Las Vegas Aces vs Portland Fire Match Player Stats
The las vegas aces vs portland fire match player stats from July 29, 2026, reveal a dominant performance by the Las Vegas Aces, who defeated the Portland Fire 98-83 at Michelob ULTRA Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Aces established control early, scoring 36 points in the opening quarter and building a 15-point victory behind outstanding performances from A’ja Wilson, Jackie Young, and Chelsea Gray.
A’ja Wilson led Las Vegas with 28 points and 14 rebounds, recording an impressive double-double. Jackie Young added 25 points, while Chelsea Gray contributed 17 points and seven assists. For Portland, Megan DiLeo led the scoring with 20 points, while Frieda Buhner delivered an important 16-point contribution from the bench. Emily Engstler also made her presence felt with 10 rebounds.
The result completed a 3-0 season-series sweep for Las Vegas. Although Portland showed improved offensive production after the opening quarter, the early scoring difference proved too difficult to overcome. The Aces’ superior shooting efficiency, effective ball movement, and strong interior scoring were the defining factors behind the victory.
Data verification note: The official WNBA game recap and box score confirm the final score, date, venue, attendance, and principal performances. The supplied dataset contains some conflicting season standings and player rankings. This article uses the verified game-day records and individual box-score figures rather than the inconsistent later standings.
Match Overview and Final Score
The contest took place on July 29, 2026, at Michelob ULTRA Arena. A crowd of 10,240 watched Las Vegas secure another important regular-season victory.
| Match Information | Details |
| Competition | WNBA |
| Matchup | Las Vegas Aces vs Portland Fire |
| Date | July 29, 2026 |
| Venue | Michelob ULTRA Arena |
| Location | Las Vegas, Nevada |
| Attendance | 10,240 |
| Final Score | Aces 98, Fire 83 |
| Winning Team | Las Vegas Aces |
| Losing Team | Portland Fire |
| Game ID | 401857095 |
| Match Status | Final |
| Season Series | Las Vegas won 3-0 |
The 15-point margin reflected the difference in offensive efficiency between the two teams. Portland collected more total rebounds, but Las Vegas converted a much higher percentage of its attempts.
The Aces also produced more assists and steals while committing one fewer turnover. These numbers demonstrate that the victory was not simply the result of individual scoring. Las Vegas performed better in several important areas of team basketball.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The opening quarter was the most important period of the game. Las Vegas immediately established an offensive rhythm and scored 36 points, while Portland managed only 21.
| Quarter | Portland Fire | Las Vegas Aces |
| First Quarter | 21 | 36 |
| Second Quarter | 16 | 17 |
| Third Quarter | 27 | 26 |
| Fourth Quarter | 19 | 19 |
| Final Score | 83 | 98 |
First Quarter: Las Vegas Takes Control
The Aces started aggressively and created separation before Portland could establish a defensive rhythm.
Las Vegas scored 36 points in the opening period. A’ja Wilson played an important role by contributing 10 points and five rebounds during the first quarter.
Portland scored 21 points, but its defense struggled to contain the Aces’ combination of inside scoring and perimeter shooting.
The 15-point opening-quarter advantage gave Las Vegas a comfortable position for the remainder of the contest.
Second Quarter: Portland Attempts a Comeback
Portland showed improvement during the second quarter.
The Fire began the period with a 12-3 scoring run, reducing the deficit to six points. Megan DiLeo helped Portland maintain its offensive pressure, while the team looked more comfortable attacking the basket.
However, Las Vegas responded with a 14-4 run to close the half.
Chelsea Gray and Jackie Young contributed important baskets during that stretch, helping the Aces restore their advantage.
At halftime, Las Vegas led 53-37.
The second quarter demonstrated Portland’s ability to compete offensively, but its defensive problems prevented the team from making a complete comeback.
Third Quarter: Portland Improves Its Scoring
The third quarter was much more competitive.
