Green Bay Packers vs New York Giants Match Player Stats
The green bay packers vs new york giants match player stats from November 16, 2025, tell the story of a competitive NFL game in which Green Bay defeated New York 27-20. The Packers built their victory around efficient quarterback play, three passing touchdowns, a productive rushing attack, and a defense that created a crucial interception. The Giants moved the ball effectively on the ground, but their inability to score through the air proved costly.
Jordan Love completed 13 of 24 passes for 174 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception. Backup quarterback Malik Willis added a touchdown pass, while Christian Watson caught two scoring passes. On the other side, Jameis Winston threw for 201 yards but finished without a passing touchdown and was intercepted once.
The final score reflected an important difference between the teams: Green Bay converted its passing opportunities into touchdowns, while New York relied heavily on its running game to stay within reach. Examining the individual performances, team statistics, and scoring pattern helps explain how the Packers secured the seven-point victory.
Game Overview: Packers vs Giants
The matchup took place on November 16, 2025, with the New York Giants hosting the Green Bay Packers. According to the supplied ESPN box-score data, Green Bay entered the game with a 6-3-1 record, while New York had a 2-9 record.
Although the Packers won, the game was not a one-sided contest. The Giants scored in the opening quarter and continued to compete through the fourth. Green Bay’s advantage came from its ability to produce touchdowns through the air and maintain enough offensive balance to protect its lead.
| Game Detail | Result |
| Matchup | Green Bay Packers vs New York Giants |
| Date | November 16, 2025 |
| Venue designation | Giants home game |
| Final score | Packers 27, Giants 20 |
| Winning team | Green Bay Packers |
| Losing team | New York Giants |
| Packers record listed | 6-3-1 |
| Giants record listed | 2-9 |
| Packers passing touchdowns | 3 |
| Giants passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | Packers 0, Giants 1 |
The most important statistical distinction was not total passing yardage. New York actually gained more passing yards than Green Bay according to the individual quarterback totals. Instead, the Packers were more productive when finishing drives, recording three passing touchdowns compared with none for the Giants.
These figures also demonstrate why a final score should be evaluated alongside the box score. Yardage shows how far an offense moved the ball, but touchdowns and turnovers help explain how that movement translated into points.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring sequence explains why the final minutes were so important. New York led early, Green Bay responded in the second quarter, and the teams exchanged the lead before the Packers delivered the decisive touchdown.
| Quarter | Packers | Giants | What Happened |
| First | 0 | 7 | Devin Singletary opened the scoring with a rushing touchdown. |
| Second | 13 | 6 | Green Bay scored through Christian Watson and Emanuel Wilson, while Singletary added another rushing score. |
| Third | 6 | 0 | Josh Whyle caught a short touchdown pass from Jordan Love. |
| Fourth | 8 | 7 | Winston gave New York the lead with a rushing touchdown before Watson’s late touchdown and a successful two-point conversion won the game for Green Bay. |
| Final | 27 | 20 | Green Bay won by seven points. |
First Quarter: New York Strikes First
The Giants established an early advantage with a five-yard rushing touchdown by Devin Singletary. Younghoe Koo converted the extra point, putting New York ahead 7-0.
Green Bay failed to score in the opening quarter. The early result showed that the Giants could use their running game to move the ball and finish a possession, even against a Packers defense that eventually made several critical plays.
For Green Bay, the score created a need to respond without allowing the game to become a contest in which New York could dictate the pace.
Second Quarter: Green Bay Finds Its Rhythm
The Packers took control of the scoreboard in the second quarter, scoring 13 points. Malik Willis connected with Christian Watson for a one-yard touchdown while Jordan Love was temporarily unavailable. The extra point was unsuccessful, leaving Green Bay one point behind at 7-6.
Emanuel Wilson then scored on an 11-yard run, giving the Packers a 13-7 lead after the extra point. The Giants answered with Singletary’s second rushing touchdown, a two-yard run. New York also missed the extra point, tying the score at 13-13.
