16 points entering the final period.

That scoring difference placed considerable pressure on Golden State.

Although the Warriors performed better in the fourth quarter, they could not completely recover.

The Importance of Atlanta’s Bench Production

Bench scoring deserves particular attention because it was one of the strongest aspects of Atlanta’s performance.

Luke Kennard scored 22 points, while CJ McCollum added 12.

Together, these two players contributed 34 points.

That production gave Atlanta additional offensive options outside its starting lineup.

Mouhamed Gueye also scored five points, while Corey Kispert and Keaton Wallace contributed two points each.

This distribution demonstrates that Atlanta received useful contributions from several rotation players.

Bench performance is particularly important during a long NBA game because starters cannot remain on the court for every possession.

Coaches need substitutes who can maintain offensive production and help the team preserve its competitive position.

Atlanta achieved that objective through Kennard’s shooting and McCollum’s scoring.

Golden State received 10 points from Melton and useful contributions from several other reserves, but its overall bench production did not match the Hawks’ offensive output.

The difference was not simply about the number of players available.

It was about how effectively each team’s substitutes converted their opportunities.

Golden State’s Main Weaknesses in the Game

Golden State had several positive individual performances, but certain statistical problems prevented the team from securing a home victory.

Inconsistent Three-Point Shooting

The Warriors attempted 42 three-pointers but converted only 10.

That represented approximately 24% accuracy.

For a team with Curry as its leading offensive player, this was a major limitation.

Golden State generated a high number of perimeter attempts but did not convert enough of them.

The difference between taking shots and making shots became particularly important during the second and third quarters.

Limited Supporting Scoring

Curry and Butler combined for 61 points.

Their performances were excellent, but Golden State needed additional offensive contributions.

Melton was the only other Warrior to reach double figures, scoring 10 points.

This created a scoring imbalance.

Atlanta, by comparison, had six players reach double figures.

The Hawks therefore had more options when Golden State focused its defensive attention on the leading scorers.

Turnover Problems

Golden State recorded 15 player turnovers.

This made it harder for the Warriors to establish consistent offensive possessions.

When a team loses possession without attempting a shot, it misses an opportunity to score.

Those lost opportunities can become particularly costly against a team that is already shooting efficiently.

Inability to Maintain Early Momentum

Golden State started the game well and established a 14-4 advantage.

However, the Warriors could not maintain that level of offensive execution.

Atlanta gradually improved its performance and controlled the next two quarters.

The early advantage demonstrated Golden State’s potential, but consistency across all four quarters was missing.

Important Plus/Minus Performances

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

It is a useful contextual statistic, although it should not be interpreted as a direct measurement of an individual’s complete performance.

Two players recorded particularly interesting plus/minus figures.

Player	Team	Plus/Minus
Jalen Johnson	Atlanta Hawks	+11
De’Anthony Melton	Golden State Warriors	+18

Johnson’s +11 reflected Atlanta’s positive scoring margin during his playing time.

Melton’s +18 was especially interesting because Golden State lost the game by 13 points.

His individual plus/minus indicates that the Warriors outscored Atlanta by 18 points during his minutes.

This does not mean Melton alone was responsible for Golden State’s better stretches.

Plus/minus is influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and game situations.

Nevertheless, his figure highlights an important detail: the Warriors had productive stretches with Melton on the floor, even though the overall team performance was insufficient.

This is why plus/minus should always be examined alongside points, rebounds, assists, shooting efficiency, and turnovers.

Starting Lineups and Player Availability

Starting lineups help explain how both teams approached the matchup.

Atlanta Hawks Starting Lineup

Atlanta started with the following players:

1. Onyeka Okongwu
2. Jalen Johnson
3. Nickeil Alexander-Walker
4. Vit Krejci
5. Dyson Daniels

The starting lineup offered a combination of scoring, rebounding, defensive activity, and playmaking.

Johnson and Okongwu provided frontcourt production, while Daniels and Alexander-Walker helped manage the perimeter offense.

Vit Krejci completed the starting group.

Atlanta also used several bench players, including CJ McCollum, Luke Kennard, Corey Kispert, and Mouhamed Gueye.