Portland scored 27 points compared with Las Vegas’ 26. The Fire found better opportunities in transition and improved their offensive production.
However, the Aces continued to maintain control of the overall game.
Even though Portland won the quarter by one point, it still entered the final period trailing 79-64.
This was an important example of why individual quarter victories do not always translate into overall success. Portland needed a much larger scoring run to change the outcome.
Fourth Quarter: The Aces Protect Their Lead
Both teams scored 19 points in the fourth quarter.
Portland continued trying to reduce the deficit, but Las Vegas remained composed and avoided giving away its advantage.
The Aces controlled the tempo, made important shots, and managed the remaining minutes effectively.
The final buzzer confirmed a 98-83 victory for Las Vegas.
las vegas aces vs portland fire match player stats: Complete Player Statistics
Individual performances played a major role in determining the result.
A’ja Wilson was the standout performer for Las Vegas, recording 28 points and 14 rebounds. Jackie Young delivered another excellent scoring performance with 25 points.
Chelsea Gray added 17 points and seven assists, providing the Aces with an effective combination of scoring and playmaking.
Portland also received valuable contributions from several players. Megan DiLeo scored 20 points, while Frieda Buhner finished with 16 points from the bench.
The following tables provide the individual statistics for players who appeared in the game.
Las Vegas Aces Player Stats
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| A’ja Wilson | 28 | 14 | 4 |
| Jackie Young | 25 | 2 | 2 |
| Chelsea Gray | 17 | 1 | 7 |
| Jewell Loyd | 11 | 5 | 3 |
| Brianna Turner | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| Justine Pissott | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Stephanie Talbot | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dana Evans | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Ta’Niya Latson | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Mai Yamamoto | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 98 | 30 | 21 |
Portland Fire Player Stats
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Megan DiLeo | 20 | 6 | 1 |
| Frieda Buhner | 16 | 5 | 2 |
| Bridget Carleton | 13 | 4 | 4 |
| Carla Leite | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| Teja Oblak | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Serah Williams | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Nyadiew Puoch | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Karlie Samuelson | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Emily Engstler | 7 | 10 | 0 |
| Holly Winterburn | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Luisa Geiselsoder | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Team Total | 83 | 33 | 18 |
Note: The official box score records Emily Engstler with seven points and 10 rebounds. Frieda Buhner was Portland’s second-leading scorer with 16 points, not Bridget Carleton.
Las Vegas Aces Player Performance Analysis
A’ja Wilson: The Most Valuable Performer
28 POINTS | 14 REBOUNDS | 4 ASSISTS
A’ja Wilson delivered the most influential individual performance of the evening.
She finished with 28 points and 14 rebounds, recording a double-double that demonstrated her importance on both ends of the court.
Wilson’s shooting efficiency was particularly impressive. She made seven of her 10 field-goal attempts, converting 70% of her shots from the floor.
She also made 13 of 14 free throws, giving Las Vegas another reliable scoring option whenever Portland struggled to defend her inside.
Her 14 rebounds helped the Aces control defensive possessions and limited Portland’s opportunities to create additional scoring chances.
Wilson’s performance was important for several reasons:
- She led both teams in scoring.
- She collected the highest individual rebound total.
- She converted 13 free throws.
- She provided four assists.
- She finished with a plus/minus of +14.
Her ability to score efficiently while controlling the paint made her the central figure in Las Vegas’ victory.
Jackie Young: An Outstanding Scoring Contribution
25 POINTS | 2 REBOUNDS | 2 ASSISTS
Jackie Young was another major reason the Aces maintained their offensive advantage.
She scored 25 points and made nine of her 14 field-goal attempts. Her 64.3% shooting percentage showed how effectively she converted scoring opportunities.
Young also connected on two three-point attempts and made all five of her free throws.
Her offensive contribution was especially important because it prevented Portland from focusing its defensive attention entirely on Wilson.
When Wilson attracted defenders near the basket, Young provided another scoring threat.