The second quarter highlighted both teams’ ability to finish short-yardage opportunities. However, the Packers demonstrated greater variety by scoring through both the passing and rushing games.
Third Quarter: A Short Passing Touchdown Gives Green Bay the Edge
The third quarter produced no points for New York. Green Bay added six points when Jordan Love threw a two-yard touchdown pass to tight end Josh Whyle.
Another missed extra point meant the Packers led 19-13 rather than 20-13. That difference became important when the Giants scored again in the fourth quarter.
Green Bay’s defense deserves credit for holding New York scoreless during this period. The Giants could run the ball and accumulate yardage, but they could not turn their third-quarter possessions into points.
Fourth Quarter: A Late Touchdown Decides the Game
New York regained the lead when Jameis Winston scored on a one-yard rushing touchdown. Koo converted the extra point, putting the Giants ahead 20-19 with just over seven minutes remaining.
Green Bay responded with a seven-play, 65-yard scoring drive that ended with a 17-yard touchdown reception by Christian Watson. The Packers then completed a two-point conversion on a pass from Love to Wilson, making the score 27-20.
The final sequence demonstrated the value of finishing a possession with a touchdown and converting the additional opportunity. Rather than settling for a one-point lead, Green Bay created a seven-point margin.
The Giants had another chance to respond, but Evan Williams intercepted Winston in the end zone with 36 seconds remaining. The Packers then recorded a late sack and forced fumble, recovered by Rashan Gary, to help close out the victory.
NBC Sports+1
Green Bay Packers vs New York Giants Match Player Stats: Quarterback Comparison
Quarterback statistics are central to understanding the game, but completion totals and passing yards alone do not tell the full story. The difference was how the quarterbacks converted their opportunities into touchdowns and whether they protected the football.
Jordan Love’s Passing Performance
Atlanta Falcons v Green Bay Packers
Jordan Love
Green Bay Packers · Quarterback
174
Passing yards
2
Passing TDs
105.2
Passer rating
0
Interceptions
Love completed 13 of 24 passes for 174 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. He averaged 7.3 yards per attempt and finished with a passer rating of 105.2. He was sacked twice for a loss of 12 yards.
His completion percentage was approximately 54.2%, which was not especially high. However, he made his passing opportunities count by throwing two touchdowns, including the decisive fourth-quarter score to Watson.
Love also contributed seven rushing yards on two carries. His passing production was particularly important because Green Bay needed to respond after Winston gave the Giants a late lead.
Love briefly left the game with a shoulder injury in the first half, which created an opportunity for Willis to contribute. Despite that interruption, Love returned and delivered the pass that put Green Bay ahead for good.
NBC Sports+1
Malik Willis Provides an Important Contribution
Willis completed both of his pass attempts for six yards and one touchdown. His touchdown pass to Watson came during a critical second-quarter possession, allowing Green Bay to stay close before taking the lead.
His passing line was small, but its impact was significant. A quarterback does not need to accumulate large yardage totals to contribute to a winning performance. In this case, Willis converted a short opportunity into six points.
He also recorded 16 rushing yards on one carry. That added mobility gave Green Bay another way to advance the ball.
Jameis Winston’s Performance for New York
Green Bay Packers v New York Giants – NFL 2025
Jameis Winston
New York Giants · Quarterback
201
Passing yards
0
Passing TDs
71.2
Passer rating
1
Interception
Winston completed 19 of 29 passes for 201 yards. He averaged 6.9 yards per attempt and recorded no passing touchdowns against one interception. His passer rating was 71.2.
Winston’s completion rate of approximately 65.5% was higher than Love’s. He also gained more passing yards. Yet those advantages did not translate into a victory because the Giants failed to score through the passing game.
Winston did contribute a one-yard rushing touchdown in the fourth quarter, temporarily putting New York ahead 20-19. That score demonstrated his ability to make a play near the goal line, but his late interception proved more costly.
The distinction is important: Winston was not completely ineffective. He helped the Giants move the ball and scored on the ground. The problem was that New York could not consistently convert its passing opportunities into touchdowns, and its final scoring chance ended in a turnover.