Player availability: Zaccharie Risacher did not participate because of left knee inflammation.

His absence reduced one available rotation option for Atlanta, but the Hawks still generated enough offensive production from their active players.

Golden State Warriors Starting Lineup

Golden State’s starting lineup consisted of:

1. Jimmy Butler III
2. Draymond Green
3. Quinten Post
4. Stephen Curry
5. Moses Moody

This group combined Curry’s perimeter scoring, Butler’s offensive versatility, and Green’s defensive and playmaking abilities.

The Warriors also used several bench players, including De’Anthony Melton, Al Horford, Gui Santos, Gary Payton II, and Brandin Podziemski.

Player availability: Jonathan Kuminga did not play because of the coach’s decision.

His absence meant Golden State had one fewer available rotation option.

However, the available players still provided sufficient depth to compete.

The more significant issue was converting offensive opportunities, especially from three-point range.

Head-to-Head Context and Second Matchup

The January matchup was an important meeting between two teams with different offensive approaches.

Atlanta’s victory gave the Hawks a 1-0 lead in the season series at that point.

The teams later met again on March 22, 2026.

Golden State won that second matchup by a score of 126-110.

This later result demonstrated that the season series was not decided by the January meeting.

The two games also produced different outcomes.

In January, Atlanta’s perimeter shooting and balanced scoring helped secure a 124-111 victory.

In March, Golden State responded with a 16-point win.

Looking at both results provides a more complete understanding of the matchup.

A single NBA game can be influenced by shooting efficiency, player availability, lineup combinations, and game-specific execution.

Therefore, evaluating both meetings is more useful than assuming the first result represents the overall strength of either team.

Statistical Lessons From the Matchup

There are several useful lessons that basketball fans can take from this game.

Scoring Balance Can Be More Important Than Individual Point Totals

Golden State had the two highest individual scorers in the contest.

Curry scored 31, while Butler added 30.

However, Atlanta won.

The Hawks had six players reach double figures, giving them a more balanced scoring distribution.

This demonstrates why individual scoring leaders do not always determine the final result.

A team with several reliable offensive contributors can create more difficult defensive decisions for its opponent.

Three-Point Accuracy Can Change a Close Game

Atlanta made five more three-pointers than Golden State.

Those additional successful shots represented a 15-point difference from beyond the arc.

The final margin was 13 points.

This does not mean three-point shooting was the only reason Atlanta won, but it clearly played a major role.

Golden State attempted more three-pointers but converted fewer.

The difference between shot volume and shot efficiency was particularly important.

Playmaking Helps Create Offensive Consistency

Atlanta’s 33 assists demonstrated effective ball movement.

Daniels, Johnson, and Okongwu were especially influential.

Their combined 23 assists helped the Hawks distribute scoring opportunities.

A balanced passing attack can make an offense more difficult to defend because the opposing team cannot focus entirely on one ball handler.

Turnover Control Protects Scoring Opportunities

Atlanta recorded eight fewer player turnovers.

That difference helped the Hawks maintain more consistent offensive possessions.

Possession management is especially important in games where both teams have capable scorers.

A missed shot still creates a rebound opportunity, but a turnover ends the possession without a shot attempt.

Reducing unnecessary turnovers therefore helps preserve scoring opportunities.

Bench Contributions Matter

Kennard’s 22 points were one of the most important supporting performances.

His scoring reduced the pressure on Atlanta’s starters.

McCollum also provided valuable offensive production.

The game showed that effective bench scoring can be a decisive advantage, particularly when the opponent depends heavily on its leading players.

What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The overall statistical comparison offers a useful picture of each team’s strengths and weaknesses.

Atlanta demonstrated strong offensive balance.

Its shooting efficiency was better, its three-point production was higher, and its assist total demonstrated effective teamwork.

The Hawks also protected the ball more effectively.

Golden State showed that it could produce outstanding individual scoring performances.

Curry and Butler were highly productive, while Green contributed nine rebounds and four assists.

However, the Warriors did not receive enough consistent scoring support.

Their three-point shooting was inefficient, and their turnover total was higher.

These factors combined to make Atlanta’s advantage difficult to overcome.