She finished with a plus/minus of +10, indicating that Las Vegas outscored Portland by 10 points during her time on the floor.
Young’s performance showed the value of having multiple reliable offensive options rather than depending on one player to produce most of the points.
Chelsea Gray: The Playmaking Leader
17 POINTS | 1 REBOUND | 7 ASSISTS
Chelsea Gray delivered an efficient performance as both a scorer and playmaker.
She recorded 17 points and seven assists, leading all players in assists.
Gray made six of her nine field-goal attempts and connected on two of her three three-point attempts.
Her shooting efficiency helped Las Vegas maintain offensive pressure without requiring excessive possessions.
More importantly, her seven assists demonstrated her ability to create opportunities for teammates.
Gray helped connect the Aces’ perimeter offense with their interior scoring options.
Her performance also reduced the pressure on Young and Wilson to create every scoring opportunity themselves.
Jewell Loyd: Valuable Production From the Bench
11 POINTS | 5 REBOUNDS | 3 ASSISTS
Jewell Loyd provided an important contribution after entering the game from the bench.
She scored 11 points, collected five rebounds, and recorded three assists.
Loyd also connected on three three-point attempts from six attempts, giving Las Vegas another perimeter scoring option.
Her 25 minutes on the court allowed the Aces to maintain offensive quality when their starting players needed rest.
This type of bench contribution is especially valuable during a long WNBA season because it reduces the pressure on the starting lineup.
Brianna Turner: Defensive and Interior Support
Brianna Turner finished with eight points and four rebounds.
She also recorded two blocks, making an important defensive contribution around the basket.
Turner’s presence helped Las Vegas maintain its interior defensive structure while Wilson contributed on both ends.
Although her scoring total was lower than those of the leading performers, her defensive work helped the Aces limit Portland’s opportunities near the rim.
Portland Fire Player Performance Analysis
Megan DiLeo: Portland’s Leading Scorer
20 POINTS | 6 REBOUNDS | 1 ASSIST
Megan DiLeo was Portland’s leading offensive performer.
She scored 20 points and made eight of her 13 field-goal attempts, producing an impressive 61.5% shooting percentage.
DiLeo also converted all three of her free throws.
Her scoring efficiency was one of the positive aspects of Portland’s performance.
She demonstrated that the Fire could create quality offensive opportunities against a strong opponent.
However, her individual production was not enough to overcome the team’s defensive problems and overall shooting disadvantage.
DiLeo’s performance was particularly important because Portland needed consistent scoring after falling behind by 15 points in the opening quarter.
Frieda Buhner: An Important Bench Performance
16 POINTS | 5 REBOUNDS | 2 ASSISTS
Frieda Buhner produced one of the most valuable performances for Portland.
She finished with 16 points, five rebounds, and two assists despite coming off the bench.
Her shooting efficiency was impressive. Buhner made three of five field-goal attempts and converted both of her three-point attempts.
She was also perfect at the free-throw line, making all eight attempts.
Her performance helped Portland maintain some offensive momentum even when the starting lineup struggled.
Buhner’s contribution is an important detail when reviewing the individual statistics because she was the team’s second-highest scorer, ahead of Bridget Carleton.
Bridget Carleton: Scoring and Playmaking
13 POINTS | 4 REBOUNDS | 4 ASSISTS
Bridget Carleton contributed 13 points, four rebounds, and four assists.
Her playmaking helped Portland create opportunities for teammates, while her perimeter shooting provided additional offensive support.
Carleton made three three-point shots from nine attempts.
However, her overall field-goal efficiency was lower than Portland needed. She converted only four of her 15 field-goal attempts.
Her four assists were still valuable because they helped Portland maintain offensive movement instead of relying entirely on individual scoring.
Carla Leite: Additional Offensive Production
11 POINTS | 0 REBOUNDS | 3 ASSISTS
Carla Leite finished with 11 points and three assists.
She made four of 10 field-goal attempts and connected on one three-pointer.
Leite also made both of her free-throw attempts.