Quarterback Statistics Table
| Statistic | Jordan Love | Malik Willis | Jameis Winston |
| Completions | 13 | 2 | 19 |
| Pass attempts | 24 | 2 | 29 |
| Completion rate | 54.2% | 100% | 65.5% |
| Passing yards | 174 | 6 | 201 |
| Yards per attempt | 7.3 | 3.0 | 6.9 |
| Passing touchdowns | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks taken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Passer rating | 105.2 | 118.8 | 71.2 |
Note: The combined Packers passing totals were 15 completions on 26 attempts for 180 gross passing yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions. Net passing yardage was 168 after sack losses. Individual passing yards are not the same as net passing yards.
The quarterback comparison shows that New York gained more yards through its starting passer, while Green Bay achieved more scoring production. Love and Willis combined for three touchdown passes without an interception, giving the Packers a more effective passing result despite fewer total passing yards.
Packers Rushing Statistics vs Giants
Green Bay’s rushing game provided a useful complement to its passing attack. The Packers recorded 128 rushing yards on 23 attempts, averaging 5.6 yards per carry. New York gained more total rushing yards, but it needed 38 attempts to produce 142 yards, an average of 3.7 yards per carry.
The difference in efficiency favored Green Bay. The Packers averaged nearly two more yards per rushing attempt, allowing them to generate meaningful gains without relying on a high volume of carries.
Green Bay’s Leading Rushers
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | TDs | Longest Run |
| Emanuel Wilson | 11 | 40 | 3.6 | 1 | 11 |
| Josh Jacobs | 7 | 40 | 5.7 | 0 | 15 |
| Bo Melton | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 17 |
| Malik Willis | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 |
| Chris Brooks | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| Jordan Love | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 4 |
| Team total | 23 | 128 | 5.6 | 1 | 17 |
Emanuel Wilson Delivers a Touchdown
Wilson carried the ball 11 times for 40 yards and scored on an 11-yard run. Although his average of 3.6 yards per carry was modest, his touchdown helped Green Bay turn a second-quarter possession into a lead.
His contribution became more important because Jacobs left the game with an ankle injury. Wilson’s ability to carry the workload and finish a scoring drive helped the Packers maintain their offensive balance.
Wilson also caught one pass for nine yards. His contribution in both phases gave the offense another option when the team needed to advance the ball.
Josh Jacobs Produces Efficient Gains
Jacobs finished with 40 rushing yards on seven attempts, averaging 5.7 yards per carry. His longest run covered 15 yards.
Although he did not score, his efficiency helped Green Bay gain ground without requiring many carries. His early departure limited his opportunity to build on that performance, but the Packers still received useful production from their remaining runners.
The Value of Green Bay’s Supporting Rushers
Bo Melton gained 17 yards on one carry, while Willis added 16 yards on a single rush. These explosive individual gains helped lift the team’s average to 5.6 yards per attempt.
Neither player recorded a rushing touchdown, but their runs illustrate how contributions from several players can improve an offense’s overall efficiency.
The Packers did not need one running back to dominate the game. Instead, Wilson provided the scoring run, Jacobs delivered efficient gains, and the supporting players added valuable yardage.
New York’s Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | TDs | Longest Run |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 19 | 88 | 4.6 | 0 | 17 |
| Devin Singletary | 16 | 44 | 2.8 | 2 | 7 |
| Jameis Winston | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 1 | 10 |
| Team total | 38 | 142 | 3.7 | 3 | 17 |
Tyrone Tracy Jr. Leads the Giants in Rushing Yards
Tracy recorded 88 rushing yards on 19 carries, averaging 4.6 yards per attempt. He was New York’s most productive runner by total yardage and longest rushing gain.
His performance gave the Giants a reliable way to advance the ball. However, Tracy did not score a rushing touchdown, so his production did not directly finish a scoring drive.
Tracy also caught four passes for 51 yards. Combining his rushing and receiving production, he accounted for 139 yards from scrimmage. That made him one of New York’s most versatile offensive contributors.
