Washington Wizards vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs 76ers match player stats from the December 3, 2025 game show how Philadelphia turned a competitive opening period into a convincing 121-102 victory. The 76ers combined efficient shooting, strong ball security, aggressive perimeter defense, and a dominant third quarter to create separation. Tyrese Maxey led all scorers with 35 points, while Andre Drummond produced a double-double and Jared McCain added 14 points from the bench. Washington had seven players reach double figures, led by Tristan Vukcevic with 16 points, but the Wizards could not match Philadelphia’s efficiency or defensive pressure.

The official NBA record identifies the game as a December 2, 2025 matchup in Philadelphia, while its game information section displays December 3 at 12:00 AM. This article follows the supplied December 3 date while using the official game record to cross-check the score, quarter breakdown, attendance, officials, and major statistical details. NBA official game record and box score

Game Overview and Final Score

Philadelphia entered the matchup with an 11-9 record and a 6-6 home record. Washington arrived at 3-17 overall and 1-11 on the road. Those records provide useful context, but the player-level numbers explain much more about why the game ended with a 19-point Philadelphia victory.

The final score was:

Philadelphia 76ers 121, Washington Wizards 102

The game was not decided by one isolated statistic. Philadelphia won through a combination of scoring efficiency, three-point shooting, turnovers, steals, and a huge third-quarter performance.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:

Quarter	Wizards	76ers
1st	31	34
2nd	23	32
3rd	23	35
4th	25	20
Final	102	121

Washington actually scored 31 points in the opening quarter, which shows that the Wizards were not immediately overwhelmed offensively. Philadelphia led by only three points after 12 minutes.

The difference became clearer in the second quarter. Philadelphia added 32 points while Washington scored 23, creating a 66-54 halftime advantage.

The third quarter was the decisive stretch. Philadelphia scored another 35 points while holding Washington to 23. That pushed the margin to 24 points entering the final period.

Washington did win the fourth quarter 25-20, but the game was already effectively decided.

This progression is important when examining the washington wizards vs 76ers match player stats because the final 19-point margin does not tell the entire story. Philadelphia’s advantage was built primarily through the middle portion of the game.

Team Statistics Tell the Story

The team comparison provides a strong explanation for the result.

Shooting efficiency

Washington shot:

• 35 of 88 from the field
• 40% overall
• 9 of 36 from three-point range
• 25% from three
• 23 of 32 from the free-throw line
• 72% from the free-throw line

Philadelphia shot:

• 46 of 102 from the field
• 45% overall
• 17 of 40 from three-point range
• 43% from three
• 12 of 17 from the free-throw line
• 71% from the free-throw line

The most obvious difference was outside shooting.

Philadelphia made eight more three-pointers than Washington, 17 compared with 9. That produced a 24-point advantage from made three-point shots alone.

Washington’s 25% three-point percentage also meant that taking 36 attempts did not translate into efficient scoring. Philadelphia, meanwhile, converted 42.5% of its three-point attempts.

That difference placed considerable pressure on the Wizards’ offense.

Ball security

Philadelphia committed only 10 turnovers compared with Washington’s 15.

That five-turnover difference may look modest, but it mattered because Philadelphia also generated 12 steals while Washington recorded five.

The 76ers therefore combined better ball security with more defensive activity.

Washington’s 15 turnovers also interrupted offensive possessions at a time when the team was already shooting only 40% from the field.

Rebounding

Washington collected 53 rebounds.

Philadelphia collected 51.

That is one area where the Wizards did not lose significantly. In fact, Washington’s 53 rebounds were two more than Philadelphia’s total.

This is an important reminder that the final score was not primarily caused by Philadelphia dominating the glass. The decisive differences were more closely connected to shooting, turnovers, steals, and scoring efficiency.

Assists

Washington recorded 23 assists.

Philadelphia recorded 26.

The three-assist advantage was relatively small, but it fits with the broader offensive picture. Philadelphia generated more points while also moving the ball slightly more effectively.

Tyrese Maxey’s 35-Point Performance

The most important individual number in the game was Tyrese Maxey’s 35 points.

Maxey played 29 minutes and finished with:

• 35 points
• 13-for-26 shooting
• 4-for-9 from three
• 5-for-5 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 4 steals
• 1 block
• 0 turnovers
• +23 plus/minus

This was an unusually complete offensive and defensive performance.