From a broader basketball perspective, the matchup illustrates how different offensive approaches can produce very different results.

A team can have elite individual scorers and still lose when the supporting statistics are unfavorable.

Similarly, a balanced team effort can overcome a strong individual scoring performance from the opposition.

Atlanta demonstrated that principle throughout the second and third quarters.

Official Match Statistics and Data Accuracy

When examining NBA player statistics, it is important to distinguish between individual performances, team totals, and game summaries.

A box score contains information about individual players, including points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, shooting attempts, and turnovers.

Team statistics summarize those performances while also accounting for certain team-level events.

For example, player turnovers and official team turnovers may be reported differently.

This explains why some box-score presentations can display different turnover totals depending on whether team turnovers are included.

Another important consideration is the difference between a player’s total scoring output and shooting efficiency.

A player who scores 30 points on 19 field-goal attempts has a different shooting profile from someone who scores 30 points on 28 attempts.

Similarly, a player who records 23 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists contributes in several areas beyond scoring.

For this matchup, the most useful statistical indicators include:

• Points: Measure each player’s scoring contribution.
• Field-goal percentage: Shows overall shooting efficiency.
• Three-point percentage: Measures perimeter shooting accuracy.
• Rebounds: Indicate performance on the offensive and defensive glass.
• Assists: Reflect opportunities created for teammates.
• Steals: Measure defensive possession creation.
• Blocks: Record successful defensive shot rejections.
• Turnovers: Show possessions lost without a successful shot attempt.
• Plus/minus: Provides context about the team’s scoring margin during a player’s minutes.

For readers who want to examine the original game information, the ESPN NBA box score provides the detailed statistical record for this matchup.

Using the original box score is important when comparing player performances, checking individual shooting numbers, or reviewing the team’s quarter-by-quarter production.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who Won the Atlanta Hawks vs Golden State Warriors Game on January 12, 2026?

The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Golden State Warriors 124-111. Atlanta secured the road victory at Chase Center in San Francisco, controlling the second and third quarters.

2. Who Was the Top Scorer for the Atlanta Hawks?

Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s leading scorer with 24 points. He shot 9-of-18 from the field, made three three-pointers, and recorded three steals.

3. How Many Points Did Stephen Curry Score Against Atlanta?

Stephen Curry scored 31 points for Golden State. He also recorded five assists and three rebounds while making 11 of his 21 field-goal attempts.

4. How Many Points Did Jimmy Butler Score?

Jimmy Butler III finished with 30 points, seven rebounds, and six assists. He converted 10 of his 19 field-goal attempts and made all eight of his free throws.

5. Which Atlanta Hawks Player Recorded the Most Rebounds?

Onyeka Okongwu led Atlanta with 12 rebounds. He also contributed 18 points, eight assists, and two steals.

6. What Was the Biggest Statistical Difference Between the Teams?

Three-point shooting was one of the biggest differences. Atlanta made 15 of 39 attempts, while Golden State converted 10 of 42. The Hawks also recorded more assists and fewer player turnovers.

Conclusion

The Atlanta Hawks secured a convincing 124-111 victory over the Golden State Warriors through balanced scoring, efficient perimeter shooting, and strong team play. Nickeil Alexander-Walker led Atlanta with 24 points, while Jalen Johnson recorded 23 points, 11 rebounds, and six assists. Luke Kennard’s 22 points off the bench and Onyeka Okongwu’s 18 points and 12 rebounds were also essential contributions.

Golden State received excellent performances from Stephen Curry and Jimmy Butler, who scored 31 and 30 points, respectively. However, the Warriors struggled with three-point accuracy and committed more player turnovers. Atlanta’s 33 assists, compared with Golden State’s 28, also highlighted the difference in offensive organization.

The third quarter ultimately proved decisive, as Atlanta outscored Golden State 35-25 and entered the final period with a substantial advantage. Although the Warriors responded in the fourth quarter, the Hawks maintained control and completed the 13-point road victory.

Overall, this matchup demonstrated the importance of balanced offensive production, effective ball movement, and shooting efficiency. Individual scoring performances remain important, but the combined contribution of an entire roster often determines the outcome of an NBA game.