Her performance gave Portland another double-digit scorer, but the Fire needed more consistent production from their overall lineup.
Emily Engstler: Portland’s Rebounding Leader
7 POINTS | 10 REBOUNDS | 0 ASSISTS
Emily Engstler was Portland’s leading rebounder with 10 total rebounds.
She collected eight defensive rebounds and two offensive rebounds.
Her rebounding performance was one of the strongest individual contributions from the Fire.
However, her offensive production was more limited. She finished with seven points and made three of six field-goal attempts.
Engstler’s 10 rebounds helped Portland finish with a 33-30 advantage in total rebounds.
This statistic demonstrates that Portland was capable of competing on the glass, even though the team struggled in other areas.
Team Statistics Comparison
Individual performances explain much of the contest, but team statistics provide a clearer understanding of why Las Vegas won.
| Statistical Category | Las Vegas Aces | Portland Fire |
| Points | 98 | 83 |
| Field Goals | 33/57 | 27/68 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 57.9% | 39.7% |
| Three-Pointers | 9/22 | 9/31 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 40.9% | 29.0% |
| Free Throws | 23/26 | 20/25 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 88.5% | 80.0% |
| Total Rebounds | 30 | 33 |
| Assists | 21 | 18 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 13 |
| Steals | 7 | 5 |
| Blocks | 3 | 1 |
Field-Goal Efficiency
The biggest statistical difference appeared in field-goal shooting.
Las Vegas converted 33 of 57 attempts, producing a 57.9% shooting percentage.
Portland made 27 of 68 attempts, finishing at 39.7%.
The difference of more than 18 percentage points was significant.
Las Vegas did not need as many attempts to produce its scoring total because the team consistently converted its opportunities.
Portland, on the other hand, needed more shots to generate fewer points.
This difference in efficiency played a major role in determining the result.
Three-Point Shooting
Both teams made nine three-point shots.
However, Las Vegas needed only 22 attempts to reach that total, while Portland attempted 31 shots.
The Aces converted 40.9% of their three-point attempts compared with Portland’s 29%.
This demonstrates an important aspect of offensive efficiency.
Making the same number of three-pointers does not mean two teams performed equally well from the perimeter. The number of attempts also matters.
Las Vegas generated more value from its available shooting opportunities.
Free-Throw Performance
Las Vegas made 23 of 26 free throws, finishing with an 88.5% conversion rate.
Portland made 20 of 25 attempts, producing an 80% rate.
The Aces therefore gained an additional advantage through more accurate free-throw shooting.
Wilson’s 13 successful free throws were particularly important.
Her ability to convert opportunities at the line helped Las Vegas maintain its scoring advantage.
Rebounding Comparison
Portland actually won the total rebounding battle.
The Fire collected 33 rebounds compared with Las Vegas’ 30.
Emily Engstler led Portland with 10 rebounds, while Wilson collected 14 for the Aces.
Despite losing the overall rebounding comparison, Las Vegas still controlled the most important parts of the game.
This illustrates why rebounds alone cannot determine which team performed better.
Shooting efficiency, turnovers, assists, and defensive execution must also be considered.
Assists and Ball Movement
Las Vegas recorded 21 assists, while Portland finished with 18.
Chelsea Gray led the Aces with seven assists.
Bridget Carleton was Portland’s leading assister with four.
The difference suggests that Las Vegas was slightly more effective at creating scoring opportunities through passing.
Good ball movement also contributed to the Aces’ high field-goal percentage.
Turnovers and Defensive Activity
Portland committed 13 turnovers, compared with 12 for Las Vegas.
The difference was small, but the Aces also recorded seven steals against Portland’s five.
Las Vegas added three blocks, while Portland recorded one.
These defensive numbers demonstrate that the Aces were slightly more effective at disrupting their opponent’s offensive possessions.
Why Did the Las Vegas Aces Win?
Several factors explain the final result.