Maxey’s 13 made field goals represented the highest individual total in the game. He also made four three-pointers and converted every free-throw attempt.

His six assists show that he was not simply taking shots. He also contributed directly to Philadelphia’s ball movement.

The four steals added another dimension.

Most importantly, Maxey did his greatest damage during the third quarter. According to the game recap, he scored 20 of his 35 points in that period. Philadelphia used that scoring burst to turn a manageable halftime advantage into a much larger lead.

That is one of the clearest examples of why individual box-score analysis should include quarter context. A player scoring 35 points is significant by itself, but scoring 20 of those points during the period in which the game separated makes the performance even more relevant to the result.

Washington’s Leading Scorer: Tristan Vukcevic

Tristan Vukcevic led Washington with 16 points in 22 minutes.

His line included:

• 16 points
• 6-for-9 field goals
• 4-for-7 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal
• -28 plus/minus

Vukcevic’s 66.7% field-goal shooting was one of Washington’s most efficient individual performances.

His four assists were also notable for a player who was not operating as the team’s primary ball handler.

However, the plus/minus of -28 reflects the difficulty Washington experienced during his minutes. Plus/minus should never be treated as a standalone measure of an individual player’s quality, because it is affected by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game situations. In this matchup, it mainly illustrates how strongly Philadelphia controlled the stretches in which Vukcevic was on the floor.

Marvin Bagley III Provides Interior Production

Marvin Bagley III finished with 13 points and eight rebounds in 26 minutes.

He shot 3-for-6 from the field, made one of two three-point attempts, and went a perfect 6-for-6 at the free-throw line.

His five blocks were particularly notable.

Bagley was therefore one of Washington’s most active players around the basket defensively while also providing efficient scoring.

His +9 plus/minus was also the best among Washington’s starters in the supplied data.

That creates an interesting contrast with the final score. Washington lost by 19 points, yet Bagley’s individual plus/minus was positive. This illustrates why a team-level result should not automatically be used to judge every player’s individual performance.

Justin Champagnie and Kyshawn George

Justin Champagnie scored 13 points in 24 minutes.

He finished 3-for-9 from the field, 2-for-5 from three, and a perfect 5-for-5 at the free-throw line. He also collected seven rebounds.

Champagnie’s free-throw shooting was especially efficient. His five successful free throws helped compensate for his relatively low field-goal percentage.

Kyshawn George added 11 points, eight rebounds, and five assists in 33 minutes.

His five assists were tied for Washington’s highest total among the listed players. George also made two three-pointers.

However, he shot 3-for-11 overall, so his offensive contribution came with relatively limited shooting efficiency.

George’s eight rebounds and five assists demonstrate his broader involvement. He was not only a scorer but also contributed on the glass and as a facilitator.

CJ McCollum’s Shooting Night

CJ McCollum scored 10 points in 24 minutes.

His shooting line was:

• 5-for-14 from the field
• 0-for-7 from three
• 3 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 turnover
• 1 block

The seven missed three-point attempts stand out.

McCollum’s five made field goals still gave him a useful scoring contribution, and his four assists showed playmaking value. But Washington needed more efficiency from a high-volume perimeter shooter in a game where Philadelphia was converting three-pointers at a much higher rate.

The contrast is particularly clear:

McCollum: 0-for-7 from three

Philadelphia team: 17-for-40 from three

That does not mean McCollum alone determined the result. Basketball outcomes are produced by five-man lineups and team possessions. Still, the perimeter shooting gap was too large for Washington to overcome.

Bilal Coulibaly’s Limited Scoring Night

Bilal Coulibaly scored only two points in 25 minutes.

He shot 1-for-5 from the field and 0-for-3 from three.

He did contribute five rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one block, but his -20 plus/minus reflected a difficult overall stretch for Washington.

His defensive activity provided value, but Philadelphia’s scoring efficiency reduced the impact of those contributions.

Washington’s Bench Contributions

The Wizards received several useful contributions from their reserves.

Malaki Branham scored eight points in 11 minutes while shooting 3-for-4 from the field.

Will Riley was especially efficient, scoring 13 points on 5-for-6 shooting and 2-for-2 from three. He also collected four rebounds and one steal in 26 minutes.

Anthony Gill scored two points in eight minutes but posted a +16 plus/minus.