Devin Singletary Scores Twice
Singletary finished with 44 rushing yards on 16 attempts and two touchdowns. His scoring runs came from five yards in the first quarter and two yards in the second.
His average of 2.8 yards per carry was lower than Tracy’s, but his short-yardage success helped keep New York competitive. Both touchdowns demonstrated the value of converting opportunities close to the goal line.
Singletary’s performance also reveals an important difference between rushing efficiency and scoring impact. A player can average fewer yards per carry yet make a substantial contribution by finishing possessions.
Rushing Comparison: Green Bay vs New York
| Team Statistic | Packers | Giants |
| Rushing attempts | 23 | 38 |
| Rushing yards | 128 | 142 |
| Yards per carry | 5.6 | 3.7 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 | 3 |
| Longest run | 17 yards | 17 yards |
The Giants gained 14 more rushing yards and scored three rushing touchdowns. However, the Packers’ higher average per carry indicates that Green Bay created more yardage per rushing opportunity.
The two teams used their ground games differently. New York relied heavily on repeated carries and short scoring runs. Green Bay spread the work across multiple players and paired its rushing production with three passing touchdowns.
Neither approach is automatically superior in every game. In this matchup, however, the Packers’ balance and greater efficiency helped them secure the victory.
Receiving Statistics: Which Players Made the Biggest Impact?
Receiving numbers help identify which players turned targets into meaningful offensive production. In this game, Christian Watson was Green Bay’s most important scoring threat, while Romeo Doubs led the Packers in receiving yards.
The Giants had several productive receivers, but none recorded a receiving touchdown. That difference was central to the final result.
Green Bay Packers Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving Yards | Average per Catch | TDs | Longest Catch |
| Romeo Doubs | 4 | 8 | 53 | 13.3 | 0 | 22 |
| Christian Watson | 4 | 5 | 46 | 11.5 | 2 | 17 |
| Savion Williams | 1 | 1 | 33 | 33.0 | 0 | 33 |
| Matthew Golden | 1 | 3 | 24 | 24.0 | 0 | 24 |
| Dontayvion Wicks | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| Emanuel Wilson | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| John FitzPatrick | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Josh Whyle | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Josh Jacobs | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Musgrave | 1 | 2 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | -1 |
Christian Watson: Green Bay’s Leading Scoring Receiver
Watson caught four passes for 46 yards and two touchdowns on five targets. His two scoring receptions made him the most decisive receiver in the game.
His first touchdown came on a one-yard pass from Willis in the second quarter. His second was a 17-yard reception from Love in the fourth quarter, giving Green Bay the lead for good.
Watson’s total yardage was not the highest on his team, but touchdowns measure something different from receiving yards. His ability to finish two separate possessions made his performance especially valuable.
The late touchdown was particularly important because the Giants had just taken a 20-19 lead. Watson’s reception changed the scoreboard, while the successful two-point conversion gave Green Bay a seven-point advantage.
Romeo Doubs Leads Green Bay in Receiving Yards
Doubs recorded four receptions for 53 yards on eight targets. His longest reception covered 22 yards.
He did not score, but his yardage gave the Packers another productive option in the passing game. His four catches matched Watson’s reception total, while his receiving yards exceeded Watson’s by seven.
Doubs’ contribution shows why the most valuable receiver is not always the player with the most touchdowns. Sustained gains from multiple receivers can help an offense maintain possession, advance downfield, and create scoring chances for other players.
Savion Williams Provides an Explosive Gain
Williams caught one pass for 33 yards on a single target, making it the longest reception recorded by a Packers receiver in the supplied statistics.
A single catch can have a large impact when it creates substantial field position. Williams’ contribution helped demonstrate that Green Bay could generate explosive gains without depending entirely on Watson or Doubs.
Matthew Golden Adds Another Downfield Threat
Golden finished with one reception for 24 yards on three targets. His catch provided another significant gain for the Packers.
Although he had fewer receptions than the leading receivers, his 24 yards on one catch helped improve Green Bay’s overall passing production. This is a useful reminder that reception totals alone do not fully describe a receiver’s contribution.