1. A Dominant Opening Quarter
The 36-21 first-quarter advantage gave Las Vegas immediate control.
Portland spent the remainder of the game trying to recover from that deficit.
Although the Fire played better in the third quarter, they never managed to erase the early disadvantage.
2. Superior Shooting Accuracy
Las Vegas finished with a 57.9% field-goal percentage.
That was significantly higher than Portland’s 39.7%.
The Aces also converted 40.9% of their three-point attempts.
This combination made their offense much more productive.
3. Multiple Scoring Options
Wilson and Young combined for 53 points.
Gray added another 17, while Loyd contributed 11 from the bench.
Having several players capable of producing points made it difficult for Portland to concentrate its defense on a single player.
4. Effective Free-Throw Shooting
Las Vegas converted 88.5% of its free throws.
Wilson alone made 13 free throws, helping the Aces maintain their advantage.
5. Better Overall Offensive Execution
The Aces recorded 21 assists and committed only 12 turnovers.
Their ability to move the basketball and convert scoring opportunities helped them maintain control throughout the contest.
What Went Wrong for the Portland Fire?
Portland had some positive individual performances, but several team-level weaknesses affected the final result.
Defensive Problems in the First Quarter
Allowing 36 points in the opening period created a difficult situation.
The Fire struggled to limit Las Vegas’ scoring opportunities and allowed the Aces to build an early advantage.
Against a team with several experienced offensive players, recovering from such a start was challenging.
Inconsistent Field-Goal Shooting
Portland’s 39.7% field-goal percentage was considerably lower than Las Vegas’ shooting efficiency.
The Fire made 27 of 68 attempts.
Although DiLeo and Buhner were efficient, the team did not receive consistent shooting production from every player.
Perimeter Shooting Difficulties
Portland attempted 31 three-pointers but converted only nine.
That represented a 29% shooting percentage.
The Fire needed better perimeter accuracy to reduce the scoring gap.
Limited Defensive Disruption
Portland recorded five steals and one block.
These figures were lower than Las Vegas’ seven steals and three blocks.
The Fire also struggled to prevent Wilson and Young from finding efficient scoring opportunities.
Head-to-Head Record: Las Vegas Aces vs Portland Fire
The July 29 contest completed the three-game season series between these teams.
Las Vegas won all three meetings.
| Game | Date | Result | Winner |
| Game 1 | June 12, 2026 | Las Vegas 105-89 Portland | Las Vegas |
| Game 2 | July 10, 2026 | Las Vegas 88-80 Portland | Las Vegas |
| Game 3 | July 29, 2026 | Las Vegas 98-83 Portland | Las Vegas |
Season-series result: Las Vegas Aces 3, Portland Fire 0.
The first meeting was the highest-scoring game of the series for Las Vegas, with 105 points.
The second contest was more competitive, as Portland limited the Aces to 88 points.
However, Las Vegas still managed to secure an eight-point victory.
In the third meeting, the Aces returned to a more efficient offensive performance and won by 15 points.
The overall series results demonstrate Las Vegas’ advantage in this particular matchup.
Portland showed that it could compete for stretches, but the Fire struggled to maintain consistent performance across all four quarters.
What the Game Reveals About Both Teams
Las Vegas Aces: Offensive Balance and Experience
The Aces demonstrated why efficient offensive basketball is so important in the WNBA.
Their performance was not dependent on one player.
Wilson controlled the interior, Young provided perimeter scoring, and Gray organized the offense.
Loyd also contributed valuable production from the bench.
This balance allowed Las Vegas to maintain its offensive rhythm throughout the game.
The team’s 57.9% field-goal percentage was especially impressive.
It showed how effective shot selection and accurate finishing can create a significant advantage without requiring an unusually high number of attempts.
Portland Fire: Positive Individual Performances With Room to Improve
Portland had several encouraging individual performances.
DiLeo scored 20 points, Buhner added 16, and Carleton contributed 13.
Engstler also collected 10 rebounds.