Bub Carrington added 10 points, three rebounds, and three assists. However, he also committed four turnovers and shot 3-for-12 from the field.

Cam Whitmore scored four points on 2-for-11 shooting and went 0-for-4 from three.

These numbers show why looking only at points can produce an incomplete picture.

Will Riley, for example, scored 13 points while shooting 83.3% from the field and 100% from three. Carrington scored 10 but needed 12 field-goal attempts and committed four turnovers.

Both players reached double figures, but they produced their offense in very different ways.

Philadelphia’s Supporting Cast

Maxey was the headline scorer, but Philadelphia’s victory was not a one-player effort.

Andre Drummond produced a double-double with 12 points and 10 rebounds in only 17 minutes.

He shot 5-for-8 from the field and also contributed three assists, one steal, and one block.

His rebounding production was particularly useful because it gave Philadelphia a reliable interior presence without requiring heavy minutes.

Dominick Barlow scored 12 points on 4-for-6 shooting and added two steals.

Paul George scored 11 points in 18 minutes and made three of his five three-point attempts.

His 3-for-5 perimeter shooting helped Philadelphia maintain spacing around its primary offensive actions.

Jared McCain’s Efficient Bench Scoring

Jared McCain was another important contributor.

He scored 14 points in 25 minutes, shooting 6-for-11 from the field and 2-for-6 from three.

He also recorded:

• 3 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal
• +37 plus/minus

The +37 was the highest plus/minus listed for either team.

That figure does not mean McCain personally created a 37-point advantage. Plus/minus tracks the team’s point differential while the player is on the floor. Still, his combination of scoring, passing, and efficient shooting was strongly associated with one of Philadelphia’s most successful lineup stretches.

VJ Edgecombe’s All-Around Contribution

VJ Edgecombe scored nine points, but his broader statistical contribution was significant.

He recorded:

• 9 points
• 4 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• 24 minutes

His six assists matched Maxey’s total for the team lead.

The two steals and two blocks also show defensive activity that does not appear in the basic scoring column.

This is a good example of why the washington wizards vs 76ers match player stats should be read as a collection of connected numbers rather than simply a list of points.

Jabari Walker’s Rebounding Impact

Jabari Walker scored 10 points and grabbed 12 rebounds in 24 minutes.

He shot 4-for-9 from the field and made two three-pointers.

His 12 rebounds were the highest total for Philadelphia.

Walker therefore provided a different type of production from Maxey. Maxey controlled scoring and creation, while Walker helped Philadelphia secure possessions and maintain its advantage on the glass.

The Third Quarter Was the Turning Point

The third quarter deserves special attention.

Philadelphia entered halftime ahead 66-54.

Washington then reduced the deficit early in the third quarter by scoring the first seven points of the period. That briefly brought the Wizards within striking distance.

Philadelphia responded immediately.

The 76ers scored 11 of the next 13 points and rebuilt a double-digit advantage.

Maxey then produced his biggest scoring burst of the night.

He scored 20 points in the third quarter alone.

Philadelphia eventually finished the quarter with 35 points while Washington managed 23.

The result was a 101-77 Philadelphia lead entering the fourth quarter.

That 24-point margin essentially removed the competitive pressure from the final period.

Washington scored 25 points in the fourth, while Philadelphia scored 20, but the Wizards were unable to erase the damage.

Why Philadelphia’s Three-Point Shooting Mattered

The 76ers made 17 of 40 three-point attempts.

Washington made only 9 of 36.

Philadelphia therefore made eight more three-pointers.

Because each successful three-point shot is worth an additional point compared with a two-point field goal, that difference had a direct effect on the scoreboard.

Philadelphia’s 42.5% three-point shooting was also dramatically higher than Washington’s 25%.

The difference was not simply about volume.

Philadelphia both attempted more effectively and converted at a much higher rate.

This gave Maxey and Philadelphia’s other creators more room to operate while forcing Washington’s defense to cover the perimeter.

Turnovers and Steals Created Additional Separation

Philadelphia’s defensive pressure was another major part of the result.

The 76ers recorded 12 steals.

Washington had five.

At the same time, Philadelphia turned the ball over only 10 times, compared with 15 for Washington.

That combination produced a favorable possession profile for Philadelphia.