Josh Whyle Scores from Close Range
Whyle caught one pass for two yards, and that reception resulted in a touchdown. His scoring catch came from Love during the third quarter.
The reception was short, but its value was high because it put points on the scoreboard. Red-zone production often depends on execution in tight spaces rather than on accumulating long catches.
New York Giants Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Targets | Receiving Yards | Average per Catch | TDs | Longest Catch |
| Isaiah Hodgins | 5 | 6 | 57 | 11.4 | 0 | 20 |
| Tyrone Tracy Jr. | 4 | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 0 | 20 |
| Wan’Dale Robinson | 4 | 9 | 36 | 9.0 | 0 | 20 |
| Theo Johnson | 3 | 4 | 36 | 12.0 | 0 | 14 |
| Jalin Hyatt | 2 | 4 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 14 |
| Devin Singletary | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Daniel Bellinger | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Isaiah Hodgins Leads New York’s Receivers
Hodgins caught five passes for 57 yards on six targets. He was the Giants’ leading receiver by both receptions and receiving yardage.
His performance helped Winston move the ball through the air, but Hodgins did not record a touchdown. New York’s passing game generated useful gains without producing the scoring plays needed to match Green Bay’s three passing touchdowns.
Tyrone Tracy Jr. Contributes as a Receiver
Tracy’s four receptions for 51 yards added to his 88 rushing yards. His combined 139 yards from scrimmage show how important he was to the Giants’ offensive output.
A running back who contributes in both the rushing and receiving games can create matchup problems for a defense. Tracy’s numbers suggest that New York found ways to involve him beyond traditional handoffs, even though that production did not result in a receiving score.
Wan’Dale Robinson and Theo Johnson Add Reliable Targets
Robinson recorded four catches for 36 yards on nine targets. Johnson added three receptions for 36 yards on four targets.
Both players contributed to New York’s passing yardage, but their production was not enough to turn the passing game into a consistent touchdown threat.
The Giants’ receiving group did its share of moving the ball. The larger problem was converting that progress into points, particularly when the game reached its decisive stages.
Receiving Comparison
| Team Statistic | Packers | Giants |
| Receptions | 15 | 19 |
| Receiving yards listed | 180 | 201 |
| Yards per reception | 12.0 | 10.6 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Longest reception | 33 yards | 20 yards |
The Giants recorded more receptions and more receiving yards, but Green Bay averaged more yards per catch and scored three receiving touchdowns.
The supplied Packers receiving total of 180 yards represents gross passing production before accounting for sacks. Their net passing yardage was 168 after 12 yards lost on sacks. The Giants recorded 201 gross passing yards and 194 net passing yards after losing seven yards on sacks.
These distinctions matter when comparing receiving tables with team passing totals. Receiving yards and net passing yards measure different things, so they should not be treated as interchangeable statistics.
Defensive Player Stats: The Plays That Changed the Outcome
Offensive statistics explain how the teams scored, but defense explains why the Giants could not hold their late lead. Green Bay’s defense recorded an interception, generated pressure on Winston, and made crucial plays during the final possessions.
Packers Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Green Bay |
| Total tackles | 83 |
| Solo tackles | 41 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 1 |
| Passes defended | 5 |
| Quarterback hits | 5 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 |
Micah Parsons Creates Pressure
Parsons recorded 1.5 sacks, three passes defended, six tackles, three quarterback hits, and a forced fumble, according to the game report. His performance gave the Packers a disruptive presence on defense.
His sack production matters because pressure can change a quarterback’s decisions even when it does not immediately result in a turnover. A quarterback facing pressure may have less time to read coverage, set his feet, or find an open receiver.
Parsons also played a role in the late defensive sequence. His pressure helped disrupt New York’s final possessions, and a late forced fumble was recovered by Rashan Gary. The combination of pass-rush pressure and ball security helped prevent the Giants from producing a final scoring response.
NBC Sports+1
Evan Williams Records the Game’s Crucial Interception
Williams’ interception of Winston in the end zone was arguably the most important defensive play of the contest.