The Fire’s 33 rebounds were another positive element.
However, the team needs greater consistency in its defensive execution and shooting efficiency.
Portland’s 29% three-point shooting and 39.7% overall field-goal percentage made it difficult to keep pace with Las Vegas.
The team also needs to improve its opening-quarter defensive performance.
Starting games with greater discipline could help prevent opponents from creating large early advantages.
Season Records and Match Context
The game-day records provided in the official recap were:
| Team | Record Before Match | Home/Away Context |
| Las Vegas Aces | 19-8 | 8-5 at home |
| Portland Fire | 11-17 | 5-10 away |
These records provide context for the matchup.
Las Vegas entered the game with a stronger overall record, while Portland was attempting to improve its position during its expansion season.
The Aces successfully defended their home court.
It is important to distinguish these game-day records from the separate season standings figures included in some statistical summaries. Those later figures do not match the records reported in the game recap and should not be presented as pregame records.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The game provides several useful statistical insights.
- A’ja Wilson dominated: Her 28 points and 14 rebounds made her the most influential player on the court.
- Jackie Young delivered consistent scoring: Her 25 points gave Las Vegas another reliable offensive weapon.
- Chelsea Gray controlled playmaking: Her seven assists helped the Aces create efficient scoring opportunities.
- Megan DiLeo led Portland: Her 20 points made her the Fire’s leading scorer.
- Frieda Buhner provided valuable bench scoring: Her 16 points were important for Portland’s offensive production.
- Las Vegas shot more efficiently: The Aces converted 57.9% of their field goals compared with Portland’s 39.7%.
- Portland won the rebounding battle: The Fire collected 33 rebounds, three more than Las Vegas.
- The Aces completed the season sweep: Las Vegas won all three meetings against Portland in 2026.
These takeaways provide a useful overview for readers who want to understand more than just the final score.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Las Vegas Aces vs Portland Fire game on July 29, 2026?
The Las Vegas Aces defeated the Portland Fire 98-83 at Michelob ULTRA Arena in Las Vegas. The victory completed a 3-0 season-series sweep.
2. How many points did A’ja Wilson score against Portland Fire?
A’ja Wilson scored 28 points and collected 14 rebounds. She also recorded four assists and finished with a double-double.
3. Who was the leading scorer for Portland Fire?
Megan DiLeo was Portland’s leading scorer with 20 points. Frieda Buhner followed with 16 points, while Bridget Carleton contributed 13.
4. How many points did Jackie Young score against Portland?
Jackie Young scored 25 points. She made nine of her 14 field-goal attempts and converted all five of her free throws.
5. What was the final score of Las Vegas Aces vs Portland Fire?
The final score was Las Vegas Aces 98, Portland Fire 83. Las Vegas won by 15 points after establishing a 36-21 advantage in the first quarter.
6. How many times did Las Vegas beat Portland during the 2026 season series?
Las Vegas won all three regular-season meetings against Portland in 2026. The results were 105-89, 88-80, and 98-83.
Conclusion
The July 29, 2026, matchup demonstrated the offensive strength and efficiency of the Las Vegas Aces. Their 98-83 victory over the Portland Fire was built on a dominant first quarter, excellent shooting, and outstanding individual contributions.
A’ja Wilson led the way with 28 points and 14 rebounds, while Jackie Young added 25 points. Chelsea Gray contributed 17 points and seven assists, giving Las Vegas the offensive balance needed to maintain control.
Portland also had some impressive individual performances. Megan DiLeo scored 20 points, Frieda Buhner added 16, and Emily Engstler collected 10 rebounds. However, the Fire struggled to match the Aces’ shooting efficiency and defensive execution.
The most important statistical difference was field-goal accuracy. Las Vegas converted 57.9% of its attempts, compared with Portland’s 39.7%. That gap played a major role in the 15-point result.
Ultimately, the game completed a 3-0 season-series sweep for the Aces and highlighted the difference between individual production and overall team efficiency.