The official game statistics also show Philadelphia scoring 24 fast-break points compared with 14 for Washington.

Philadelphia had 28 points off turnovers, while Washington had nine.

That 19-point difference in points off turnovers is especially notable because it exactly matched the final margin.

It does not mean every point of the final margin came directly from turnovers, since all game statistics interact. But it highlights just how strongly Philadelphia benefited from Washington’s mistakes.

The Rebounding Battle Was Surprisingly Close

Despite the final score, Philadelphia did not dominate total rebounding.

Washington finished with 53 rebounds.

Philadelphia finished with 51.

Washington therefore had a two-rebound advantage.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the game.

A team can lose the game despite winning or staying close in a traditional box-score category. Washington’s rebounding advantage could not compensate for the shooting and turnover differences.

The matchup therefore demonstrates why individual categories need to be interpreted together.

Efficiency Versus Volume

Another useful way to understand the game is through efficiency.

Washington attempted 88 field goals.

Philadelphia attempted 102.

Philadelphia therefore took 14 more shots.

At the same time, the 76ers made 46 field goals compared with Washington’s 35.

That is an 11-field-goal difference.

Philadelphia also converted eight more three-pointers.

The combination of higher shot volume and higher shooting efficiency created a substantial scoring advantage.

Washington did make 23 free throws compared with Philadelphia’s 12, which helped narrow the gap. But the Wizards could not generate enough efficient offense from the field to offset Philadelphia’s perimeter production.

Player Efficiency Highlights

Several individual statistical profiles stand out.

Tyrese Maxey

Maxey combined high scoring with excellent ball security.

His 35 points, six assists, four steals, and zero turnovers were the clearest all-around offensive profile in the game.

Andre Drummond

Drummond’s 12 points and 10 rebounds in 17 minutes gave Philadelphia efficient interior production.

Jared McCain

McCain added 14 points and five assists while shooting 6-for-11.

Will Riley

Riley scored 13 points on only six field-goal attempts and made both of his three-point attempts.

Marvin Bagley III

Bagley recorded 13 points, eight rebounds, and five blocks.

Kyshawn George

George contributed 11 points, eight rebounds, and five assists.

These examples show how different statistical contributions shaped the contest.

A Closer Look at Plus/Minus

Plus/minus can be useful when analyzing a game, but it should be treated carefully.

Philadelphia’s highest listed plus/minus was Jared McCain at +37.

Adem Bona was next at +26.

Tyrese Maxey finished at +23.

For Washington, Marvin Bagley III recorded +9, while Anthony Gill posted +16 in limited minutes.

At first glance, Washington’s positive numbers might seem surprising in a 19-point loss.

However, plus/minus measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court. It does not isolate an individual’s performance from teammates or opponents.

For that reason, plus/minus works best when combined with shooting, assists, turnovers, rebounds, defensive statistics, and minutes.

What the Box Score Says About Washington

Washington’s statistical profile points to several clear issues in this specific game.

The Wizards had enough scoring distribution to put seven players in double figures. They also won the total rebounding battle.

However, the offense lacked consistent perimeter efficiency.

A 25% three-point percentage is difficult to overcome when the opponent shoots 42.5% from the same range.

The Wizards also committed five more turnovers than Philadelphia while producing seven fewer steals.

That combination created additional opportunities for the 76ers.

Washington’s 40% overall field-goal percentage was not disastrous by itself, but it was insufficient against a Philadelphia team that shot 45% overall and created more high-value possessions.

What the Box Score Says About Philadelphia

Philadelphia’s statistical profile was much more balanced.

The 76ers:

• Shot 45% overall
• Shot 42.5% from three
• Made 17 three-pointers
• Had 26 assists
• Committed only 10 turnovers
• Recorded 12 steals
• Scored 24 fast-break points
• Produced 28 points off turnovers

The combination is more important than any single number.

Philadelphia did not need to dominate every category. It won enough possession-related and efficiency-related categories to build a decisive lead.

Season Series Context

As of this December matchup, Philadelphia had taken both meetings against Washington.

The supplied season-series information lists:

Game 1: Philadelphia 139, Washington 134 in overtime, October 29, 2025

Game 2: Philadelphia 121, Washington 102, December 3, 2025

That made Philadelphia 2-0 in the series at that point in the season.