The Giants had reached a position where a touchdown could have tied the game, depending on the extra point. Instead, Williams intercepted the pass with 36 seconds remaining, ending New York’s best opportunity to respond to the Packers’ late score.
The interception illustrates why turnovers can matter more than a difference in total yardage. New York had gained more yards overall, but the turnover prevented those yards from producing the points the team needed.
Isaiah McDuffie Leads Green Bay in Tackles
McDuffie recorded 11 total tackles, including five solo tackles, and was listed with half a sack.
Tackles are not a complete measure of defensive performance, but they help show which players were consistently involved in stopping the opposing offense. McDuffie’s total indicates that he was heavily involved throughout the game.
New York Giants Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | New York |
| Total tackles | 47 |
| Solo tackles | 32 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for loss | 2 |
| Passes defended | 5 |
| Quarterback hits | 8 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Defensive touchdowns | 0 |
Brian Burns Delivers a Strong Pass-Rushing Performance
Burns recorded two sacks, two tackles for loss, one pass defended, and four quarterback hits.
His pressure helped the Giants disrupt Green Bay’s passing game. The two sacks and four quarterback hits were notable because the Packers did not have a completely clean passing performance.
However, New York’s defense could not force an interception or create a turnover that directly stopped Green Bay’s decisive scoring opportunity. The defense generated pressure, but the offense ultimately needed to do more with the opportunities it received.
Bobby Okereke and Dane Belton Contribute in Tackling
Okereke and Belton each recorded seven total tackles, making them the Giants’ leading tacklers in the supplied statistics.
Their involvement reflected the defensive workload required to contain Green Bay’s balanced offense. Yet tackling volume alone does not determine whether a defense has successfully prevented scoring. The Packers managed three passing touchdowns and a rushing touchdown, which proved sufficient to win.
Team Statistics: Packers vs Giants
The overall team figures offer one of the clearest explanations of the result. New York produced more total yards and first downs, while Green Bay gained more yards per play and committed fewer turnovers.
| Team Statistic | Packers | Giants |
| Final score | 27 | 20 |
| Total net yards | 296 | 336 |
| First downs | 19 | 22 |
| Rushing yards | 128 | 142 |
| Passing yards, net | 168 | 194 |
| Total plays | 51 | 69 |
| Average yards per play | 5.8 | 4.9 |
| Rushing attempts | 23 | 38 |
| Passing attempts | 26 | 29 |
| Sacks allowed | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 1 |
| Third-down conversions | 7 of 11 | 7 of 14 |
| Fourth-down conversions | 0 of 0 | 3 of 4 |
| Time of possession | 24:04 | 35:56 |
| Penalties | 5 for 48 yards | 6 for 77 yards |
Team totals are based on the supplied box-score data. Total net yards exclude sack yardage from passing production.
Why the Giants Gained More Total Yards but Lost
New York gained 336 total yards, compared with 296 for Green Bay. The Giants also recorded 22 first downs, three more than the Packers.
Those numbers might suggest that New York controlled the game. However, the scoreboard tells a different story because the teams differed in scoring efficiency and ball security.
Green Bay averaged 5.8 yards per play, while New York averaged 4.9. The Packers generated more yardage per snap despite running 18 fewer plays.
The Giants also threw one interception and lost one fumble. Green Bay did not throw an interception and did not lose a fumble.
This combination meant New York could move the ball without receiving the full scoring benefit of its yardage advantage. Green Bay, meanwhile, made its fewer offensive plays count.
Third-Down Efficiency Favored Green Bay
The Packers converted seven of 11 third-down attempts, a rate of approximately 63.6%. The Giants converted seven of 14, exactly 50%.
Both teams converted seven third downs, but Green Bay needed fewer attempts to reach that total. Better third-down efficiency can help an offense sustain drives while reducing the number of possessions available to its opponent.
The Giants were successful on three of four fourth-down attempts. That shows New York was willing and able to extend drives in high-pressure situations. Still, fourth-down success did not overcome the team’s lack of passing touchdowns and its late turnover.