The supplied data also includes two later meetings:

Game 3: Philadelphia 131, Washington 110, January 8, 2026

Game 4: Philadelphia 153, Washington 131, April 2, 2026

Those later results should not be mixed into the December 3 game-day context when describing the season series as it stood at that time. The December matchup was the second meeting, so the 2-0 series record is the appropriate figure for that point in the season.

How to Read These Player Stats Properly

If you are studying a box score for fantasy basketball, statistical research, matchup analysis, or general basketball understanding, several numbers deserve attention.

Start with shooting efficiency

Look at field-goal percentage and three-point percentage before looking only at raw scoring.

A player scoring 13 points on 5-for-6 shooting has a very different offensive profile from someone scoring 13 points on 5-for-15 shooting.

Check turnovers alongside assists

A high assist total is valuable, but turnovers provide important context.

Maxey’s six assists with zero turnovers were particularly efficient.

Washington had several players with useful assist numbers, but the team committed 15 turnovers overall.

Separate rebounding from scoring

Drummond’s 10 rebounds and Walker’s 12 rebounds demonstrate that Philadelphia received substantial interior support even though Maxey dominated the scoring column.

Consider minutes

A player’s production should always be viewed relative to playing time.

Drummond recorded 12 points and 10 rebounds in 17 minutes.

Gill had a +16 plus/minus in only eight minutes.

These numbers should not automatically be projected over a larger workload without additional evidence.

Use plus/minus as context

Plus/minus can highlight successful lineups, but it should not replace the rest of the box score.

Important Takeaways From the Matchup

The most useful conclusions from the statistical record are straightforward.

Philadelphia’s victory was built around superior shooting efficiency, especially from three-point range.

The 76ers also protected the ball better and generated more steals.

Maxey was the central offensive figure, but Philadelphia received meaningful contributions from Drummond, McCain, Walker, George, Barlow, and Edgecombe.

Washington had legitimate individual positives. Vukcevic led the team in scoring, Bagley contributed five blocks and eight rebounds, George supplied five assists and eight rebounds, and Riley shot extremely efficiently.

The difference was that Philadelphia’s collective efficiency translated those individual contributions into a much larger team scoring output.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most in the Wizards vs 76ers game?

Tyrese Maxey led all players with 35 points for Philadelphia. He shot 13-for-26 from the field, made four three-pointers, and added six assists and four steals.

What was the final score between Washington and Philadelphia?

The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Washington Wizards 121-102.

Who led the Wizards in scoring?

Tristan Vukcevic led Washington with 16 points. He shot 6-for-9 from the field and also recorded four rebounds and four assists.

How many points did Tyrese Maxey score?

Tyrese Maxey scored 35 points in 29 minutes. He also recorded six assists, four rebounds, four steals, one block, and zero turnovers.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Philadelphia shot better from three. The 76ers made 17 of 40 attempts, or 42.5%, while Washington made 9 of 36 attempts, or 25%.

How many rebounds did Andre Drummond have?

Andre Drummond recorded 10 rebounds in 17 minutes. He also scored 12 points, giving him a double-double.

Conclusion

The washington wizards vs 76ers match player stats from this matchup show a game that was shaped by efficiency rather than rebounding dominance.

Philadelphia won despite collecting two fewer total rebounds. The decisive advantages came from shooting, three-point conversion, turnovers, steals, and scoring during the second and third quarters.

Tyrese Maxey’s 35-point performance was the headline achievement, particularly because he scored 20 points in the third quarter when Philadelphia created its largest separation. Andre Drummond added a double-double in limited minutes, Jared McCain provided efficient scoring and playmaking, and Philadelphia received useful contributions throughout the rotation.

Washington’s numbers also contain several encouraging individual performances. Tristan Vukcevic led the Wizards with 16 points, while Marvin Bagley III combined 13 points and eight rebounds with five blocks. Will Riley scored 13 points with exceptional shooting efficiency, and Kyshawn George contributed across several statistical categories.

Ultimately, the 121-102 result was a product of several connected factors. Philadelphia shot 45% overall and 42.5% from three, while Washington shot 40% overall and 25% from deep. The 76ers also committed fewer turnovers and recorded more steals, creating additional scoring opportunities.

For anyone examining this matchup beyond the final score, those relationships between individual production and team efficiency provide the clearest explanation of how Philadelphia built a 19-point victory.