Time of Possession Favored New York
The Giants controlled the ball for 35 minutes and 56 seconds, compared with 24 minutes and four seconds for the Packers.
That difference of almost 12 minutes shows that New York had more opportunities to run plays and manage possessions. However, possession time does not automatically lead to a victory.
Green Bay was more efficient in converting opportunities into touchdowns. The Packers’ scoring production, combined with the interception in the closing seconds, outweighed New York’s advantage in time of possession.
Turnovers and Penalties Made a Difference
Green Bay recorded two fumbles but recovered both, leaving the team with no lost fumbles. The Giants recorded one fumble and lost it. New York also threw the only interception.
Penalties were another difference. The Packers were penalized five times for 48 yards, while the Giants had six penalties for 77 yards.
Penalties can erase gains, create difficult down-and-distance situations, and extend an opponent’s possession. The 29-yard difference in penalty yardage was not the sole reason for the result, but it added to the challenges New York faced.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams did not dominate the box score, but their performance is relevant because the final margin was only seven points.
| Special Teams Category | Packers | Giants |
| Field goals | 0 of 0 | 0 of 0 |
| Extra points | 1 of 3 | 2 of 3 |
| Kicking points | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 2 |
| Punting yards | 195 | 90 |
| Average punt | 48.8 yards | 45.0 yards |
| Punts inside the 20 | 2 | 0 |
| Kick returns | 3 for 70 yards | 4 for 108 yards |
| Punt returns | 1 for 0 yards | 2 for 17 yards |
Missed Extra Points Affected the Score
Green Bay converted only one of three extra-point attempts, while New York converted two of three. Neither team attempted a field goal.
The Packers’ missed extra points meant that two of their touchdowns initially produced six points instead of seven. Their successful two-point conversion following Watson’s late touchdown helped establish the final seven-point margin.
New York also missed an extra point following Singletary’s second touchdown. That left the Giants tied at 13 rather than leading by a point after the second-quarter scores.
The game demonstrates how missed kicks can change the mathematics of late-game decisions. When a contest is close, teams must consider the score, the time remaining, and the points required on subsequent possessions.
Daniel Whelan’s Punting Helps Field Position
Packers punter Daniel Whelan recorded four punts for 195 yards, averaging 48.8 yards per punt. Two of his punts finished inside the opponent’s 20-yard line.
New York’s Jamie Gillan recorded two punts for 90 yards, averaging 45 yards per punt. Neither of his punts finished inside the 20.
Punting does not always receive the same attention as touchdowns or interceptions, but field position can affect how difficult the next scoring drive becomes. Whelan’s ability to place two punts inside the 20 helped Green Bay apply pressure on New York’s offense.
What the Match Player Stats Reveal About the Packers’ Victory
The statistical story becomes clearer when the major categories are considered together rather than separately.
1. Green Bay Was More Efficient With Its Offensive Plays
The Packers averaged 5.8 yards per play compared with New York’s 4.9. They also produced three passing touchdowns and one rushing touchdown.
This was a balanced offensive performance rather than one built entirely around a single player. Love delivered two passing scores, Willis contributed another, and Wilson added a rushing touchdown.
2. Christian Watson Was the Most Important Scoring Target
Watson caught two touchdown passes, including the decisive 17-yard score in the fourth quarter. His 46 receiving yards were not the highest on the team, but his scoring contribution was unmatched.
His performance is a useful example of why touchdowns and timing should be considered alongside total yardage when evaluating a receiver.
3. New York’s Ground Game Kept the Contest Close
The Giants recorded 142 rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns. Singletary scored twice, Tracy gained 88 rushing yards, and Winston added a short rushing touchdown.
That production helped New York lead 20-19 in the fourth quarter. The rushing game was productive enough to give the Giants a genuine chance to win, even without a passing touchdown.
4. The Passing Touchdown Difference Was Decisive
Green Bay recorded three passing touchdowns, while New York recorded none. The Giants’ quarterback gained more passing yards, but the Packers converted their passing opportunities into more points.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the game: passing yardage is a measure of production, not a direct measure of scoring success.
5. The Final Turnover Ended New York’s Comeback Opportunity
Williams’ interception in the end zone stopped a potential game-tying possession. The late defensive pressure that followed further reduced New York’s chances.
Without that interception, the Giants would have retained an opportunity to score. Instead, Green Bay protected its lead and secured the victory.
How to Read NFL Player Statistics Correctly
For readers comparing performances across NFL games, several statistical distinctions are especially useful.
- Passing yards versus net passing yards: Passing yards generally describe the quarterback’s passing production, while net passing yards account for sack yardage lost by the offense.
- Yards per attempt versus completion percentage: Yards per attempt indicates how much passing yardage an offense produces per throw. Completion percentage measures how often a pass is completed.
- Rushing yards versus rushing touchdowns: Yardage measures ground production, while touchdowns show how often that production directly results in a score.
- Receiving yards versus receiving touchdowns: A receiver may lead in yardage without scoring. Touchdowns and the timing of catches provide additional context.
- Total yards versus offensive efficiency: A team can gain more yards but still lose if it commits turnovers or fails to finish drives.
- Tackles versus defensive impact: Tackles measure involvement, but sacks, interceptions, forced fumbles, and pass breakups help reveal how defenders changed possessions.
These distinctions prevent common errors when interpreting a box score. They also make player comparisons more meaningful because each statistic describes a different part of performance.
For the official game record and complete box-score details, consult the ESPN NFL box score.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Packers vs Giants game on November 16, 2025?
The Green Bay Packers defeated the New York Giants 27-20. Green Bay scored 13 points in the second quarter, six in the third, and eight in the fourth, while New York scored seven, six, zero, and seven points across the four quarters.
2. How many passing yards did Jordan Love record against the Giants?
Jordan Love completed 13 of 24 passes for 174 yards and two touchdowns. He threw no interceptions and finished with a passer rating of 105.2.
3. Who was the leading receiver in the Packers vs Giants game?
Isaiah Hodgins led all listed receivers by receiving yards with 57 on five catches. For Green Bay, Romeo Doubs led the team with 53 receiving yards, while Christian Watson recorded two touchdown receptions.
4. Which running back scored the most rushing touchdowns?
Devin Singletary scored two rushing touchdowns for the Giants. Green Bay’s Emanuel Wilson scored one rushing touchdown, while the Packers also produced three passing touchdowns.
5. How did the Packers win despite gaining fewer total yards?
Green Bay gained 296 total net yards compared with New York’s 336, but the Packers averaged more yards per play and scored three passing touchdowns. The Giants recorded one interception and lost one fumble, while Green Bay protected the ball and intercepted Winston in the end zone during the closing seconds.
6. Which defensive player made the decisive play?
Evan Williams made the decisive interception in the end zone with 36 seconds remaining. Micah Parsons also contributed significantly with 1.5 sacks, three passes defended, and a forced fumble.
Conclusion
The green bay packers vs new york giants match player stats show how Green Bay won a competitive game through offensive balance, efficient scoring, and timely defensive execution. The Packers finished with a 27-20 victory despite gaining fewer total yards and having considerably less possession time than the Giants.
Jordan Love threw two touchdowns without an interception, Malik Willis added a passing score, and Christian Watson caught two touchdowns, including the decisive fourth-quarter reception. Emanuel Wilson supplied an important rushing touchdown, while Romeo Doubs led Green Bay in receiving yards.
New York’s strongest contributions came from its running game. Tyrone Tracy Jr. gained 88 rushing yards, Devin Singletary scored twice on the ground, and Winston added a rushing touchdown. The Giants also generated more total yardage and first downs, but their passing game failed to produce a touchdown.
Ultimately, the difference was execution in the moments that mattered most. Green Bay converted its passing opportunities into points, avoided losing a fumble, and made a crucial interception to stop New York’s final comeback attempt. The game illustrates why a complete NFL performance must be evaluated through scoring efficiency, turnovers, individual contributions, and the timing of decisive plays, not yardage alone.
